Abstract
Large underestimates of the limitation to photosynthesis imposed by stomata can occur because of an error in the standard method of calculating average substomatal pressures of carbon dioxide when heterogeneity of those pressures occurs across a leaf surface. Most gas exchange data supposedly indicating nonstomatal inhibition of photosynthesis by water stress could have this error. However, if no stomatal closure occurs, any reduction in photosynthesis must be due to nonstomatal inhibition of photosynthesis. Net carbon dioxide exchange rates and conductances to water vapor were measured under field conditions in upper canopy leaves of tomato plants during two summers in Beltsville, Maryland, USA. Comparisons were made near midday at high irradiance between leaflets in air with the ambient water vapor content and in air with a higher water content. The higher water content, which lowered the leaf to air water vapor pressure difference (VPD), was imposed either one half hour or several hours before measurements of gas exchange. In both seasons, and irrespective of the timing of the imposition of different VPDs, net photosynthesis increased 60% after decreasing the VPD from 3 to 1 kPa. There were no differences in leaf conductance between leaves at different VPDs, thus transpiration rates were threefold higher at 3 than at 1 kPa VPD. It is concluded that nonstomatal inhibition of photosynthesis did occur in these leaves at high transpiration rate.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Boyer JS (1965) Effects of osmotic water stress on metabolic rates of cotton plants with open stomata. Plant physiol 40: 229–234
Bunce JA (1984) Effects of humidity on photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 35: 1245–1251
Bunce JA (1987) Species-specific responses to water stress of gas exchange parameters mimicked by applied abscisic acid. Can J Bot 65: 103–106
Downton WJS, Loveys BR, Grant WJR (1988) Stomatal closure fully accounts for the inhibition of photosynthesis by abscisic acid. New Phytol 108: 263–266
Farquhar GD and Sharkey TK (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 33: 317–345
Farquhar GD, Hubik KT, Terashima I, Condon AG and Richards RA (1987) Genetic variation in the relationship between photosynthetic CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance to water loss. In: Biggins J (ed) Progress in Photosynthesis Research V, pp 209–212. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers
Laisk A (1983) Calculation of leaf photosynthetic parameters considering the statistical disribution of stomatal apertures. J Exp Bot 34: 1627–1635
Sharkey TD (1984) Transpiration-induced changes in the photosynthetic capacity of leaves. Planta 160: 143–150
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bunce, J.A. Nonstomatal inhibition of photosynthesis by water stress. Reduction in photosynthesis at high transpiration rate without stomatal closure in field-grown tomato. Photosynth Res 18, 357–362 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034840
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034840