Abstract
Rapid industrialization and urbanization over the past few decades has resulted in the massive contamination of the environmental resources such as air, water, and soil. A wide variety of industrial activities and operation such as discharge or dumping of effluents, accidental leakage and spills, and fugitive emission are responsible for contamination of environment. Heterogeneous compounds generated from industries include organic as well as inorganic anthropogenic compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, alkyl benzenes (benzene, toluene, xylene, and ethyl benzene), volatile organic compounds, persistent organic pollutants, and oxyanions (nitrate, sulfate, chromate, etc.). Nowadays, management of these pollutants in industries with conventional methods is a highly challenging task due to their toxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity and their being recalcitrant to natural degradation. To overcome the challenges associated with the above heterogeneous compounds, a modified biodegradation method could be adopted for the effective elimination of these toxic recalcitrants and their derivatives from the industrial effluents. This chapter aims to describe the emission of recalcitrant from different industries, challenges, accessible treatment techniques with their merits as well as demerits, and realistic approach for treatment of heterogeneous compounds by modified sequential bioreactor system to achieve zero pollutant emission.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
11.1 Introduction
Water is a tremendously available natural resource on the earth. Owing to huge industrialization and urbanization, water pollution becomes a worldwide problem. According to the United Nations world population prospects 2017 revision, the current world population is 7.6 billion which is expected to be 8.6 billion in 2030 and 98 billion in 2050. Based on the population growth rate, requirement of clean and safe water will be more in the forthcoming years. Sustainable and clean water cycles are utmost priority policy of various countries in the world. Therefore, it is the essential requisite for present environment to protect the water from being polluted or to develop any cost-effective method. An illogical and rapid global human activity reverberates into environmental deterioration (Singh and Singh 2019). In the present scenario, enormous development of various types of industries gives rise to economic capital of country but at the same time led to the production of hazardous compounds which has caused global deterioration of ecosystem. These industries use huge amount of potable water for different kinds of industrial processes and release the wastewater which contains numerous hazardous pollutants which affect the flora and fauna. Nowadays, contamination of surface water, land water, ground water, sediments, and air due to their contact with hazardous and toxic chemicals is a serious issue throughout the world (Barcelo and Kostianoy 2016). Generally, pollution is caused by heterogeneous compounds such as organics (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), alkyl benzenes, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs)), inorganics (oxyanions), nutrients, heavy metals, and several micro pollutants with its derivatives such as pesticides, antibiotics, disinfection by-products (DBPs), endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs), personal care products (PCPs), and pharmaceuticals (Bui et al. 2019). All of these pollutants are considered to be the most dangerous due to its intrinsic toxicity, recalcitrant behavior, and high exposure level to the environment. Therefore, these pollutants have been blacklisted and placed on priority list by several environmental protection agencies. However, there is no probability to stop the release of wastewater into the environment. The conventional treatment methods are feasible to reduce the harmful effects of these pollutants. The different physicochemical treatment methods such as chemical precipitation, adsorption, membrane separation process, advanced oxidation process, ozonation, and ion-exchange are available for removal of these toxic pollutants from the environment at full scale (Wang and Chen 2009). However, these treatment techniques have certain limitations depending on the compound to be removed and their efficiency. In that, certain compounds are removed completely by some methods, few compounds are not removed at all, and some are removed partially by these physicochemical treatment methods (Rajasulochana and Preethy 2016). The problems associated with these techniques can be overcome by biodegradation methods. Biodegradation or bioremediation becomes more popular nowadays because they are cost-effective, energy-saving, and eco-friendly for the treatment of wastewater. Bioremediation is a feasible technology for the removal of organic as well as inorganic pollutants by means of microorganism or detoxification of hazardous/toxic chemicals from the environment (Basha et al. 2010; Pandey et al. 2007).
The major goal of bioremediation technology is transformation of organic pollutants into their less toxic metabolites or mineralization into CO2 and water. This microbiological process reduces the hydrocarbon concentration to permissible levels so that there will be any chance of an unacceptable risk to the environment/human health (Talley 2006). Since the last decades, plentiful research has been carried out in order to eliminate these hazardous contaminants from the environment by using appropriate treatment methods. The newer ones are applied additionally to the existing conventional treatment techniques. These methods essentially include an extra step or process or application in the earlier methods to achieve the complete removal of hazardous pollutants. In the last few years, intense research is carried out to investigate the applicability of such advanced treatment technologies not only to remove only organic and inorganic contaminants but also to remove microorganisms, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, viruses, and protozoa from wastewater. This chapter provides knowledge about recent updates in bioremediation of recalcitrant compounds, conventional methods available to treat these toxic recalcitrant compounds with their merits and demerits, and application of newly made technology in context to complete the removal of recalcitrant compounds from the environment.
11.2 Classification of Heterogeneous Compounds
The constituents of wastewater are generally classified as organic and inorganic. Inorganic compound in contrast to organic compound is a chemical compound lacking C-H bonds. Some inorganic compounds comprise of carbon or hydrogen atoms in their molecular structure that are often only considered as inorganics such as carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), cyanides (CN−), thiocyanates (SCN−), carbides (C2−), carbonates (CO3−), water (H2O), and hydrochloric acid (HCl). Mostly inorganic compounds consist of metallic constituents, but not all. In fact, the compounds which are inorganic in nature are found in majority in this universe. The major sources of inorganic compounds (metallic and nonmetallic) in the wastewater are derived from industrial activities, by the addition of mineralized water from wells and groundwater, mining activities, by the release of inorganic chemical wastes, from the farms and agricultural lands, transportation, etc. (Speight 2017).
An organic compound is defined as any chemical compounds which entail carbon and hydrogen atoms also termed as hydrocarbon together covalently linked with oxygen and nitrogen in some cases. In general, molecules of organic compounds are associated with living organism. These typically consist of proteins (40–60%), carbohydrates (25–50%), and oils and fats (8–12%). The broad classifications of heterogeneous compounds are described in the following sections.
11.2.1 Types of Organic Compounds
11.2.1.1 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or PAHs are recalcitrant organic compounds comprising of two or more fused benzene rings in linear, cluster, or angular arrangements. Incomplete combustion at high temperature (500–800 °C) or involvement of organic molecules at low temperature (100–300 °C) results in the formation of PAH compounds. PAH in aquatic system comes from accidental leakage, oil spills, atmospheric deposition on sediments, and release of contaminated sediments. PAH generally occurs in oil, coal, and tar deposits. With the increase in molecular weight, their concentration decreases in water owing to their very less hydrophilic property, although they are still the most problematic substances as they pose toxicity threat on ecosystem due to their carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic nature (Haritash and Kaushik 2009).
11.2.1.2 Alkyl Benzenes
Alkyl benzene or monocyclic aromatics with saturated side chains constitute important class of hydrocarbons. The alkyl benzenes are derivative of benzene in that more than one hydrogen atoms are replaced by alkyl groups of various structures. They are considered as substitute of aromatic hydrocarbons (Francis 1948). The term BTX refers to the mixture of benzene, toluene, and three xylene isomers (ortho, meta, and para) and together comes under the category of aromatic hydrocarbons from the effluent of petroleum refining and petrochemical industries. If ethyl benzene is included in the mixture, the referred mixture is known as BTEX. Benzene, toluene, xylene, and ethyl benzene can be made by several processes. Nevertheless, huge amount of BTEX is produced from the recovery of aromatics during the catalytic reforming of naphtha in petroleum refinery industries. Also, formation of cracked naphtha by steam cracking of hydrocarbons is also responsible for the production of BTX compounds.
11.2.1.3 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Volatile organic compound or VOC is any organic chemical compound that has a very high vapor pressure (> 1 mm Hg) at ordinary room temperature (25 °C). The high vapor pressure is due to its low boiling point which causes molecules to evaporate or sublimate at bulk. VOC is categorized in three different ways:
-
Very volatile organic compounds (VVOCs)
-
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
-
Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs)
More volatility of compounds is directly related to the higher degree of emission from the surface. Very volatile organic compounds are highly volatile in nature, hence it is difficult to measure, and are found mostly as gases in the air rather than in any kind of materials or on the surfaces. Propane, butane, and methyl chloride are examples of VVOCs (boiling point 50–100 °C), whereas formaldehyde, acetone, ethanol, and hexanol whose boiling point ranges from 50–100 to 240–260 °C are known as VOCs. SVOC boiling point ranges from 240–260 to 380–400 °C, and examples are pesticides, plasticizers, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), etc. (USEPA regulations 2019). Volatile organic compounds are of great environmental concern because being in a vapor state, it is very mobile and easily incorporated into the environment. In addition to that, the release of these compounds into public area like treatment plant causes severe effects to plant workers.
11.2.1.4 Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are of global environmental concern owing to their persistence to environmental degradation, potential for long-term transport, accumulation in the food chain, as well as toxic adverse effects on human health and environment. In general, human being comes in contact with these hazardous compounds in several ways such as food, breathing of air, outdoors, and indoor workplace. POPs are contained in our usable products for daily living (flame retardants, surfactants) which are generally added in order to enhance the product quality. So, it can be said that POPs are available everywhere in this earth in considerable amount. The very much known examples of POPs are pesticides such as DDT, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), dioxins, and dibenzofuran. Human exposure to these compounds causes risk of cancer, reproductive disorders, disruption of immune systems, etc. (WHO database 2019; Morabet 2018).
11.2.2 Types of Inorganic Compounds
11.2.2.1 Nitrate
Nitrate, the most highly oxidized form of nitrogen, is an inorganic substance which is formed naturally when nitrogen combines with oxygen or ozone. Nitrogen is essential for the growth of microorganisms, plants, and animals because it works as nutrient or stimulator for them. It is a common contaminant of drinking water and creates serious health problems if present in excessively high concentrations (Seferlis 2008). Nitrate is commonly present in the surface and ground water because it is an end product during aerobic decomposition of organic nitrogenous matter. Significant sources of nitrates include fertilizers, animal feedlots, septic systems, industrial waste, food waste, and drainage from livestock feedlots.
11.2.2.2 Sulfates
In natural environment, sulfur is present in the form of pyrite (FeS2) and gypsum in sediment (CaSO4), whereas sulfates occur naturally in several minerals includes barite (BaSO4) and epsomite (MgSO4.7H2O). Point sources of sulfates are sewage treatment plant and municipal or industrial discharge such as tanneries, pulp mills, and textile mills, runoff from fertilized agricultural lands, production of pharmaceutical products, fermentation process, and mining process. Sulfates are generally used in the production of fertilizers, dyes, soaps, shampoos, insecticides, fungicides, sedimentation agents, and plating industries (Klok et al. 2013; Jarvis and Younger 2000). Their solubility in water depends on covalent bonds with specific element like magnesium, potassium and sodium sulfates are more soluble, whereas barium and calcium sulfates and some heavy metals are sparingly soluble in water. Similar to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycle, a new platform of sulfur-based technologies incorporated with sulfur cycle was developed for the simultaneous removal of possible contaminants like sulfate, carbon, phosphorus, metals, and nitrogen from wastewater (Hao et al. 2014).
11.2.2.3 Heavy Metals
Heavy metals are naturally occurring substances which possess high atomic weight and density relatively more than water. By taking into consideration or assumptions that heaviness and toxicity are correlated, it also includes metalloids such as arsenic which is very toxic at low level of exposure. Environmental contamination by heavy metals nowadays becomes an ecological and global public health concern. Their multiple applications in various places such as industrial, agricultural, domestic, and technological application are responsible for the huge distribution in the environment. The effluent from mining regions generally contains lead, arsenic, copper, chromium, cadmium, and zinc. The release of these heavy metals into the environment leads to contamination of soil, water, and agricultural land (accumulation of metals on food crops and plants) (Verma and Kaur 2016). Among all the above-mentioned heavy metals, chromate is considered as one of the human carcinogen via inhalation. It has high environmental mobility, and it can develop from anthropogenic and natural sources. The major sources of chromium and its derivatives come from chemical industries, dye production, preservation of wood, leather tanning, manufacturing of various alloys, and chrome plating (Zhitkovich 2011).
