Abstract
Agent-based modelling on a computer appears to have a special role to play in the development of social science and the formulation of social policy. It offers a means of discovering general and applicable social theory, and grounding it in precise assumptions and derivations, whilst addressing those elements of individual cognition that are central to human society. However, there are important questions to be asked and difficulties to be overcome in achieving this potential. What differentiates agent-based modelling from traditional computer modelling? What different types of agent-based models are there, and what are the structural relationships between them (if any)? Which model types should be used in which circumstances? If it is appropriate to use a complex model, for example one incorporating “deliberative” agents, how can it be validated? If it can only be validated in general terms, does this mean that we are forced into a “theory building” mode in which the focus of the investigation lies in the model’s properties? If so, what types of parameter space may a complex model have? How best can very large parameter spaces be explored? Some of these questions are here addressed and are illustrated by reference to recent agent-based models for the environment. A particular application is then considered in some detail: agent-based modelling of intervention strategies for integrated ecosystem management, especially management of the Fraser River watershed in British Columbia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axtell, R. (2001). Effects of Interaction Topology and Activation Regime in Several Multi-Agent Systems. In: 33–48.
Bousquet, F., Cambier, C., Mullon, C., Morand, P., and Quensiere, J. (1994). Simulating Fishermen’s Society. In: Gilbert, N. and Doran, J.E. (eds.) Simulating Societies. UCL Press, London. pp. 143–164.
Carpenter, S., Brock, W. and Hanson, P. (1999). Ecological and Social Dynamics in Simple Models of Ecosystem management. Conservation Ecology 3(2): 4. http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art4
Christie, P. and White, A.T. (1997). Trends in Development of Coastal Area Management in Tropical Countries: From Central to Community Orientation. Coastal Management, 25, 155–181.
Doran, J.E. (1997). From Computer Simulation to Artificial Societies. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation International, 14, 69–78.
Doran, J.E. (1998). Simulating Collective Misbelief. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol 1(1) http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/1/3.html
Doran, J.E. (2000). Trajectories to Complexity in Artificial Societies: Rationality, Belief and Emotions. In: T. A. Kohler and G. J. Gummerman (eds.). Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 89–105.
Doran, J.E. and Palmer, M. (1995). The EOS Project: Integrating Two Models of Palaeolithic Social Change. In: Gilbert, N. and Conte, R. (eds.). Artificial Societies. UCL Press, London. pp. 103–125.
Dorcey, A.H.J. (1997). Collaborating Towards Sustainability Together: The Fraser Basin Management Board and Program. In: Shrubsole, D. and Mitchell, B. (eds.). Practising Sustainable Water Management: Canadian and International Experiences. Canadian Water Resources Association. Available at http://www.interchg.ubc.ca/dorcey/chcwra/fccwra.html
Downing, T.E., Moss, S., and Pahl-Wostl, C. (2001). Understanding Climate Policy Using Participatory Agent-Based Social Simulation. In: Moss, S. and Davidsson, P. (eds.). Multi-Agent Based Simulation. Springer, Berlin. LNAI 1979. pp. 198–213.
Epstein, J.M. and Axtell, R. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Washington, D.C. The Brookings Institution Press and MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
FIRMA (2000). See web page at http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/firma/index.html
Fishwick, P.A., Sanderson, J.G. and Wolff, W.F. (1998). A Multimodeling Basis for AcrossTrophic-Level Ecosystem Modeling: The Florida Everglades Example. SCS Transactions on Simulation, 15 (2), 76–98.
Gilbert, G.N. (2000). Modelling Sociality: The View from Europe. In: T. A. Kohler and G. J. Gummerman (eds.). Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 355–372.
Gilbert, G.N. and Troitzsch K.G., (1999). Simulation for the Social Scientist. Open University Press.
Hales, D. (2001). Memetic Evolution and Sub-Optimisation. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Hall, K. et al (2000) Brunette Basin Watershed Plan. Policy and Planning Department, Greater Vancouver Regional District.
Healey, M. (1998). Paradigms, Policies, and Prognostications about the Management of Watershed Ecosystems In: Naiman, R.J. and Bilby, R.E. (eds.) River Ecology and Management. Springer. Pp. 662–682.
