Abstract
We compared the organ specificity and the strength of different constitutive (CaMV-35S, CaMV-35Somega, Arabidopsis ubiquitin UBQ1, and barley leaf thionin BTH6 promoter) and one inducible promoter (soybean heat-shock promoter Gmshp17.3) in stably transformed Arabidopsis thaliana plants. For this purpose we constructed a set of plant expression vectors equipped with the different promoters. Using the uidA reporter gene we could show that the CaMV-35S promoter has the highest expression level which was enhanced two-to threefold by the addition of a translational enhancer (TMV omega element) without altering the organ specificity of the promoter. The barley leaf thionin promoter was almost inactive in the majority of lines whereas the ubiquitin promoter exhibited an intermediate strength. The heat-shock promoter was inducible up to 18-fold but absolute levels were lower than in the case of the ubiquitin promoter. Conclusive quantitative results for different organs and developmental stages were obtained by the analysis of 24 stably transformed lines per promoter construct.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Altmann T, Damm B, Frommer WB, Martin T, Morris PC, Schweizer D, Willmitzer L, Schmidt R: Easy determination of ploidy level in Arabidopsis thaliana plants by means of pollen size measurement. Plant Cell Rep 13: 652–656 (1994).
Battraw MJ, Hall TC: Histochemical analysis of CaMV 35S promoter-β-glucuronidase gene expression in transgenic rice plants. Plant Mol Biol 15: 527–538 (1990).
Benfey PN, Ren L, Chua N-H: Tissue-specific expression from CaMV 35S enhancer subdomains in early stages of plant development. EMBO J 9: 1677–1684 (1990).
Bevan M: Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Res 12: 8711–8721 (1984).
Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254 (1979).
Callis J, Raasch JA, Vierstra RD: Ubiquitin extension proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 265: 12486–12493 (1990).
Dowson Day MJ, Ashurst JL, Mathias SF, Watts JW, Wilson TMA, Dixon RA: Plant viral leaders influence expression of a reporter gene in tobacco. Plant Mol Biol 23: 97–109 (1993).
Frohberg C, Heins L, Gatz C: Characterization of the interaction of plant transcription factors using a bacterial repressor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 10470–10474 (1991).
Gallie DR: Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 77–105 (1993).
Gallie DR, Sleat DR, Watts JW, Turner PC, Wilson TMA: A comparison of eukaryotic viral 5′-leader sequences as enhancers of mRNA expression in vivo. Nucl Acids Res 15: 8693–8711 (1991).
Gallie DR, Lucas WJ, Walbot V: Visualizing mRNA expression in plant protoplasts: Factors influencing efficient mRNA uptake and translation. Plant Cell 1: 301–311 (1989).
Gallie DR, Walbot V: Identification of the motifs within the tobacco mosaic virus 5′-leader resposible for enhancing translation. Nucl Acids Res 20: 4631–4638 (1992).
Grevelding C, Fantes V, Kemper E, Schell J, Masterson R: Single-cope T-DNA insertions in Arabidopsis are the predominant form of integration in root-derived transgenics, whereas multiple insertions are found in leaf discs. Plant Mol Biol 23: 847–860 (1993).
Hershey HP, Stoner TD: Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones for RNA species induced by substituted benzenesulfonamides in corn. Plant Mol Biol 17: 679–690 (1991).
Holsters M, De Waele D, Depicker A, Messens E, Van Montagu M, Schell J: Transfection and transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Gen Genet 163: 182–187 (1978).
Huang H, Ma H: An improved procedure for transforming Arabidopsis thaliana (Landsberg erecta) root explant. Plant Mol Biol Rep 10: 372–383 (1992).
Ingelbrecht ILW, Herman LMF, Dekeyser RA, Van Montagu MC, Depicker AG: Different 3′ end regions strongly influence the level of gene expression in plant cells. Plant Cell 1: 671–680 (1989).
Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan M: GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6: 3901–3907 (1987).
Mett VL, Lochhead LP, Reynolds PHS: Copper-controllable gene expression system for whole plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 4567–4571 (1993).
Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497 (1962).
Schena M, Lloyd AM, Davis RW: A steroid-inducible gene expression system for plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 10421–10425 (1991).
Schöffl F, Rieping M, Baumann G, Bevan M, Angermüller S: The function of plant heat shock promoter elements in the regulated expression of chimaeric genes in transgenic tobacco. Mol Gen Genet 217: 246–253 (1989).
Takahashi T, Naito S, Yoshibumi K: The Arabidopsis HSP18.2 promoter/GUS gene fusion in transgenic Arabidopsis plants: a powerful tool for the isolation of regulatory mutants of the heat-shock response. Plant J 2: 751–761 (1992).
Töpfer R, Matzeit V, Gronenborn B, Schell J, Steinbiss H-H, A set of plant expression vectors for transcriptional and translational fusions. Nucl Acids Res 15: 5890 (1987).
Valvekens D, Van Montagu M, Van Lijsebettens M: Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis root explants by using kanamycin selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 5536–5540 (1988).
Vancanneyt G, Schmidt M, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L, Rocha-Rosa M: Construction of an introncontaining marker gene: Splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Mol Gen Genet 220: 245–250 (1990).
Vierling E: The roles of heat shock proteins in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42: 579–620 (1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holtorf, S., Apel, K. & Bohlmann, H. Comparison of different constitutive and inducible promoters for the overexpression of transgenes in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Mol Biol 29, 637–646 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041155
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041155