Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture ((PSBA,volume 32))

Abstract

The first report on induced mutation of a gene indicated the potential application of mutagenesis for plant improvement (Muller, 1927). Five decades later Brock (1980) was able to write ‘The role of induced mutations in plant breeding has been a controversial subject for several decades.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, S.W., R. Kunanuvatchaidach and I.D. Godwin. 1995. Somaclonal variation in rice — drought tolerance and other agronomic characters. Aust J Bot. 43: 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, P.M., P.J. Larkin, H.S. Bariana, E.S. Lagudah, R. Appels, P.M. Waterhouse, R.I.S. Brettel, X. Chen, H.J. Xu, Z.Y. Xin, Y.T. Qian, X.M. Zhou, Z.M. Cheng and G.H. Zhou. 1995. The use of cell culture for sub-chromosomal introgressions of barley yellow dwarf virus resistance from Thinopyrum intermedium to wheat. Genome 38: 395–405.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brettel, R.I.S., P.M. Banks, Y. Cauderon, X. Chen, Z.M. Cheng, P.J. Larkin and P.M. Waterhouse. 1988. A single wheatgrass chromosome reduces the concentration of barley yellow dwarf virus in wheat. Ann Appl Biol. 113: 599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, R.D. 1979. Mutation plant breeding for seed protein improvement. In: Seed Protein Improvement in Cereals and Grain Legumes, Vol. 1, pp. 43–55. Vienna: IAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, R.D. 1980. Mutagenesis and crop improvement. In: The Biology of Crop Productivity (ed. P.S. Carlson), pp. 383–409. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croughan, S.S., S.S. Quisenberry, M.M. Eichhorn, P.D. Colyer and T.F. Brown. 1994. Registration of Brazos-R3 bermudagrass germplasm. Crop Sci. 34: 542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.A. and W.R. Sharp. 1983. Single gene mutations in tomato plants regenerated from tissue culture. Science 221: 949–951.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.A., W.R. Sharp and H.P. Medina-Filho. 1984. Somaclonal and gametoclonal variation. Am. J Bot. 71: 759–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, G.B. 1994. Potential for the improvement of malting quality of barley by genetic engineering. In: Improvement of Cereal Quality by Genetic Engineering, pp. 135–138 (eds R.J. Henry and R.A. Ronalds). New York and London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavazzi, G., C. Tonelli, G. Todesco, E. Arreghini, F. Raffaldi, F. Vecchio, G. Barbuzzi, M.G. Biasini and F. Sala. 1987. Somaclonal variation versus chemically induced mutagenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 74: 733–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, L. and P.S. Rao. 1983. Yellow-seeded variants in in vitro regenerants of mustard (Brassica juncea Coss Var Rai-5). Plant Sci Lett. 30: 327–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgetti, L., M.R. Vergara, M. Evangelista, F. Loschiavo, M. Terzi and V.N. Ronchi. 1995. On the occurrence of somatic meiosis in embryogenic carrot cell cultures. Mol Gen Genet. 246: 657–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M.W. and P.J. Larkin, 1995. Adenine methylation at dam sites increases transient gene expression in plant cells. Transgen Res. 4: 324–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A.G. 1986. Genetic control of polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in flax (Linum usitassimum) seed oil. Theor Appl Genet. 72: 654–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A.G. and J.C.P. Dribnenki, 1994. Linola — a new premium polyunsaturated oil. Lipid Technol., March/April: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heszky, L.E. and E. Simon-Kiss, 1992. ‘Dama’, the first plant variety of biotechnology origin in Hungary, registered in 1992. Hung Agric Res. 1: 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, U., K. Badaeva, W. Busch, B. Friebe and B.S. Gill, 1996. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Agropyron chromatin specifying resistance to barley yellow dwarf virus in wheat. Genome 39: 336–347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler, S.M. and R.L. Phillips, 1993. Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation variation in maize. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 90: 8773–8776.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katiyar, R.K. and V.L. Chopra, 1995. A somaclone of Brassica juncea is processed into a variety and is released for commercial cultivation in India. Cruciferae News. 17: 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukreja, A.K., O.P. Dhawan, A.K. Mathur, P.S. Ahuja and S. Mandal, 1991. Screening and evaluation of agronomically useful somaclonal variations in Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L). Euphytica 53: 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J. 1987. Somaclonal variation: history, method and meaning. Iowa State J Res. 61: 393–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J. and W.R. Scowcroft, 1981. Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell culture for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet. 60: 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J., S.A. Ryan, R.I.S. Brettell and W.R. Scowcroft, 1984. Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 67: 443–455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G.J., E.J. Finnegan, M.A. Ayliffe and J.G. Ellis, 1995. The L6 gene for flax rust resistance is related to the Arabidopsis bacterial resistance gene RPS2 and the tobacco viral resistance gene N. Plant Cell. 7: 1195–1206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.G., G.J. Tanner, A.C. Delves and P.J. Larkin, 1993. Asymmetric somatic hybrid plants between Medicago sativa L (alfalfa, lucerne) and Onobrychis viciifolia Scop (sainfoin). Theor Appl Genet. 