Summary
Cultured Catharanthus roseus cells were immobilized using geometrically identical needled fibreglass mats prepared with a range of surface coatings. The phenyl (PS), polyglycol (PG), aldehyde (CHO), alkyl (CTMS), and silanol (AW) coatings, along with the untreated glass (HC) surface, produced surfaces with a range of surface tensions. The immobilization efficiency of the substratum, measured as the percentage of cells immobilized, increased with increasing substratum surface tension in the order PS < PG < CHO < CTMS < AW < HC. The dependence of immobilization efficiency on substratum surface tension can be described using a thermodynamic model of adhesion that considers the extent of plant cell adhesion to be a function of the surface tensions of the substratum, the suspending liquid, and the plant cells. In addition, this dependence also demonstrates the fundamental role of adhesion in the immobilization process involving a glass fibre matrix. However, cell entrapment processes are also implicated. The untreated glass fibre substratum (HC), which demonstrated the greatest immobilization efficiency, was used for further characterization of the immobilization strategy. Maximum inoculum biomass was determined to be approximately 1.9 g cells (fresh weight)/g substratum (dry weight) to achieve greater than 90% immobilization efficiency. The growth rate of immobilized cultures was slower than suspension cultures, probably due to mass transfer limitations. Production of the indole alkaloids, tryptamine, catharanthine, and ajmalicine, was also suppressed relative to suspension-cultured cells. These results are considered in relation to other immobilization strategies and their apparent effects on cellular processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Archambault J, Volesky B, Kurz WGW (1989) Surface immobilization of plant cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 33:293–299
Brodelius P, Mosbach K (1982) Immobilized plant cells. Adv Appl Microbiol 28:1–26
Brodelius P, Deus B, Mosbach K, Zenk M (1979) Immobilized plant cells for the production and transformation of natural products. FEBS Lett 103:93–97
Dainty AL, Goulding KH, Robinson PK, Simpkins I, Trevan MP (1985) Effect of immobilization on plant cell physiology — real or imaginary. Trends Biotechnol 3:59–60
DiCosmo F, Facchini PJ, Neumann AW (1988) Does the spontaneous adhesion of cultured plant cells to polymer surfaces have potential as an immobilization technique? Trends Biotechnol 6:137–140
Facchini PJ, Neumann AW, DiCosmo F (1988a) Thermodynamic aspects of plant cell adhesion to polymer surfaces. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 29:346–355
Facchini PJ, Radvanyi LG, Giguere Y, DiCosmo F (1988b) Adhesion of Catharanthus roseus cells to surfaces: effect of substrate hydrophobicity. Biotechnol Bioeng 9:935–938
Facchini PJ, Neumann AW, DiCosmo F (1989a) The effect of inoculum concentration on the kinetics and extent of cultured plant cell adhesion to polymer surfaces under static conditions. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 11:72–84
Facchini PJ, Neumann AW, DiCosmo F (1989b) Adhesion of suspension-cultured Catharanthus roseus cells to surfaces: effect of pH, ionic strength, and cation valency. Biomaterials 10:318–324
Jirku V, Macek T, Vanek T, Krumphanzyl V, Kubanek V (1981) Continuous production of steriod glycoalkaloids by immobilized plant cells. Biotechnol Lett 3:447–450
Li SK, Smith RP, Neumann AW (1984) Wilhelmy technique and solidification front technique to study the wettability of fibres. J Adhesion 17:105–122
Lindsey K, Yeoman MM (1983) The relationship between growth rate, differentiation, and alkaloid accumulation in cell cultures. J Exp Bot 34:1055–1065
Lindsey K, Yeoman MM, Black GM, Mavituna F (1983) A novel method for the immobilization and culture of plant cells. FEBS Lett 155:143–149
Majerus F, Pareilleux A (1986) Alkaloid accumulation in Ca-alginate entrapped cells of Catharanthus roseus: using a limiting growth medium. Plant Cell Rep 5:302–305
Murashige TO, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol 15:473–497
Neumann AW, Good RJ, Hope CJ, Sejpal M (1974) An equation-of-state approach to determine the surface tensions of low energy solids from contact angles. J Colloid Interface Sci 49:291–304
Payne GF, Payne NN, Shuler ML (1988) Bioreactor considerations for secondary metabolite production from plant cell tissue cultures: indole alkaloids from Catharanthus roseus. Biotechnol Bioeng 31:905–912
Rhodes MJC (1985) Immobilized plant cell cultures. Top Enzyme Ferment Biotechnol 10:51–87
Robins RJ, Parr AJ, Richards SR, Rhodes MJC (1986) Studies of environmental features of immobilized plant cells. In: Morris P, Scragg AH, Stafford A, Fowler MW (eds) Secondary metabolism in plant cell cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 162–172
Rosevear A, Lambe CA (1985) Immobilized plant cells. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 31:37–58
Taylor JA, West DW (1980) The use of Evan's Blue stain to test the survival of plant cells after exposure to high salt and osmotic pressure. J Exp Bot 31:571–576
Widholm JM (1972) The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranin for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Technol 47:189–194
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Offprint requests to: F. Dicosmo
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Facchini, P.J., DiCosmo, F. Immobilization of cultured Catharanthus roseus cells using a fibreglass substratum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33, 36–42 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170566
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170566