11.3 Effluents from Various Industries
Tremendously, the main important sources of the pollution of environment are industrial effluent or discharge. A huge amount of wastewater is dumped into the rivers, coastal areas, lakes, and nearby water bodies. Based on different industries and contaminant, there are various types of industrial wastewater; each sector produces its own specific combination of pollutants (Walakira and Okat-okumu 2011). In general industries discharge two types of wastewater such as organic and inorganic industrial wastewater.
11.3.1 Inorganic Wastewater
The main source of industrial inorganic wastewater is coal and steel industry, electroplating plants, iron picking works, commercial enterprises, and nonmetallic industries. This wastewater comprises huge amount of heavy metals, suspended matter, less COD, slag, etc. Mainly inorganic wastewater is produced by the following industries:
-
Electric power plants
-
Battery manufacturing plant
-
Iron and steel industry
-
Mines and quarries
-
Textile and leather industries
-
Microelectronic plant
11.3.2 Organic Industrial Wastewater
Organic industrial wastewater chiefly entails organic waste from those chemical industries which use organic substances for incorporating chemical reactions. The organic wastewater can be removed by means of biological treatment. The industries producing organic wastewaters are as follows:
-
Pharmaceuticals, organic dye-stuffs
-
Pesticides and herbicides, glue and adhesives, textiles
-
Tanneries and leather industries
-
Pulp and paper and cellulose manufacturing plants
-
Oil refining industries
-
Petrochemical industries
-
Food and dairy industries
-
Brewery and fermentation factories
-
Iron and steel industry
11.4 Toxic Effects of Heterogeneous Pollutants
In this section, the different types of organic and inorganic pollutants coming from various industries as well as their toxic effects are demonstrated. The receiving water bodies are polluted by the effluent discharged from industries rendering them unsuitable for drinking and any other purposes. Table 11.1 shows the adverse effects caused by various kinds of pollutants.
11.5 Physicochemical Treatment Techniques with Merits and Demerits
Generally, conventional wastewater treatment method comprises of a combination of physical and chemical processes for the removal of contaminates. The evolution of physicochemical process came in the late 1950s and at the start of 1960s. During that time for the removal of BOD and suspended solids sedimentation, sand filtration, various types of filters such as press, drum, and cartridge filters, coagulation and flocculation processes were used. In between 1980s and 1990s, absorption using activated carbon was adopted by some researchers for nitrification and BOD removal. In the past two decades, membrane processes such as micro-, ultra- and nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and advanced oxidation process come into the scenario for possible removal of emerging pollutants in tertiary treatment (Dezotti et al. 2011). Different types of physicochemical treatment methods available for removal of heterogeneous pollutants with their merits and demerits are presented in Table 11.2.
11.6 Bioremediation
According to United States of Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), bioremediation is spontaneous or managed process which involves living microorganism to degrade or transformation of contaminants into less toxic or nontoxic forms, therefore remedying or eliminating from environmental (EPA 1994). The major goal of bioremediation is to stimulate organism with supplement of essential nutrients that enables them to detoxify or destroy the contaminants. Transformation of organic contaminants through microorganism normally occurs due to organism used pollutants or contaminants for self-growth and reproduction because it works as carbon source or food for them and it provides electrons so that organism can extract to obtain energy. Microorganism gains energy through catalyzing energy-releasing chemical reactions which involves breakdown of chemical bonds and transfer of electrons away from the environment. There are two types of bioremediation:
-
In situ bioremediation: It refers to remediation at the point of origin. The advantage of in situ bioremediation is that it prevents the spreading of contaminants during transportation.
-
Ex situ bioremediation: It refers to remediation when the contaminated waste has been removed from the treatment place. It helps to control the bioremediation products and making the contaminated area free for use.
11.6.1 Conventional Bioremediation Techniques/Reactors
11.6.1.1 Continuous Stirred-Tank Bioreactors (CSTB)
In the continuous stirred-tank bioreactor, the contents of the vessel no longer vary with time, so that microorganism remains in the bioreactor. The most successful continuous systems are with yeasts and bacteria, in that the desired products are the cells or primary metabolite of the compound. Activated sludge process is the most widely used CSTB process in wastewater treatment. Chemostat is a type of CSTB which is used to culture microorganism and study the basic biochemical properties of microbes. In this reactor, liquid is continuously introduced and taken off from the reactor. The main characteristic of ideal CSTB is that the concentration of microorganism and substrates is uniform everywhere throughout the reactor. It is generally used for anaerobic and aerobic treatment of high concentration of organic and inorganic mixtures (Rittmann and McCarty 2012). The removal of various hydrocarbons from industrial wastewater by using mixed microbial consortium in a CSTB is reported in the literature (Gargouri et al. 2011; Geerdink et al. 1996). The schematic representation of CSTB is shown in Fig. 11.1.
11.6.1.2 Fluidized Bed Bioreactors
In the fluidized bed reactor, attachments of microorganism to the carrier are maintained in suspension by upward flow rate of fluid which needs to be treated. The microorganisms attached to the substance are known as biofilm carriers. These may be granular activated carbon (GAC), sand grains, gravels, diatomaceous earth, or any other solids which are resistant to abrasion. Due to upward velocity of the fluid, carriers are in continuous suspension which depends upon the relative density of the carrier to water. The fluidized bed reactor has the advantage to continuously withdraw products and introduce reactants due to its nature of being fluidized. In continuous process, this reactor allows the manufacturers to produce different products more efficiently rather than batch process. Fluidized bed bioreactors are extensively used for many industrial wastewater treatments such as petroleum wastewater, textile industry effluent, and real acid mine drainage water (Balagi and Poongothai 2012; Banerjee and Ghoshal 2016; Sahinkaya et al. 2011). The basic structure of fluidized bed reactor is shown in Fig. 11.2.
11.6.1.3 Packed Bed Bioreactor
Generally, packed bed bioreactors are used for aerobic treatment of wastewater in the form of trickling filters. Packed bed reactor is the most common biofilm reactor in which carrier media are stationary. Various kinds of packed bed materials such as rock, slag, plastics, and ceramic can be procured from the commercial market based on the size and requirement according to specific reactors. The arrangement of packing materials in the packed bed reactors can be continuous or in multiple stages. Packed bed reactors can be used for removal of nitrate in denitrification process and also in anaerobic treatment for highly concentrated industrial wastewater. Higher volumetric loading is possible in packed bed reactor. Biodegradation of chlorophenol and fluorine polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in packed bed bioreactor system has been reported in the literature by using mixed bacterial consortium and LDPE immobilized Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, respectively (Zilouei et al. 2006; Sonwani et al. 2019). Pictorial representation of packed bed reactor is given in Fig. 11.3.
11.6.1.4 Membrane Bioreactor
Membrane bioreactors are basically developed after the ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, microfiltration, and reverse osmosis. In membrane bioreactor, the soluble enzyme and substrate are introduced on one side of the membrane, and from the other side, the product is forced out through the membrane (Fig. 11.4). It is operated with microorganism agglomerated in the form of flocs and preserved in suspension by stirring. The membrane acts as a selective barrier to these flocs. This bioreactor permits the separation of flocs (sludge) from the aqueous phase to relative phase. Recently developed submerged membrane bioreactor shows the reduction of energy consumption. In this, hollow fiber membrane module is submerged in the bioreactor system operated in different environmental conditions, i.e., anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic. Ammonia and phenol up to 1000 mg/L can be removed by using aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor as reported by (Rezakazemi et al. 2018).
11.7 Factors Affecting Biodegradation
11.7.1 Temperature
Temperature is one of the important environmental factors, which can alter the biodegradation ability of the microbes. Different types of microbes can survive in wide range of temperature. The temperature can alter the kinetics. Hence the optimization of temperature is quite essential for conducting biodegradation process. The temperature dependency of reaction rate constant can be estimated by Van’t Hoff-Arrhenius relationship (Metcalf and Eddy 2014). The increasing in the temp increases the rate of biodegradation. Most of the fungus and algae are well grow in lower temperature. PAH compounds can be easily biodegraded at high thermophilic range (55 °C). Manzano et al. (1999) have reported about the biodegradation of nonylphenolpolyethoxylate where the growth rate increases with increase in temperature (i.e., 8.936 at 25 °C). Bacterial growth rate is double for each 10 °C hike. At higher temperature the degradation of aromatic compound was more due to the higher metabolic activity and higher bacterial density. Bauer and Capone (1985) reported that the temperature and oxygen content are two important rate-limiting factors for mineralization of PAH compounds. Armenante et al. (1999) discussed about the effect of temperature on the degradation of halogenated phenolic compounds. The rate of dehalogenation increased with increasing in temperature from 25 to 30 °C. The high phenol degradation has been reported by using P. putida at 30°C. Here, the rate of degradation increases with increase in temperature (El-Naas et al. 2009).
11.7.2 pH
pH plays a vital role for biodegradation as well as biodeterioration. Lower pH is excellent for the microbial attack. The pH range for the biological growth is 6.5–7.8. The pH of the medium gradually drops down when the growth of the microbes is good. The higher pH inhibits the algal growth (Falkiewicz-Dulik et al. 2015). From the earlier reported literature, PAH compound (phenanthrene) easily degraded at acidic pH (6.5) using M. vanbaalenii PYR-1 (Kim et al. 2005). Similarly, Dursun and Tepe (2005) reported that phenol removal and microbial (Ralstonia eutropha) growth rate is high at pH 7, but it decreases at acidic and alkaline pH.
11.7.3 C/N Ratio
Microbes require nutrient for their cell growth and replication. If the carbon source is more or less, it affects the overall growth of microbes. Carbon source is an important factor for nitrification/denitrification reaction. The nitrification efficiency and dynamic behavior of nitrifiers and heterotrophs are greatly affected by C/N ratio (Wang et al. 2009). At high C/N ratio, the growth rate of the heterotrophs is more than the nitrifiers (Xia et al. 2008). Hence, the nitrification process is getting retarded in the biodegradation process.
11.7.4 F/M Ratio
Food/microbes ratio is one of the important factors to investigate about the efficacy of the wastewater treatment system. F/M ratio can be adjusted by changing recirculation ratio. Lesser F/M ratio prevents induction of enzymes, and higher F/M ratio is toxic for the microbes, hence increasing the lag phase. The food is considered as COD and BOD loading to the treatment system and microbes present in the existing system. F/M ratio of 0.75 is adequate for biodegradation of phenol in anaerobic condition (Hussain et al. 2009). F/M ratio can also affect the sludge granule size which is important for the aerobic process. High F/M ratio makes faster and bigger size granules (Li et al. 2011).
