Abstract
The application of performance based criteria in the allocation of resources and the targeting of substantial research funds to topics of national priority are two major features of the new research funding climate in Australian higher education. Successful competition for such funds will depend on universities developing and implementing appropriate research management plans and on the overall research performance of their academic staff. This paper reports the views of academic staff from one Australian university on such issues as the determinants of research performance and the importance of individual autonomy in the selection of research topics. One of the main findings is that research activity is highly variable and influenced by a number of factors including, personal characteristics; differences in research styles, methods and strategies both within and between disciplines; and dependence on funding. The findings show that academics firmly believe in “freedom of inquiry” in the choice of research topic.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Austin, Anne E. and Gamson, Zelda (1983), Academic Workplace. Washington, D.C., ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report no. 10.
Australian Research Grants Committee; Australian Science and Technology Council; and Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee (1984), Australian Research Grants Scheme: Funding Survey. Canberra.
Australian Science and Technology Council (ASTEC) (1987), Improving the Research Performance of Australia's Universities and Other Higher Education Institutions. Canberra, ASTEC.
Baldwin, Roger G. (1985), Correlates of the Vital Academic Career. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Chicago, II, March 15–17.
Barnes, S. B. and Dolby, R. G. A. (1970), The Scientific Ethos: A Deviant Viewpoint, European Journal of Sociology11, pp. 3–25.
Bean, John. (1982), A Causal Model of Faculty Research Productivity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, March, New York.
Biglan, Anthony. (1973a), The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas, Journal of Applied Psychology57, pp. 195–203.
Biglan, Anthony. (1973b), Relationships between Subject Characteristics and Structure and Output of University Departments, Journal of Applied Psychology57, pp. 204–213.
Bourke, Paul (1986), Quality Measures in Universities. Canberra, The Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission.
Bowden, J. and Anwyl, J. (1983), Some Characteristics and Attitudes of Academics in Australian Universities and Colleges of Advanced Education, Higher Education Research and Development, 2, pp. 39–61.
Braxton, John M. (1983), Departmental Colleagues and Individual Faculty Publication Productivity, The Review of Higher Education6, pp. 115–128.
Braxton, John M. and Toombs, William (1982), Faculty Uses of Doctoral Training: Consideration of a Technique for the Differentiation of Scholarly Effort from Research Activity, Research in Higher Education16, pp. 265–282.
Bresser, Rudi K. (1984), The Context of University Departments, Research in Higher Education20, pp. 3–15.
Bresser, Rudi K. (1985), Ideologies and the Measurement of Academic Effectiveness, Research in Higher Education23, pp. 184–200.
Brookes, Michael C. and German, Katherine L. (1983), Meeting the Challenge: Developing Faculty Careers. Washington, D.C., ASHE.
Cameron, Susan W. and Blackburn, Robert T. (1981), Sponsorship and Academic Career Success, Journal of Higher Education52, pp. 369–377.
Chan, James L. (1978), Organizational Consensus Regarding the Relative Importance of Research Output Indicators, Accounting Review53, pp. 309–323.
Collins, W. Andrew (1971), Identifying and Fostering Productive Researchers: An Occasional Paper from ERIC at Stanford, Palo Alto, California: Stanford University ERIC Clearinghouse on Ecuational Media and Technology.
Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission (CTEC) (1986), Review of Efficiency and Effectiveness in Higher Education. Canberra, AGPS.
Corcoran, Mary and Clark, Shirley M. (1984), Professional Socialization and Contemporary Career Attitudes of Three Faculty Generations, Research in Higher Education20, pp. 131–153.
Crane, Diane (1965), Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition, American Sociological Review30, pp. 699–714.
Creswell, John W. (1985), Faculty Research Performance. Washington D.C. ASHE.
Creswell, John W. (1986a), Concluding Thoughts: Observing, Promoting, Evaluating, and Reviewing Research Performance. In J. W. Creswell (ed.), Measuring Faculty Research Performance, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc., pp. 87–102.
Creswell, John W. (1986b), Measuring Faculty Research Performance, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc.
Creswell, John W. (1987), ASTEC Report Improving the Research Performance of Australia's Universities and Other Higher Education Institutions - CTEC Response. Canberra, CTEC.
De Rome, E., Boud, D. and Genn, J. M. (1985), Changes in Academic Staff Perceptions of the Status of Teaching and Research, Higher Education Research and Development4, pp. 131–143.
Elton, Lewis (1986), Research and Teaching: Symbiosis or Conflict? Higher Education15, pp. 299–304.
Everett, J. E. and Entrekin, L. V. (1987), Academic Attitudes. North Ryde, NSW, Methuen, Australia.
Fenker, R. M. (1975), The Evaluation of University Faculty and Administrators: A Case Study, Journal of Higher Education46, pp. 665–686.
Finkelstein, Martin J. (1982), Faculty Colleagueship Patterns and Research Productivity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, March, New York.
Finkelstein, Martin J. (1984), The American Academic Profession. Columbus, Ohio State University Press.
Flämig, Christian (1980), Organisation of Research - a Basic Condition for Efficient Research at Universities? International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education4, pp. 271–290.
Fox, Mary Frank (1983), Publication Productivity among Scientists, Social Studies of Science13, pp. 285–305.
Gardiner, John J. (1985), Excellence in Research: Creative Organizational Responses at Berkley, Harvard, MIT, and Stanford, ASHE 1985 meeting paper.
Garner, C. A. (1979), Academic Publication, Market Signaling and Scientific Research Decisions, Economic Inquiry17, pp. 575–584.
