Abstract
The vision informing 20th Century philosophy has been aptly described as one of a desert landscape. Philosophers behave as if in expectation of an ontological tax collector to whom they will owe the less the fewer entities they declare. The metaphysical purge is perpetrated under a banner emblazoned with Occam’s Razor. But Occam never counselled ontological genocide at all cost. He only cautioned against multiplying entities beyond necessity His Razor is thus in full harmony with the complementary principle, known as Menger’s Comb, which cautions against trying to do with less what requires more. The two methodological precepts are just two sides of the same coin.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grossmann, Reinhardt, Meinong, London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1974).
Russell, Bertrand, “Meinong’s Theory of Complexes and Assumptions (II)” Mind 7 (1904) pp. 336–524.
Wigner, Eugene P., “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 8 (1960), pp. 1–14.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tichý, P. (1995). Constructions as the Subject Matter of Mathematics. In: Depauli-Schimanovich, W., Köhler, E., Stadler, F. (eds) The Foundational Debate. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1995], vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3327-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3327-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4617-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3327-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive