Abstract
A comparative study of naidid subfamilies shows that a combination of ordination, Jaccard/Average Linkage cluster analysis and Wagner parsimony provides a useful basis for a rational phylogeny but that this does not differ markedly from the original proposed by Sperber nearly four decades ago. Hennig rules, modified by Wiley, permit a preliminary phylogeny and classification of the Annelida to be made by hand. An error in earlier versions suggested that the Dorydrilidae lacked prostate glands, and this is corrected.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banfield, C. F. & J. C. Gower, 1980. A note on the graphical representation of multivariate binary data. Appl. Statist. 29: 238–245.
Brinkhurst, R. O., 1982. Evolution in the Annelida. Can. J. Zool. 60: 1043–1059.
Brinkhurst, R. O., 1984a. The position of the Haplotaxidae in the evolution of the oligochaete annelids. Hydrobiol. 115: 25–36.
Brinkhurst, R. O., 1984b. Comments on the evolution of the Annelida. Hydrobiol. 109: 189–191.
Brinkhurst, R. O. & K. A. Coates, 1985. The genus Paranais (Oligochaeta, Naididae) in North America. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 98: 303–313.
Camin, J. H. & R. R. Sokal, 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution, 19: 311–326.
Coates, K. A., 1987. Redescription of the oligochaete genus Propappus and diagnosis of the new Family Propappidae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) (in press).
Cormack, R. M., 1971. A review of classification. J. R. Statist. Soc. A. 134: 321–353.
Eck, R. V. & M. O. Dayhoff, 1966. Atlas of protein sequence and structure 1966. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Spring.
Erseus, C., 1984. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the gutless Phallodrilinae (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae), with descriptions of one new genus and twenty-two new species. Zool. Scr. 13: 239–272.
Farris, J. S. & M. F. Mickevitch, 1982. Phylogenetic analysis system (PHYSYS). Fortran V software system of cladistic and phenetic algorithms.
Felsenstein, J., 1982. Numerical methods for inferring evolutionary trees. Quart. Rev. Biol. 57: 379–404.
Felsenstein, J., 1983. Statistical inference of phylogenies. J. R. Statist. Soc. A. 146: 246–272.
Felsenstein, J., 1984. Phylogeny inference package (PHYLIP). Version 2.4. Documentation.
Gower, J. C., 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53: 325–338.
Jamieson, B. G. M., 1978. Phylogenetic and phenetic systematics of the opisthopore Oligochaeta (Annelida: Clitellata). Evol. Theory, 3: 195–233.
Jamieson, B. G. M., 1980. Preliminary discussion of an Hennigian analysis of the phylogeny and systematics of opisthoporous oligochaetes. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 17: 261–275.
Kasprzak, K., 1984. The previous and contemporary conceptions on phylogeny and systematic classifications of Oligochaeta (Annelida). Ann. Zool. 38: 205–223.
Kluge, A. G. & J. S. Farris, 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 1–32.
Sims, R. W., 1980. A preliminary numerical evaluation of the taxonomic characters of Allolobophora auct. and some allies (Lumbricida: Oligochaeta) occurring in France. Pedobiologia, 20: 212–226.
Sneath, P. H. A. & R. R. Sokal, 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 573 pp.
Sperber, C., 1948. A taxonomical study of the Naididae. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 28: 1–296.
Wiley, E. O., 1981. Phylogenetics. The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley, New York, 439 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brinkhurst, R.O., Nemac, A.F.L. A comparison of phenetic and phylogenetic methods applied to the systematics of Oligochaeta. Hydrobiologia 155, 65–74 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025632
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025632