11.8 Types of Bioprocess
11.8.1 Suspended Growth Process
In this process the microbes used to treat the wastewater are in the form of suspension and by means of mechanical mixing or aeration. The mixed liquor suspended sludge coming from the reactor to the clarifier contains high amount of active microbes which is subjected to recycle to the reactor as seed sludge. The activated sludge process is an example of the suspended growth process which is generally used for the municipal wastewater treatment process. In the suspended growth process, maximum percentage of solids can be separated by gravity settling. In aerobic system the heterotrophic bacteria produce polymeric material in the form of flocks which is continuously circulated through the reactor and comes in contact with the oxidizing organic pollutant. The main objectives of the activated sludge process are to remove the maximum possible oxidizable material and produce biological flocks. These two important factors should be considered at the time of optimization of aerobic suspended growth process. Multiple pollutants such as phenol, cresol, xylenol, quinoline, indole, and cyanide coming in coke oven wastewater are efficiently treated using aerobic suspended growth process (Sharma et al. 2018). Degradation of phenanthrene is also reported using mixed microbial culture under aerobic condition (Yuan et al. 2000).
11.8.2 Attached Growth Process
In this process the microbes are attached to a support medium, and the support medium can be a fixed one or a moving one. The microorganisms degrade the organic material and form a biofilm through which it is attached to the support material. The excess growth of biomass is sloughed from the carrier material and allowed for disposal. Tricking filter, rotating biological contactor, and fluidized bed reactor are the examples of attached growth process. In the past few years, the attached growth process is considered to be the most promising treatment system in the field of environmental engineering. Passive aerated biological filter is one of the emerging treatment systems for the high organic loading wastewater which helps to reduce the energy cost of treatment process (Ismali and Twafik 2016; Abou-Elela et al. 2019). Different types of carrier materials such as jute fiber, plastic fiber, and polyester fiber are effectively used as carrier materials for successfully treating the slaughter house and other wastewaters (Aziz et al. 2018; Rodriguez et al. 2011).
11.9 Modified Bioremediation Techniques for Heterogeneous Compounds
11.9.1 Sequential Bioreactor (SBR) System
Sequential bioreactor system has drawn the attention of many researchers due to its innovative applications in the wastewater treatment. In this treatment more than one reactor is connected series. Sequential bioreactors work on different modes such as filling, mixing, reacting, sedimenting, and decanting. These reactors can be used in various biochemical environments like organic removal followed by nitrification and denitrification. This type of reactors mainly used for removal of toxic organics as well as nitrogen and other inorganic pollutants. Based on the characteristic of the wastewater hydraulic retention time, organic loading rate and sludge retention time can be changed in sequential bioreactor system. Nowadays researchers pay more attention to hybrid treatment systems for wastewater management. Combinations of attached and suspended growth systems are together used in SBR to handle high organic loading (textile industry effluent) and shock loading problems (Shoukat et al. 2019).
11.9.2 Anammox Process
It is also one of the innovative biological treatment processes to treat the ammonia-nitrogen-rich wastewater. In this process, ammonium ion is oxidized into nitrogen gas under anaerobic condition where autotrophic bacteria oxidized and converted inorganic carbon to cellular carbon using nitrite as electron acceptor (Rittmann and McCarty 2012). Anammox process has been used to treat landfill leachate, coke oven wastewater, and pharmaceutical wastewater (Liang et al. 2009; Toh and Ashbolt 2002; Tang et al. 2011). The first full-scale anammox treatment plant was established and operated in the Netherlands (Jin et al. 2012). Anammox bacteria possess slow growth rate and less yield and are very much sensitive to other environment conditions. Hence, it is difficult to grow the anammox bacteria and maintain suitable environment for this process which is the main drawback of this process. Excess amount of ammonium-nitrogen also shows the inhibitory impact to the anammox bacteria. The release of free ammonia from the anammox process leads to reduce the process efficiency. Synergistic effect of anammox bacterial with denitrifying bacteria is also mentioned in literature. But it is difficult to maintain the dissolved oxygen and pH in a single reactor. Therefore to overcome these issues, the pH of this process should be always maintained at neutral condition. Some additional pretreatment techniques must be adopted to treat the inhibitory compounds present along with other pollutants. Anammox sludge should be intermittently added to maintain the good quantity of anammox bacteria within the reactor. Dissolved oxygen is also a key factor for anammox process; therefore air saturation level should be maintained between 2% and 18% (Jin et al. 2012).
11.9.3 SHARON Process
SHARON (single reactor system for high ammonium removal over nitrite) process is used to treat high-nitrogen-comprising wastewater. This process takes place at high temperature (35 °C) using intermittently aerated CSTB with less retention time. Both AOB (ammonia oxidizing bacteria) and NOB (Nitrite oxidizing bacteria) are essential to operate this system. NOB is commonly washed out due to less retention time and therefore nitrite only formed in SHARON reactor that reduces the pH. This process needs only less than 25% of oxygen and 40% of carbon source to convert the nitrite from ammonia than nitrate (Van Dongen et al. 2001). SHARON process coupled with anammox process is used to treat the landfill leachate and refinery wastewater which contain high amount of nitrogen with cyanide, phenol, and sulfide (Shalini and Joseph 2018; Milia et al. 2012). Here, SHARON process used followed by anammox process.
11.9.4 Moving Bed Bioreactor (MBBR)
MBBR technology developed from the activated sludge process and bio filter process. In MBBR different types of carrier material were used over which the biomass can grow. MBBR is connected in series to establish the sequential MBBR to achieve the continuous contact of biomass with pollutants. Selection of biomass carrier material in MBBR is one of the key factors which enhance the growth of biomass with higher surface area (e.g., polyurethane foam, polyethylene media, etc.). MBBR can also be operated in different environments (i.e., anaerobic, aerobic, and anoxic). Biomass in MBBR can be in suspended or attached form. This process has many advantages such as no sludge bulking issues, less sludge production, and resistance to higher organic loading and shows very good removal efficiency. MBBR is successfully used for treatment of slaughter house and refinery wastewater. Coke oven wastewater containing a variety of pollutants and phenolic wastewater can also be efficiently treated by MBBR (Sahariah et al. 2016; Borghai and Hosseini 2004). It can be used as potential treatment technique with high sludge retaining time.
