Abstract
Modern higher education is accountable to a range of stakeholders – typically to national governments, sponsors and other authorities and, increasingly, to employers and students (Burke, 2005; Lauen & Gaddis, 2012; Marope, Wells, & Hazelkorn, 2013). This accountability extends to the use of resources, quality of teaching, and also higher education responses to meet socio-economic demands and needs.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- High Education
- Personal Information
- High Education Institution
- Social Contract
- Learning Management System
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2142/1949
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2011). Collateral damage: Social inequalities in a global age. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2012). On education: Conversations with Riccardo Mazzeo. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
Bichsel, J. (2012). Analytics in higher education: Benefits, barriers, progress and recommendations. Louisville, Colorado: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1-22. Retrieved from http://www.vbsinternational.eu/files/media/research_article/Evidencebased_education_Biesta1.pdf
Bollier, D. (2010). The promise and peril of big data. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute. Retrieved from http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/The_Promise_and_Peril_of_Big_Data.pdf
Booth, M. (2012, July 18). Learning analytics: The new black. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/learning-analytics-new-black
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2013). Six provocations for big data. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1926431
Burke, J. S. (2005). Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic and market demands. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Code of Fair Information Practices. (1973). Retrieved from http://simson.net/ref/2004/csg357/handouts/01_fips.pdf
Crawford, K. (2013, April 1). The hidden biases in big data. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/04/the_hidden_biases_in_big_data.html
Crow, M. M. (2012, July 18). No more excuses: Michael M. Crow on Analytics. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1241P.pdf
Danaher, J. (2014, January 7). Rule by algorithm? Big data and the threat of algocracy. Retrieved from http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/danaher20140107
Datoo, S. (2014, January 14). Big data: 4 predictions for 2014. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/datablog/2014/jan/14/big-data-4-predictions-for-2014
Diaz, V., & Brown, M. (2012). Learning analytics: A report on the ELI focus session. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/PDF/ELI3027.pdf
Diller, A. (1996). Ethics of care and education: A new paradigm, its critics, and its educational significance. In A. Diller, B. Houston, K. P. Morgan, & M. Ayim (Eds.) The gender question in education: Theory, pedagogy and politics. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Ess, C., Buchanan, E., & Markham, A. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: 2012 recommendations from the AOIR ethics working committee. Unpublished draft.
Ferguson, R. (2012). The state of learning analytics in 2012: A review and future challenges (Technical Report KMI-12-0). Milton Keynes, U.K.: Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University. Retrieved from http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/techreport/kmi-12-01
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (Eds.). (2006). The new politics of surveillance and visibility. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Held, V. (2005). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. New York: Oxford University Press.
Henman, P. (2004). Targeted! Population segmentation, electronic surveillance and governing the unemployed in Australia. International Sociology, 19, 173-191.
Hennessy, J., & McNamara, P.M. (2013). At the altar of educational efficiency: Performativity and the role of the teacher. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 12(1), 6-22.
Hickman, L. (2013, July 1). How algorithms rule the world. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2013/jul/01/how-algorithms-rule-world-nsa
Johnson, J. A. (2013, April). From pen data to information justice. Paper presented at Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2241092
Knox, D. (2010, October). Spies in the house of learning: A typology of surveillance in online learning environments. Paper presented at Edge2010, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, Newfoundland, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.mun.ca/edge2010/wp-content/uploads/Knox-Dan-Spies-In-the-House.pdf
Kruse, A., & Pongsajapan, R. (2012). Student-centered learning analytics. Retrieved from https://cndls.georgetown.edu/m/documents/thoughtpaper-krusepongsajapan.pdf
Lanier, J. (2013). How should we think about privacy? Making sense of one of the thorniest issues of the digital age. Scientific American, 309(5) 64-71.
Lauen, D. L., & Gaddis, S. M. (2012). Accountability pressure, academic standards, and educational triage. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED530122.pdf
Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, September/October, 31-40.
Lyon, D. (2001). Facing the future: Seeking ethics for everyday surveillance. Ethics and Information Technology, 3, 171-181.
Lyon, D. (Ed.). (2006). Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond. Devon, U.K.: Willan Publishing.
Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
Lyon, D., Haggerty, K. D., & Ball, K. (2012). Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Marope, P. T. M., Wells, P. J., & Hazelkorn, E. (Eds.). (2013). Rankings and accountability in higher education: Uses and misuses. Paris, France: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002207/220789e.pdf
Marwick, A. E. (2014). How your data are being deeply mined. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/jan/09/how-your-data-are-beingdeeply-mined/?pagination=false
Marx, G. T. (1998). Ethics for the new surveillance. The Information Society: An International Journal, 14(3), 171-185. DOI: org/10.1080/019722498128809.
May, H. (2011). Is all the fuss about learning analytics just hype? Retrieved from http://www.loomlearning.com/2011/analytics-schmanalytics
Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2009). The virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Morozov, E. (2013a). The real privacy problem. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520426/the-real-privacy-problem/
Morozov, E. (2013b). To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism, and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. London, U.K.: Penguin Books.
Oblinger, D. G. (2012). Let’s talk analytics. EDUCAUSE Review, July/August, 10-13.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Viking.
Patton, J. W. (2000). Protecting privacy in public? Surveillance technologies and the value of public places. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 181-187.
Pounder, C. N. M. (2008). Nine principles for assessing whether privacy is protected in a surveillance society. Identity in the Information Society, 1, 1-22. DOI 10.1007/s12394-008-0002-2.
Peters, M. A. (2013). Managerialism and the neoliberal university: Prospects for new forms of ‘open management’ in higher education. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 5(1), 11-26.
Prinsloo, P. (2009). Modeling throughput at Unisa: The key to the successful implementation of ODL. Retrieved from http://umkn-dsp01.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/6035
Prinsloo, P. (2013). Ethics and learning analytics as a Faustian pact: Between Orwell, Huxley, Kafka and the deep blue sea. Presented at the LASI13 conference, Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.up.ac.za/telematic/sahela2013/day2-9h30-sahela2013-paul_UNISA_ethics_and_learning_analytics_as_a_fuastian_pact.pdf
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2013, April). An evaluation of policy frameworks for addressing ethical considerations in learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 240-244). New York: ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2460344
Rosen, J. (2000). The unwanted gaze: The destruction of privacy in America. New York, NY: Random House.
Sadowsky, J. (2013). The injustices of open data. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/06/28/open_data_can_promote_social_injustice.html
Siemens, G. (2011). Learning analytics: Envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice. Paper presented at 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK12), Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://learninganalytics.net/LAK_12_keynote_Siemens.pdf
Silver, N. (2012). The signal and the noise: The art and science of prediction. London, U.K.: Allen Lane.
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1509-1528. DOI: 10.1177/0002764213479366.
Solove, D. J. (2004) The digital person: Technology and privacy in the information age. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Stage, F. K., & Hossler, D. (2000). Where is the student? Linking student behaviors, college choice, and college persistence. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.) Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Stoddart, E. (2012). A surveillance of care: Evaluating surveillance ethically. In K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.) Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. London, U.K.: Routledge.
Subotzky, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: A socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 177-193.
Varvel, V. E., Montague, R. A, & Estabrook, L. S. (2007). Policy and e-learning. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.) The Sage handbook of e-learning research. London: Sage.
Wagner, E., & Ice, P. (2012). Data changes everything: Delivering on the promise of learning analytics in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/data-changes-everythingdelivering-promise-learning-analytics-higher-education
Webster, A. (2004) State of the art, risk, science and policy – Researching the social management of uncertainty. Policy Studies, 25(1), 5-18. DOI: 10.1080/0144287042000208206.
Willis, J. E. III, Campbell, J. P., & Pistilli, M. D. (2013). Ethics, big data, and analytics: A model for application. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/ethics-big-data-and-analytics-model-application
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prinsloo, P., Slade, S. (2014). Student Data Privacy and Institutional Accountability in an Age of Surveillance. In: Menon, M.E., Terkla, D.G., Gibbs, P. (eds) Using Data to Improve Higher Education. Global Perspectives On Higher Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-794-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-794-0_12
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-794-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)