Abstract
Food losses due to crop infections caused by different pathogens such as bacteria, viruses and fungi are persistent issues in agriculture for centuries across the globe. The timely detection and appropriate identification of casual agents associated with diseases of crop plants or seeds are considered to be the most important issue in formulating the management strategies. Seed health testing to detect seed-borne pathogens is an important step in the management of crop diseases. Specificity, sensitivity, speed, simplicity, cost-effectiveness and reliability are the main requirements for the selection of seed health test methods. Examples of frequently used seed assays include visual examination, selective media, seedling grow-out and serological assays which, while appropriate for some pathogens, often display inadequate levels of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has emerged as a tool for the detection of microorganisms from diverse environments. Thus far, it is clear that nucleic acid-based detection protocols exhibit higher level of sensitivity than conventional methods. Unfortunately, PCR-based seed tests require the extraction of PCR-quality DNA from target pathogens in backgrounds of saprophytic organisms and inhibitory seed-derived compounds. The inability to efficiently extract PCR-quality DNA from seeds has restricted the acceptance and application of PCR for the detection of seed-borne pathogens. To overcome these limitations, several modified PCR protocols have been developed including selective target colony enrichment followed by PCR (Bio-PCR). These techniques seek to selectively concentrate or increase target organism populations to enhance detection and have been successfully applied for detecting fungi in seed. Ultimately, improved protocols based upon PCR, ELISA, etc. will be available for the detection of all seed-borne pathogens and may supersede conventional detection methods. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of conventional and modern tools used for the early detection and identification of seed-borne fungal pathogens.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Seed-borne pathogens possess a serious threat to seedling establishment. Close association of the pathogens with seeds facilitates their long-term survival, introduction into new areas and widespread dissemination. Under such conditions, elimination is the most effective disease management strategy accomplished by using seed detection assay to screen and reject infested seed lots before sowing/planting or its distribution to the farmers or seed growers. Transboundary spread of pathogens is a major concern today. Precise detection methods are essential for seed-borne pathogens to support seed health strategies. While choosing a method, it is essential to see that it is reliable, less time-consuming, cost-effective, reproducible and sensitive. The conventional seed health testing methods are being used in the identification of fungus up to species level. The considerable advancement in molecular biology has facilitated rapid identification/detection of seed-borne pathogens. Over 100 years of seed health studies, many new methods were developed, or older methods were modified, but all of them used for the detection and identification of seed-borne organisms have to fulfil six main requirements (Ball and Reeves 1991):
-
(i)
Specificity – the ability to distinguish a particular target organism from others occurring on tested seeds.
-
(ii)
Sensitivity – the ability to detect organisms at low incidence in seed stocks.
-
(iii)
Speed – less time requirements, to enable prompt action against the target pathogen(s).
-
(iv)
Simplicity – minimization of a number of examination stages to reduce error and enable testing by a staff not necessarily highly qualified.
-
(v)
Cost-effectiveness – costs should determine acceptance to the test.
-
(vi)
Reliability – methods must be sufficiently robust to provide repeatable results within and between samples of the same stock regardless who performs the test.
2 Why Detection of Seed-Borne Fungal Pathogens is Important?
-
Seed-borne fungal pathogens present a serious threat to seedling establishment and hence may contribute as potential factor in crop failure.
-
Seeds not only facilitate the long-term survival of these pathogens but also may act as a vehicle for their introduction into newer areas and their widespread dissemination.
-
Seed-borne fungal pathogens are able to cause catastrophic losses to food crops and hence directly linked to the food security.
-
Unlike infected vegetative plant tissues, infested seeds can be asymptomatic, making visual detection impossible.
-
Additionally, fungal pathogen’s populations on seeds may be low, and the infested seeds may be non-uniformly distributed within a lot.
3 Detection Methods for Seed-Borne Fungal Pathogens
The following methods are used to detect seed-borne fungal pathogens which include conventional and modern methods.
3.1 Conventional Detection Methods
3.1.1 Visual Examination of Dry Seeds
The first step of the detection of seed-borne pathogens is examination of dry seeds with unaided eye (naked eye) or with the magnifying glasses (hand lens). In certain cases, infected seeds exhibit different characteristic symptoms produced by various seed-borne fungal pathogens on seed surface, viz. seed rot, seed necrosis, shrunken seed, seed discolouration, shrivelling, etc. (Table 5.1 and Fig. 5.1). Besides these symptoms, dry seeds are examined for the presence of admixtures such as sclerotia, fungal fructification such as pycnidia and acervuli, smut balls and smut sori, etc. In this method stereoscopic microscope, hand lens or naked eye can be used for a sample consisting of 400 or more seeds. By this examination some additional significant risks can also be eliminated, e.g. weed seed contaminants, insect pests and abnormal seeds. Seed may be soaked in water or other liquids to make pathogen structures, e.g. pycnia, and symptoms, i.e. anthracnose, on the seed coat more visible.
Visual examination method may be coupled with automatic devices that sort seeds based on visuals of physical characteristics (Paulsen 1990; Walcott et al. 1998) to reduce seed lot infestation. But, as a limitation, these systems usually have low detection sensitivity, which makes these devices less useful in decision-making system for rejection of seed lots. Additionally, seeds infested by fungi, bacteria and viruses may display no macroscopic symptoms, making visual or physical inspection of seeds useless as a detection assay.
3.1.2 Microscopic Examinations
-
(a)
Examination of Seed Washings
This method is used to detect seed-borne pathogens which are loosely present on the seed surface. This method is mostly used for the detection of fungi causing smuts, bunts, downy mildew, powdery mildew and rust with the important exception of loose smut of wheat and barley which are internally seed-borne diseases. For seed washing test, seed samples (50 seeds) are placed in test tubes containing sterile distilled water (10 ml) and a few drops (10–20) of 95% ethyl alcohol or a detergent. The sample tubes are agitated in a mechanical shaker for 10 min. The aqueous suspension is then centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant is poured off and the pellet is re-suspended in 2 ml of sterile water. Spores or fungal structure present in the suspension can be viewed by examining a few drops of the suspension under the light microscope.
-
(b)
NaOH Seed Soak Method
The NaOH seed soak method was first used by Agarwal and Srivastava (1981). This method is applied for the detection of Karnal bunt of wheat and bunt (kernel smut) of paddy. In this method seeds are soaked in 0.2–0.3% NaOH solution for 24 h at 25–30 °C. Next day the solution is decanted and the seeds are thoroughly washed in tap water. After washing, the seeds are spread over blotter paper so that the excess moisture is absorbed by blotter. Now the seeds are examined visually. The wheat seeds showing black to shiny black discolouration may contain Karnal bunt infection of Tilletia indica. This may be confirmed by rupturing suspected seed with a fine needle in a drop of water, the bunt spores (teliospores) will be released, if the suspected seed is infected. Similarly, the infection in paddy seeds due to bunt or kernel smut disease of paddy caused by Tilletia barclayana can also be detected. Likewise, by treating the rice seeds with NaOH (0.2%), the infection by Trichoconiella padwickii could be inferred by the change of colour of the diseased portion of infected seeds to black (Singh and Maheshwari 2001).
-
(c)
Whole Embryo Count Method
This method is used when seed-borne infection is deep seated in the seed tissues such as embryo in case of loose smut of wheat and barley. The embryo count method was first used by Skvortzov (1937) for detecting loose smut pathogen Ustilago nuda var. tritici. He dissected the embryos, macerated them with NaOH and then stained them with aniline blue. This method is completed in 3–4 days. This method was modified by Agarwal et al. (1978) as follows (Fig. 5.2):
3.1.3 Incubation Methods
-
(a)
Testing on Agar Media: In agar tests seeds are incubated on agar media for a particular length of time and optimum temperature under alternating light and dark cycles. The associated fungi are detected based on their morphological and habit characters on seed surface and colony characters on the medium. It is used to detect Alternaria, Bipolaris, Curvularia, Fusarium, etc. in infected seeds.
-
(b)
Blotter Testing: Doyer (1938) and de Temp (1953) were first to adopt blotter paper method in seed health management. This test is used to detect infection of seeds, and in certain cases, infection of the germinated seedlings can also be detected by this method. Blotter method is the most widely used seed health assay. Mainly this method is of two types:
-
(i)
Standard Moist Blotter (SMB) Method
In the standard blotter test, seeds are sown in Petri dishes containing 1–3 layers of water or buffer-soaked absorbing (blotting) paper or cellulose pads for a couple of days depending on the fungus and type of seed tested (Marcinkowska 2002). In general, 10–20 non-sterilized seeds (depending on the seed size) are placed equidistant from each other in Petri dish and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C with alternate cycles of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness for 7–10 days. In the blotter test, seeds are subjected to conditions that enable pathogen growth and expression during the incubation period (Fig. 5.3). After the incubation period, the seeds are examined under a stereomicroscope for the presence of fungal colonies, and their characteristics are recorded for the identification of the fungal pathogens.
The seed must be surface-sterilized prior to its placement on blotter paper in Petri dish, if the internally seed-borne fungal pathogens are to be detected. Seeds may be immersed in a NaOCl solution containing 1% chlorine for 10 min or in 1.7% NaOCl solution for 1 min followed by immersion in 70% chlorine for 10 min (ISTA 1966). The germination of seeds may be obstructed by wetting the blotting paper with 0.1–0.2% 2,4-D. This procedure has been used for the detection of Leptosphaeria maculans (anamorph Phoma lingam) in crucifer seeds (Hewett 1977) and for routine seed health testing of common bean and soybean (Dhingra et al. 1978).
-
(ii)
Deep Freezing Blotter (DFB) Method
The DFB method is used to detect a wide range of fungi which are able to grow easily from seeds in the presence of humidity. After plating seeds as described in the SMB method, the Petri dishes are incubated at 20 ± 2 °C for 24 h and then transferred to a − 20 °C freezer for 24 h followed by incubation at 20 ± 2 °C for 5 days under cool white fluorescent light with alternating cycles of 12 h light and 12 h darkness. Pure cultures are obtained through hyphal-tip and single-spore isolation techniques and maintained on carrot potato agar (CPA) slants for further studies. Fungi are identified using cultural, biochemical, macromorphological and micromorphological characteristics as described by Raper and Fennel (1965), Booth (1971), Ellis (1971) and Domsch et al. (1980).