11.9.5 Modern Hybrid Systems
Combination of two or more treatments combined in a single system to achieve the zero pollutant discharge is called as hybrid treatment system. For instance, (a) suspended cum attached growth process and (b) sequential bioreactor combined with physicochemical reactor are some of the familiar hybrid systems. Use of the biological process in real field at higher scale is a big challenge for the environmental engineers due to the persistence nature. Recently researchers have developed many novel hybrid techniques to handle the multi-toxic compounds. In this context three-stage anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic and four-stage anaerobic-anoxic-oxic-oxic bioreactors have been developed and successfully used for treatment of refractory chemical and PAH compounds present in coke oven wastewater (Zhou et al. 2017, 2018). Novel integrated hybrid treatment approach is also an advanced treatment strategy in the field of environmental engineering. Recently, Ren et al. (2019) have reported that integrated hybrid process can be used as efficient technique to treat the PAHs, phenols, BTEXs, and heterocyclic compounds coming from coking wastewater reclamation plant. In this study, anaerobic-aerobic-coagulation-sand filter-ultrafiltration- adsorption-nanofiltration-RO system has been proposed to target each pollutant for efficient removal in a specific unit according to its characteristics.
The addition of gas absorption unit in the hybrid process can be another value addition to the integrated hybrid treatment system. Recently, a potential hybrid system has been developed in the field of biological wastewater treatment which is known as integrated biophysical hybrid reactor system (Anandkumar 2016). It is a combination of sequential physical and biological process. The integrated biophysical hybrid reactor system is established for the remediation of high loading of organic and inorganic pollutants or heterogeneous pollutants resulting from various processes of industries. This hybrid reactor comprises of three units, namely, anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic sequential bioreactor, gas absorption unit, and polishing unit. The integrated biophysical hybrid reactor system is shown in Fig. 11.5. In the first step, a three-stage anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic sequential bioreactor system is used wherein each reactor consists of three equal sections packed with sponge cubes as biomass carrier to obtain the maximum pollutant removal efficiency. Secondly, in gas absorption unit low-cost and recyclable adsorbent is used for the removal of various gaseous by-products coming from the anaerobic and anoxic units. In the third stage, surface-modified coal fly ash-based cationic and anionic ceramic adsorbents are packed in the inbuilt cationic-anionic polishing unit to achieve the zero pollutant discharge in the effluent after treatment.
11.10 Conclusion and Future Scope
This chapter describes the different types of heterogeneous pollutants coming from industrial effluents and their toxic effects. Various physicochemical treatment techniques exist to handle these pollutants, and their merits and demerits are discussed. Also, it comprises different biological treatment processes applied for treatment of pollutants coming from different industries. Different types of bioreactors as well as newly modified processes and the factors affecting the biodegradation process are included. Biological treatment processes have many advantages as well as some limitation. Considering these limitations of bioprocess therefore users can modify the process according to the necessity. Some researchers have recently developed new hybrid bioreactor systems with certain modifications to handle the heterogeneous pollutants to attain the zero pollutant discharge in the effluent which shows the realistic approach of the biological wastewater treatment system. In future, there will be a great demand for eco-friendly hybrid systems in clean technologies to deal the global water pollution challenges.
References
Abou-Elela SI, Hellal MS, Aly OH, Abo-Elenin SA (2019) Decentralized wastewater treatment using passively aerated biological filter. J Environ Technol 40:250–260
Alturki AA, Tadkaew N, McDonald JA, Khan SJ, Price WE, Nghiem LD (2010) Combining MBR and NF/RO membrane filtration for the removal of trace organics in indirect potable water reuse applications. J Membr Sci 365:206–215
Anandkumar J (2016) Combined novel bio-physical treatment for heterogeneous wastewater pollutants. SERB-DST Sponsored Project, Government of India
Anjaneyulu Y, Sreedhara Chary N, Samuel Suman Raj D (2005) Decolourization of industrial effluents: available methods and emerging technologies—a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 4:245–273
Armenante PM, Kafkewitz D, Lewandowski GA, Jou CJ (1999) Anaerobic–aerobic treatment of halogenated phenolic compounds. J Water Res 33(3):681–692
Aziz H, Puat N, Alazaiza M, Hung YT (2018) Poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment using submerged fibers in an attached growth sequential batch reactor. J Environ Res Public Health 15(8):1734
Balaji K, Poongothai S (2012) Evaluation of fluidized bed reactor in treating dyeing effluent. Int J Eng Sci Technol 4(7):3134–3139
Banerjee A, Ghoshal AK (2016) Biodegradation of real petroleum wastewater by immobilized hyper phenol-tolerant strains of Bacillus cereus in a fluidized bed bioreactor. 3 Biotech 6(2):137
Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4:361–377
Barcelo D, Kostianoy AG (2016) Advanced treatment technologies for urban wastewater reuse. Springer, Cham
Barrera-Dıaz C, Bilyeu B, Roa G, Bernal-Martinez L (2011) Physicochemical aspects of electrocoagulation. Sep Purif Rev 40:1–24
Basha KM, Rajendran A, Thangavelu V (2010) Recent advances in the biodegradation of phenol: a review. Asian J Exp Biol Sci 1:219–234
Bauer JE, Capone DG (1985) Degradation and mineralization of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons anthracene and naphthalene in intertidal marine sediments. J Appl Environ Microbiol 50(1):81–90
