Abstract
The author states first praxeology's dilemma: if its theoremes are a priori in the unidimensional sense in which praxeology seems to be intended, then the theory as represented in the theorem is inapplicable. If it is not a priori in that sense, then praxeology is already defeated. In a concrete analysis of a part of a praxeological system the author shows that the contention which sees economic theory simply as the result of formal deduction starting from an a priori axiom is unfounded. As a language, praxeology is not ‘water-tight’; its line of reasoning must always draw from the inarticulate background of professional knowledge. Praxeology can be explained away as a process of dialectical redefinition of concepts, ultimately and inevitably dependent upon empirical hypotheses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gutiérrez, C. The extraordinary claim of praxeology. Theor Decis 1, 327–336 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140287
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140287