Gmelch, Walter H., Lovrich, Nicholas P. and Wilke, Phyllis Kay (1984), Sources of Stress in Academe, Research in Higher Education20, pp. 477–490.
Grimes, A. J. (1980), Cosmopolitan-local: A Multidimensional Construct, Research in Higher Education13, pp. 195–211.
Haim, Gabiel (1981), Academic Ideologies and Styles of Research among Academic Researchers, Research in Higher Education15, pp. 291–304.
Higher Education: a Policy Statement (1988), (Circulated by The Hon J.S. Dawkins, MP Minister for Employment, Education and Training. Canberra, AGPS.
Le Grew, Daryl (1984), Pursuing Productivity, Excellence and Other Research Snarks, VESTES27, pp. 39–43.
Liebert, Roland J. (1977), Research-Grant Getting and Productivity among Scholars, Journal of Higher Education48, pp. 164–192.
Light, D. W. Jr., Marsden, L. R. and Corl, T. C. (1973), The Impact of the Academic Revolution on Faculty Careers. Washington, D.C., American Association for Higher Education.
Lindsay, Alan (1982), Institutional Evaluation, VESTES25, pp. 28–34.
Lodahl, Janice and Gordon, Gerald (1972), The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments, American Sociological Review37, pp. 57–72.
Lowe, Ian (1987), University Research Funding, Australian Universities Review30, pp. 2–12.
Martin, B. and Irvine, J. (1982), Assessing Basic Research, Research Policy12, pp. 61–90.
Moses, Ingrid (1986), Promotion of Academic Staff: Reward and Incentive, Higher Education15, pp. 135–150.
Mulkay, Michael (1976), The Mediating Role of the Scientific Elite, Social Studies of Science6, pp. 445–470.
OECD (1981), The Future of University Research. Paris.
Packard, John S. (1977), The Norm of (Research) Productivity versus the Spirity of Inquiry, in Proceedings of a National Conference on Productivity and Effectiveness in Educational Research and Development, Palo Alto, California, Dec 6–7.
Parsons, Talcott and Platt, Gerarld (1973), The American University. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Pelz, D. C. and Andrews, Frank M. (1976), Scientists in Organizations. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan.
Powell, J. P., Barrett, E. and Shanker, V. (1983), How Academics View Their Work, Higher Education12, pp. 297–313.
Reskin, Barbara F. (1977), Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science, American Sociological Review42, pp. 491–504.
Reskin, Barbara F. (1979), Academic Sponsorship and Scientists' Careers, Sociology of Education52, pp. 129–146.
Roe, Ernest (1988), On Scholars and Pragmatists and Fitting It All In, Higher Education Research and Development7, pp. 163–175.
Roe, Ernest, McDonald, Rod and Moses, Ingrid (1984), Reviewing Academic Performance. Brisbane, University of Queensland Press.
Romney, Leonard C., Bogen, Gerald and Micek, Sidney S. (1979), Assessing Institutional Performance. The Importance of Being Careful, International journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education3, pp. 79–89.
Ross, Ian (1983), Research in the Main Sectors: University. In Arthur Birch (ed.) Science Research in Australia: Who Benefits? Papers from the ANU Public Affairs Conference June 23 and 24, 1983. Canberra, Centre for Continuing Education, Australian National University.
Rouban, Anne M. T. (1985), The Evaluation of Research, International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education9, pp. 44–51.
Sadowski, Dieter and Backes, Uschi (1987), Research Efficiency in University Departments. In RJS MacPherson (ed.) Ways and Meanings of Research in Educational Administration, University of New England Teaching Monograph Series 5. Armidale, University of New England, pp. 267–286.
Sizer, John (1986), Efficiency and Scholarship; Uncomfortable or Compatible Bedfellows? Higher Education Review18, pp. 45–53.
Smith, Richard and Fielder, Fred E. (1971), The Measurement of Scholarly Work, Educational Record52, pp. 225–232.
Stark, Joan S., Lowther, A. and Hagerty, Bonnie M. K. (1986), Faculty Roles and Role Preferences in Ten Fields of Professional Study, Research in Higher Education25, pp. 3–30.
Startup, Richard (1985), The Changing Perspective of Academic Researchers, 1973–1983, Studies in Higher Education10, pp. 69–78.
Swinnerton-Dyer, Peter (Sir) (1985), Higher Education into the 1990s, Higher Education Review17, pp. 9–18.
Taylor, Michael G. (1985), Evaluation of Research and Resource Allocation, International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education9, pp. 86–94.
Thompson, Mark E. and Brewster, David A. (1978), Faculty Behavior in Low-Paradigm Versus High-Paradigm Disciplines: A Case Study, Research in Higher Education8, pp. 169–175.
Toombs, William (1973), Productivity: Burden of Success. Washington, D.C., American Association for Higher Education.
Wanner, Richard A., Lewis, Lionel S. and Gregorio, David I. (1981), Research Productivity in Academia, Sociology of Education54, pp. 238–253.
West, L. H. T., Hore, T. and Boon, P. K. (1980), Publication Rates and Productivity, VESTES23, pp. 32–37.
Wettersten, John (1985), On Conservative and Adventorous Styles of Scientific Research, Minerva23, pp. 443–463.
Wheeler, Daniel and Creswell, John (1985), Developing Faculty as Researchers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Chicago, II, March 15–17.
Whitley, Richard D. and Frost, Penelope A. (1971), The Measurement of Performance in Research, Human Relations24, pp. 161–178.
Williams, Gareth (1984), Research and Research Policy, Higher Education in Europe9, pp. 11–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wood, F. Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. High Educ 19, 81–100 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142025
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142025