The percentage of seed infection in each sample and the percentage of infection in each region are determined by the following formulae:
$$ \mathrm{Mean}\ \mathrm{rate}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{seed}\ \mathrm{infection}=\frac{\mathrm{Number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{seed}\mathrm{s}\ \mathrm{on}\ \mathrm{which}\ \mathrm{a}\ \mathrm{fungal}\ \mathrm{species}\ \mathrm{identified}}{\mathrm{Number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{seed}\mathrm{s}\ \mathrm{tested}}\times 100 $$$$ \mathrm{Mean}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{regional}\ \mathrm{infection}=\frac{\mathrm{Frequency}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{sample}\ \mathrm{on}\ \mathrm{which}\ \mathrm{a}\ \mathrm{fungus}\ \mathrm{identified}}{\mathrm{Number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{sample}\mathrm{s}\ \mathrm{collected}}\times 100 $$ -
(i)
For species-level identification, the fungi are isolated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and maintained at 24 ± 1 °C for 7–10 days. The identification is conducted using colony colour, colony texture pattern, arrangement of spore on the conidiophores, spore shape and size (Watanabe 2002; Leslie and Summerell 2006; Utobo et al. 2011).
The blotter method has been coupled with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for the detection of seed-borne fungi (Alves and Pozza 2009). The seeds of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), maize (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were submitted to the standard blotter test. The specimens were prepared and observed with the standard SEM methodology. It was possible to identify Fusarium sp. on maize, C. gossypii var. cephalosporioides and Fusarium oxysporum on cotton and Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium sp., Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. on common bean (Alves and Pozza 2009).
-
(c)
Seedlings Symptoms Test and Grow-Out Test
Seedlings symptoms test is based on the characteristic symptoms produced by seed-borne fungi on growing seedlings under controlled conditions, whereas in grow-out test, plants are grown beyond the seedling stage in near-optimum conditions of temperature and moisture in sterile medium, i.e. sand, and water-agar medium, and the seedlings/plants are observed for symptoms of the fungal pathogens. It can facilitate the detection of a number of fungal pathogens associated with seed rotting and other symptoms at seedling stage, e.g. fungal pathogens causing seedling diseases as Alternaria, Bipolaris, Fusarium, Pyricularia, etc. This method involves the planting of a certain number of seeds, preferably on sterile soil for determining the number of infected plants and calculating the percent infected plants out of the total number of seed sown. These test results are helpful in assessing field performance and estimating the number of infection loci/unit area, if the seed lot under investigation is used for cultivation by farmers. Infection of soybean seeds by Colletotrichum truncatum was detected by this method (Dhingra et al. 1978). This method is very effective in the case of non-cultivable obligate pathogens causing downy mildew diseases. However, it requires large greenhouse space, and also it is time-consuming, making it unsuitable for testing a large number of seed lots. There are a number of seedling symptoms and grow-out tests as follows:
-
(i)
Test Tube Agar Method
This method was developed by Khare, Mathur and Neergaard in 1977. It is used for the detection of Septoria nodorum in wheat seeds and is very useful for assaying the small quantity of high cost material. In this method infection of root can also be examined. Fungal pathogens of cereals like Drechslera sp., Bipolaris sp. and Septoria sp. can be easily detected. Steps used in procedure are as follows:
-
1.
15 ml water agar is taken in test tube, sterilized and solidified with a slight slant.
-
2.
One seed is sown in each test tube and incubated at 28 ± 1 °C with 12 hours alternating cycles of light and darkness.
-
3.
Seedlings are examined after 14 days for the typical symptoms of disease in the coleoptiles.
-
4.
The symptoms can be easily studied being visible on roots as well as on green parts.
-
(ii)
Hiltner’s Brick Stone Method
It was developed by Hiltner in 1917. Sterile crushed brick stone with a maximum piece size of 3–4 mm is used to fill in plastic pots up to ¾th of their capacity. The crushed brick stone in the pot is saturated with water and seeds are placed 1 cm deep. The pots are kept in darkness at room temperature, and observations for disease symptoms are recorded after 2 weeks by removing the seedlings. It is a good method for testing field performance giving information on seedling symptoms. It is also used for testing treated seed.
-
(iii)
Sand Method
This method is similar to Hiltner’s brick stone method except that in place of sterile crushed brick stone, sterilized sand is used.
-
(iv)
Standard Soil Method
A pre-sterilized uniform soil mixture containing four parts clay, six parts peat and essential amount of fertilizer is filled in plastic multi-pot trays. After sowing the seed, appropriate moisture should be maintained. The symptoms are observed after incubation for 2–4 weeks depending on the kind of seed and temperature.
-
(d)
Selective Media
It is a direct method of seed testing in which seed-borne pathogens are allowed to grow on specific media. The use of selective media for the detection of pathogens is more reliable than blotter or agar method. This can be done by directly plating surface-sterilized seed samples or seed wash liquid onto artificial media, followed by adequate incubation under favourable conditions. Once a fungal pathogen is isolated, it can be identified by its cultural, morphological or biochemical characteristics. Selective artificial media are developed that use antibiotics, fungicides, selected carbon and nitrogen sources and other inhibitory compounds to retard the growth of non-target microflora while allowing the target pathogen to grow. For example, potato dextrose agar is useful for the detection of Septoria nodorum in wheat, while PCNB agar is a selective medium for the detection of Fusarium species in cereals. The list of some selective and semi-selective media for different seed fungi is given in Table 5.2.
3.2 Serological Detection Techniques
The seed-infecting fungal communities may comprise the saprobes which can grow rapidly over the target fungal pathogens. These fast-growing saprobes arrest their isolation; and examination of their morphological characteristics becomes difficult and confusing. In the case of rice seed-borne pathogens, such situation exists, where about 30 fungal phytopathogens infecting rice have been reported to be seed-borne (Mew et al. 1988). Additionally, the presence of very closely related strains, race or even fungal species on the seeds makes the detection morphologically almost impossible. Therefore, more sensitive techniques such as immunoassay and nucleic acid-based protocols are needed to overcome this issue. Since pure culture of the pathogens is not needed in serological detection protocols, these techniques could be applied to detect biotrophic as well as necrotrophic seed-borne pathogens (Mancini et al. 2016).
After the first use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) by Clark and Adams (1977), employed for successful detection of plant viruses, this technique has been widely adopted and modified based on requirement of the assays (Fang and Ramasamy 2015). This serological method is used for the identification of diseases based on antibodies and colour change in the assay. Serological assays depend on antibodies generated against specific antigens of plant pathogens. The antibodies bind specifically to its antigens and consequently are detected by the enzymatic digestion of substrates. Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies have been produced against fungal antigens present in culture filtrate, cell fractions, whole cells, cell walls and extracellular components (Narayanasamy 2005).
Species of several seed-borne fungi like Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium have been demonstrated to be potential mycotoxin producers. A monoclonal antibody (MAb) capable of reacting with antigens of 10 field fungi and 27 storage fungi was generated. The presence of fungal pathogens in barley seeds was detected using a polyclonal antibody (PAb) raised against Penicillium aurantiogriseum var. melanoconidium in indirect ELISA test. A clear linear relationship was recorded between absorbance and fungal population increase, suggesting the utility of these antibodies for a broad-spectrum assay to determine the fungal content in seeds (Banks et al. 1993). Rice and corn seeds colonizing fungi, viz. Aspergillus parasiticus, Penicillium citrinum and Fusarium oxysporum, were detected by employing double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) test. The absorbance values of ELISA were in good correlation with concentration of mould growth, and the sensitivity of this DAS-ELISA was 1 μg/ml (Chang and Yu 1997).
Karnal bunt disease of wheat caused by Tilletia indica is an internationally quarantined fungal disease with a significant impact on international wheat trade as well as quality and quantity of wheat seed. SDS-PAGE analysis suggested that T. indica has a protein of 64 kDa weight with antigenic properties. Antibodies specific to this protein specifically reacted with pathogen’s teliospores in a microwell sandwich-ELISA and dipstick immunoassay. The detection limit of both of these immunoassays was 1.25 ng/well of purified T. indica protein or 40 ng/well of crude spore extract, which distinguished Karnal bunt from all wheat smuts and, to some degree, the rice smut, T. barclayana (Kutilek et al. 2001). Ustilago nuda causes loose smut in barley and it is an internally seed-borne pathogen. Eibel et al. (2005b) employed a DAS-ELISA test with biotinylated detection antibodies to detect loose smut pathogen in naturally infected barley seeds.
Phomopsis longicolla is a seed-borne fungal pathogen causing Phomopsis seed decay of soybean, a major concern for quality seed production in soybean (Glycine max L.). This pathogen was detected using indirect ELISA and a modified immunoblot assay, named as seed immunoblot assay (SIBA). The comparative efficiency of both detection assays was evaluated. The problems with nonspecific interference occurred during ELISA test could be solved by employing seed immunoblot assay (SIBA) for detection. In SIBA, infected soybean seeds are transferred to nitrocellulose paper on which the mycelium of P. longicolla grows out forming a clearly visible coloured blotch on the nitrocellulose paper after the assay. Since the viable spores can only produce the mycelium, SIBA test is capable of differentiating the living and dead spores of the pathogen, which is a distinct advantage of this technique. In contrast ELISA test results do not offer such vital information (Gleason et al. 1987). Similarly, wheat seeds with different grades of Karnal bunt (Tilletia indica) infection could be readily detected by seed immunoblot binding assay (SIBA). After the immuno-processing, coloured imprints were produced on nitrocellulose paper on which infected wheat seeds were placed for vigour test, indicating the presence of viable teliospores of Tilletia indica in the wheat seed lots tested (Kumar et al. 1998).
Two methods, viz. PCR-based assay and DAS-ELISA, were developed and evaluated for the detection of Tilletia caries (syn. T. tritici), a seed-borne fungus causing common bunt in wheat. Double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) was performed using biotinylated detection antibodies. The presence of bunt pathogen could be detected by PCR in shoots as well as in leaves of infected wheat plants. Except for the closely related T. controversa, no cross-reactions with other fungi were observed with both methods. The analysis of results obtained from DAS-ELISA of plant shoots revealed that artificial inoculation of seeds with T. caries at EC 10 was efficient in infecting all host population, with a great variability in the inoculum of pathogen. ELISA employed in the assay was found most suited than PCR assay, allowing precise quantification of the amount of fungal antigen present in the plant (Eibel et al. 2005a). Agar plating method and DAS-ELISA were compared for the detection of Macrophomina phaseolina, a seed-borne fungal pathogen and causal agent of root rot diseases in wide host range. The presence of the pathogen was confirmed in four out of five lots by both the detection methods; however, DAS-ELISA format revealed more sensitivity in the detection of the pathogen in higher percentage of seeds as compared to agar plating method which additionally required much time and is inconvenient (Afouda et al. 2009).
Instead of successful detection of some seed-borne fungi, we may conclude that serological techniques have limited values in the detection of seed-borne fungal pathogens, since they contain many nonspecific antibodies which may cause cross-reactions with related and unrelated species concealing the effects of specific antibodies (Dewey 1992; Miller et al. 1992). These assays are widely applied to detect seed-borne viruses, but insufficiency of species-specific antibodies is a major limitation in its wide application for the detection of seed-borne fungal pathogens. Besides, serology-based assays can also detect non-viable fungal propagules, which can lead to imprecise interpretations (Mancini et al. 2016).
3.3 Nucleic Acid-Based Detection Methods
Generally, nucleic acid-based techniques resulting in a high level of sensitivity and specificity are used for species-specific detection of seed-borne pathogens. Through these techniques, very small quantities of samples or tissues are sufficient for the detection of pathogens in seeds of various crops. In recent times nucleic acid-based detection methods have become the preferred choice for detection, identification and quantification of seed-borne fungal pathogens. In molecular detection several strategies, viz. polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR, magnetic capture hybridization-PCR, Bio-PCR, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, real-time PCR and DNA barcoding, are available for the detection and identification of pathogens which involves propagation of putative pathogen propagules on a culture medium and subsequent PCR on washes from the culture plates, often using nested PCR primer pairs and sometimes without DNA extraction.
3.3.1 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Molecular-based methods began after the introduction of PCR in the mid-1980s. Over the past few decades, considerable advancement has taken place in the development of molecular diagnostics for the detection of pathogens in seeds (Molouba et al. 2001). Potential benefits (e.g. rapid, same-day analysis, specific and sensitive tests) this new technology offers, make it extremely attractive. PCR is a method which enables amplification and multiplication, up to a manifold, of the target sequence of DNA. In fungi, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region has been widely used to design specific primers to detect the presence of seed-borne infection of fungi. PCR procedures/protocols have been developed for the detection of several seed-borne fungal pathogens associated with seeds of various commercially important crops (Mancini et al. 2016).
Rhynchosporium secalis, a causative agent of barley scald disease, overwinters in the plant debris, and this pathogen is capable of infecting barley seeds without producing conspicuous symptoms, or it may induce typical scald symptoms on seeds. A PCR-based detection method was developed, and in this assay, pathogen-specific primer pairs derived from the ITS region of rDNA of R. secalis were effective in detecting this pathogen in the symptomless seed infections. The detection assay revealed the presence of the diagnostic band in the symptomless seeds of susceptible cultivar (Lee et al. 2001). Further, a primer set (RS1 and RS3) derived from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of ribosomal RNA genes of this pathogen was used to quantify the inoculum of seed-borne infection caused by Rhynchosporium secalis in barley using competitive PCR (Lee et al. 2002).
A complex of three species, viz. Alternaria brassicae, A. brassicicola and A. japonica, are responsible for the black spot disease of crucifers. To restrict the transboundary spread of this disease by infected seeds, it is essential to ensure the absence of these pathogenic Alternaria species in seed shipments, which constitutes the disease management strategies. A PCR-based diagnostic technique was developed using specific primers developed from sequence analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of nuclear rDNA of Alternaria brassicae, A. brassicicola and A. japonica. This protocol was able to detect these pathogens in DNA extracted from seed macerates (Iacomi-Vasilescu et al. 2002). Another attempt was made to detect Alternaria brassicae, an important seed-borne fungal incitant of the black spot disease of crucifers using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay. A. brassicae-specific primers sets were designed on the basis of the sequences of two clustered genes potentially involved in pathogenicity. The designed two sets of primers were used for conventional and real-time PCR assay. By both the detection methods, A. brassicae was specifically detected using DNA extracted from seed (Guillemette et al. 2004).
Rice blast disease, a serious threat to rice production, is caused by Magnaporthe grisea. A PCR-based detection protocol was developed using primers designed on the basis of nucleotide sequences of the mif 23, an infection-specific gene of M. grisea. The primers amplified target DNA from genetically and geographically diverse isolates of M. grisea, but not from DNA of other fungi tested, proving the specificity of the primers. The detection limit was ~20 pg of pathogen DNA. This PCR-based seed assay was capable in detecting M. grisea in rice seed lots with infestation rates as low as 0.2% (Chadha and Gopalakrishna 2006).
Septoria tritici (teleomorph, Mycosphaerella graminicola) is an economically important pathogen causing leaf blotch disease in wheat. Septoria tritici, naturally contaminating wheat seeds, was detected employing conventional PCR assay. The species-specific primers developed from strict alignment of ITS and α-tubulin sequences of Septoria tritici were used in the diagnostic assay. A single DNA fragment was amplified from DNA of S. tritici, but not from DNA of wheat seeds or other fungi selected, the detection limit being 0.5 pg of pathogen DNA (Consolo et al. 2009).
Downy mildew disease caused by biotrophic obligate oomycete Peronospora arborescens (Berk.) is one of the most economically important diseases of opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) worldwide. This pathogen was detected in opium poppy seeds using sensitive nested PCR assay. Two primers designed from the sequences of ITS region of rDNA improved the pathogen detection sensitivity significantly up to 1000-fold compared with single PCR employing same primers. The frequent detection of P. arborescens in seeds suggested the likely threat posed by this incitant for rapid spread through the seeds (Montes-Borrego et al. 2009).
The fungus Corynespora cassiicola is responsible for target spot disease in soybean in Brazil. This pathogen can be transmitted by seeds and is able to cause severe damage in this crop. Though early diagnostic of the disease by conventional seed testing is possible, species-level detection through these methods is time-consuming and cumbersome. A PCR-based assay was employed using specific GA4-F/GA4-R primers for the detection of C. cassiicola in pure culture and in soybean seeds. The pathogen could be detected in infected and inoculated seed samples at the low level of 0.25% (Sousa et al. 2016).
Species-specific detection of Diaporthe phaseolorum and Phomopsis longicolla, responsible for soybean seed decay, was achieved using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and TaqMan chemistry (Zhang et al. 1999). An ultrasonic processor was used to break the seed coats and cells, enabling the extraction of fungal DNA from soybean seeds. Three TaqMan primer/probe sets were designed, based on DNA sequences of the ITS regions of ribosomal DNA. Primer/probe set PL-5 amplified a 96 bp fragment within the ITS 1 region of P. longicolla, D. phaseolorum var. caulivora, D. phaseolorum var. meridionalis and D. phaseolorum var. sojae. An 86 bp DNA fragment was obtained within the ITS 2 region of P. longicolla by the set PL-3, whereas set DPC-3 was able to produce 151 bp DNA fragment within the ITS 2 region of D. phaseolorum var. caulivora. The detection sensitivity of TaqMan primer/probe sets was as low as 0.15 fg (four copies) of plasmid DNA. When using PCR-RFLP for Diaporthe and Phomopsis detection, the assay was able to detect as little as 100 pg of pure DNA. However, TaqMan detection provided the fastest results of all the methods tested (Zhang et al. 1999).
Tilletia indica, the incitant of Karnal bunt disease, can be correctly identified based on morphological features but the germination of teliospores is time-consuming. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection assay was employed using species-specific primers designed from rDNA-ITS region and 2.3 kb mtDNA fragment of this pathogen. The primer set from ITS region could specifically amplify 570 bp amplicon of T. indica, whereas primer set derived from mtDNA was able to amplify 885 bp amplicon of KB pathogen only (Thirumalaisamy et al. 2011). This assay was able to avoid delay in detection and wrong identification of closely related species of T. indica from wheat seed lots.
Spot blotch disease of wheat caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana is one of the important diseases of wheat. This disease development may take place through seed-borne infections. A quick and reliable PCR-based diagnostic assay was developed to detect B. sorokiniana using a pathogen-specific marker derived from genomic DNA. A PCR-amplified DNA amplicon (650 bp) was obtained in B. sorokiniana isolates employing universal rice primer (URP 1F), and it was cloned in pGEMT easy vector and sequenced. A primer pair RABSF1 and RABSR2, of six primers designed based on sequences of PCR-amplified DNA amplicon, amplified a DNA sequence of 600 bp in B. sorokiniana isolates. The pathogen could be detected specifically in a mixed population comprising of total 74 isolates of B. sorokiniana, Bipolaris spp. and other pathogens infecting wheat and other hosts. This single DNA fragment was amplified only from DNA of B. sorokiniana, but not from DNA of other species of Bipolaris genus and other pathogenic fungi tested, suggesting the specificity of the detection assay, the detection limit being 50 pg of genomic DNA (Aggarwal et al. 2011).
Seed-borne fungal pathogen, Alternaria radicina, causes black rot disease of carrot. A PCR-based seed assay was developed for the detection of A. radicina from infested carrot seed. PCR primers used in assay were designed based on a cloned random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fragment of this pathogen. This seed assay was coupled with 5-day incubation under high humidity conditions to increase the fungal biomass. PCR amplification of the target A. radicina DNA sequence was improved by the addition of skim milk to the PCR reaction mixture. This PCR-based assay was able to detect the pathogen (Alternaria radicina), from seed lots with infestation rates as low as 0.1% (Pryor and Gilbertson 2001).
Pyrenophora graminea, a fungal incitant of leaf stripe disease of barley, is transmitted entirely by seed, and it cannot infect the leaf directly. This pathogen could be detected employing RAPD primers designed using a sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) approach. Out of 60 RAPD primers, a set of P. graminea-specific primers (PG2 F/R) was obtained that amplified a single DNA fragment (435 bp) from 37 isolates of P. graminea tested, but not from other Pyrenophora spp. or saprophytes isolated from barley seed. The diagnostic assay was completed within 25 min (including melting point analysis) using a LightCycler, capable of measuring emission of fluorescence from the binding of SYBR Green I dye to the PCR products. The rapidity was coupled with the closed ‘in-tube’ detection of PCR products which reduces the chances for contamination (Taylor et al. 2001b).
Anthracnose is mainly a seed-borne disease caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). The pathogen could be detected employing a rapid, specific and sensitive PCR-based detection method. Based on data analysis of sequences of rDNA region consisting of the 5.8S gene and internal transcribed spacers (ITS) 1 and 2 of 4 C. lindemuthianum races and 17 Colletotrichum spp. downloaded from GenBank, 5 forward primers were designed. One forward primer showing specificity of the detection was selected for use in combination with ITS 4 to specifically detect C. lindemuthianum. A 461 bp specific DNA band was obtained from the genomic DNA template of 16 isolates of C. lindemuthianum, but not from other Colletotrichum species or 10 bean pathogens. A nested PCR protocol was applied to enhance the sensitivity of detection, which enabled the detection of as little as 10 fg of C. lindemuthianum genomic DNA and 1% infected seed powder. This detection assay could be accomplished within 24 h against a 2-week period required for culturing the pathogen, and this protocol required no specialized taxonomic expertise (Fig. 5.4) (Chen et al. 2007).
Fusarium wilt of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) is a serious threat for the lettuce production around the world. The fungal incitant of the disease Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae has the potential for seed-borne spread. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae was detected in the seed of lettuce using a nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR)-based assay. Sequences of intergenic spacer region of the rDNA were used to design three primers for PCR amplifications. A PCR product (2270 bp) was generated using primer pair GYCF1 and GYCR4C in the first amplification. A 936 bp DNA fragment was amplified employing the forward primer GYCF1 and the nested primer R943 in the second amplification. The nPCR protocol successfully detected the target sequence in genomic DNA of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae at 1 fg/μl. The nPCR seed assay was coupled with a 4-day incubation under high humidity conditions to increase fungal biomass for DNA extraction. In seed lots known amounts of F. oxysporum f. sp. lactucae-infested seed were mixed with non-infested seed, and this assay detected the pathogen from seed lots with infestation rates as low as 0.1% (Mbofung and Pryor 2010).
3.3.2 Multiplex PCR
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (multiplex PCR) is a valuable molecular tool which offers simultaneous amplification of several DNA amplicons of different sizes, within single PCR reaction (Sint et al. 2012). The multiplex PCR technique was first described by Chamberlain et al. (1988). This technique has various applications and is being commonly used for the identification and detection of pathogens, gene deletion analysis, high-throughput SNP genotyping, linkage and mutation analyses, etc. Since multiplex PCR consists of multiple primer sets within a single PCR mixture to produce amplicons of different sizes that are specific to different DNA sequences, it is capable of detecting several seed-borne pathogenic fungi simultaneously with high sensitivity. Preferably, potential seed health tests can be designed as multiplex assays for particular crops, with their ability to detect all seed-borne pathogens required for phytosanitary purposes.
Multiplex PCR was employed to differentiate members of two groups belonging to Aspergillus flavus. The first Aspergillus flavus group encloses A. flavus and A. parasiticus as aflatoxin producers, and the second group includes A. oryzae and A. sojae which are best known for their capability to ferment soybean to prepare various food products. Aflatoxigenic strains could be detected, and their differentiation was possible employing the multiplex PCR protocol that minimized the risk of a genotype being a phenotypic producer of aflatoxin. This assay was based on four genes involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis, viz. norsolorinic acid reductase (nor-1), versicolorin A dehydrogenase (ver-1), sterigmatocystin O-methyltransferase (omt-1) and a regulatory protein (apa-2) (Chen et al. 2002). Multiplex PCR could successfully detect Fusarium species within Fusarium head scab complex (Waalwijk et al. 2003) and Rhynchosporium secalis, a seed-borne fungal incitant causing economically important leaf blotch disease of barley (Fountaine et al. 2007). There may be chances that a seed may harbour very closely related species of fungi. The occurrence of very closely related fungal species on the seed may lead to overlapping while simultaneous detection. In multiplex PCR, possible problem of overlapping of amplicons with similar sizes could be overcome using primers, already dyed with different colour fluorescent dyes (Sint et al. 2012).
Comparison of two PCR-based protocols was done for the detection of Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium subglutinans, important fungal pathogens of maize and other cereals worldwide. PCR-based protocols were used for the identification of these pathogens targeting the gaoB gene, which codes for galactose oxidase. The designed primers recognized isolates of F. verticillioides and F. subglutinans obtained from maize seeds from several regions of Brazil but did not recognize other Fusarium spp. or other fungal genera. A multiplex PCR diagnostic protocol was capable to simultaneously detect the genomic DNA from F. verticillioides and F. subglutinans growing in artificially or naturally infected maize seeds (Faria et al. 2012).
Fusarium culmorum causes disease complex, viz. seed rot, seedling blight and ear rot in maize. The multiplex PCR assay was standardized targeting trichothecene metabolic pathway genes, viz. Tri6, Tri7 and Tri13, for the detection of trichothecene (DON/NIV) chemotypes and rDNA gene for the specific detection of Fusarium culmorum species in freshly harvested maize seeds. The analysis of primers employed in multiplex PCR assay revealed that 94 isolates were able to produce deoxynivalenol/nivalenol DON/NIV. The practical usefulness of mPCR assay was validated by comparing these results with high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) and found that mPCR results equivocally matched with the HPTLC chemical analysis for field samples (Venkataramana et al. 2013).
3.3.3 Magnetic Capture Hybridization (MCH)-PCR
Interference caused by inhibitory compounds of seed extracts in conventional PCR is a major limitation affecting both assay sensitivity and reliability. The magnetic capture hybridization-PCR (MCH-PCR) has the advantage that the MCH process purifies and concentrates the DNA of interest while removing non-target DNA and other substances that can inhibit the in vitro enzymatic manipulation of nucleic acids that are normally found in complex sharing biological material. In MCH-PCR, magnetic beads coated with single-stranded DNA probes are used to capture DNA fragments which are further used for PCR amplification. This technique has been successfully used to detect fungi, viruses and bacteria in materials containing PCR inhibitory compounds (Jacobsen 1995). With the use of MCH-PCR, the detection sensitivity can be enhanced up to 10- to 100-fold as compared to conventional PCR protocol.
Complex of three species of Botrytis, viz. B. aclada, B. allii and B. byssoidea, are responsible for neck rot disease in onion. The pathogens of this disease are transmitted by onion seeds. An MCH-PCR diagnostic protocol was employed for the rapid and sensitive detection of B. aclada in onion seed samples. The DNA of B. aclada could be detected using MCH-PCR diagnostic protocol, in aqueous solutions prepared from seed extract with detection limit as 100 fg of fungal DNA/ml. MCH-PCR protocol was more sensitive and efficient than normal PCR, in detecting the fungus B. aclada in seed lots with 4.8% and 9.9% infection in naturally infested seeds. MCH-PCR detection assay could be completed within 24 hours against a 10–14-days period required in conventional methods to test onion seeds (Walcott et al. 2004). Two important seed-borne pathogens of cucurbits could be detected by employing a magnetic capture hybridization (MCH) multiplex real-time PCR assay. This assay offered the improved simultaneous detection of two different pathogens in cucurbit seed lots, viz. Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli, a causal agent of bacterial fruit blotch, and Didymella bryoniae, a fungal incitant of gummy stem blight disease (Ha et al. 2009).
3.3.4 Bio-PCR
Bio-PCR enables the enhancement of fungal biomass since seed-borne fungi generally infect the host seeds at very low concentration of inoculum, and therefore the DNA of the fungal pathogen is not enough for the subsequent reactions, limiting the use of conventional PCR-based detection. This technique was developed by Schaad et al. (1995) primarily to detect a seed-borne bacterium from bean seed extracts. Later, this technique was also proved to be efficient for detection of fungi (Munkvold 2009). Bio-PCR is mainly applied for fungi and bacteria. In this detection method, a pre-assay incubation step is coupled with PCR process. Bio-PCR consists of the preventive growth of non-target pathogens on selective medium and selective increase in the biomass of target microorganisms, followed by DNA extraction and amplification by PCR (Schaad et al. 1995).
Bio-PCR has been proven successful in the detection/identification of Tilletia indica teliospores in wheat seed samples (Schaad et al. 1997). In Bio-PCR, standard deep-freeze blotter method was utilized as pre-assay incubation to increase the fungal biomass of Alternaria dauci and A. radicina from infected seeds of carrot and was detected using of specific primers of A. dauci and A. radicina during the PCR assay (Konstantinova et al. 2002).
Though Bio-PCR offers several advantages over conventional PCR assay, like it is highly sensitive, eliminates PCR inhibitors and avoids false positives due to dead cells since it detects live cells only (Marcinkowska 2002), there are some limitations of Bio-PCR also, viz. if selective media are used, the method becomes more expensive and pre-assay requires 5–7-days period to increase fungal growth, which substantially increases the time required for the completion of the assays (Mancini et al. 2016).
3.3.5 Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP)
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is one of the novel nucleic acid amplification technologies that enables the synthesis of large amounts of DNA in a short period of time with high specificity. This technique was developed by Notomi et al. (2000) as a simple, cost-effective and rapid method for the specific detection of genomic DNA (Mancini et al. 2016). In the future it may be a potential alternative to PCR, since LAMP protocol does not require thermocycler apparatus. LAMP uses a pair of four or six oligonucleotide primers with eight binding sites hybridizing specifically to diverse areas of a target gene and a thermophilic DNA polymerase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus for DNA amplification. Additionally, being a highly specific diagnostic protocol, the amplification efficiency of LAMP is extremely high, which provides improved sensitivity, and can overcome the problem of inhibitors that usually adversely affect PCR methods (Fu et al. 2011). LAMP products can be visualized by gel electrophoresis, using magnesium pyrophosphate, which enhances precipitation of amplified DNA (Fukuta et al. 2003; Nie 2005), with a real-time turbidity reader (Fukuta et al. 2004; Mori et al. 2004), or with the addition of an intercalating dye, such as SYBR Green I, which produces a colour change in the presence of target phytopathogen (Iwamoto et al. 2003; Mumford et al. 2006).
Fusarium graminearum is the major causative agent among the species complex of Fusarium head blight of small cereals and is potential producer of the mycotoxins, viz. deoxynivalenol, nivalenol and zearalenone. The pathogen could be detected by employing LAMP assay, based on the gaoA gene (galactose oxidase) of Fusarium graminearum. Amplification of DNA during the reaction was indirectly detected in situ by using calcein fluorescence as a marker, circumventing the use of time-requiring electrophoretic analysis. The LAMP protocol was able to detect the presence ~2 pg of purified target DNA per reaction within 30 min, specifically from DNA of F. graminearum (Niessen and Vogel 2010).
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (Foc), the incitant of Fusarium wilt, is both a soil-borne and seed-borne fungus. It is one of the most devastating pathogens of chickpea, causing major economic losses ranging from 10% to 40% worldwide. It is estimated to cause a 10–15% yield loss annually in India (Haware and Nene 1982). A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was developed targeting the elongation factor 1 alpha gene sequence for visual detection of Foc. The LAMP reaction was optimal at 63 °C for 60 min. In the presence of hydroxynaphthol blue (HNB) added before amplification, DNA of Foc developed a characteristic sky blue colour, whereas this colour was absent in the DNA of six other plant pathogenic fungi. Later, gel electrophoresis analysis confirmed the results obtained with LAMP and HNB. The detection limit of this LAMP assay for Foc was 10 fg of genomic DNA per reaction, against 100 pg of conventional PCR (Ghosh et al. 2015).
Karnal bunt in wheat caused by a fungus Tilletia indica is a quarantine disease, and therefore timely and specific detection of the pathogen is very essential. The pathogen could be detected specifically with rapidity employing the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) at 62 °C. Four major unique regions were identified in T. indica through analysis of alignment of the mitochondrial DNA of T. indica and T. walkeri. Six LAMP primers designed from one of these major unique regions in T. indica could amplify T. indica DNA. Among 17 isolates of T. indica, T. walkeri, T. horrida, T. ehrhartae and T. caries, this protocol offered highly specific detection of T. indica. Endpoint detection with the naked eye could be possible using the fluorescent chemical calcein. The diagnostic assay could be completed in 30 min, offering similar sensitivity as with conventional PCR. The specificity issues that occurred during PCR-based detection protocols due to the high DNA homology of T. indica with other Tilletia species, especially T. walkeri, could be solved by employing this technique for detection (Gao et al. 2016).
Phomopsis longicolla is an important seed-borne fungal pathogen responsible for the deterioration in the seed quality of soybean. The pathogen could be detected employing loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) diagnostic assay based on transcription elongation factor 1-α (TEF1-α), identified as a suitable target for the detection of P. longicolla. This LAMP diagnostic assay, with great specificity, was capable to detect all 54 isolates of P. longicolla from the rest of the 41 isolates of other fungi tested. Before the amplification of LAMP products, hydroxynaphthol blue (HNB) was added, and a sky blue colour was only developed in the presence of P. longicolla, while other fungal isolates failed to show colour change. The detection limit of the assay was 100 pg/μL fungal DNA, and additionally the assay also detected P. longicolla from diseased soybean tissues and residues from different origins (Dai et al. 2016).
Anthracnose is a worldwide occurring fungal disease of soybean. This disease is primarily caused by Colletotrichum truncatum. Rapid and direct detection of the pathogen in diseased soybean tissues could be possible employing a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay. A pair of species-specific primers was designed using the target gene Rpb1 (that codes for the large subunit of RNA polymerase II). During the screening, species-specific primers amplified the genomic DNA of Colletotrichum truncatum at 62 °C over 70 min. The presence of C. truncatum could be confirmed by a yellow-green colour (visible to the unaided eye), developed in LAMP reaction products after addition of SYBR Green I dye. This Rpb1-Ct-LAMP assay could successfully diagnose soybean anthracnose in field samples collected from various locations of China and was able to detect C. truncatum in soybean seeds from farmers’ markets, the detection limit being 100 pg (per μL genomic DNA of pathogen) (Tian et al. 2017).
3.3.6 Real-Time PCR
It is a laboratory technique of molecular biology based on PCR, which consists of amplification and simultaneous detection or quantification of targeted DNA molecule. Real-time PCR consists of coupling DNA amplification with fluorescent substances which can be easily measured, giving an indirect measurement of DNA amplification. This is the case of TaqMan (Heid et al. 1996; Taylor et al. 2001a) where fluorescence is directly linked to the excision of reporter dye molecules, which is directly related to DNA amplification. In contrast to other detection techniques, a much quicker and more sensitive, quantitative assay could be provided by real-time PCR assays.
Detection through real-time PCR was reported for Didymella bryoniae, an incitant of gummy stem blight of cucurbits (Ling et al. 2010). A real-time fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was developed using SYBR Green chemistry to quantify three species of Botrytis, viz. B. aclada, B. allii and B. byssoidea, associated with onion (Allium cepa) seed that are also able to induce neck rot of onion bulbs (Chilvers et al. 2007). The nuclear ribosomal intergenic spacer (IGS) regions of target and non-target Botrytis spp. were sequenced and aligned and used to design a primer pair specific to B. aclada, B. allii and B. byssoidea. The primers reliably detected 10 fg of genomic DNA per PCR reaction extracted from pure cultures of B. aclada and B. allii (Chilvers et al. 2007).
Simultaneous detection of Pantoea ananatis and Botrytis allii was performed in onion seeds using magnetic capture hybridization and real-time PCR (Ha and Walcott 2008). Montes-Borrego et al. (2011) have achieved real-time PCR quantification of Peronospora arborescens, the opium poppy downy mildew pathogen, in seed stocks and symptomless infected plants. Ioos et al. (2012) have used duplex real-time PCR tool for sensitive detection of the quarantine oomycete Plasmopara halstedii in sunflower seeds. A real-time PCR assay utilizing SYBR Green was developed to detect V. dahliae associated with spinach seed (Duressa et al. 2012). More recently, a multiplex TaqMan real-time PCR assay was developed for the detection of spinach seed-borne pathogens, viz. Peronospora farinosa f. sp. spinaciae, Stemphylium botryosum, Verticillium dahliae and Cladosporium variabile, that cause economically important diseases on spinach (Feng et al. 2014). They tested TaqMan assays on DNA extracted from numerous isolates of the four target pathogens, as well as a wide range of non-target, related fungi or oomycetes and numerous saprophytes commonly found on spinach seed. Multiplex real-time PCR assays were evaluated by detecting two or three target pathogens simultaneously. Singular and multiplex real-time PCR assays were also applied to DNA extracted from bulked seed and single spinach seed (Feng et al. 2014). Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli is a devastating pathogen that can cause significant economic losses and can be introduced into fields through infested common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds. Robust seed health testing methods can be helpful in preventing long-distance dissemination of this pathogen by contaminated seeds. A rapid real-time PCR assay (qPCR) protocol was developed for the detection and quantification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli in common bean seeds. SYBR Green and TaqMan qPCR methods were compared directly using primers based on the Fop virulence factor ftf1. Both qPCR assays detected infection in seed at low levels (0.25%); however, the TaqMan assay was found more reliable at quantification than the SYBR Green assay (Sousa et al. 2015). To ensure adequate specificity and sensitivity and comparable amplification efficiency of different pathogens in real-time PCR assays, it is critical to choose the appropriate target DNA fragments to design the primers and probes (Mancini et al. 2016). Recently, a real-time PCR-based marker was developed for the detection of teliospores of Tilletia indica in soil (Gurjar et al. 2017).
3.3.7 DNA Barcoding
DNA barcoding is a taxonomic method that uses a short genetic marker in an organism’s DNA to identify it as belonging to a particular species (Hebert et al. 2003). The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is a recently proposed DNA barcode marker for fungi (Schoch et al. 2012). Identification of universal barcoding regions is important to detect seed-borne fungi. Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) has been used as the primary barcode marker for fungi based on its ability to successfully identify inter- and intraspecific variation among a wide range of fungi. An ideal barcoding gene should be sufficiently conserved to be amplified with wide range of primers, however divergent enough to identify closely related species. Other applications include, for example, identifying plant leaves even when flowers or fruits are not available and identifying insect larvae (which may have fewer diagnostic characters than adults and are frequently not well-known) (Kress et al. 2005). Barcoding regions of some important seed-borne fungi are given in Table 5.3.
3.4 Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
After its first application in basic biological research, NGS technologies have been extended to other fields of application, which have included plant disease diagnosis. As NGS has been a valuable technique for the rapid identification of disease-causing agents from infected plants, it can also be applied to the detection of fungal pathogens in seeds. This technique has been applied to study the mycobiome of wheat seed, using 454 pyrosequencing, allowing the identification of several fungal genera (Nicolaisen et al. 2014). In view of this technology’s great potential, the major sequencing platforms used for genome and other sequencing applications, 454 sequencing, AB/SOLiD technology and Illumina/Solexa sequencing are described below.
The first NGS technology that was proposed by Roche for the market was 454 sequencing, which bypasses cloning steps by taking advantage of PCR emulsion, a highly efficient in vitro DNA amplification method. It is based on colony sequencing and pyrosequencing. The pyrosequencing approach is a sequencing-by-synthesis technique that measures the release of pyrophosphate by producing light, due to the cleavage of oxyluciferin by luciferase. Currently, the 454 platform can produce 80–120 Mb of sequence in 200 to 300 bp reads in a 4 h run (Morozova and Marra 2008; Barba et al. 2014).
AB/SOLiD technology is sequencing by oligonucleotide ligation and detection (SOLiD). It depends on ligation-based chemistry with di-base labelled probes and uses minimal starting material. Sequences are obtained by measuring serial ligation of an oligonucleotide to the sequencing primer by a DNA ligase enzyme. Each SOLiD run requires 5 days and generates 3–4 Gb of sequence data with an average read length of 25–35 bp (Mardis 2008; Morozova and Marra 2008).
Illumina/Solexa sequencing is similar to the Sanger-based methods, because it uses terminator nucleotides incorporated by a DNA polymerase. However, Solexa terminators are reversible, allowing continuation of polymerization after fluorophore detection and deactivation. Sheared DNA fragments are immobilized on a solid surface (flow-cell channel), and solid-phase amplification is performed. At the end of the sequencing run (4 days), the sequence of each cluster is computed and subjected to quality filtering to eliminate low-quality reads. A typical run yields about 40–50 Mb (typical read length of 50–300 bp; Varshney et al. 2009; El-Metwally et al. 2014).
The availability of these NGS assays means that they should now be used to examine the presence of pathogens on or in seeds, especially 454 sequencing that has already been proven to identify fungi on seeds; they may be proved useful in the future for routine seed diagnosis.
3.5 Other Newly Developed Diagnostic Techniques
3.5.1 Biospeckle Laser Technique
A recently applied tool that can reveal the presence of pathogenic fungi on seeds is known as the ‘biospeckle’ laser technique. This technique is based on the optical phenomenon of interference that is generated by a laser light that interacts with the seed coat. Examination of seeds under laser light allows the identification of areas with different activities (Braga et al. 2005; Rabelo et al. 2011). As fungi present on the seeds have biological activity, this method can detect their presence on seeds.
3.5.2 Videometer Lab Instrument
One more recently developed tool called videometer lab instrument that can distinguish infected seeds from healthy seeds is a multispectral vision system also useful to determine the colour, texture and chemical composition of seed surfaces (Boelt et al. 2018). The combinations of the features from images captured by visible light wavelengths and near-infrared wavelengths were worthwhile in the separation of healthy spinach seeds from seeds infected by Stemphylium botryosum, Cladosporium spp., Fusarium spp., Verticillium spp. or A. alternata (Olesen et al. 2011). Seed quality of castor (Ricinus communis L.) based on seed coat colour was predicted employing multispectral imaging technology using VideometerLab instrument. This technology was able to distinguish viable seeds from dead seeds with 92% accuracy, suggesting its utility for seed deterioration caused by fungal pathogens (Olesen et al. 2015).
4 Summary
Seed health has become an important quarantine issue, mainly in the international movement of seeds and germplasm exchange. Thus, it is essential to make sure that no potentially damaging pathogens are established on seeds. Conventional seed detection methods including visual examination, selective media, seedling grow-out assay and the serological assays have been used extensively, but all have limitations like inefficiency and sensitivity. The molecular methods have shown great potential for improving pathogen detection in seeds as it embodies many of the key characteristics including specificity, sensitivity, rapidity, ease of implementation, interpretation and applicability. PCR and its modifications including Bio-PCR and MCH-PCR may offer opportunities to evade inhibitory compounds while improving detection of seed-borne pathogens. Further, reduced cost and more efficiency will ultimately allow DNA-based detection methods to replace the vast range of seed detection assays presently engaged and will provide advanced detection abilities essential for healthy seedling establishment. A comparative analysis of various seed detection methods based on the time required for completion, sensitivity, ease of application and specificity along with the examples of fungi detected on seeds using the particular technique has been summarized below in Table 5.4.
5 Challenges and Future Directions
Besides the unique advantages offered by the various seed/plant disease detection methods, each method has its own limitations. Before adopting these assays, it is critical to rigorously evaluate their applicability, precision and accuracy in real-world, high-throughput testing of naturally infested seeds. To ensure that these assays work, they must be validated in stringent multilaboratory tests which evaluate their reproducibility and repeatability. Only assays evaluated in this manner should be considered for testing of commercial seeds.
6 Conclusion
In this chapter, we reviewed the currently existing methods for detection of seed-borne fungal phytopathogens. Although the conventional methods are widely used for the detection of seed-borne fungal phytopathogen presently, they are relatively difficult to operate, require expert technicians and are time-consuming for data analysis. Ultimately, improved protocols based upon PCR, ELISA, etc. will be available for the detection of all seed-borne pathogens and may supersede conventional detection methods.
References
Afouda L, Wolf G, Wydra K (2009) Development of a sensitive serological method for specific detection of latent infection of Macrophomina phaseolina in cowpea. J Phytopathol 157(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2008.01453.x
Agarwal VK, Sinclair JB (1997) Principles of seed pathology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 539
Agarwal VK, Singh OV (1974) Routine testing of crop seeds for Fusarium moniliforme with a selective medium. Seed Res 2:19–22
Agarwal VK, Srivastava AK (1981) A simpler technique for routine examination of rice seed lots for rice bunt. Seed Technol News 11(3):1–2
Agarwal VK, Verma HS, Singh SB (1978) Techniques for detection of loose smut infection in wheat seeds. Seed Technol News 8(3):1
Aggarwal R, Gupta S, Banerjee S et al (2011) Development of a SCAR marker for detection of Bipolaris sorokiniana causing spot blotch of wheat. Can J Microbiol 57(11):934–942. https://doi.org/10.1139/w11-089
Alborch L, Bragulat MR, Cabanes FJ (2010) Comparison of two selective culture media for the detection of Fusarium infection in conventional and transgenic maize kernels. Lett Appl Microbiol 50(3):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02787.x
Alves MDC, Pozza EA (2009) Scanning electron microscopy applied to seed-borne fungi examination. Microsc Res Tech 72(7):482–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20695
Amatulli MT, Spadaro D, Gullino ML et al (2010) Molecular identification of Fusarium spp. associated with bakanae disease of rice in Italy and assessment of their pathogenicity. Plant Pathol 59(5):839–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02319.x
Andrew S, Pitt JI (1986) Selective medium for isolation of Fusarium species and dematiaceous hyphomycetes from cereals. Appl Environ Microbiol 51(6):1235–1238
Ball SFL, Reeves JC (1991) The application of new techniques in the rapid testing for seed-borne pathogens. Plant Var Seeds 4:169–176
Banks JN, Cox SJ, Northway BJ (1993) Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to field and storage fungi. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 32(1–3):137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-8305(93)90046-5
Barba M, Czosnek H, Hadidi A (2014) Historical perspective, development and applications of next-generation sequencing in plant virology. Viruses 6(1):106–136. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6010106
Boelt B, Shrestha S, Salimi Z et al (2018) Multispectral imaging – a new tool in seed quality assessment? Seed Sci Res 28(3):222–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258518000235
Booth C (1971) The genus Fusarium. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, p 237
Braga RA Jr, Rabelo GF, Granato LR et al (2005) Detection of fungi in beans by the laser biospeckle technique. Biosyst Eng 91(4):465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.05.006
Chadha S, Gopalakrishna T (2006) Detection of Magnaporthe grisea in infested rice seeds using polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Microbiol 100:1147–1153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02920.x
Chamberlain JS, Gibbs RA, Ranier JE et al (1988) Deletion screening of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 16(23):11141–11156. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.23.11141
Chang GH, Yu RC (1997) Rapid immunoassay of fungal mycelia in rice and corn. J Chin Agric Chem Soc 35:533–539
Chen RS, Tsay JG, Huang YF et al (2002) Polymerase chain reaction-mediated characterization of molds belonging to the Aspergillus flavus group and detection of Aspergillus parasiticus in peanut kernels by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. J Food Prot 65(5):840–844
Chen YY, Conner RL, Gillard CL et al (2007) A specific and sensitive method for the detection of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in dry bean tissue. Plant Dis 91(10):1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-10-1271
Chilvers MI, du Toit LJ, Akamatsu H et al (2007) A real-time, quantitative PCR seed assay for Botrytis spp. that cause neck rot of onion. Plant Dis 91(5):599–608. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-5-0599
Cilliers AJ, Swart WJ, Wingfield MJ (1994) Selective media for isolating Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Plant Dis 78:1052–1055
Clark MF, Adams AN (1977) Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol 34(3):475–483
Consolo VF, Albani CM, Berón CM et al (2009) A conventional PCR technique to detect Septoria tritici in wheat seeds. Australas Plant Pathol 38(3):222–227. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP08099
Cunfer BM, Manandhar JB (1992) Use of a selective medium for isolation of Stagonospora nodorum from barley seed. Phytopathology 82:788–791. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-82-788
Dai T, Shen H, Zheng XB (2016) Establishment and evaluation of a TEF1-α based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detection of Phomopsis longicolla. Australas Plant Pathol 45(3):335–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0415-6
De Rossi RL, Reis EM (2014) Semi-selective culture medium for Exserohilum turcicum isolation from corn seeds. Summa Phytopathol 40(2):163–167. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-5405/1925
de Temp J (1953) The blotter method of seed health testing programme. ISTA 28:133–151
Deshpande GD (1993) Development of medium for selective expression of Curvularia lunata in sorghum seed health testing. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 18:142–143
Dewey FM (1992) Detection of plant-invading fungi by monoclonal antibodies. In: Duncan JM, Torrance L (eds) Techniques for the rapid detection of plant pathogens. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 47–63
Dhingra OD, Sediyama C, Carraro IM et al (1978) Behavior of four soybean cultivars to seed infecting fungi in delayed harvest. Fitopatol Bras 3:277–382
Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH (1980) Compendium of soil fungi, vol 1. Academic Press, London, p 860
Doyer LC (1938) Manual for the determination of seed-borne diseases. International Seed Testing Association, Wageningen, p 59
Duressa D, Rauscher G, Koike ST et al (2012) A real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae in spinach seed. Phytopathology 102(4):443–451. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-10-11-0280
