Abstract
The pace of change in the world is accelerating, yet educational institutions have not kept pace. Indeed, schools have historically been the most static of social institutions, uncritically passing down from generation to generation outmoded didactic, lecture-and-drill-based, models of instruction. Predictable results follow. Students, on the whole, do not learn how to work by, or think for, themselves. They do not learn how to gather, analyze, synthesize and assess information. They do not learn how to analyze the diverse logic of the questions and problems they face and hence how to adjust their thinking to those problems. They do not learn how to enter sympathetically into the thinking of others, nor how to deal rationally with conflicting points of view. They do not learn to become critical readers, writers, speakers and listeners. They do not learn how to use their native languages clearly, precisely, or persuasively. They do not, therefore, become ‘literate’, in the proper sense of the word. Neither do they gain much in the way of genuine knowledge since, for the most part, they could not explain the basis for what they believe. They would be hard pressed to explain, for example, which of their beliefs were based on rational assent and which on simple conformity to what they have been told. They have little sense as to how they might critically analyze their own experience, or identify national or group bias in their own thinking. They are much more apt to learn on the basis of irrational than rational modes of thought. They lack the traits of mind of a genuinely educated person: intellectual humility, courage, integrity, perseverance, and faith in reason.
Happily, there is a movement in education today striving to address these problems in a global way, with strategies and materials for the modification of instruction at all levels of education. At its foundation is an emerging new theory of knowledge, learning, and literacy, one which recognizes the centrality of independent critical thinking to all substantial learning, one which recognizes that higher-order, multilogical thinking is as important to childhood as to adult learning, and as important to foundational learning in monological as in multilogical disciplines. This educational reform movement is not proposing an educational miracle cure, for its leading proponents recognize that many social and historical forces must come together before the ideals of the critical thinking movement will become a full academic reality. Schools do not exist in a social vacuum. To the extent that the broader society is uncritical so, on the whole, will be society's schools. Nevertheless, the social conditions necessary for fundamental changes in schooling are increasingly apparent. The pressure for fundamental change is growing. Whether and to what extent these needed basic changes will be delayed or side-tracked, thus requiring new periodic resurgences of this movement, with new, more elaborate articulations of its ideals, goals, and methods — only time will tell.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Bibliography
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Newman, S.: in press, ‘The New Apprenticeship: Teaching Student the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics.’ In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Cognition and Instruction: Issues and Agendas. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Crosswhite, F. J.: 1987, ‘Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education: A Mathematics Educator's Perspective.’ In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 256–277. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Driver, R.: 1986, Restructuring the Physics Curriculum: Some Implications of Studies on Learning for Curriculum Development. Invited paper presented at the International Conference on Trends in Physics Education, Tokyo, Japan.
Driver, R.: 1987, ‘Promoting Conceptual Change in Classroom Settings: The Experience of The Children's Learning In Science Project.’ in J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of theSecond International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Driver, R.,and Easley, J.: 1978, ‘Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students.’ Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.
Easley, J.: 1983a, ‘A Japanese Approach to Arithmetic.’ For the Learning of Mathematics, 3, 3.
Easley, J.: 1983b, ‘What's There to Talk about in Arithmetic?’ Problem Solving (Newsletter, The Franklin Institute Press), 5.
Easley, J.: 1984a, ‘Is There Educative Power in Students’ Alternative Frameworks?’ Problem Solving (Newsletter, The Franklin Institute Press), 6.
Easley, J.: 1984b, ‘A Teacher Educator's Perspective on Students' and Teachers' Schemes: Or Teaching by Listening’. Unpublished paper, presented at the Conference on Thinking, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Ennis, Robert H.: 1985, ‘Goals For A Critical-Thinking/Reasoning Curriculum’ Illinois Critical Thinking Project. University of Illinois, U. C. Champaign.
Kilpatrick, J.: 1987, ‘Problem Formulating: Where do Good Problems Come From?’ In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 123–148, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Lipman, Mathew.: 1988, ‘Critical Thinking and the Use of Criteria’ Inquiry, Newsletter of the Institute for Critical Thinking, Montclair State College Upper Montclair.
Passmore, John.: 1967, ‘On Teaching to be Critical.’ The Concept of Education, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 192–211.
