Abstract
A typical concentric ellipse multiple-arch system was observed in the solar corona during the February 4, 1962 eclipse in New Guinea. The following results have been obtained from analysis of a white-light photograph taken by N. Owaki (see Owaki and Saito, 1967a).
-
(1)
The arches are composed of four equidistant components, elliptical in shape, and almost concentric with a prominence at the common center of the ellipses.
-
(2)
The prominence and arch system appears to be the lower region of a helmet-shaped streamer.
-
(3)
The widths of the arches are observed to increase with height.
-
(4)
Analysis was made in the light of three models for the coronal structures that could lead to the observed arches: (a) rod-like concentrations of electrons; (b) tunnel-shaped elliptical shells of electrons; and (c) dome-like ellipsoidal shells of electrons. Electron densities are derived for the models, and the dome-like model is excluded as a possibility for arch systems exhibiting a coronal cavity.
-
(5)
The scale height in the arch-streamer region is found to be almost the same as that of the K-corona, suggesting equal temperatures, density distributions, etc. in each region.
-
(6)
There is a dark space (a coronal cavity) between the innermost arch and the prominence. The brightness of this cavity is 1/5 that of the adjacent arch. It is 3% brighter than the background corona of the arch-streamer system.
-
(7)
A comparison is made between the deficiency of electrons in the coronal cavity and the excess of electrons in the prominence. It is found that the ratio of the excess to the deficiency lies between 0.9 and 40.
-
(8)
A comparison between the electron efflux from the ‘leaky magnetic bottle’ possibly formed by rod-shaped coronal arches and the electron influx into those arches from the chromosphere leads us to the conclusion that the rod model is probably valid and that spicules appear to be an adequate supply for the electrons observed in the arches. The tunnel model may be valid, but in that case spicules are probably not the sources of the electrons observed in coronal arches.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balanovsky, J. and Perepelkin, E.: 1928, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 88, 740.
Beckers, J. M.: 1964, AFCRL Environmental Research Paper No. 49, Sacramento Peak Observatory.
Cragg, T., Howard, R. and Zirin, H.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 138, 303.
Dunn, R.B.: 1960, Dissertation, Harvard University (= Sacramento Peak Obs. Contr. No. 87, 1965).
Kawaguchi, I.: 1967, Solar Phys. 1, 420.
Kippenhahn, R. and Schlüter, A.: 1957, Z. Astrophys. 43, 36.
Laffineur, M., Bloch, M. and Bretz, M.: 1961, Sky and Telescope 21, 195: also see D. E. Billings, A Guide to the Solar Corona (1966), Academic Press, New York, pp. 16 and 20.
Leighton, R.B., Noyes, R.W. and Simon, G.W.: 1962, Astrophys. J. 135, 474.
Leroy, J.L.: 1966, L'astronomie 80, 271.
Leroy, J.L. and Servajean, R.: 1966, Ann. Astrophys. 29, 263.
Malville, J. M.: 1967, Sky and Telescope 23, 136.
Newkirk, G., Jr.: 1967, ‘Structure of the Solar Corona’, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 5, 213.
Owaki, N. and Saito, K.: 1967, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 19, 279.
Saito, K. and Owaki, N.: 1967, Publ Astron. Soc. Japan 19, No. 4.
Saito, K. and Billings, D.E.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 760.
Saito, K. and Hata, S.: 1964, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 16, 240.
Smith, S. et al.: 1965, AAS-NASA Solar Eclipse Symposium, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California.
Thomas, R.: 1958, unpublished lectures on ‘Leaky Magnetic Bottles’, University of New Mexico.
Van deHulst, H. C.: 1950, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 11, 135.
VonKlüber, H.: 1932, Z. Astrophys. 4, 1.
VonKlüber, H.: 1961, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 123, 61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Member of the High Altitude Observatory Solar Project supported under contract F 19628-67-C-0231.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saito, K., Hyder, C.L. A concentric ellipse multiple-arch system in the solar corona. Sol Phys 5, 61–86 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147121
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147121