Abstract
In Melbourne, the month of May signals the end of autumn and that the academic semester is in full swing. The mornings are chilly and it’s difficult to get out of bed. At the other end of the day, the clocks have been wound back and it gets dark early. Like the lightness of summer, all the welcoming events for new students have disappeared and across the campus the first years are assumed to have settled in to the rhythm of university life.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Participatory Action Research
- Relational Ethic
- Human Research Ethic Committee
- Belmont Report
- Academic Semester
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Blackmore J. Tracking the nomadic life of the educational researcher: What future for feminist public intellectuals and the performative university? The Australian Educational Researcher. 2003;30(3):1–24.
Brennan M. Dividing the university: Perspectives from the middle. In: Blackmore J, Brennan M, Zippin L, editors. Re-positioning university governance and academic work. Rotterdam: Sense; 2010. p. 115–132.
Cannella, G.S., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2007). Predatory vs. dialogic ethics: Constructing an illusion of ethical practice as the core of research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 315-335.
Cresswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage: Los Angeles; 2011.
DePalma R. Socially just research for social justice: Negotiating consent and safety in a participatory action research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33:215–227.
Department of Health, Education & Welfare. Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Federal Register. 1979;44:23192–7.
Ellis C. Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007;13:3–29.
Ellis C, Bochner A. Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000. p. 733–768.
Fitzgerald T, White J, Gunter HM. Hard labour? Academic work and the changing landscape of higher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2012.
Francis R. Independent inquiry into care provided by the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005-March 2009. The Stationery Office: Vols. I & II. London; 2010.
Halse C, Honey A. Rethinking ethics review as institutional discourse. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007;13:336–352.
Halse C, Honey A. Unraveling ethics: Illuminating the moral dilemmas of research ethics. In: Luttrell W, editor. Qualitative educational research: Readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice. New York: Routledge; 2010. p. 123–138.
Heron J, Reason P. A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry. 1997;3:274–294.
Marginson S, Murphy P, Peters MA. Global creation: Space, connection and universities in the age of the knowledge economy. New York: Peter Lang; 2009.
O’Reilly M, Dixon-Woods M, Angell E, Ashcroft R, Bryman A. Doing accountability: A discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2009;31:246–261.
Rizvi F, Lingard B. Globalizing educational policy. London: Routledge; 2010.
Sidani S, Streiner DL, LeClerc CM. Mitigating the impact of external forces. In: Streiner DL, Sidani S, editors. When research goes off the rails: Why it happens and what you can do about it. New York: The Guilford Press; 2010. p. 106–112.
Sikes P, Piper H. Ethical research, academic freedom and the role of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33:205–213.
White J, Fitzgerald T. Researcher tales and research ethics: The spaces in which we find ourselves. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33:273–285.
Wright Mills, C. (1959/2010). On intellectual craftsmanship. In W. Luttrell (Ed.) (2010), Qualitative educational research: Readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice (pp. 139-145). New York: Routledge.
Yates L. What does good educational research look like?: Situating a field and its practices. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press; 2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
White, J., Grant, J., Rumbold, J., Rumbold, B. (2012). Presumptuous Methodology. In: Vicars, M., McKenna, T., White, J. (eds) Discourse, Power, and Resistance Down Under. Transgressions, vol 88. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-037-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-037-8_13
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-037-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)