87: 455–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J.H., C. Dixelius, I. Eriksson and K. Glimelius, 1995. Brassia napus (+) B. tounefortii, a somatic containing traits of agronomic importance for rapeseed breeding. Plant Sci. 109: 75–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, D. and J. Jacobsen, 1995. What’s brewing in barley biotechnology? Bio/technology 13: 245–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maluszynski, M., B.S. Ahloowalia and B. Sigurbjörnsson, 1995. Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, S.L., K. Ali and K.S. Barna, 1994. Somaclonal variation in a food legume — Lathyrus sativus. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 3: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metakovsky, E.V., A.Y. Novoselskaya and A.A. Sozinov, 1987. Problem of interpreting results obtained in studies of somaclonal variation in gliadin proteins in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 73: 764–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezencev, N., G. Clement and E. Guiderdoni, 1995. Variation among progenies of diploid plants regenerated from haploid, microspore-derived cell-suspension protoplasts of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Breeding — Z. Planzenzücht. 114: 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micke, A., B. Donini and M. Maluszynski, 1987. Induced mutations for crop improvement — a review. Trop Agric. 64: 259–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H.J. 1927. Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science 66: 84–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.V., J.P. Slang, R.N. Oram, D.A. Tran and P.A. Salisbury, 1988. Variation in seed glucosinolate concentrations of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. + Coss.). Aust J Exp Agric 28: 779–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R.L., S.M. Kaeppler and P. Olhoft, 1994. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 91: 5222–5226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Racchi, M.L., M. Rebecchi, G. Todesco, E. Nielsen, and G. Forlani, 1995. Glyphosate tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). 2. Selection and characterization of a tolerant somaclone. Euphytica 82: 165–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala, F., G. Baratta, G. Todesco, G. Consonni, G. Gavazzi, C. Tonelli, and F. Vecchio, 1990. Somaclonal variation and chemically induced mutagenesis for the production of salt and drought tolerance in tomato. Acta Hort. 28: 353–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, J., G.C. Mitra and A.K. Sharma, 1991. An evaluation of a somaclone of Dioscorea floribunda Mart and Gall. Experientia 47: 284–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, J.F. 1981. Protoplasts as sources of disease resistance in plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 19: 145–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sibi, M. 1976. La notion de programme génétique chez les végétaux supérieurs. II. Aspect expérimental; obtention de variants (par culture de tissus in vitro sur Lactuca sativa L., apparition) de vigeur chez les croisements. Ann Amélior Plantes. 26: 523–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skirvin R.M. and J. Janick, 1976. Tissue culture-induced variation in scented pelargonium spp. J. Am Soc Hort Sci. 101: 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sree Ramulu, K. 1982. Genetic instability at the S-locus of Lycopersicon peruvianum plants regenerated from in vitro culture of anthers: generation of new S-allele reversions. Heredity 49: 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoutjesdijk, P.A., P.J. Larkin and P.W.G. Sale, 1996. Improving the acid-soil tolerance of Medicago sativa by asymmetric somatic hybridization. In: Plant Soil Interactions at Low pH, (ed. R.A. Date et al.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 455–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z., C. Zhao, K. Zheng, X. Qi and Y. Fu, 1983. Somaclonal genetics of rice, Oryza sativa L. Theor Appl Genet. 67: 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, C.R., B.L. Burson and W.R. Jordan, 1993. Physiological variation in tissue culture regenerated apomictic Paspalum dilatatum.J Plant Physiol. 141: 482–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Upelniek, V.P., A.Y. Novoselskaya, J. Shutka, G. Galiba and E.V. Metakovsky, 1995. Genetic variation at storage protein-coding loci of common wheat (cv ‘Chinese Spring’) induced by nitrosoethylurea and by the cultivation of immature embryos in vitro. Theor Appl Genet. 90: 372–379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Q.J., M.C. Rush and J.H. Oard, 1995. Homozygous variation in rice somaclones — nonrandom variation instead of mitotic recombination. Crop Sci. 35: 954–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y.S. and E. Pehu, 1993. RFLP analysis of asymmetric somatic hybrids between Solanum tuberosum and irradiated S. brevidens. Theor Appl Genet. 86: 754–760.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, V.K. and S.L. Mehta, 1995. Lathyrus sativus — a future pulse crop free of neurotoxin. Current Sci. 68: 288–292.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larkin, P.J. (1998). Introduction. In: Jain, S.M., Brar, D.S., Ahloowalia, B.S. (eds) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9125-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9125-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4956-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9125-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics