Abstract
The first report on induced mutation of a gene indicated the potential application of mutagenesis for plant improvement (Muller, 1927). Five decades later Brock (1980) was able to write ‘The role of induced mutations in plant breeding has been a controversial subject for several decades.’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adkins, S.W., R. Kunanuvatchaidach and I.D. Godwin. 1995. Somaclonal variation in rice — drought tolerance and other agronomic characters. Aust J Bot. 43: 201–209.
Banks, P.M., P.J. Larkin, H.S. Bariana, E.S. Lagudah, R. Appels, P.M. Waterhouse, R.I.S. Brettel, X. Chen, H.J. Xu, Z.Y. Xin, Y.T. Qian, X.M. Zhou, Z.M. Cheng and G.H. Zhou. 1995. The use of cell culture for sub-chromosomal introgressions of barley yellow dwarf virus resistance from Thinopyrum intermedium to wheat. Genome 38: 395–405.
Brettel, R.I.S., P.M. Banks, Y. Cauderon, X. Chen, Z.M. Cheng, P.J. Larkin and P.M. Waterhouse. 1988. A single wheatgrass chromosome reduces the concentration of barley yellow dwarf virus in wheat. Ann Appl Biol. 113: 599–603.
Brock, R.D. 1979. Mutation plant breeding for seed protein improvement. In: Seed Protein Improvement in Cereals and Grain Legumes, Vol. 1, pp. 43–55. Vienna: IAEA.
Brock, R.D. 1980. Mutagenesis and crop improvement. In: The Biology of Crop Productivity (ed. P.S. Carlson), pp. 383–409. New York: Academic Press.
Croughan, S.S., S.S. Quisenberry, M.M. Eichhorn, P.D. Colyer and T.F. Brown. 1994. Registration of Brazos-R3 bermudagrass germplasm. Crop Sci. 34: 542.
Evans, D.A. and W.R. Sharp. 1983. Single gene mutations in tomato plants regenerated from tissue culture. Science 221: 949–951.
Evans, D.A., W.R. Sharp and H.P. Medina-Filho. 1984. Somaclonal and gametoclonal variation. Am. J Bot. 71: 759–774.
Fincher, G.B. 1994. Potential for the improvement of malting quality of barley by genetic engineering. In: Improvement of Cereal Quality by Genetic Engineering, pp. 135–138 (eds R.J. Henry and R.A. Ronalds). New York and London: Plenum.
Gavazzi, G., C. Tonelli, G. Todesco, E. Arreghini, F. Raffaldi, F. Vecchio, G. Barbuzzi, M.G. Biasini and F. Sala. 1987. Somaclonal variation versus chemically induced mutagenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 74: 733–738.
George, L. and P.S. Rao. 1983. Yellow-seeded variants in in vitro regenerants of mustard (Brassica juncea Coss Var Rai-5). Plant Sci Lett. 30: 327–330.
Giorgetti, L., M.R. Vergara, M. Evangelista, F. Loschiavo, M. Terzi and V.N. Ronchi. 1995. On the occurrence of somatic meiosis in embryogenic carrot cell cultures. Mol Gen Genet. 246: 657–662.
Graham, M.W. and P.J. Larkin, 1995. Adenine methylation at dam sites increases transient gene expression in plant cells. Transgen Res. 4: 324–331.
Green, A.G. 1986. Genetic control of polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in flax (Linum usitassimum) seed oil. Theor Appl Genet. 72: 654–661.
Green, A.G. and J.C.P. Dribnenki, 1994. Linola — a new premium polyunsaturated oil. Lipid Technol., March/April: 29–33.
Heszky, L.E. and E. Simon-Kiss, 1992. ‘Dama’, the first plant variety of biotechnology origin in Hungary, registered in 1992. Hung Agric Res. 1: 30–32.
Hohmann, U., K. Badaeva, W. Busch, B. Friebe and B.S. Gill, 1996. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Agropyron chromatin specifying resistance to barley yellow dwarf virus in wheat. Genome 39: 336–347.
Kaeppler, S.M. and R.L. Phillips, 1993. Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation variation in maize. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 90: 8773–8776.
Katiyar, R.K. and V.L. Chopra, 1995. A somaclone of Brassica juncea is processed into a variety and is released for commercial cultivation in India. Cruciferae News. 17: 92–93.
Kukreja, A.K., O.P. Dhawan, A.K. Mathur, P.S. Ahuja and S. Mandal, 1991. Screening and evaluation of agronomically useful somaclonal variations in Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L). Euphytica 53: 183–191.
Larkin, P.J. 1987. Somaclonal variation: history, method and meaning. Iowa State J Res. 61: 393–434.
Larkin, P.J. and W.R. Scowcroft, 1981. Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell culture for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet. 60: 197–214.
Larkin, P.J., S.A. Ryan, R.I.S. Brettell and W.R. Scowcroft, 1984. Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 67: 443–455.
Lawrence, G.J., E.J. Finnegan, M.A. Ayliffe and J.G. Ellis, 1995. The L6 gene for flax rust resistance is related to the Arabidopsis bacterial resistance gene RPS2 and the tobacco viral resistance gene N. Plant Cell. 7: 1195–1206.