Belgiorno V, Rizzo L, Fatta D, Della Rocca C, Lofrano G, Nikolaou A, Naddeo V, Meric S (2007) Review on endocrine disrupting-emerging compounds in urban wastewater: occurrence and removal by photocatalysis and ultrasonic irradiation for wastewater reuse. Desalination 215:166–176
Bellona C, Drewes JE, Xu P, Amy G (2004) Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment—a literature review. Water Res 38:2795–2809
Borghei SM, Hosseini SH (2004) The treatment of phenolic wastewater using a moving bed biofilm reactor. J Process Biochem 39(10):1177–1181
Bratby J (2006) Coagulation and flocculation in water and wastewater treatment, vol 407. IWA Publishing, London
Bui XT, Chiemchaisri C, Fujioka T, Varjani S (2019) Introduction to recent advances in water and wastewater treatment technologies. In: Energy, environment and sustainability. Springer, Singapore
Dezotti M, Lippel G, Bassin JP (2011) Emerging, consolidated technologies and introduction to molecular techniques. In: Advances biological process for wastewater treatment. Springer, Rio de Janeiro
Duan J, Gregory J (2003) Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 100–102:475–502
Dursun AY, Tepe O (2005) Internal mass transfer effect on biodegradation of phenol by Ca- alginate immobilized Ralstoniaeutropha. J Hazrad Mater 126(1–3):105–111
El-Naas MH, Al-Muhtaseb SA, Makhlouf S (2009) Biodegradation of phenol by Pseudomonas putida immobilized in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) gel. J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):720–725
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1994) Assessment and remediation of contaminate sediments (ARCS) program, final summary report, EPA-905-S-94-001. EPA, Chicago
Falkiewicz-Dulik M, Janda K, Wypych G (2015) Handbook of material biodegradation, biodeterioration and biostabilization, 2nd edn. Chem Tech Publishing United States, Toronto
Food Safety WHO (2019). https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/technical-overview-volatile-organic-compounds. Accessed 25 May 2019
Forgacs E, Cserhati T, Oros G (2004) Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review. Environ Int 30:953–971
Francis AW (1948) Properties of alkylbenzenes. Chem Rev 42(1):107–162
Gargouri B, Karray F, Mhiri N, Aloui F, Sayadi S (2011) Application of a continuously stirred tank bioreactor (CSTR) for bioremediation of hydrocarbon-rich industrial wastewater effluents. J Hazard Mater 189(1–2):427–434
Geerdink MJ, van Loosdrecht MM, Luyben KCA (1996) Biodegradability of diesel oil. Biodegradation 7(1):73–81
Grover DP, Zhou JL, Frickers PE, Readman JW (2011) Improved removal of estrogenic and pharmaceutical compounds in sewage effluent by full scale granular activated carbon: impact on receiving river water. J Hazard Mater 185:1005–1011
Hao Tian-wei, Peng-yu X, Mackey HR, Chi K, Lu H, Ho-kwong C, Loosedrecht MCM van, Guang-Hao C (2014) A review of biological sulfate conversion in wastewater treatment. Water Res 65:1–21
Haritash AK, Kaushik CP (2009) Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. J Hazard Mater 169:1–15
Henze M (2001) Wastewater treatment—biological and chemical processes. Springer, Berlin
Huerta-Fontela M, Galceran MT, Ventura F (2011) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and hormones through drinking water treatment. Water Res 45:1432–1442
Hussain A, Parveen T, Kumar P, Mehrotra I (2009) Phenolic wastewater: effect of F/M on anaerobic degradation. Desalin Water Treat 2(1–3):260–265
Ismail S, Tawfik A (2016) Performance of passive aerated immobilized biomass reactor coupled with Fenton process for treatment of landfill leachate. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 111:22–30
Jarvis AP, Younger PL (2000) Broadening the scope of mine water environmental impact assessment: a UK perspective. Environ Impact Assess 20:85–96
Jin RC, Yang GF, Yu JJ, Zheng P (2012) The inhibition of the Anammox process: a review. J Chem Eng 197:67–79
Kim YH, Freeman JP, Moody JD, Engesser KH, Cerniglia CE (2005) Effects of pH on the degradation of phenanthrene and pyrene by Mycobacterium vanbaalenii PYR-1. J Appl Microbial Biotechnol 67(2):275–285
Klok JBM, de Graff M, van den Bosch PLF, Bolee NC, Keesman KJ, Janssen AJH (2013) A physiologically based kinetic model for bacterial sulfide oxidation. Water Res 47:483–492
Lefebvre O, Lee LY, Ng HY (2010) Physicochemical treatment of micropollutants: coagulation and membrane processes. In: Virkutyte J, Jegatheesan V, Varma RS (eds) Treatments of micropollutants in water and wastewater. IWA Publishing, London, pp 205–237
Li AJ, Li XY, Yu HQ (2011) Effect of the food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio on the formation and size of aerobic sludge granules. Process Biochem 46(12):2269–2276
Liang Z, Liu JX, Li J (2009) Decomposition and mineralization of aquatic humic substances (AHS) in treating landfill leachate using the Anammox process. Chemosphere 74(10):1315–1320
Manzano MA, Perales JA, Sales D, Quiroga JM (1999) The effect of temperature on the biodegradation of a nonylphenolpolyethoxylate in river water. Water Res 33(11):2593–2600
Matilainen A, Vepsalainen M, Sillanpaa M (2010) Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 159:189–197
Metcalf & Eddy (2014) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 5th edn. Mc-Graw Hill Publication, New York
Milia S, Cappai G, Perra M, Carucci A (2012) Biological treatment of nitrogen-rich refinery wastewater by partial nitritation (SHARON) process. Environ Technol 33(13):1477–1483
Morabet RE (2018) Effect of outdoor air pollution on human health. In: Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Nghiem LD, Manis A, Soldenhoff K, Schafer AI (2004) Estrogenic hormone removal from wastewater using NF/RO membranes. J Membr Sci 242:37–45
Nguyen LN, Hai FI, Kang J, Price WE, Nghiem LD (2012) Removal of trace organic contaminants by a membrane bioreactor—granular activated carbon (MBR–GAC) system. Bioresour Technol 113:169–173
Pandey A, Singh P, Iyenger L (2007) Bacterial decolorization and degradation of azo dyes. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 59:73–84
Rajasulochana P, Preethy V (2016) Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water-a comprehensive review. Resour Eff Technol 2:175–184
