Abstract
At the present time, sharp differences of opinion exist concerning the possible and probable consequences of giving studients a test before the commencement of instruction. Researchers are unclear about the effects of such “pre-tests” on subsequent learning (if any), and they are also unclear about the effects of such tests on further tests (of varying degrees of similarity and difference) given after instructional sessions. There is evidence that pre-tests can have orienting and motivational and (hence) teaching functions — in addition to the sought-for testing function. There is also evidence that these additional functions can be either general or specific. The present paper contributes to the ongoing debate by discussing the issues involved in the context of a series of experiments conducted by the author.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Apter M. J., Boorer D., Murgatroyd S. (1971). “A comparison of the multiple-choice and constructed response pre-tests in programmed instruction,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology. 8, 2, 125–130.
Ausubel D. P. (1960). “The use of advance organisers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272. (Reprinted in Ausubel, 1969.)
Ausubel D. P. (1961). “The role of discriminability in meaningsful verbal learning and retention,” Journal of Educational Psychology. 52, 266–274. (Reprinted in Ausubel, 1969.)
Ausubel D. P. (1969). Readings in School Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ausubel D. P. and Fitzgerald D. (1962). “Organiser, general background and antecedent learning variables in sequential verbal learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology. 53, 243–249. (Reprinted in Ausubel, 1969.)
Ausubel D. P. and Robinson F. G. (1969). School Learning: An Introduction to Educational Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.
Berlyne D. (1954). “An experimental study of human curiosity,” British Journal of Psychology. 45, 256–265.
Berlyne D. (1966). “Conditions of prequestioning and retention of meaningful material,” Journal of Educational Psychology. 57, 128–132.
Boyce G. C. and Sime M. E. (1969). “The variable of ‘attention’ and its effect on learning,” in MannA.P. and BrunstromC.K., eds., Aspects of Educational Technology III. London: Pitman.
Campbell D. T. and Stanley J. C. (1963). “Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching,” in GageN.L., e.d., Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Distad H. W. (1927). “A study of the reading performance of pupils under different conditions on different types of materials,” Journal of Educational Psychology. 18, 247–258.
Frase L. T. (1970). “Boundary conditions for mathemagenic behaviours,” Review of Educational Research. 40, 337–348.
Glaser R. and Resnick L. B. (1972). “Instructional psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology. 23, 207–276.
Gustafson H. W. and Toole D. L. (1970). “Effects of adjunct questions, pre-testing and degree of student supervision on learnign from instructional text,” The Journal of Experimental Education, 39, 53–58.
Hartley J. (1969). “Observations on the training function of a pre-test,” Industrial Training International. 4, 134.
Hartley J. (1970). “Programmed instruction as ‘propaganda’: two methods of publicising traffic signs compared. Reports No. 1 and 2.” Unpublished, Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berks, England.
Hartley, J. (1971). “Improving publicity: a suggestion,” Visual Education (February). 29–30.
Hartley J. (1972a). “Writing a program: a case history,” in HartleyJ., ed., Strategies for Programmed Instruction: An Educational Technology. London: Butterworths.
Hartley J. (1972b). “The effects of pre-test difficulty on post-test performance follwoing self-instruction,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology. 9, 2, 108–112.
Hartley, J. (1973). “The effects of pre-test difficulty on post-test performance following self-instruction: a further study.” In preparation.
Hartley J. and Holt J. (1970). “The effects of pre-testing on post-test performance following programmed instruction,” in BajpaiA and LeedhamJ., eds., Aspects of Educational Technology IV. London: Pitman,
Hartley J.; Holt J; Swain F. (1970). “The effects of pre-tests, interim tests and age on post-test performance following self-instruction,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology. 7, 4, 250–256.
Heim A. (1970). Intelligence and Personality. Harmondsworth: Penguin,
Holmes E. (1931). “Reading guided by questions versus careful reading and re-reading without questions,” School Review. 39, 361–367.
Kellogg W. & Payne B. (1938). “The true-false question as an aid in studying,” Journal of Educational Psychology. 29, 581–589.
Leith, G. O. M. (1967). “Conflict and interference: a study of the facilitating effect of reviews in learning sequences.” Research Memorandum on Programmed Learning, School of Education, University of Birmingham.
Lewis D. G. (1969). “The role of the pre-test in experimental design,” Research in Education. 1, 2, 62–75.
Lumsdaine A. A. (1963). “Instruments and media of instruction,” in GageN.L., ed., Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Mackworth N. (1967). “A stand camera for line of sight recording,” Perception and Psychophysics. 2, 547–552.
Mackworth N. (1968). “The wide angle reflection eye camera for visual choice and pupil size,” Perception and Psychophysics. 3, 32–34.
McKeachie W. J. and Hiler W. (1954). “The problem oriented approach to teaching psychology,” Journal of Educational Psychology. 43, 224–232.
Morasky R. M. and Willcox H. H. (1970). “Time required to process information as a function of question placement,” American Educational Research Journal. 7, 561–567.
Morasky R. M. (1972). “Eye movements as a function of adjunct question placement,” American Educational Research Journal. 9, 251–261.
Natkin G. and Stahler E. (1969). “The effects of adjunct questions on short and long-term recall of prose materials,” American Educational Research Journal. 6, 3, 425–432.
Peeck J. (1970). “Effects of pre-test questions on delayed retention of prose materials,” Journal of Educational Psychology. 61, 241–246.
Proger B. B.; Taylor R. G.; Mann L.; Coulson J. M.; and Bayuk R. J. (1970). “Conceptual restructuring for detailed passages,” Journal of Educational Research. 64, 1, 28–34.
Rothkopf E. Z. (1970). “The concept of mathemagenic behaviours,” Review of Educational Research. 40, 325–336.
Samuels S. J. (1969). “The effect of post-test relevant pre-tests and discussion type feedback on learning and retention,” Psychonomic Science. 16, 67–68.
Sime M. E. and Boyce G. C. (1969). “Overt responses, knowledge of results and learning,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology. 6, 1, 12–19.
Sullivan A. M. and Skanes G. (1971). “Differential transfer of training in bright and dull subjects of the same mental age,” British Journal of Educational Psychology. 41, 287–293.
Warr P. B.; Bird W. W.; Rackham N. (1970). Evaluation of Management Training. London: Gower Press.
Washburne J. N. (1929). “The use of questions on social science material,” Journal of Educational Psychology. 20, 321–359.
Welch W. W. and Walberg H. S. (1970). “Pre-test and sensitisation effects in curriculum evaluation,” American Educational Research Journal. 7, 4, 605–614.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is indebted to the students, pupils, teachers, and headmasters who were involved in these experiments, to Miss J. Holt and Mrs. S. Fraser who assisted with studies, to the Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, who supplied the test and instructional materials, and to the Social Science Research Council who financed this research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartley, J. The effect of pre-testing on post-test performance. Instr Sci 2, 193–214 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139871
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139871