Li, Y.G., G.J. Tanner, A.C. Delves and P.J. Larkin, 1993. Asymmetric somatic hybrid plants between Medicago sativa L (alfalfa, lucerne) and Onobrychis viciifolia Scop (sainfoin). Theor Appl Genet. 87: 455–463.
Liu, J.H., C. Dixelius, I. Eriksson and K. Glimelius, 1995. Brassia napus (+) B. tounefortii, a somatic containing traits of agronomic importance for rapeseed breeding. Plant Sci. 109: 75–86.
McElroy, D. and J. Jacobsen, 1995. What’s brewing in barley biotechnology? Bio/technology 13: 245–249.
Maluszynski, M., B.S. Ahloowalia and B. Sigurbjörnsson, 1995. Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 303–315.
Mehta, S.L., K. Ali and K.S. Barna, 1994. Somaclonal variation in a food legume — Lathyrus sativus. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 3: 73–77.
Metakovsky, E.V., A.Y. Novoselskaya and A.A. Sozinov, 1987. Problem of interpreting results obtained in studies of somaclonal variation in gliadin proteins in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 73: 764–766.
Mezencev, N., G. Clement and E. Guiderdoni, 1995. Variation among progenies of diploid plants regenerated from haploid, microspore-derived cell-suspension protoplasts of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Breeding — Z. Planzenzücht. 114: 149–154.
Micke, A., B. Donini and M. Maluszynski, 1987. Induced mutations for crop improvement — a review. Trop Agric. 64: 259–287.
Muller, H.J. 1927. Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science 66: 84–87.
Palmer, M.V., J.P. Slang, R.N. Oram, D.A. Tran and P.A. Salisbury, 1988. Variation in seed glucosinolate concentrations of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. + Coss.). Aust J Exp Agric 28: 779–782.
Phillips, R.L., S.M. Kaeppler and P. Olhoft, 1994. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 91: 5222–5226.
Racchi, M.L., M. Rebecchi, G. Todesco, E. Nielsen, and G. Forlani, 1995. Glyphosate tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). 2. Selection and characterization of a tolerant somaclone. Euphytica 82: 165–173.
Sala, F., G. Baratta, G. Todesco, G. Consonni, G. Gavazzi, C. Tonelli, and F. Vecchio, 1990. Somaclonal variation and chemically induced mutagenesis for the production of salt and drought tolerance in tomato. Acta Hort. 28: 353–359.
Sen, J., G.C. Mitra and A.K. Sharma, 1991. An evaluation of a somaclone of Dioscorea floribunda Mart and Gall. Experientia 47: 284–288.
Shepard, J.F. 1981. Protoplasts as sources of disease resistance in plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 19: 145–166.
Sibi, M. 1976. La notion de programme génétique chez les végétaux supérieurs. II. Aspect expérimental; obtention de variants (par culture de tissus in vitro sur Lactuca sativa L., apparition) de vigeur chez les croisements. Ann Amélior Plantes. 26: 523–547.
Skirvin R.M. and J. Janick, 1976. Tissue culture-induced variation in scented pelargonium spp. J. Am Soc Hort Sci. 101: 281–290.
Sree Ramulu, K. 1982. Genetic instability at the S-locus of Lycopersicon peruvianum plants regenerated from in vitro culture of anthers: generation of new S-allele reversions. Heredity 49: 319–330.
Stoutjesdijk, P.A., P.J. Larkin and P.W.G. Sale, 1996. Improving the acid-soil tolerance of Medicago sativa by asymmetric somatic hybridization. In: Plant Soil Interactions at Low pH, (ed. R.A. Date et al.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 455–457.
Sun, Z., C. Zhao, K. Zheng, X. Qi and Y. Fu, 1983. Somaclonal genetics of rice, Oryza sativa L. Theor Appl Genet. 67: 67–73.
Tischler, C.R., B.L. Burson and W.R. Jordan, 1993. Physiological variation in tissue culture regenerated apomictic Paspalum dilatatum.J Plant Physiol. 141: 482–486.
Upelniek, V.P., A.Y. Novoselskaya, J. Shutka, G. Galiba and E.V. Metakovsky, 1995. Genetic variation at storage protein-coding loci of common wheat (cv ‘Chinese Spring’) induced by nitrosoethylurea and by the cultivation of immature embryos in vitro. Theor Appl Genet. 90: 372–379.
Xie, Q.J., M.C. Rush and J.H. Oard, 1995. Homozygous variation in rice somaclones — nonrandom variation instead of mitotic recombination. Crop Sci. 35: 954–957.
Xu, Y.S. and E. Pehu, 1993. RFLP analysis of asymmetric somatic hybrids between Solanum tuberosum and irradiated S. brevidens. Theor Appl Genet. 86: 754–760.
Yadav, V.K. and S.L. Mehta, 1995. Lathyrus sativus — a future pulse crop free of neurotoxin. Current Sci. 68: 288–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larkin, P.J. (1998). Introduction. In: Jain, S.M., Brar, D.S., Ahloowalia, B.S. (eds) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9125-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9125-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4956-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9125-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive