Abstract
This article draws attention to two basic features of British higher education which may influence the workability of certain Leverhulme proposals. These are vertical integration and professionalism. It is suggested that a consideration of these is crucial given the nature of the Leverhulme strategy. Many of the Leverhulme proposals are grounded in assumptions about the behaviour of institutions and actors in British higher education. An examination of vertical integration and professionalism in the system indicates that such assumptions may be unfounded. The discussion focuses both on how the proposals themselves are shaped by the professionalism of British higher education, and on how the feasibility of the proposals may be affected by the system's vertical integration and professionalism. Both the basic proposals of Leverhulme as a whole as well as of the monographs on access, teachers and learning, and institutional change are examined. In concluding it is noted that the treatment of vertical integration and professionalism provide policy makers and reformers with important levers of control to grasp in the future.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ball, Stephen J. (1981). “Continuity and conflict in comprehensive schooling,” Universities Quarterly 35 (2): 211–220.
Black, Paul and Sparkes, John (1982). “Teaching and learning,” in D. Bligh (ed.) Professionalism and Flexibility in Learning. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Brock, Colin (1981). “Problems of articulation between secondary and higher education in England and Wales,” European Journal of Education 16 (2): 153–174.
Cerych, Ladislav (1983). “International comparisons,” Appendix to Williams and Blackstone Response to Adversity. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Donaldson, Lex (1975). Policy and the Polytechnics. Farnborough, Hants: Saxon House/ Lexington Books.
Ekholm, Lars (1983). “Upper Secondary School and Higher Education in Sweden: How do they Relate?” paper presented at the conference “The Relation Between Secondary and Higher Education: An International View” held at UCLA from July 25–28, 1983.
Elton, Lewis (1982). “Assessment for learning,” in D. Bligh (ed.) Professionalism and Flexibility in Learning. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Entwistle, N. J. and Wilson, J. (1977). Degrees of Excellence: The Academic Achievement Game. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Excellence in Diversity (1983). Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Farrant, John H. (1981). “Trends in admissions,” in O. Fulton (ed.) Access to Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Fulton, Oliver (1981). “Principles and policies,” in O. Fulton (ed.) Access to Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Gordon, Alan (1981). “The educational choices of young people,” in O. Fulton (ed.) Access to Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Gray, J., McPherson, A. and Raffe, D. (1983). Reconstructions of Secondary Education: Theory Myth and Practice Since the War. London: RKP.
Greenwood, Gordon E. and Ramagli, Howard J. (1980). “Alternatives to student ratings of college teaching,” Journal of Higher Education 51 (6): 673–685.
Halsey, A. H., Heath, A. F. and Ridge, J. M. (1980). Origins and Destinations: Family, Class, and Education in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hayes, Robert H. and Abernathy, William J. (1980). “Managing our way to economic decline,” Harvard Business Review 58 (4): 67–77.
Hoggart, Richard, Stephens, Michael, Taylor, John and Smethurst, Richard (1982). “Continuing Education Within Universities and Polytechnics,” in D. Bligh (ed.) Professionalism and Flexibility in Learning. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Howell, D. A. (1979). “Academic decision-making: The BEd degree in British universities,” Higher Education Review Spring, pp. 172\-41.
Hughes, Everett (1958). Men and Their Work. New York: Glencoe Press.
King, Lauriston R. (1978). The Washington Lobbyists for Higher Education. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Lindley, Robert M. (1981). “The challenge of market imperatives,” in R. M. Lindley (ed.) Higher Education and the Labour Market. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Lon Hefferlin, J. B. (1969). Dynamics of Academic Reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Maden, Margaret (1983). “The Relation Between Secondary Education and Higher Education in England and Wales,” paper presented at the conference “The Relation Between Secondary and Higher Education: An International View” held at UCLA from July 25–28, 1983.
Moss, G. D. and Brew, A. (1981). “The contribution of the Open University to innovation in higher education,” Higher Education 10 (2): 141–151.
Peston, Maurice (1981). “Higher education policy,” in R. M. Lindley (ed.) Higher Education and the Labour Market. Guilford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Scott, Peter (1982). “NABs 3 into 2,” editorial for Times Higher Education Supplement n. 522 November 5, 1982.
Silver, Harold (1981). “Teacher education: who are the conservatives?” Universities Quarterly 35 (2): 221–226.
Spencer, C. P. (1972). “Selective secondary education, social class and the development of adolescent subcultures,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 42 (1): 1–13.
Taylor, William (1982). “Change within a contracting system,” in L. Wagner (ed.) Agenda for Institutional Change in Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Teichler, Ulrich (1983). “The Relation Between Secondary and Higher Education in the Federal Republic of Germany” paper presented at the conference “The Relation Between Secondary and Higher Education: An International View” held at UCLA from July 25–28, 1983.
Times Higher Education Supplement (1982). 10/9/82 n. 514 p. 9.
Times Higher Education Supplement (1983). 27/5/83 n. 551 pp. i–iv.
Trow, Martin (1981). “Comparative perspectives on access,” in O. Fulton (ed.) Access to Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Williams, Gareth and Tessa Blackstone (1983). Response to Adversity: Higher Education in a Harsh Climate. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is a Postdoctoral Research Scholar with the Comparative Higher Education Research Group at the UCLA Graduate School of Education.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhoades, G. Conditioned demand and professional response. High Educ 13, 139–169 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129489
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129489