Abstract
This chapter reviews the main theoretical perspectives and key recent empirical research on the gender division of housework. We focus on unpaid housework, but where relevant also consider childcare. The chapter starts with an overview of research on time use in households and examines variation in domestic work time in relation to individual and household characteristics and across countries. We then review the main theoretical arguments advanced to explain the continuing gender division of household labor focusing on recent developments and debates. Finally we examine the consequences of gender divisions in household labor for wellbeing focusing on time pressure, work-family conflict and general happiness using data from the International Social Survey Program. Our empirical findings show that women continue to spend more time on housework than men and have a larger share of routine housework. In addition, housework time increases perceived time pressure and work-family conflict and decreases women’s happiness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278–308.
Barnett, R. C., & Shen, Y. (1997). Gender, high- and low-schedule-control housework tasks, and psychological distress: A study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 403–428.
Batalova, J. A., & Cohen, P. N. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 743–755.
Baxter, J. (2000). The joys and justice of housework. Sociology, 34(4), 609–631.
Baxter, J. (2002). Patterns of change and stability in the gender division of household labour in Australia, 1986–1997. Journal of Sociology, 38(4), 399–424.
Baxter, J., & Hewitt, B. (2013). Negotiating domestic labor: Women’s earnings and housework time in Australia. Feminist Economics, 19(1), 29–53.
Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 259–272.
Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Western, M. (2009). Who uses paid domestic labor in Australia? Choice and constraint in hiring household help. Feminist Economics, 15(1), 1–26.
Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American Households. New York: Plenum Press.
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191–228.
Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.
Boye, K. (2009). Relatively different? How do gender differences in well-being depend on paid and unpaid work in Europe? Social Indicators Research, 93, 509–525.
Braun, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H., & Baumgärtner, M. K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1145–1156.
Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.
Chesters, J. (2013). Gender convergence in core housework hours: Assessing the relevance of earlier approaches for explaining current trends. Journal of Sociology, 49, 78–96.
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208–1234.
Cooke, L. P., & Baxter, J. (2010). “Families” in international context: Comparing institutional effects across western societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 516–536.
DeMaris, A., & Longmore, M. A. (1996). Ideology, power, and equity: Testing competing explanations for the perceptions of fairness in household labor. Social Forces, 74(3), 1043–1071.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ferree, M. (1976). Working-class jobs: Housework and paid work as sources of satisfaction. Social Problems, 23(4), 431–441.
Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Dell.
Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–78.
Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 751–767.
Fuwa, M., & Cohen, P. N. (2007). Housework and social policy. Social Science Research, 36, 512–530.
Geist, C. (2005). The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review, 21(1), 23–41.
Geist, C., & Cohen, P. N. (2011). Headed toward equality? Housework change in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 832–844.
Gerson, K. (1993). No man’s land: Men’s changing commitments to family and work. New York: Basic Books.
Glass, J., & Fujimoto, T. (1994). Housework, paid work, and depression among husband’s and wives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 179–191.
Golding, J. M. (1990). Division of household labor, strain, and depressive symptoms among Mexican Americans and Non-Hispanic whites. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 103–117.
Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74, 1029–1042.
Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 322–355.
Greenstein, T. N. (2009). National context, family satisfaction, and fairness in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1039–1051.
Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 700–711.
Gupta, S. (2006). Her money, her time: Women’s earnings and their housework hours. Social Science Research, 35, 975–999.
Gupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 399–417.
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Higgins, C., Duxbury, L., & Lee, C. (1994). Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations, 43(2), 144–150.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Avon.
Hook, J. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 639–660.
Hook, J. (2010). Gender inequality in the welfare state: Sex segregation in housework, 1965–2003. American Journal of Sociology, 115(5), 1480–1523.
ISSP Research Group. (2002). International social survey programme: Family and changing gender roles III - ISSP 2002. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
Jacob, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kan, M. Y., Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2011). Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology, 45(2), 234–251.
Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Skytthe, A. (2005). Partner + children = happiness? The effects of partnerships and fertility on well-being. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 407–445.
Larson, R., Richards, M., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (1994). Divergent worlds: The daily emotional experience of mothers and fathers in the domestic and public spheres. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1034–1046.
Lennon, M. C., & Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506–531.
Livingston, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Role responses to work-family conflict: An examination of gender role orientation among working men and women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 207–216.
Mattingly, M. J., & Sayer, L. (2006). Under pressure: Gender differences in the relationship between free time and feeling rushed. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 205–221.
Mauno, S., & Kinnunen, U. (1999). The effects of job stressors in marital satisfaction in Finnish dual earner couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 879–895.
Mencarini, L., & Siron, M. (2012). Happiness, housework and gender inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 203–219.
Milkie, M. A., & Peltola, P. (1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the work-family balancing act. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(2), 476–490.
Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2010). Cultural and institutional contexts. In J. Treas & S. Drobnič (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 125–146). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Roxburgh, S. (2002). Racing through life: The distribution of time pressures by roles and role resources among full-time workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(2), 121–145.
Roxburgh, S. (2004). ‘There just aren’t enough hours in the day’: The mental health consequences of time pressure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 115–131.
Sanchez, L. (1994). Gender, labor allocations, and the psychology of entitlement within the home. Social Forces, 73(2), 533–553.
Sayer, L. C. (2010). Trends in housework. In J. Treas & S. Drobnič (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 19–35). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327–347.
Sullivan, O. (2011). An end to gender display through the performance of housework? A review and reassessment of the quantitative literature using insights from the qualitative literature. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 3(1), 1–13.
Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181–196.
Treas, J., & Drobnič, S. (Eds.). (2010). Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Treas, J., Van Der Lippe, T., & Tai, T. (2011). The happy homemaker? Married women’s well-being in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 90(1), 111–132.
Van der Lippe, T. (2007). Dutch workers and time pressure: Household and workplace characteristics. Work, Employment and Society, 21(4), 693–711.
Voydanoff, P. (1988). Work role characteristics, family structure, and work/family conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(3), 749–761.
Wall, G., & Arnold, S. (2007). How involved is involved fathering? An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood. Gender and Society, 21(4), 508–527.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baxter, J., Tai, To. (2016). Inequalities in Unpaid Work: A Cross-National Comparison. In: Connerley, M., Wu, J. (eds) Handbook on Well-Being of Working Women. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9896-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9897-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)