Ren J, Li J, Li J, Chen Z, Cheng F (2019) Tracking multiple aromatic compounds in a full-scale coking wastewater reclamation plant: interaction with biological and advanced treatments. Chemosphere 222:431–439
Rezakazemi M, Maghami M, Mohammadi T (2018) Wastewaters treatment containing phenol and ammonium using aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor. Chem Cent J 12(1):79
Rittmann BE, McCarty PL (2012) Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New York
Rodríguez DC, Ramirez O, Mesa GP (2011) Behaviour of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria in a sequencing batch reactor for the removal of ammoniacal nitrogen and organic matter. Desalination 273:447–452
Rojas MR, Leung C, Whitley D, Zhu Y, Arnold RG, Saez AE (2011) Advanced oxidation of trace organics in water by hydrogen peroxide solar photolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:12479–12487
Saferlis P (2008) Measurement and process control for water and energy use in the food industry. In: Handbook of water and energy management in food processing. Elsevier, Burlington
Sahariah BP, Anandkumar J, Chakraborty S (2016) Treatment of coke oven wastewater in an anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic moving bed bioreactor system. J Desalin Water Treat 57(31):14396–14402
Sahinkaya E, Gunes FM, Ucar D, Kaksonen AH (2011) Sulfidogenic fluidized bed treatment of real acid mine drainage water. Bioresour Technol 102(2):683–689
Shalini SS, Joseph K (2018) Combined SHARON and ANAMMOX processes for ammoniacal nitrogen stabilisation in landfill bioreactors. J Bioresour Technol 250:723–732
Sharma SK, Sanghi R (2012) Advances in water treatment and pollution prevention. Springer, Dordrecht
Sharma NK, Philip L, Murty BS (2018) Aerobic degradation of complex organic compounds and cyanides in coke oven wastewater in presence of glucose. In: Sharma AK, Singh VP, Bhattacharjya AK, Kartha SA (eds) Urban ecology, water quality and climate change. Water science and technology library, vol 84. Springer, Cham, pp 293–304
Shoukat R, Khan SJ, Jamal Y (2019) Hybrid anaerobic-aerobic biological treatment for real textile wastewater. J Water Process Eng 29:100804
Singh RL, Singh RP (2019) Advances in biological treatment of industrial waste water and their recycling for a sustainable future. Springer, Singapore
Sonune A, Ghate R (2004) Developments in wastewater treatment methods. Desalination 167:55–63
Sonwani RK, Giri BS, Das T, Singh RS, Rai BN (2019) Biodegradation of fluorine by neoteric LDPE immobilized Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes NRSS3 in a packed bed bioreactor and analysis of external mass transfer correlation. Process Biochem 77:106–112
Speight JG (2017) Sources and types of inorganic pollutants. In: Environmental inorganic chemistry for engineers. Elsevier, Cambridge
Talley JW (2006) Bioremediation of recalcitrant compounds. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Tang CJ, Zheng P, Chen TT, Zhang JQ, Mahmood Q, Ding S, Wu DT (2011) Enhanced nitrogen removal from pharmaceutical wastewater using SBA-ANAMMOX process. Water Res 45(1):201–210
Technical overview of volatile organic compounds USEPA (2019). https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/technical-overview-volatile-organic-compounds. Accessed 25 May 2019
Ternes TA, Meisenheimer M et al (2002) Removal of pharmaceuticals during drinking water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36:3855–3863
Toh S, Ashbolt N (2002) Adaptation of anaerobic ammonium-oxidising consortium to synthetic coke-ovens wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59(2–3):344–352
Tuhkanen TA, Marinosa PC (2010) UV irradiation for micropollutant removal from aqueous solutions in the presence of H2O2. In: Virkutyte J, Jegatheesan V, Varma RS (eds) Treatments of micropollutants in water and wastewater. IWA Publishing, London, pp 295–316
Van Dongen LGJM, Jetten MSM, van Loosdrecht MC (2001) The combined SHARON/Anammox process. IWA Publishing, London
Verma N, Kaur G (2016) Trends on biosensing systems for heavy metals detection. Compr Anal Chem 74:33–71
Walakira P, Okot-Okumu J (2011) Impact of industrial effluents on water quality of streams in Nakawa-Ntinda, Uganda. Appl Sci Environ Manage 15(2):289–296
Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27:195–226
Wang LK, Pereira NC, Hung Y (2009) Handbook of environmental engineering. Humana Press, Totowa
Xia S, Li J, Wang R (2008) Nitrogen removal performance and microbial community structure dynamics response to carbon nitrogen ratio in a compact suspended carrier biofilm reactor. Ecol Eng 32:256–262
Yuan SY, Wei SH, Chang BV (2000) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a mixed culture. Chemosphere 41(9):1463–1468
Zhao W, Sui Q, Huang X (2018) Removal and fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a hybrid anaerobic–anoxic–oxic process for highly toxic coke wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 635:716–724
Zhitkovich A (2011) Chromium in drinking water: sources, metabolism and cancer risk. Chem Res Toxicol 24(10):1617–1629
Zhou X, Zhang Z, Li Y (2017) Four-stage biofilm anaerobic–anoxic–oxic–oxic system for strengthening the biological treatment of coking wastewater: COD removal behaviors and biokinetic modeling. RSC Adv 7(38):23714–23726
Zilouei H, Guieysse B, Mattiasson B (2006) Biological degradation of chlorophenols in packed- bed bioreactors using mixed bacterial consortia. Process Biochem 41(5):1083–1089
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Science and Engineering Research Board (DST), Govt. of India, for allowing them to use the project-related information (SB/EMEQ-107/2014) to write this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yadu, A., Satapathy, M., Sahariah, B.P., Anandkumar, J. (2020). Realistic Approach for Bioremediation of Heterogeneous Recalcitrant Compounds. In: Shah, M., Banerjee, A. (eds) Combined Application of Physico-Chemical & Microbiological Processes for Industrial Effluent Treatment Plant. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0497-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0497-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0496-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0497-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)