Edwards SG, Seddon B (2001) Selective media for the specific isolation and enumeration of Botrytis cinerea conidia. Lett Appl Microbiol 32(2):63–66
Eibel P, Wolf GA, Koch E (2005a) Detection of Tilletia caries, causal agent of common bunt of wheat, by ELISA and PCR. J Phytopathol 153(5):297–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2005.00973.x
Eibel P, Wolf GA, Koch E (2005b) Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of loose smut of barley (Ustilago nuda). Eur J Plant Pathol 111:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-004-1421-z
El-Metwally S, Osama OM, Mohamed H (2014) Next generation sequencing technologies and challenges in sequence assembly. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0715-1
Ellis MB (1971) Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes, 1st edn. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, p 608. isbn-13: 978-0851986180
Fang Y, Ramasamy RP (2015) Current and prospective methods for plant disease detection. Biosensors 5(3):537–561. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios5030537
Faria CB, Abe CA, da Silva CN et al (2012) New PCR assays for the identification of Fusarium verticillioides, Fusarium subglutinans, and other species of the Gibberella fujikuroi complex. Int J Mol Sci 13(1):115–132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13010115
Feng C, Mansouri S, Bluhm BH et al (2014) Multiplex real-time PCR assays for detection of four seed borne spinach pathogens. J Appl Microbiol 117(2):472–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12541
Fountaine JM, Shaw MW, Napier B et al (2007) Application of real-time and multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays to study leaf blotch epidemics in barley. Phytopathology 97:297–303
Fu G, Huang SL, Wei JG et al (2007) First record of Jatropha podagrica gummosis caused by Botryodiplodia theobromae in China. Aust Plant Dis Notes 2(1):75–76. https://doi.org/10.1071/DN07030
Fu S, Qu G, Guo S et al (2011) Applications of loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 163(7):845–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9088-8
Fukuta S, Iida T, Mizukami Y et al (2003) Detection of Japanese yam mosaic virus by RT-LAMP. Arch Virol 148(9):1713–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-003-0134-5
Fukuta S, Ohishi K, Yoshida K et al (2004) Development of immunocapture reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the detection of Tomato spotted wilt virus from chrysanthemum. J Virol Methods 121(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.05.016
Gao Y, Tan MK, Zhu YG (2016) Rapid and specific detection of Tilletia indica using loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification. Australas Plant Pathol 45(4):361–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0422-7
Gaur A (2011) An introduction to seed pathology. Galgotia Publications Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, p 351
Geiser DM, Klich MA, Frisvad JC et al (2007) The current status of species recognition and identification in Aspergillus. Stud Mycol 59:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2007.59.01
Ghosh R, Nagavardhini A, Sengupta A et al (2015) Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for rapid detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris – wilt pathogen of chickpea. BMC Res Notes 8:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-0997-z
Gleason ML, Ghabrial SA, Ferriss RS (1987) Serological detection of Phomopsis longicolla in soybean seeds. Phytopathology 77:371–375. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-77-371
González-Jaen MT, Mirete S, Patino B et al (2004) Genetic markers for the analysis of variability and for production of specific diagnostic sequences in Fumonisin-producing strains of Fusarium verticillioides. Eur J Plant Pathol 110(5–6):525–532. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJPP.0000032392.20106.81
Guillemette T, Iacomi-Vasilescu B, Simoneau P (2004) Conventional and real-time PCR based assay for detecting pathogenic Alternaria brassicae in cruciferous seed. Plant Dis 88:490–496
Gurjar MS, Aggarwal R, Jogawat A et al (2017) Development of real time PCR assay for the detection and quantification of teliospores of Tilletia indica in soil. Indian J Exp Biol 55(6):549–554
Ha Y, Walcott RR (2008) Simultaneous detection of Pantoea ananatis and Botrytis allii in onion seeds using magnetic capture hybridization and real-time PCR. Phytopathology 98:S64–S65
Ha Y, Fessehaie A, Ling KS et al (2009) Simultaneous detection of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli and Didymella bryoniae in cucurbit seedlots using magnetic capture hybridization and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Phytopathology 99(6):666–678. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-99-6-0666
Haware MP, Nene YL (1982) Races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp ciceri. Plant Dis 66:809–810
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL et al (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 270(1512):313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ et al (1996) Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res 6(10):986–994
Hewett PD (1977) Pretreatment in seed health testing: hypochlorite in the 2,4-D-blotter for Leptosphaeria maculans (Phoma lingam). Seed Sci Technol 5:599
Hiltner L (1917) Technische vorschriften fur die Prufung von saatgut, gultig vom I. Juli 1916 an B Besonderer Teil I. Getreide, Landwirtsch, Verso SIn 89:379–383
Horst RK (2008) Westcott’s plant disease handbook, 7th edn. Springer, Dordrecht
Iacomi-Vasilescu B, Blancard D, Guenard M et al (2002) Development of a PCR-based diagnostic assay for detecting pathogenic Alternaria species in cruciferous seeds. Seed Sci Technol 30:87–95
Ioos R, Fourrier C, Wilson V et al (2012) An optimized duplex real-time PCR tool for sensitive detection of the quarantine oomycete Plasmopara halstedii in sunflower seeds. Phytopathology 102(9):908–917. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-12-0068-R
ISTA (1966) International rules for seed testing. Proc Int Seed Test Assoc 31:1–152
Iwamoto T, Sonobe T, Hayashi K (2003) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. avium and M. intracellulare in sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol 41(6):2616–2622
Jacobsen CS (1995) Microscale detection of specific bacterial DNA in soil with a magnetic capture hybridization and PCR amplification assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(9):3347–3352
Jung B, Lee S, Ha J et al (2013) Development of a selective medium for the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum using toxoflavin produced by the bacterial pathogen Burkholderia glumae. Plant Pathol J 29(4):446–450. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.07.2013.0068
Kachroo P, Leong SA, Chattoo BB (1994) Pot2, an inverted repeat transposon from the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Mol Gen Genet 245(3):339–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290114
Kamil D, Prameela Devi T, Prabhakaran N et al (2015) NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6: a suitable secondary barcode for speciation of genus Fusarium. J Pure Appl Microbiol 9:545–551
Khare MN (1996) Methods to test seeds for associated fungi. Indian Phytopathol 49(4):319–328
Khare MN, Mathur SB, Neergaard P (1977) A seedling symptom test for detection of Septoria nodorum in wheat seed. Seed Sci Technol 5:613–617
Kong P, Hong CX, Richardson PA (2003) Rapid detection of Phytophthora cinnamomi using PCR with primers derived from the Lpv putative storage protein genes. Plant Pathol 52(6):681–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2003.00935.x
Konstantinova P, Bonants PJM, van Gent-Pelzer MPE et al (2002) Development of specific primers for detection and identification of Alternaria spp. in carrot material by PCR and comparison with blotter and plating assays. Mycol Res 106(1):23–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201005160
Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA et al (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(23):8369–8374. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503123102
Kulik MM (1975) Comparison of blotters and guaiacol agar for detection of Helminthosporium oryzae and Trichoconis padwickii in rice seeds. Phytopathology 65(11):1325–1326
Kumar A, Singh A, Garg GK (1998) Development of seed immunoblot binding assay for the detection of Karnal bunt (Tilletia indica) of wheat. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 7(2):119–120
Kumar K, Singh J, Khare A (2004) Detection, location, transmission and management of seed-borne Colletotrichum dematium causing die-back and anthracnose in chilli. Farm Sci J 13(2):152–153
Kutilek V, Lee R, Kitto GB (2001) Development of immunochemical techniques for detecting Karnal bunt in wheat. Food Agric Immunol 13(2):103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540100120055675
Landa BB, Montes-Borrego M, Munoz-Ledesma FJ et al (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of downy mildew pathogens of opium poppy and PCR based in planta and seed detection of Peronospora arborescens. Phytopathology 97(11):1380–1390. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-97-11-1380
Lee HK, Tewari JP, Turkington TK (1999) Histopathology and isolation of Rhynchosporium secalis from infected barley seed. Seed Sci Technol 27(2):477–482
Lee HK, Tewari JP, Turkington TK (2001) A PCR-based assay to detect Rhynchosporium secalis in barley seed. Plant Dis 85:220–225. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.2.220
Lee HK, Tewari JP, Turkington TK (2002) Quantification of seedborne infection by Rhynchosporium secalis in barley using competitive PCR. Plant Pathol 51(2):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2002.00685.x
Leslie JF, Summerell BA (2006) The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell, Ames, p 388
Li S (2011) Phomopsis seed decay of soybean. In: Sudaric A (ed) Soybean – molecular aspects of breeding. In Tech, Rijeka, pp 277–292
Ling KS, Wechter WP, Somai BM et al (2010) An improved real-time PCR system for broad-spectrum detection of Didymella bryoniae, the causal agent of gummy stem blight of cucurbits. Seed Sci Technol 38(3):692–703. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2010.38.3.17
Links MG, Demeke T, Grafenhan T et al (2014) Simultaneous profiling of seed-associated bacteria and fungi reveals antagonistic interactions between microorganisms within a shared epiphytic microbiome on Triticum and Brassica seeds. New Phytol 202(2):542–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12693
Manandhar JB, Cunfer BM (1991) An improved selective medium for the assay of Septoria nodorum from wheat seed. Phytopathology 81:771–773
Mancini V, Murolo S, Romanazzi G (2016) Diagnostic methods for detecting fungal pathogens on vegetable seeds. Plant Pathol 65(5):691–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12515
Mangan A (1971) A new method for the detection of Pleospora bjoerlingii infection of sugarbeet seed. Trans Br Mycol Soc 57(1):169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(71)80096-7
Marcinkowska JZ (2002) Methods of finding and identification of pathogens in seeds. Plant Breed Seed Sci 46(1):31–48
Mardis ER (2008) The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends Genet 24(3):133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.007
Mbofung GCY, Pryor BM (2010) A PCR-based assay for detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae in lettuce seed. Plant Dis 94:860–866
Mehl HL, Epstein L (2007) Identification of Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae race 1 and race 2 with PCR and production of disease-free pumpkin seeds. Plant Dis 91(10):1288–1292. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-10-1288