Paul, Richard W.: 1987, Critical Thinking Handbook: K-3, A Guide for Remodelling Lesson Plans in Language Arts, Social Studies and Science, Co-authors: A. J. A. Binker, Marla Charbonneau. Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.
Paul, Richard W.: 1987, Critical Thinking Handbook: 4–6, A Guide for Remodelling Lesson Plans in Language Arts, Social Studies and Science, Co-authors: A. J. A. Binker, Karen Jensen, Heidi Kreklau. Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.
Paul, Richard W.: 1982, ‘Teaching Critical Thinking in the Strong Sense: A Focus on Self-Deception, World Views, and a Dialectical Mode of Analysis,’ Informal Logic, J. Anthony Blair and Ralph Johnson, editors.
Paul, Richard W.: 1985, ‘The Critical Thinking Movement: A Historical Perspective,’ National Forum, Stephen White, editor.
Paul, Richard W.: 1987, ‘Critical Thinking and the Critical Person,’ Thinking: Progress in Research and Teaching Bishop, and Lochhead, editors. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Perkins, Hillsdale, NJ.
Paul, Richard W.: 1987, ‘Dialogical Thinking: Critical Thought essential to the Acquisition of Rational Knowledge and Passions,’ Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, Joan Baron and Robert Steinberg, editors. W. H. Freeman Company, Publishers, NY, NY.
Paul, Richard W.: 1984, ‘Critical Thinking: Fundamental to Education for a Free Society,’ Educational Leadership, Ronald Brandt, editor.
Paul, Richard W.: 1988, ‘Ethics Without Indoctrination,’ Education Leadership, Ronald Brandt, editor.
Resnick, Lauren: 1987, ‘Education & Learning to Think, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
Roth, K. J.: 1984, ‘Using Classroom Observations to Improve Science Teaching and Curriculum Materials.’ In C. W. Anderson (Ed.), Observing Science Classrooms: Perspectives from Research and Practice (1984 Yearbook of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.) Columbus, OH: ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Roth, K. J.: 1985, Food for Plants: Teacher's Guide (Research Series No. 153). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
Roth, K. J.: 1986, ‘Conceptual-Change Learning and Student Processing of Science Texts.’ (Research Series 167). East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
Roth, K. J.: 1987, Helping Science Teachers Change: The Critical Role of Teachers' Knowledge about Science and Science Learning Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1985, Mathematical Problem Solving Academic press, New York.
Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1986, ‘On Having and Using Geometric Knowledge’ in J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, pp. 225–264, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1987, ‘What's All the Fuss about Metacognition?’ in A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 189–215. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Schoenfeld, A. H.: In press, ‘When Good Leaching Leads to Bad Results: The Disasters of ‘Well Taught’ Mathematics Classes’. Educational Psychologist.
Scriven, Michael: 1985, ‘Critical For Survival’ National Forum, pp. 9–12.
Sheffler, Israel: 1973, Reason and Teaching. Bobbs-Merrill, New York.
Sheffler, Israel: 1965, Conditions of Knowledge, Scott Foresman, Chicago.
Siegel, Harvey: 1988, Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education, Routledge, New York & London.
Siegel, Harvey: 1980, ‘Critical Thinking As an Educational Ideal,’ The Educational Forum, pp. 7–23.
Smith, E. L.: 1983, ‘Teaching for Conceptual Change: Some Ways of Going Wrong.’ In H. Helm and J. Novak (Eds.), Proceeding of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Smith, E. L.: and Anderson, C. W.: 1987a, The Effects of Training and Use of Specially Designed Curriculum Materials on Conceptual Change Teaching and Learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington, DC.
Smith, E. L.: 1987b, ‘What Besides Conceptions Needs to Change in Conceptual Change Learning?’ In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconcoptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paul, R.W. Critical thinking in North America: A new theory of knowledge, learning, and literacy. Argumentation 3, 197–235 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128149
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128149
Key words
- Critical thinking
- Didactic theory of knowledge and instruction
- Critical theory of knowledge
- Monological versus multilogical issues
- problems
- disciplines
- Sophistic critical thinking
- Weak sense versus strong sense
- critical thinking
- Fair-minded
- critical thinking
- Perfections of thought
- Elements of thought
- Domains of thought
- Higher order lower order thinking
- Traits of mind
- Intellectual virtues
- The logic of learning
- The logic of proof
- Functional falsehoods
- Social construction of knowledge
- Critical society/person
- Irrational practices