Abstract
A feature shared by certain major revolutions is that they were not anticipated. Here is an explanation, which hinges on the observation that people who come to dislike their government are apt to hide their desire for change as long as the opposition seems weak. Because of this preference falsification, a government that appears unshakeable might see its support crumble following a slight surge in the opposition's apparent size, caused by events insignificant in and of themselves. Unlikely though the revolution may have appeared in foresight, it will in hindsight appear inevitable because its occurrence exposes a panoply of previously hidden conflicts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akhavi, S. (1980). Religion and politics in contemporary Iran. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Arendt, H. (1963/1965). On revolution. New York: Penguin Books.
Arjomand, S.A. (1986). Iran's Islamic Revolution in comparative perspective. World Politics 38 (April): 383–414.
Bakhash, S. (1984). The reign of the Ayatollahs: Iran and the Islamic Revolution. New York: Basic Books.
Buchanan, A. (1979). Revolutionary motivation and rationality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9: 59–82.
Chamberlin, W.H. (1935). The Russian Revolution 1917–1921, Vol. 1. New York: Macmillan.
Cobb, R. (1969). A second identity: Essays on France and French history. London: Oxford University Press.
Davies, J.C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review 27: 5–19.
DeNardo, J. (1985). Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Easterlin, R.A. (1980). Birth and fortune: The impact of numbers on personal welfare. New York: Basic Books.
Elster, J. (1985). Making sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1 (3): 288–299.
Fischhoff, B., and Beyth, R. (1975). ‘I knew it would happen’ — remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13: 1–16.
Gardiner, P. (1952). The nature of historical explanation. London: Oxford University Press.
Gurr, T.R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1807/1949). The phenomenology of mind. J.B. Bailke, transl. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Heikal, M. (1981/1982). Iran: The untold story. New York: Pantheon Books.
Hoveyda, F. (1979/1980). The fall of the Shah. R. Liddell, transl. New York: Wyndham Books.
Hume, D. (1741-42/1963). Essays: Moral, political, and literary. London: Oxford University Press.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., Eds. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuran, T. (1987a). Chameleon voters and public choice. Public Choice 53 (1): 53–78.
Kuran, T. (1987b). Preference falsification, policy continuity and collective conservatism. Economic Journal 97 (September): 642–665.
Kuran, T. (1988). The tenacious past: Theories of personal and collective conservatism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 10 (September): 143–171.
Lenin, V.I. (1902/1975). What is to be done? In R.C. Tucker (Ed.), The Lenin anthology, 12–114. New York: Norton.
Malia, M. (1980). Comprendre la Révolution Russe. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Mao Tse-Tung (1930/1972). A single spark can start a prairie fire. In Selected military writings of Mao Tse-Tung, 65–76. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
Marx, K. (1859/1970). A contribution to the critique of political economy. New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1867–94/1967). Capital, 3 vols. New York: International Publishers.
Medvedev, R.A. (1967/1973). Let history judge: The origins and consequences of Stalinism. C. Taylor, transl. New York: Vintage Books.
Nisbett, R., and Ross., L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1980/1984). The spiral of silence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Olson, M. (1965/1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Paléologue, M. (1924). An ambassador's memoirs. London: Doubleday.
Popper, K.R. (1957/1961). The poverty of historicism. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations, 3rd. ed. New York: Free Press.
Schapiro, L. (1984). The Russian Revolutions of 1917: The origins of modern communism. New York: Basic Books.
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, D., and Tilly, C. (1972). Hardship and collective violence in France. American Sociological Review 37: 520–532.
Taylor, S. (1982). The availability bias in social perception and interaction. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, 190–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tocqueville, A. de (1856/1955). The old régime and the French Revolution. S. Gilbert, transl. New York: Doubleday.
Tullock, G. (1974). The social dilemma: The economics of war and revolution. Blacksburg, VA: University Publications.
Tullock, G. (1987). Autocracy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.
Uhlaner, C.J., and Grofman, B. (1986). The race may be close but my horse is going to win: Wish fulfillment in the 1980 presidential election. Political Behavior 8: 101–129.
Walsh, W.B. (1975). The Petrograd garrison and the February Revolution of 1917. In R.F. Weigley (Ed.), New dimensions in military history: An anthology, 257–273. San Rafael, CA: Presidio Press.
Walton, T. (1980). Economic development and revolutionary upheavals in Iran. Cambridge Journal of Economics 4: 271–292.
Zagorin, P. (1973). Theories of revolution in contemporary historiography. Political Science Quarterly 88: 23–52.
Zonis, M. (1983). Iran: A theory of revolution from accounts of the revolution. World Politics 35 (July): 586–606.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
For valuable discussions, I am grateful to Gary Dymski, Richard Easterlin, and especially Bruce Thompson, who provided some key references on the French and Russian Revolutions. I also benefited from comments by Berhanu Abegaz, Robert Higgs, Viktor Kipnis, Daniel Klein, Mustapha Nabli, Jeffrey Nugent, Everett Rogers, Gordon Tullock, and several participants at seminars at USC and UCLA. Under grant no. SES-8509234, my research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation of the United States. I presented the paper at the March 1988 meetings of the Public Choice Society, held in San Francisco.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuran, T. Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution. Public Choice 61, 41–74 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116762
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116762