Abstract
In order to position yourself with a Global Positioning System (GPS) device, you need (1) to have a GPS device with (2) accurate software, (3) the knowledge to use and interpret it, and last but not least (4) information from at least three different satellites in order to determine a position.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
ASEI see Teknikföretagen further down.
Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box. Raising standards through classroom assessment. Department of Educational & Professional Studies. GL Assessment the measure of potential. Kings College London.
Black, P. (2008). Formative assessment in the learning and teaching of design and technology education: Methods and techniques. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 13(3), 19–26.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009a). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31
Black, P. J., Harrisson, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2009/ 2003). Assessment for learning. Putting it into practice. Open University Press.
Blomdahl, E. (2007). Teknik i skolan – en studie av teknikundervisning för yngre skolbarn, HLS förlag. Stockholm
Bjurulf, V. (2008) Teknikämnets gestaltningar. En studie av lärares arbete med skolämnet teknik. Karlstad University studies, nr 2008:29 Doctoral thesis.
Dakers, J. R. (2007) Incorporating technological literacy into classroom practice. In de Vries, Custer, Dakers, Martin (Eds.), Analyzing Best Practices in Technology Education, (pp. 125–138). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
Eisner, E. W. (2007/1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, N. Y.:Toronto.
Elwood, J. (2008) Gender issues in testing and assessment. In P. Murphy & K. Hall (Eds.), Learning and practice. Agency and identities (pp. 87–101). The Open University. SAGE
Fabricius, T., Malm, I., & Pisilä, S. (2002). Skolinspektörernas årsrapport 2001/2002: Grundskolan (Utbildningsförvaltningens rapportserie, nr.2002:5). Stockholm: Utbildningsförvaltningen.
Fagerlund P., & Högberg B., (2010/2007), Bedöma är inte att döma. In A. Petterson, (Eds.), Sporre eller otyg (pp. 125–130). Mölnlycke: Lärarförbundets förlag.
Forsberg, E. och Lindberg, V., (2010). Svensk forskning om bedömning – en kartläggning. Rapportnummer 2:2010. Vetenskapsrådet.
Gipps, C. V., (2004/1994). Beyond testing. Towards a theory of educational assessment. London & New York: LaVergne, TN USA: The Falmer Press.
Gipps, C. V., & Murphy, P (2010/1999). A fair test? Assessment, achievement and equity. Open University Press.
Hartell, E. (2011). Hur sätter man betyg i teknik? In Hansson, Nordlander, Skogh (Eds.), Teknikutbildning för framtiden – perspektiv på teknikundervisningen i grundskola och gymnasium (pp. 75–87). Stockholm: Liber AB.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–
Hirsh, Å. (2011). A tool for learning? An analysis of targets and strategies in Swedish Individual Educational Plans. Nordic Studies in Education, 2011(1), 14–30. Universitetsförlaget.
Holmgren, A. (2010). Lärargruppers arbete med bedömning för lärande. In Lundahl & Folke-Fichtelius (Eds.), Bedömning i och av skolan – praktik, principer, politik (pp. 168–181). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kimbell, R., & Stables, K. (2008). Researching design learning. Springer.
Kimbell, R. (2007). Assessment. In de Vries, Custer, Dakers, Martin (Eds.), Analyzing best practices in technology education (pp. 247–258). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
Klapp Lekholm, A. (2008). Grades and grade assignment: effects of student and school characteristics http://hdl.handle.net/2077/18673 (Retrieved 11–12-02)
Klapp-Lekholm, A. (2010). Lärares betygssättningspraktik, in S. Eklund (Eds. Bedömning för lärande – en grund för ökat lärande. Forskning för undervisning och lärande (2010:3) 20–29.
Klasander, C. (2010). Talet till tekniska system. PhD thesis, Linköping University, Department of social and welfare studies, Norrköping, Sweden.
Kvale, S. (2008/2007). Doing interviews. The SAGE Qualitative Research Kit. SAGE.
Leahy et al (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day-by-day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 19–24.
Lindberg, V. (2005) Svensk forskning om bedömning och betyg. Studies in Educational Policy.
Lindström, L. (2006). Creativity: What is it? Can you assess it? Can it be taught? The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(1), 53–66.
Lindström, L. (2009/2005). Pedagogisk bedömning. In L. Lindström & V. Lindberg (Eds.), Pedagogisk bedömning. Om att dokumentera, bedöma och utveckla kunskap. (pp. 11–27) Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag.
Lundahl C. (2009). Varför nationella prov? Framväxt, dilemman, möjligheter. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Moreland et al (2008). Design and technology inside the black box. Assessment for learning in the design and technology classroom. Booklet in The black box series Black et al rEds. GL assessment the measure of potential. Kings college London.
Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in education; Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 149–170.
Nyström, P. (2004). Rätt matt på prov. Om valideringar av bedömningar i skolan. Umeå universitet, Pedagogiska institutionen, No 71.
Pettersson, A. (2009/2005). Bedömning – varför, vad och varthän? In Lindström & Lindberg (Eds.). Pedagogisk bedömning. Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag
Rosentahl & Jacobson (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom. Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. P x-y Crown House Publishing Company. USA.
SALAR Öppna jämförelser – grundskola. a) 2007, b) 2008, c) 2009 and d)2010 http://www.skl.se/vi_arbetar_med/oppnajamforelser/oppnajamforelser_grundskola Accessed on 23 November 2011.
Skolinspektionsmyndigheten (School Inspectorate) (2009) 2009a) http://www.skolinspektionen.se/Documents/Rapporter/Mora_Inspektionsrapport.pdf?epslanguage=sv Accessed on 23 November 2011. 2009b) http://www.skolinspektionen.se/Documents/Rapporter/Hofors_tillsynsrapport.pdf?epslanguage=sv Accessed on 23 November 2011.
2009c) http://www.skolinspektionen.se/Documents/Rapporter/Falkenberg-inspektionsrapport.pdf?epslanguage=sv Accessed on 23 November 2011.
SIRIS (2009), www.skolverket.se (retrieved 10–10-21).
Skolverket (LpO94) (The National Agency for Education) (2009). Syllabuses for the compulsory school (2nd ed.). Skolverket and Fritzes.
Skolverket (2008a) Matematik. En samtalsguide om kunskap, arbetssätt och bedömning. Downloaded from http://www.skolverket.se/2.3894/publicerat/2.5006?_xurl_=http%3A%2F%2Fwww4.skolverket.se%3A8080%2Fwtpub%2Fws%2Fskolbok%2Fwpubext%2Ftrycksak%2FRecord%3Fk%3D1952 Accessed on 25 November 2011.
Skolverket (2008b). Naturorienterande ämnen. En samtalsguide om kunskap, arbetssätt och bedömning. http://www.skolverket.se/2.3894/publicerat/2.5006?_xurl_=http%3A%2F%2Fwww4.skolverket.se%3A8080%2Fwtpub%2Fws%2Fskolbok%2Fwpubext%2Ftrycksak%2FRecord%3Fk%3D1952 Accessed on 25 November 2011.
Skolverket (2010). Ämnesproven 2010 i grundskolans årkurs 9 och specialskolans årkurs 10. http://wwwskolverket.se/prov-och-bedomning/nationella-prov/2.1101/2.1181/2.1182/amnesprov_i_arskurs_9. Accessed on 29 April 2012.
Skolverket (2010). Dr 71–2010:4, Om nationella prov. http://www.skolverket.se/sb/d/2853 Accessed on 27 July 2010.
Teknikföretagen (2005). Association of Swedish engineering industries, Alla barns rätt till teknikundervisning, Stockholm: Teknikföretagen
Vetenskapsrådet (2005). Vad är god forskningsed? Rapport 1:2005 http://www.vr.se/download/18.6b2f98a910b3e260ae28000334/god_forskningssed_3.pdf Accessed on 2 September 2011.
Wiliam, D. (2009). Assessment for learning: why, what and how? An inaugural professorial lecture by Dylan Wiliam. Leading education and social research. Institute of Education University of London. London: Elanders.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartell, E. (2013). Looking for a Glimpse in the Eye. In: Skogh, IB., Vries, M.J.D. (eds) Technology Teachers as Researchers. International Technology Education Studies, vol 10. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-443-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-443-7_12
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-443-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)