Abstract
Faculty members at state-related comprehensive universities (SCUs) are ‘caught in the middle,’ caught between the demands of a research university model of higher education and other models such as that of the liberal arts or community colleges. They are caught in the ambiguity of not having determined their own identity. The SCUs are a major forće in higher education that resulted from historical trends and the demands of parents, students, and state legislators for services. But the emerging form of these institutions has yet to complete its metamorphosis. During their transformation, the SCUs have emulated the high-status research universities as their own low status forced a search for an identity different from their origins, commonly as teachers colleges. The unfortunate consequence of the SCUs' quest for status has been low faculty satisfaction and additional loss of institutional self-esteem. Furthermore, an emphasis on published research has led to a disparagement of scholarship as it is manifested in teaching and service. As faculty members focus more on disciplinary research, their involvement with students and in university governance and other campus affairs diminishes. What can SCUs do? Five alternative approaches that SCUs could use to develop distinct identities appropriate to their constituencies are examined. The concept that connects these different approaches is ‘scholarship,’ in its traditional sense. A broader definition of scholarship could enable the SCUs to achieve excellence in ways not dictated by the research university model. There is some reason to hope that there is increasingly effective internal and external pressures for SCUs to develop and enact such distinctive identities.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aldrich, C. A. (1989). ‘Faculty members' values need reordering’, (Letter to the editor) The Chronicle of Higher Education 35 (17), B5.
Alpert, D. (1985). ‘Performance and paralysis: the organizational context of the American research university’, Journal of Higher Education 56, 241–281.
American Association of State Colleges and Universities (1971). Quality and Effectiveness in Undergraduate Higher Education. Washington: American Association of State Colleges and Universities.
Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving Educational Excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W. (1989). ‘Moral messages of the university’, Educational Record 70, 22–25.
Austin, A. E. and Gamson, Z. F. (1984). Academic Workplace: New Demands, Heightened Tensions. Washington: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Baldridge, J. W., Curtis, D., Ecker, G. and Riley, G. (1978). Policy Making and Effective Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barzun, J. (1960). ‘The cults of “research” and “creativity”’, Harper's Magazine 222 (October), 69–74.
Bess, J. L. (1982). University Organization: A Matrix Analysis of the Academic Professions. New York: Human Sciences Press.
Bowen, H. R. and Schuster, J. H. (1986). American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boyer, E. (1987). College: The Undergraduate Experience in America. New York: Harper and Row.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1989). The Condition of the Professoriate: Attitudes and Trends, 1989. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Dunham, E. A. (1969). Colleges of the Forgotten Americans. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Eurich, N. P. (1981). Systems of Higher Education in Twelve Countries: A Comparative View. New York: Praeger.
Feldman, K. A. (1987). ‘Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: a review and exploration’, Research in Higher Education 26, 227–298.
Fox, M. F. (1985). ‘Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship’, in Smart, J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 1). New York: Agathon Press, pp. 255–282.
Harcleroad, F. F. and Ostar, A. W. (1987). Colleges and Universities for Change: America's Comprehensive Public State Colleges and Universities. Washington: AASCU Press.
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Jencks, C. and Riesman, D. (1968). The Academic Revolution. New York: Doubleday and Company.
Ladd, L. S. and Lipset, S.M. (1975). The Divided Academy: Professors and Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lynton, E. A. (1983). ‘A crisis of purpose: reexamining the role of the university’, Change 15, 18–23, 53.
Lysons, A. (1990). ‘Dimensions and domains of organisational effectiveness in Australian higher education’, Higher Education 20, 287–300.
Merton, R. K. (1968). ‘The Matthew effect in science’, Science 159, 56–63.
Pellino, G. R., Blackburn, R. T. and Boberg, A. L. (1984). ‘The dimensions of academic scholarship: faculty and administrator views’, Research in Higher Education 20, 103–115.
Rice, R. E. (1990). ‘Rethinking what it means to be a scholar’, Teaching Excellence (Newsletter of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education).
Ruscio, K. P. (1987). ‘The distinctive scholarship of the selective liberal arts college’, Journal of Higher Education 58, 205–222.
Russell, S. H., Cox, R. S., Williamson, C., Boismier, J., Javitz, H., Fairweather, J. and Zimbler, L. J. (1990). Faculty in Higher Education Institutions, 1988. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Office in Educational Research and Improvement.
Trow, M. A. (1984). ‘The analysis of status’, in Clark, B. R. (ed.), Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 132–164.
Weathersby, G. B. (1983). ‘State colleges in transition’, in Froomkin, J. (ed.), The Crisis in Higher Education. New York: Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, pp. 23–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like to thank those many reviewers, anonymous and known, who graciously gave their time to read and comment on earlier, longer forms of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henderson, B.B., Kane, W.D. Caught in the middle: faculty and institutional status and quality in state comprehensive universities. High Educ 22, 339–350 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137029
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137029