Healey, M. (1998a). Barriers and Bridges to Sustainability in the Fraser Basin. Invited address to the State of the Basin conference, November 20 and 21`x, 1998. Vancouver.
Healey, M. (ed.) (1999). Seeking Sustainability in the Lower Fraser Basin: Issues and Choices. Institute for Resources and the Environment, Westwater Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Jennings, N.R., and Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) (1998). Agent Technology. Springer, Berlin.
Kluver, J. and Schmidt, J. (1999). Topology, Metric and Dynamics of Social Systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 2, no. 3, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/2/3/7.html
Kohler, T.A., Kresl, J., Van West, C., Carr E., and Wilshusen, R.H. (2000). Be There Then: a Modelling Approach to Settlement Determinants and Spatial Efficiency Among Late Ancestral Pueblo Populations of the Mesa Verde Region, U.S. In: T. A. Kohler and G. J. Gummerman (eds.). Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Oxford University Press. pp. 145–178.
Lansing, J.S. (2000). Anti-Chaos, Common Property, and the Emergence of Cooperation. In: T. A. Kohler and G. J. Gummerman (eds.). Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Oxford University Press. pp. 207–223.
Lansing, J.S, Kremer, J.N, and Smuts, B.B. (1998). System-Dependent Selection, Ecological Feedback and the Emergence of Functional Structure in Ecosystems. J Theor. Biol. 192, 377–391.
Lawson, B.G. and Park, S. (2000). Asynchronous Time Evolution in an Artificial Society Model. [ONLINE] JASSS, Vol. 3, No. 1.
Lee, K. and Fishwick, P.A. (1997). A Methodology for Dynamic Model Abstraction Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation International, 13 (4), 217–229.
Marshall, D. (1998) Watershed management in British Columbia: The Fraser Basin Experience. Environments, Vol. 25, No. 2 /3, 64–79.
Moss, S. (1998). Critical Incident Management: An Empirically Derived Computational Model. [ONLINE] JASSS, Vol. 1, No. 4.
Moss S. (2001). Messy Systems: The Target for Multi Agent Based Simulation. In: Moss, S. and Davidsson, P. (eds.). Multi-Agent Based Simulation. Springer, Berlin. LNAI 1979. pp. 1–14.
Nielsen, J.R. and Vedsmand, T. (1999). User Participation and Institutional Change in Fisheries Management: a Viable Alternative to the Failures of ‘Top-Down’ Driven Control? Ocean Coastal Management, 42, 19–37.
Nilsson, N.J. (1971). Problem-Solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Norling, E., Sonenberg, L. and Ronnquist, R. (2001). Enhancing Multi-Agent Based Simulation with Human-Like Decision Making Strategies. In: Moss, S. and Davidsson, P. (eds.). MultiAgent Based Simulation. Springer, Berlin. LNAI 1979. pp. 214–228
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ostrom, E. (1995). Constituting Social Capital and Collective Action. In: R. O. Kehane and E. Ostrom (eds.). Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains. Sage Publications, London. pp. 125–160.
Prietula, M.J., Carley, K.M., and Gasser, L. (1998). Simulating Organisations. AAAI and MIT Press.
Rouchier, J., Bousquet, F., Le Page, C., and Bonnefoy, J.-L. (2001). Multi-Agent Modelling and Renewable Resource Issues: the Relevance of Shared Representations for Interacting Agents. In: Moss, S. and Davidsson, P. (eds.). Multi-Agent Based Simulation. Springer, Berlin. LNAI 1979. pp. 181–197.
Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall.
Teran, O., Edmunds, B., and Wallis, S. (2001). Mapping the Envelope of Social Simulation Trajectories. In: Moss, S. and Davidsson, P. (eds.). Multi-Agent Based Simulation. Springer, Berlin. LNAI 1979. pp. 229–243.
Walters, C.J. (1986). Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Macmillan, New York. WCED (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Weiss, G. (ed.) (1999). Multiagent Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doran, J.E. (2001). Can Agent-Based Modelling Really be Useful?. In: Saam, N.J., Schmidt, B. (eds) Cooperative Agents. Theory and Decision Library, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1177-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1177-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5902-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1177-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive