Abstract
In this chapter, we synthesize prior empirical research focused on digital inequalities among older adults. We highlight studies that detail both antecedents and consequences of the digital divide. We also discuss popular theories and models such as the theory of reasoned action, the technology adoption model, and the senior technology adoption model, which have served as the foundation for understanding technology adoption and use among older adults. Despite the prevalence of digital inequalities among older adults, our review points to findings that suggest that when older adults adopt and use information and communication technologies (ICTs) they can experience enhanced quality of life. We conclude this chapter by discussing directions for future research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, M. & Perrin. (2017). Technology use among seniors. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for Internet & Technology.
Ball, C., Francis, J., Huang, K.-T., Kadylak, T., Cotten, S., & Rikard, R. (2017). The physical-digital divide: Exploring the social gap between digital natives and physical natives. Journal of Applied Gerontology.
Barbosa Neves, B., Franz, R., Judges, R., Beermann, C., & Baecker, R. (2017). Can digital technology enhance social connectedness among older adults? A feasibility study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 0733464817741369.
Barnard, Y., Bradley, M. D., Hodgson, F., & Lloyd, A. D. (2013). Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1715–1724.
Berkowsky, R. W., Rikard, R. V., & Cotten, S. R. (2015). Signing off: Predicting discontinued ICT usage among older adults in assisted and independent living. In J. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human aspects of it for the aged population. Design for everyday life: First international conference, ITAP 2015, Held as Part of HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2–7, 2015. Proceedings, Part II (pp. 389–398). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20913-5_36.
Blit-Cohen, E., & Litwin, H. (2004). Elder participation in cyberspace: A qualitative analysis of Israeli retirees. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 385–398.
Chan, M. (2015). Multimodal connectedness and quality of life: Examining the influences of technology adoption and interpersonal communication on well-being across the life span. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12089.
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. (2011). A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology, 10, 1–12.
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57, 635–652.
Choi, M., Kong, S., & Jung, D. (2012). Computer and Internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: A meta-analysis. Healthcare Informatics Research, 18, 191–198.
Chopik, W. J. (2016). The benefits of social technology use among older adults are mediated by reduced loneliness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 551–556.
Cotten, S. R. (2017). Examining the roles of technology in aging and quality of life. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72, 823–826.
Cotten, S. R., Anderson, W. A., & McCullough, B. M. (2013). Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: Cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e39.
Cotten, S. R., Ford, G., Ford, S., & Hale, T. M. (2012b). Internet use and depression among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 496–499.
Cotten, S. R., Ford, G., Ford, S., & Hale, T. M. (2014). Internet use and depression among retired older adults in the United States: A longitudinal analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 763–771.
Cotten, S. R., Francis, J., Kadylak, T., Rikard, R., Huang, T., Ball, C., & DeCook, J. (2016). A tale of two divides: Technology experiences among racially and socioeconomically diverse older adults. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population.
Cotten, S. R., McCullough, B., & Adams, R. (2011). Technological influences on social ties across the lifespan. Handbook of Lifespan Psychology, 647–671.
Cotten, S. R., Yost, E. A., Berkowsky, R. W., Winstead, V., & Anderson, W. A. (2017). Designing technology training for older adults in continuing care retirement communities.
Courtin, E., & Knapp, M. (2015). Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: A scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12311.
Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., Sharit, J. (2017). Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist, gnw249.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.
Davison, E., & Cotten, S. R. (2003). Connection discrepancies: Unmasking further layers of the digital divide. First Monday, 8.
Davison, E., & Cotten, S. R. (2009). Connection disparities: The importance of broadband connections. Handbook of research on overcoming digital divides: Constructing an equitable and competitive information society (p. 346).
de Veer, A. J., Peeters, J. M., Brabers, A. E., Schellevis, F. G., Rademakers, J. J. J., & Francke, A. L. (2015). Determinants of the intention to use e-Health by community dwelling older people. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 103.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In K. Neckerman & S. Shafer (Eds.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fazio, E. M. (2009). Sense of mattering in late life. In W. R. Avison, C. S. Aneshensel, S. Schieman, & B. Wheaton (Eds.), Advances in the conceptualization of the stress process (pp. 149–177). New York: Springer.
Findlay, R. A. (2003). Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: Where is the evidence? Ageing & Society, 23, 647–658.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research (Addison-Wesley Series in Social Psychology). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Francis, J., Kadylak, T., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2016). When it comes to depression, ICT use matters: A longitudinal analysis of the effect of ICT use and mattering on depression among older adults. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 301–306). Springer International Publishing.
Francis, J., Kadylak, T., Makki, T., Rikard, R. V., & Cotten, S. R. (In press). Catalyst to connection: When technical difficulties lead to social support for older adults. American Behavioral Scientist.
Francis, J., Rikard, R. V., Cotten, S. R., & Kadylak, T. (2017). Does ICT use matter? How information & communication technology (ICT) use affects perceived mattering among a predominantly female sample of older adults residing in retirement communities. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1417459.
Freese, J., Rivas, S., & Hargittai, E. (2006). Cognitive ability and Internet use among older adults. Poetics, 34, 236–249.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public place. New York: Glencoe: the free press.
Heart, T., & Kalderon, E. (2013). Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82, e209–e231.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First, Monday, 7.
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35, 602–621.
