Abstract
Classification and ordination methods represent the two primary groups of ordering techniques for the analysis of floristic data in plant ecology. Current problems in the use and application of the methods are introduced and through a review of 734 articles across 11 ecological journals from 1960 to 1986, the history and evolution of the methods are displayed, the extent to which different techniques have been applied in the past and up to the present is demonstrated and problems and trends are discussed. A clear and substantial increase in the application of ordination and classification methods over the survey period is shown but with this increased usage, problems have come in terms of choice and evaluation of methods, the emphasis on inductive rather than deductive approaches, possible over-emphasis on methodology and technique rather than ecological application, low levels of use in applied studies and an increased tendency to use complementary and multiple analyses.
All of the problems are related to broader aspects of the present position of vegetation description and analysis within vegetation science in general and in particular the relationship between community ecology and individualistic plant ecology.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Austin, M. P. 1976. Performance of four ordination techniques assuming three different non-linear species response models. Vegetatio 33: 43–49.
Austin, M. P. 1977. Use of ordination and other multivariate descriptive methods to study succession. Vegetatio 35: 165–175.
Austin, M. P. 1979. Current approaches to the non-linearity problem in vegetation analysis. In: Patil, G. P. & Rosenzweig, M. (eds), Contemporary quantitative ecology and related econometrics. pp. 197–210. Int. Coop. Publ., Fairland, Maryland.
Austin, M. P. 1980. Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. Vegetatio 42: 11–21.
Austin, M. P. 1985. Continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 39–61.
Austin, M. P. 1987. Models for the analysis of species' response to environmental gradients. Vegetatio 69: 35–45.
Austin, M. P. & Austin, B. O. 1980. Behaviour of experimental plant communities along a nutrient gradient. J. Ecol. 68: 891–918.
Austin, M. P., Cunningham, R. B. & Fleming, P. M. 1984. New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures. Vegetatio 55: 11–27.
Beals, E. W. 1984. Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Adv. Ecol. Res. 14: 1–55.
Brown, M. J., Ratkowsky, D. A. & Minchin, P. R. 1984. A comparison of detrended correspondence analysis and principal coordinates analysis using four sets of Tasmanian vegetation data. Aust. J. Ecol. 9: 273–279.
Causton, D. 1988. Introduction to vegetation analysis. Unwin Hyman, London.
Clymo, R. S. 1980. Preliminary survey of the peat-bog Hummell Knowe Moss using various numerical methods. Vegetatio 42: 129–148.
Crawley, M. J. 1986. The structure of plant communities. In: Crawley, M. J. (ed.), Plant ecology, pp. 1–50. Blackwell. Oxford.
Dale, M. B. 1975. On objectives of methods of ordination. Vegetatio 30: 15–32.
Dargie, T. C. D. 1984. On the integrated interpretation of indirect site ordinations: a case study using semi-arid vegetation in southeastern Spain. Vegetatio 55: 37–55.
Dargie, T. C. D. 1986. Species richness and distortion in reciprocal averaging and detrended correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 65: 95–98.
Digby, P. G. N. & Kempton, R. A. 1987. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities. Chapman and Hall, London.
Ezcurra, E. 1987. A comparison of reciprocal averaging and non-centred principal components analysis. Vegetatio 71: 41–47.
Fasham, M. J. R. 1977. A comparison of non-metric multidimensional scaling, principal components analysis and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines and coenoplanes. Ecology 58: 551–561.
Feoli, E. & Feoli Chiapella, L. 1980. Evaluation of ordination methods through simulated coenoclines: some comments. Vegetatio 42: 35–41.
Gauch, H. G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gauch, H. G. & Whittaker, R. H. 1972a. Coenocline simulation. Ecology 53: 446–451.
Gauch, H. G. & Whittaker, R. H. 1972b. Comparison of ordination techniques. Ecology 53: 868–875.
Gauch, H. G. & Whittaker, R. H. 1976. Simulation of community patterns. Vegetatio 33: 13–16.
Gauch, H. G. & Whittaker, R. H. 1981. Hierarchical classification of community data. J. Ecol. 69: 537–558.
Gauch, H. G., Whittaker, R. H. & Singer, S. B. 1981. A comparative study of non-metric ordinations. J. Ecol. 69: 135–152.
Gauch, H. G., Whittaker, R. H. & Wentworth, T. R. 1977. A comparative study of reciprocal averaging and other ordination techniques. J. Ecol. 65: 157–174.
Gittins, R. 1979. Ecological applications of canonical analysis. In: Orlóci, L., Rao, C. R. & Stiteler, W. M. (eds), Stat. Ecol. 7: 309–535, Int. Coop.: Fairland, Maryland.
Goldsmith, F. B. 1973a. The vegetation of exposed sea cliffs at South Stack, Anglesey. I. The multivariate approach. J. Ecol. 61: 787–818.
Goldsmith, F. B. 1973b. The vegetation of exposed sea cliffs at South Stack, Anglesey. II. Experimental studies. J. Ecol. 61: 819–830.
Goodall, D. W. 1970. Statistical plant ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 99–124.
Goodall, D. W. 1978. Numerical classification. In: Whittaker, R. H. (ed.), Classification of plant communities, pp. 247–286. Junk, The Hague.
Greig-Smith, P. 1983. The development numerical classification and ordination. Vegetatio 42: 1–9.
Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative plant ecology. 3rd ed. Blackwell, Oxford.
Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester.
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.
Hill, M. O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.
Hill, M. O. 1979a. DECORANA — A Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Hill, M. O. 1979b. TWINSPAN — A Fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification the individuals and the attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Hill, M. O. & Gauch, H. G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.
Jongman, R. G. H., ter Braak, C. J. F. & van Tongeren, O. F. R. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen.
Keddy, P. A. 1987. Beyond reductionism and scholasticism in plant community ecology. Vegetatio 69: 209–211.
Kellman, M. C. 1980. Plant geography, 2nd ed. New York.
Kershaw, K. A. & Looney, J. H. H. 1985. Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology. 3rd ed. Arnold, London.
Lambert, J. M. & Williams, W. T. 1966. Multivariate methods in plant ecology. IV. Comparison of information analysis and association analysis. J. Ecol. 54: 635–664.
May, R. M. 1985. Evolutionary ecology and John Maynard Smith. In: Greenwood, P. J., Harvey, P. H., Slatkin, M. (eds), Evolution: Essays in honour of John Maynard Smith, pp. 107–116, Cambridge University Press.
McIntosh, R. P. 1967. The continuum concept of vegetation. Bot. Rev. 33: 130–187.
Minchin, P. R. 1987a. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69: 89–107.
Minchin, P. R. 1987b. Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive model. Vegetation 71: 145–156.
Nie, N. H. (ed.) 1983. SPSSX users guide. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Noy-Meir, I. & van der Maarel, E. 1987. Relations between community theory and community analysis in vegetation science: some perspectives. Vegetatio 69: 5–15.
Oksanen, J. 1987. Ordination of boreal heath-like vegetation with principal component analysis, correspondence analysis and multidimensional scaling. Vegetatio 52: 181–189.
Oksanen, J. 1987. Problems of joint displays of species and site scores in correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 72: 51–57.
Oksanen, J. 1988. A note on the occasional instability of detrending in correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 74: 29–32.
Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. 2nd ed. Junk, The Hague.
Pielou, E. C. 1984. The interpretation of ecological data. Wiley, New York.
Prentice, I. C. 1977. Non-metric ordination models in ecology. J. Ecol. 65: 85–94.
Roberts, D. W. 1987. A dynamical systems perspective on vegetation theory. Vegetation 69: 27–33.
Shipley, B. & Keddy, P. A. 1987. The individualistic and community-unit concepts as falsifiable hypotheses. Vegetatio 69: 47–55.
Silvertown, J. W. 1982. Introduction to plant population ecology, Longman, London.
Strauss, R. E. 1982. Statistical significance of species clusters in in association analysis. Ecology 63: 634–639.
Swaine, M. D. & Greig-Smith, P. 1980. An application of principal components analysis to vegetation change in permanent plots. J. Ecol. 68: 33–41.
ter Braak, C. J. F. 1983. Principal components biplots and alpha and beta diversity, Ecology 64: 454–462.
ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.
ter Braak, C. J. F. 1987a. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69–77.
ter Braak, C. J. F. 1987b. CANOCO — a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis (version 2.0). TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen.
ter Braak, C. J. F. & Prentice, I. C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271–317.
Turkington, R. & harper, J. L. 1979. The growth distribution and neighbour relationships of Trifolium repens in a permanent pasture. 1. Ordination, pattern and contact. J. Ecol. 67: 201–218.
van der Maarel, E., Janssen, J. G. M. & Louppen, J. M. W. 1978. TABORD, a program for structuring phytosociological tables. Vegetatio 38: 143–156.
van der Maarel, E. 1979. Vegetatio 1980: the past six years and the near future. Vegetatio 41: 129–132.
van der Maarel, E. 1980. On the interpretability of ordination diagrams. Vegetatio 42: 43–45.
van der Maarel, E. 1984a. Vegetation science in the 1980s. In: Cooley, J. H. & Golley, F. B. (eds), Trends in ecological research for the 1980s, pp. 89–110. Plenum Press, New York.
van der Maarel, E. 1984b. Dynamics of plant populations from a synecological viewpoint. In: Dirzo, R. & Sarukhan, J. (eds), Perspectives on plant ecology, pp. 66–82. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
van der Maarel, E. & van der Maarel-Versluys, M. 1988. Index to Vegetatio volumes 51–73 and some notes on the position of the journal. Vegetatio 73: 123–189.
Wartenberg, D., Ferson, S. & Rohlf, F. J. 1987. Putting things in order: a critique of detrended correspondence analysis. Amer. Nat. 129: 434–448.
Whittaker, R. H. 1953. A consideration of climax theory: the elimax as a population and pattern. Ecol. Monog. 23: 41–78.
Whittaker, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42: 207–264.
Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. 2nd ed. MacMillan, New York.
Whittaker, R. H. & Gauch, H. G. 1978. Evaluation of ordination techniques. In: Whittaker, R. H. (ed.), Ordination of plant communities, pp. 277–336, Junk The Hague.
Williams, W. T. & Lance, G. N. 1968. Choice of strategy in the analysis of complex data. Statistician 18: 31–43.
Wilson, M. V. 1981. A statistical test of the accuracy and consistency of ordinations. Ecology 62: 8–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kent, M., Ballard, J. Trends and problems in the application of classification and ordination methods in plant ecology. Vegetatio 78, 109–124 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033421
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033421