Skip to main content

Rice Sheath Blight — Pathogen Biology and Diversity

  • Chapter
Major Fungal Diseases of Rice

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani Kühn was originally reported causing sheath blight of rice in Japan at the beginning of this century (Miyake, 1910). However, rice sheath blight has developed into a major disease only during the past two decades. Nowadays, the disease is second only to, and often rivals, rice blast (Pyricularia oryzae) in terms of economic importance in many major rice-growing countries. The emergence of R. solani as a major rice pathogen has been attributed to the intensification of the rice-cropping system characterised by the development of new, short-statured, high-tillering, high-yielding varieties and an increase in nitrogen fertilisation inducing a favourable micro-climate for the pathogen. The rice sheath blight pathogen has been associated with isolates of one particular intraspecific group (ISG) of Rhizoctonia solani, anastomosis group (AG) 1 IA (Yamaguchi et al., 1984; Vijayan and Nair, 1985; Borthakur and Addy, 1988; Jones and Belmar, 1989), but diversity within this ISG appears to be much greater than was previously assumed (Liu and Sinclair, 1993). Detailed knowledge of pathogen characteristics at this taxonomic level is still lacking and has hampered understanding of the patho-systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N. A. (1982) The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani, Annual Review of Phytopathology 20, 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1993) Country reports on crop loss due to sheath blight, in: Rice sheath blight management workshop,. China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, China, 11–15 October 1993, IRRI, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anuratha, C.S., Zen-KuoChang, Cole, K.C., Mew, T., Muthukishnan, S. and Zen, K.C. (1996) Induction of chitinases and ß-1,3-glucanases in Rhizoctonia solani-infected rice plants: isolation of infection-related chitinase cDNA clone, Physiologia-Plantarum 97, 39–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K.F. (1970) Types of Rhizoctonia diseases and their occurrence, in J.R. Parmeter Jr. (ed.), Rhizoctonia solani: Biology and pathology, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banniza, S., Rutherford, M.A., Bridge, P.D., Holderness, M and Mordue, J.E.M. (1996) Biological characterisation of Rhizoctonia solani in rice-based cropping systems. Proceedings Brighton Crop Protection Conference. Vol.1:399–404,The British Crop Protection Council, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Banniza, S., Bridge, P.D., Holderness, M., Rutherford, M.A. and Simons, S.A. (1997) Assessments of characteristics for determining pathogen populations of Rhizoctonia solani in rice-based cropping systems, in: Proceedings of the 4th EFPP-Symposium on ‘Diagnosis and Identification of Plant Pathogens’

    Google Scholar 

  • Bera, S. and Purkayastha, R.P. (1995) Differential response of pathogenesis-related proteins to phytoalexin elicitors and its impact on sheath blight disease in rice, Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 32, 902–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthakur, B.K. and Addy, S.K. (1988) Anastomosis grouping in isolates of Rhizoctonia solani causing sheath blight disease, Indian Phytopathology 41, 351–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, T.D., White, T.J. and Taylor, J.W. (1991) Fungal molecular systematics, Annual Review of Ecological Systematics 22, 525–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, R.H. (1990) Pectic zymograms as criteria in taxonomy of Rhizoctonia, Mycological Research 94, 938–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cu, R.M., Mew, T.W., Cassman, K.G. and Teng, P.S. (1996) Effect of sheath blight on yield in tropical, intensive rice production system, Plant Disease 80, 1103–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damicone, J.P., Patel, M.V. and Moore, W.F. (1993) Density of sclerotia of Rhizoctonia solani and incidence of sheath blight in rice fields in Mississippi, Plant Disease 77, 257–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodman, R.L. and Flentje, N.T. (1970) The mechanism and physiology of plant penetration by Rhizoctonia solani, in J.R.Parmeter Jr. (ed.), Rhizoctonia solani, biology and pathology, University of California Press, Berkley, pp. 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, K.N. (1992) Analysis of fungal population structure using molecular techniques, in G.0 Caroll and D.T. Wicklow (eds.), The fungal community. Its organization and role in the ecosystem, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flentje, N.T., Dodman, R.L. and Kerr, A. (1963) The mechanism of host penetration by Thanatephorus cucumeris, Australian Journal of Biological Science 16, 784–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foroutan, A. and Rahimian, H. (1991) Distribution and characteristics of isolates of R. solani and R. oryzaesativae in rice fields of Mazandaran, Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 27, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay, S. and Chakrabarti, N.K. (1982) Sheath blight on rice, Review of Plant Pathology 61, 451460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, D.E. and Nowick,E.M. (1992) Selection for resistance to rice sheath blight through number of infection cushions and lesion type, Plant Disease 76, 721–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabaji-Hare, S.H., Meller, Y., Gill, S. and Charest, P.M. (1990) Investigation of genetic relatedness among anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani using cloned DNA probes, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 12, 393–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnk, J.S. and Jones, R.K. (1992) Determination of whole-cell fatty acids in isolates of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA, Phytopathology 82, 68–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnk, J.S. and Jones, R.K. (1993) Differentiation of populations of AG-2–2 of Rhizoctonia solani by analysis of cellular fatty acids, Phytopathology 83, 278–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnk, J.S. and Jones, R.K., (1994): Comparison of whole-cell fatty acid compositions in intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani AG-I, Phytopathology 84, 271–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.K. and Belmar, S.B., (1989): Characterisation and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp, isolated from rice, soybean, and other crops grown in rotation with rice in Texas, Plant Disease 73, 1004–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W.G., Kim, C.K. and Yu, S.H. (1988) Anastomosis grouping and cultural characteristics of isolates of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn from sclerotia overwintered in paddy fields, Korean Journal of Plant Pathology 4, 136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuninaga, S. and Yokosawa, R. (1982) DNA base sequence homology in Rhizoctonia solani Kühn I. Genetic relatedness within anastomosis group 1, Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 48, 659667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F.N., (1980): Number, viability and buoyancy of Rhizoctonia solani sclerotia in Arkansas rice fields, Plant Disease 64, 298–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. N. and Rush, M.C. (1983) Rice sheath blight: A major rice disease, Plant Disease 67, 829–832. Lin, W., Anuratha, C.S., Dana, K., Potrykus, I., Muthukrishnan, S. and Datta, S.K. (1995) Genetic Engineering of rice for resistance to sheath blight, Biotechnology 13, 686–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z.L. and Sinclair, J.B. (1993) Differentiation of intraspecific groups within anastomosis group 1 of Rhizoctonia solani using ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer and isozyme comparison, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 15, 272–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D.S. and Rush, M.C., (1980a): Infection cushion formation on rice sheaths by Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology, 70: 947–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D.S. and Rush, M.C. (1980b) Relation between infection by Rhizoctonia solani and R. oryzae and disease severity in rice, Phytopathology 70, 941–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaquoi, R.C. and Rush, M.C., (1987): Relationship of quantity of epicuticular wax to resistance of rice to sheath blight. [Abstract] Phytopathology, 77: 1723

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama, N., Moromizato, Z., Ogoshi, A. and Wakimoto, S. (1978) Grouping Rhizoctonia solani with non-specific esterase zymogram, Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 44, 652–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mew, T.W. and Rosales, A.M. (1986) Bacterization of rice plants for the control of sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani, Phytopathology 76, 1260–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, I. (1910) Studien über die Pilze der Reispflanze in Japan, Journal of the College of Agriculture, Imperial University of Tokyo 2, 237–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogoshi, A. and Ui, T. (1983) Diversity of clones within an anastomosis group of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn in a field, Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 49, 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogoshi, A., Cook, R.J. and Bassett, E.N. (1990) Rhizoctonia species and anastomosis groups causing root rot of wheat and barley in the Pacific Northwest, Phytopathology 80, 784–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou, S.H. (1985) Rice diseases, Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palo, M.A. (1926) Rhizoctonia disease of rice: I. Study of the disease and of the influence of certain conditions upon the viability of the sclerotial bodies of the causal fungus, Philippine Agriculturist 15, 361–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, A.R.C.S. and Bertus, L.S. (1932) Sclerotial diseases of rice in Ceylon. 1. Rhizoctonia solani Kühn, Ceylon Journal of Science All, 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter, J.R.,Jr., Sherwood, R.T. and Platt, W.D. (1969) Anastomosis grouping of Thanatephorus cucumeris, Phytopathology 59, 1270–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter, J.R.,Jr., and Whitney, H.S. (1970) Taxonomy and Nomenclature of the imperfect state, in J.R. Parmeter, Jr (ed.), Rhizoctonia solani: Biology and pathology, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawn, J.D. (1983) Biochemistry,Harper Row Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, O.A. (1918) Philippine economic plant diseases, The Philippine Journal of Science A13, 165–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savary, S., Castilla, N.P., Elazegui, F.A., McLaren, C.G., Ynalvez, M.A. and Teng, P.S. (1995) Direct and indirect effects of nitrogen supply and disease source structure on rice sheath blight spread,Phytopathology 85, 959–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahjahan, A.K.M., Fabeller, N. and Mew, T.W., (1990): Effect of crop management practices on the sclerotia dynamics of Rhizoctonia solani in upland rice, Bangladesh Journal of Plant Pathology 6, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, R. T. (1969) Morphology and pathology of four anastomosis groups of Thanatephorus cucumeris, Phytopathology 59, 1924–1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirai, M. (1906) On Hypochnus sasakii n. sp., [Abstract] Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 20, 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.K., Satyanarayana, K. and Reddy, A.P.K. (1990) Studies on morphology, growth habit, hyphal anastomosis and virulence pattern of five isolates of sheath blight pathogen of rice, Indian Phytopathology 43, 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneh, B., Burpee, L. and Ogoshi, A., (1991) Identification of Rhizoctonia species, APS Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota.Vijayan, M. and Nair, C. M. (1985) Anastomosis grouping of isolates of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn (Thanatephorus cucumeris (Frank) Donk) causing sheath blight of rice Current Science 54, 89–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilgalys, R. (1988) Genetic relatedness among anastomosis groups in Rhizoctonia as measured by DNA DNA hybridization, Phytopathology78, 698–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilgalys, R. and Gonzalez, D. (1990) Ribosomal DNA restriction length polymorphisms in Rhizoctonia solani, Phytopathology 80, 151–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilgalys, R. and Cubeta, M.A. (1994) Molecular systematics and population biology of Rhizoctonia, Annual Review of Phytopathology 32, 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C.T. (1934) Rhizoctonia sheath blight of rice, Bulletin of the College of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Nanking 15, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, T., Kardin, M.K., Wagiman and Tantera, D.M. (1984) Hyphal anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn in Indonesia, Penelitian Pertanian 4, 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber, M. and Manibhushanrao, K. (1982) Studies on comparative gel electrophoretic patterns of proteins and enzymes from isolates of Rhizoctonia solani causing sheath blight disease in rice. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 28, 762–771.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Banniza, S., Holderness, M. (2001). Rice Sheath Blight — Pathogen Biology and Diversity. In: Major Fungal Diseases of Rice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2157-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2157-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5835-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2157-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics