Abstract
The productivity of wheat and barley was compared in soils of different salt concentrations with a limited water supply. Productivity was assessed as total dry weight or dry weight per unit of water used (water use efficiency, WUE). Barley achieved the highest productivity because it used more of the available water and it had a greater WUE for above-ground dry weight. However, when WUE for total organic weight of roots and shoots was determined, or WUE was corrected for grain production, wheat and barley had the same productivity. In two experiments in drying soils with different salt concentrations but the same amount of soil water, wheat and barley had a higher dry weight than salt-tolerant grasses and they were more productive than C4 halophytes and non-halophytes when adjusted for water use. In one experiment, sown at a low plant density, barley and wheat used less water than some halophytes and they completed their life cycle leaving some water behind in the soil. Their higher WUE did not compensate for their lower water use. However, when all species were sown at a high density, wheat and barley were either as productive or more productive than the most salt-tolerant species, including a C4 halophyte, as they used all the available water and had the highest WUE. A sunflower cultivar was similary more productive than a salt-tolerant relative. The contribution that salt-tolerant relatives of wheat, barley and sunflower can make to genetically improving the productivity of these species in dry saline soils is questioned.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blum A, Mayer J and Goland G 1988 The effect of grain number per ear (sink size) on source activity and its water-relations in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 39, 106–114.
Brugnoli E and Lauteri M 1991 Effects of salinity on stomatal conductance, photosynthetic capacity, and carbon isotope discrimination of salt-tolerant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and salt-sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) C3 non-halophytes. Plant Physiol. 95, 628–635.
Farquhar G D and Richards R A 1984 Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11, 539–552.
Forster B P, Phillips M S, Miller T E, Baird E and Powell W 1990 Chromosome locations of genes controlling tolerance of salt (NaCl) and vigour in Hordeum vulgare and H. chilense. Heredity 65, 99–107.
Gorham J 1990 Salt tolerance in Triticeae: K/Na discrimination in Aegilops species. J. Exp. Bot. 41, 615–621.
Guy R D, Warne P G and Reid D M 1988 Stable carbon isotope ratio as an index of water-use efficiency in C3 halophytes—possible relationship to strategies for osmotic adjustment. In Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. Eds. P W Rundel, J R Ehleringer and K A Nagy. pp 55–75. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Kingsbury R W and Epstein E 1984 Selection for salt resistant spring wheat. Crop Sci. 24, 310–315.
McCree K J 1986 Whole-plant carbon balance during osmotic adjustment to drought and salinity stress. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 33–43.
McCree K J and Richardson S G 1987 Salt increases the water use efficiency in water stressed plants. Crop Sci. 27, 543–547.
McGuire P E and Dvorak J 1981 High salt-tolerance potential in wheatgrasses. Crop Sci. 21, 702–705.
Morgan J M 1983 Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drough tolerance in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 607–614.
Pearcy R W and Ehleringer J R 1984 Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 1–13.
Rawson H M 1986 Gas exchange and growth in wheat and barley grown in salt. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 475–489.
Rawson H M, Begg J E and Woodward R G 1977 The effect of atmospheric humidity on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of leaves of several plant species. Planta 134, 5–10.
Rawson H M, Richards R A and Munns R 1988 An examination of selection criteria for salt tolerance in wheat, barley and triticale. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 39, 759–772.
Richards R A 1983 Should selection for yield in saline regions be made on saline or non-saline soils? Euphytica 32, 431–438.
Richards R A, Dennet C W, Qualset C O, Epstein E, Norlyn J D and Winslow M D 1987. Variation in yield of grain and biomass in wheat, barley and triticale in a salt-affected field. Field Crops Res. 15, 227–287.
Winter E and Läuchli A 1982 Salt tolerance of Trifolium alexandrinum L. I. Comparison of salt response of T. alexandrinum and T pratense. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9, 221–226.
Yeo A R 1983 Salinity resistance: Physiologies and prices. Physiol. Plant. 58, 214–222.
Yeo A R and Flowers T J 1986 Salinity resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and a pyramiding approach to breeding varieties for saline soils. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 161–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, R.A. Increasing salinity tolerance of grain crops: Is it worthwhile?. Plant Soil 146, 89–98 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012000
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012000