Mehl HL, Epstein L (2008) Sewage and community shower drains are environmental reservoirs of Fusarium solani species complex group 1, a human and plant pathogen. Environ Microbiol 10(1):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01446.x
Mew T, Bride J, Hibino H et al (1988) Rice pathogens of quarantine importance. In: Proceedings of international workshop on rice seed health. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, pp 101–115
Miller SA, Rittenburg JH, Peterson FP et al (1992) From research bench to the market place: development of commercial diagnostic kits. In: Duncan JM, Torrance L (eds) Techniques for the rapid detection of plant pathogens. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 208–221
Mirzaei S, Goltapeh EM, Shams-Bakhsh M et al (2008) Identification of Botrytis spp. on plants grown in Iran. J Phytopathol 156(1):21–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01317.x
Molouba F, Guimier C, Berthier C (2001) Detection of bean seed-borne pathogens by PCR. Acta Hortic 546:603–607. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.546.84
Montes-Borrego M, Munoz-Ledesma FJ, Jimenez-Díaz RM et al (2009) A nested-polymerase chain reaction protocol for detection and population biology studies of Peronospora arborescens, the downy mildew pathogen of opium poppy, using herbarium specimens and asymptomatic, fresh plant tissues. Phytopathology 99(1):73–81. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-99-1-0073
Montes-Borrego M, Munoz-Ledesma FJ, Jimenez-Diaz RM et al (2011) Real-time PCR quantification of Peronospora arborescens, the opium poppy downy mildew pathogen, in seed stocks and symptomless infected plants. Plant Dis 95(2):143–152. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-10-0499
Mori Y, Kitao M, Tomita N et al (2004) Real-time turbidimetry of LAMP reaction for quantifying template DNA. J Biochem Biophys Methods 59(2):145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2003.12.005
Morozova O, Marra MA (2008) Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics 92:255–264
Mumford R, Boonham N, Tomlinson J et al (2006) Advances in molecular phytodiagnostics – new solutions for old problems. Eur J Plant Pathol 116(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-006-9037-0
Munkvold GP (2009) Seed pathology progress in academia and industry. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:285–311. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081916
Murakishi HH (1951) Purple seed stain of soybean. Phytopathology 41:305–318
Muthaiyan MC (2009) Principles and practices of plant quarantine. Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, p 577
Narayanasamy P (2005) Immunology in plant health and its impact on food safety. The Haworth Press, New York
Nicolaisen M, Justesen AF, Knorr K et al (2014) Fungal communities in wheat grain show significant co-existence patterns among species. Fungal Ecol 11:145–153
Nie X (2005) Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA for detection of Potato virus Y. Plant Dis 89:605–610. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-0605
Niessen L, Vogel RF (2010) Detection of Fusarium graminearum DNA using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay. Int J Food Microbiol 140(2–3):183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.036
Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H et al (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28(12):e63
Olesen MH, Carstensen JM, Boelt B (2011) Multispectral imaging as a potential tool for seed health testing of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Seed Sci Technol 39:140–150
Olesen MH, Nikneshan P, Shrestha S et al (2015) Viability prediction of Ricinus communis L. seeds using multispectral imaging. Sensors 15(2):4592–4604. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150204592
Pastircak M (2007) Fungal diversity of winter wheat ears and seeds in Slovakia. In: Proceeding of the cost Susvar Fusarium workshop: Fusarium diseases in cereals–potential impact from sustainable cropping systems. Velence, Hungary, June 1–2, pp 45–48
Paulsen MR (1990) Using machine vision to inspect oilseeds. Inform 1(1):50–55
Pryor BM, Gilbertson RL (2001) A PCR-based assay for detection of Alternaria radicina on carrot seed. Plant Dis 85:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.1.18
Rabelo GF, Enes AM, Braga RA Jr et al (2011) Frequency response of biospeckle laser images of bean seeds contaminated by fungi. Biosyst Eng 110(3):297–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.09.002
Randall-Schadel BL, Bailey JE, Beute MK (2001) Seed transmission of Cylindrocladium parasiticum in peanut. Plant Dis 85(4):362–370. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.4.362
Raper KB, Fennel DI (1965) The genus Aspergillus. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, p 686
Robideau GP, De Cock AW, Coffey MD et al (2011) DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and internal transcribed spacer. Mol Ecol Resour 11(6):1002–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03041.x
Rohel EA, Payne AC, Hall L et al (1998) Isolation and characterization of α-tubulin genes from Septoria tritici and Rhynchosporium secalis, and comparative analysis of fungal α-tubulin sequences. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 41(3):247–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1998)41:3
Rude SV, Duczek LJ, Seidle E (1999) The effect of Alternaria brassicae, Alternaria raphani and Alternaria alternata on seed germination of Brassica rapa canola. Seed Sci Technol 27(2):795–798
Sachan IP, Agarwal VK (1995) Seed discolouration of rice: location of inoculum and influence on nutritional value. Indian Phytopathol 48(1):14–20
Schaad NW, Cheong SS, Tamaki S et al (1995) A combined biological and enzymatic amplification (BIO-PCR) technique to detect Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola in bean extracts. Phytopathology 85:243–248
Schaad NW, Bonde MR, Hatziloukas E (1997) Bio-PCR: a highly sensitive technique for detecting seed-borne fungi and bacteria. In: Hutchins JP, Reeves JC (eds) Seed health testing. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 159–164
Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S et al (2012) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(16):6241–6246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117018109
Segalin M, Reis EM (2010) Semi-selective medium for Fusarium graminearum detection in seed samples. Summa Phytopathol 36(4):338–341. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-54052010000400010
Seifert KA, Samson RA, de Waard JR et al (2007) Prospects for fungus identification using CO1 DNA barcodes, with Penicillium as a test case. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(10):3901–3906. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611691104
Singh D, Maheshwari VK (2001) Influence of stack burn disease of paddy on seed health status. Seed Res 29(2):205–209
Sint D, Raso L, Traugott M (2012) Advances in multiplex PCR: balancing primer efficiencies and improving detection success. Methods Ecol Evol 3(5):898–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00215.x
Skvortzov S (1937) A simple method for detecting hyphae of loose smut in wheat grains. Zashch Rast (Leningrad) 15:90–91
Sousa MV, Machado JC, Simmons HE et al (2015) Real-time quantitative PCR assays for the rapid detection and quantification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli in Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) seeds. Plant Pathol 64(2):478–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12257
Sousa MV, Siqueira CS, Machado JC (2016) Conventional PCR for detection of Corynespora cassiicola in soybean seeds. J Seed Sci 38(2):085–091. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1545v38n2152049
Taylor E, Bates J, Kenyon D et al (2001a) Modern molecular methods for characterization and diagnosis of seed-borne fungal pathogens. J Plant Pathol 83:75–81
Taylor EJA, Stevens EA, Bates JA et al (2001b) Rapid-cycle PCR detection of Pyrenophora graminea from barley seed. Plant Pathol 50(3):347–355. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00563.x
Thirumalaisamy PP, Singh DV, Aggrawal R et al (2011) Development of species-specific primers for detection of Karnal bunt pathogen of wheat. Indian Phytopathol 64:164
Thompson RS, Aveling TAS, Blanco Prieto R (2013) A new semi-selective medium for Fusarium graminearum, F. proliferatum, F. subglutinans and F. verticillioides in maize seed. S Afr J Bot 84:94–101
Tian Q, Lu C, Wang S et al (2017) Rapid diagnosis of soybean anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum truncatum using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay. Eur J Plant Pathol 148(4):785–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1132-2
Utobo EB, Ogbodo EN, Nwogbaga AC (2011) Seed borne mycoflora associated with rice and their influence on growth at Abakaliki, Southeast Agro-Ecology, Nigeria. Lib Agric Res Cent J Int 2(2):79–84
Varshney RK, Nayak SN, May GD et al (2009) Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol 27(9):522–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.05.006
Venkataramana M, Shilpa P, Balakrishna K et al (2013) Incidence and multiplex PCR based detection of trichothecene chemotypes of Fusarium culmorum isolates collected from freshly harvested maize kernels in southern India. Braz J Microbiol 44(2):401–406. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013000200009
Waalwijk C, Kastelein P, de Vries I et al (2003) Major changes in Fusarium spp. in wheat in the Netherlands. Eur J Plant Pathol 109:743–754. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026086510156
Walcott RR (2003) Detection of seed borne pathogens. HortTechnology 13(1):40–47
Walcott RR, McGee DC, Misra MK (1998) Detection of asymptomatic fungal infections of soybean seeds by ultrasound analysis. Plant Dis 82:584–589
Walcott RR, Gitaitis RD, Langston DB (2004) Detection of Botrytis aclada in onion seed using magnetic capture hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction. Seed Sci Technol 32(2):425–438. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2004.32.2.14
Warham EJ (1986) Karnal bunt disease of wheat: a literature review. Trop Pest Manage 32:229–242
Warham EJ, Butler LD, Sutton BC (1996) Seed testing of maize and wheat: a laboratory guide. CIMMYT, Mexico, p 84
Watanabe T (2002) Pictorial atlas of soil and seed fungi: morphologies of cultured fungi and key to species, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 506
Wu WS, Chen TW (1999) Development of a new selective medium for detecting Alternaria brassicicola in cruciferous seeds. Seed Sci Technol 27:397–409
Zhang AW, Hartman GL, Curio-Penny B et al (1999) Molecular detection of Diaporthe phaseolorum and Phomopsis longicolla from soybean seeds. Phytopathology 89(9):796–804. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.9.796
Zhang Z, Zhang J, Wang Y et al (2005) Molecular detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum and Mycosphaerella melonis in infected plant tissues and soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 249(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.057
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumar, R. et al. (2020). Diagnosis and Detection of Seed-Borne Fungal Phytopathogens. In: Kumar, R., Gupta, A. (eds) Seed-Borne Diseases of Agricultural Crops: Detection, Diagnosis & Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9046-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9046-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9045-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9046-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)