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43, 159–172.
Huang, K.-T., Robinson, L., & Cotten, S. (2015). Mind the emotional gap: The impact of emotional costs on student learning outcomes. In L. Robinson, S. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. Hale & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (Studies in media and communications (Vol. 10, pp. 121–144). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Kadylak, T., Francis, J., Cotten, S. R., Rikard, R. V., LaRose, R., Makki, T., et al. (2016). Extending the STAM: The role of habit in the acceptance of technology. Gerontechnology, 15(suppl), 39s. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2016.15.s.612.00.
Kadylak, T., Makki, T., Francis, J., Cotten, S. R., Rikard, R. V., & Sah, Y. (2017, May). Disrupted copresence: An analysis of older adults’ views on the impact of ICT use during FtF interactions. Paper presented at International Communication Association Conference, San Diego, CA.
Khosravi, P., Rezvani, A., & Wiewiora, A. (2016). The impact of technology on older adults’ social isolation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 594–603.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 740–755.
LaRose, R. (2015). The psychology of interactive media habits. The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 365–383).
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.
Ma, Q., Chen, K., Chan, A. H. S., & Teh, P. L. (2015, August). Acceptance of ICTs by older adults: A review of recent studies. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (pp. 239–249). Cham: Springer.
McMellon, C. A., & Schiffman, L. G. (2002). Cybersenior empowerment: How some older individuals are taking control of their lives. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 21, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/07364802021002002.
Millward, P. (2003). The ‘grey digital divide’: Perception, exclusion and barriers of access to the Internet for older people. First Monday, 8.
Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 708–726.
Nowak, K. (2001, May). Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation. In Presence 2001 Conference, Philadelphia, PA (pp. 1–23).
Peek, S. T., Wouters, E. J., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83, 235–248.
Petersen, J., Kaye, J., Jacobs, P. G., Quinones, A., Dodge, H., Arnold, A., et al. (2016). Longitudinal relationship between loneliness and social isolation in older adults: Results from the cardiovascular health study. Journal of Aging and Health, 28, 775–795.
Renaud, K., & Van Biljon, J. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study. In Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: Riding the Wave of Technology (pp. 210–219). ACM.
Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902857678.
Robinson, L. (2012). Information-seeking 2.0: The effects of informational advantage. RESET—Social Science Research on the Internet, 1, 89–115.
Rosenberg, M., & McCullough, B. C. (1981). Mattering: Inferred significance and mental health among adolescents. Research in Community and Mental Health, 2, 163–182.
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6, 341–362.
Shankar, A., McMunn, A., Demakakos, P., Hamer, M., & Steptoe, A. (2017). Social isolation and loneliness: Prospective associations with functional status in older adults. Health Psychology, 36, 179.
Schieman, S., & Taylor, J. (2001). Statuses, roles, and the sense of mattering. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 469–484.
Schroeder, R. (2010). Mobile phones and the inexorable advance of multimodal connectedness. New Media & Society, 12, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809355114.
Smith, A. (2014). Older adults and technology use: Adoption is increasing, but many seniors remain isolated from digital life. Pew Research Center.
Smith, A. (2014). Older adults and technology use: Usage and adoption. Pew research: Internet project from https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/usage-and-adoption/.
Taylor, J., & Turner, R. J. (2001). A longitudinal study of the role and significance of mattering to others for depressive symptoms. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 310–325.
Thoits, P. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 145–161.
Tichenor, P., Donohue, G., & Olien, C. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinions Quarterly, 34, 159–170.
Tsai, H. S., Rikard, R.V., Cotten, S.R., & Shillair, R. (2015b). Live and learn: Older adults’ technology learning, A quantitative approach. Paper presented at International Communication Association Conference 2015, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Tsai, H.-Y., Shillair, R., Cotten, S. R., Winstead, V., & Yost, E. (2015a). Getting grandma online: Are tablets the answer for increasing digital inclusion for older adults in the U.S.? Educational Gerontology, 41, 695–709.
Van Deursen, A., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (Vol. 10, pp. 29–52): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media Society, 16, 507–526.
Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19, 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240390227895.
Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2003). Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1313–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x.
Wang, L., Rau, P. L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Older adults’ acceptance of information technology. Educational Gerontology, 37, 1081–1099.
Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., Gruner, A., & Downs, J. (2013, April). Older adults as digital content producers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 39–48). ACM.
Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Lal, B. (2011, June). Is UTAUT really used or just cited for the sake of it? A systematic review of citations of UTAUT’s originating article. In ECIS (p. 231).
Winstead, V., Anderson, W. A., Yost, E. A., Cotten, S. R., Warr, A., & Berkowsky, R. W. (2013). You can teach an old dog new tricks: A qualitative analysis of how residents of senior living communities may use the web to overcome spatial and social barriers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 32, 540–560.
Yuan, S., Hussain, S. A., Hales, K. D., & Cotten, S. R. (2016). What do they like? Communication preferences and patterns of older adults in the United States: The role of technology. Educational Gerontology, 42, 163–174.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Francis, J., Ball, C., Kadylak, T., Cotten, S.R. (2019). Aging in the Digital Age: Conceptualizing Technology Adoption and Digital Inequalities. In: Neves, B., Vetere, F. (eds) Ageing and Digital Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3693-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3693-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3692-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3693-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)