Skip to main content

Planning Cells: A Gate to “Fractal” Mediation

  • Chapter
Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 10))

Abstract

Ecology suffers. Humanity is far from having peace with Nature. The world population explodes. Ethnic conflicts are ubiquitous. Wars and civil wars are haunting all continents and many nations. The individual in society has lost functions and lacks cultural identity. Millions of people die from hunger. Millions are driven away from home and live in refugee camps. Problems abound!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond, G. A., and S. Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton University Press: Princeton 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique (Little Brown: Boston 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongardt, H., P. C. Dienel, and H. Henning, Bürger planen das Rathausviertel. Planungszellen erarbeiten Ausgangsdaten für den städtebaulichen Wettbewerb “Rathaus/Gürzenich Köln” (Campus: Frankfurt/Main 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgergutachten, ISDN, compiled by P. C. Dienel, B. Moog-Kopp, and A. Reinert. (Participation Research Unit: University of Wuppertal 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgergutachten, Regelung sozialer Folgen neuer Informationstechnologien, compiled by P. C. Dienel, M. Huppertz and H. Poschmann. Fourth Edition (Participation Research Unit: University of Wuppertal 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, H., “The Resolution of Technically Intensive Public Policy Disputes,” Science, Technology, and Human Values, 9 (Winter 1984), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. R., and R. Ueberhorst, Creative Democracy: Systematic Conflict Resolution and Policymaking in a World of High Science and Technology (Praeger: New York 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, N., J. M. Kelly, and P. Schaefer, “Citizen panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation,” Public Administration Review, 46 (1986), 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C., “Partizipation an Planungsprozessen als Aufgabe der Verwaltung,” in: Die Verwaltung, 4(1971), 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C., New Options for Participatory Democracy. Werkstattpapier No.1 of the University of Wuppertal (Participation Research Unit: University of Wuppertal 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C., “Contributing to Social Decision Merthodology: Citizen Reports on Technological Projects,” in: C. Vlek and G. Cvetkovich (eds.), Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects (Kluwer: Dordrecht 1989), pp. 133–152.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C., Die Planungszelle. Eine Alternative zur Establishment-Demokratie Third Edition (Westdeutscher Verlag: Opladen 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C., NIP — Nucleos de Intervencion Participativa: Un paso hacia la democracia (Zarautz: in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C., and D. Garbe, Zukünftige Energiepolitik. Ein Bürgergutachten (HTV Edition “Technik und Sozialer Wandel”: Munich 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidgenössisches Justiz-und Polizeidepartement (ed.), Mitwirkungsverfahren undmodelle (Bundesamt für Raumplanung: Bern 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A., The Active Society. A Theory of Societal and Political Processes (The Free Press: New York 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A., The Spirit of Community. Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda (Crown: New York 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D. J., “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms,” Science, Technology, and Human Values, 15, 2 (Spring 1990), 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, T., and D. Garbe, Bürgergutachten Energieversorgung Jüchen-Nord (Participation Research Unit: University of Wuppertal 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbe, D., “Social Compatibility of Telecommunication Technologies. Results of the Citizen Report on ISDN,” Telecommunications Policy, 11 (1992), 646–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbe, D., and A. Grothe, Bürgergutachten Testkriterien und Testplanung (Participation Research Unit: University of Wuppertal 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbe, D., and M. Hoffmann, Soziale Urteilsbildung und Einstellungsänderungen in Planungszellen (Participation Research Unit: University of Wuppertal 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grottian, P., and A. Murswieck, “Zur theoretischen und empirischen Bestimmung von politisch-administrativen Handlungsspielräumen,” in: P. Grottian and A. Murswieck (eds.), Handlungsspielräume der Staatsadministration (Hoffmann und Campe: Hamburg 1974), pp. 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P., “Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory,” in: H. Jungermann and D. de Zeeuw (eds.), Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs (Reidel: Dordrecht 1977), pp. 165–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kathlene, L., and J. A. Martin, “Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives, and Policy Formation,” Policy Analysis and Management, 10 (1991), 46–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laboratorio de Sociologia Juridica (ed.), Dictamen Ciudadano Astigaaraga (San Sebastian, Spain: December 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibholz, G., “Parteienstaat und repräsentative Demokratie,” in: H. Rausch (ed.), Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: Darmstandt 1968), 222–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N., “Die Knappheit der Zeit und die Vordringlichkeit des Befristeten,” Die Verwaltung, 1 (1968), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. E., Participatory Pluralism (Nelson Hall: Chicago 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. E., The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., “Premises of Risk Communication: Results of Two Participatory Experiments,” in: R.E. Kasperson and P.J. Stallen,(eds.), Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives (Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht 1991), pp. 457–481.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., H. U. Stegelmann, G. Albrecht, U. Kotte, and H. P. Peters, “An Empirical Investigation of Citizens’ Preferences Among Four Energy Scenarios,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 26, 1 (1984), 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., G. Albrecht, U. Kotte, H.P. Peters, and H.U. Stegelmann, Sozialverträgliche Energiepolitik. Ein Gutachten für die Bundesregierung (HTV Edition “Technik und Sozialer Wandel”: Munich 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., R. Goble, D. Levine, H. Rakel, and T. Webler, Citizen Participation for Sludge Management, Final Report to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (CENTED, Clark University: Worcester, MA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., and D. Levine, “Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication,” in: R. Kasperson and P.J. Stallen (eds.), Communicating Risk to the Public (Kluwer: Dordrecht 1990), pp. 175–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., T. Webler, H. Rakel, P. C. Dienel, and B. Johnson, “Public Participation in Decision Making: A Three-Step-Procedure,” Policy Sciences, 26 (1993), 189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., and T. Webler, “Konfliktbewältigung durch Kooperation in der Umweltpolitik — Theoretische Grundlagen und Handlungsvorschläge,” in: Umweltökonomische Studenteninitiative OIKOS an der Hochschule St. Gallen (ed.), Kooperationen für die Umwelt. Im Dialog zum Handeln (Ruegger Verlag: Zürich 1994), pp. 11–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, N., “Citizen Participation and Democratic Theory,” in: S. Langton (ed.), Citizen Participation in America (Lexington Books: Lexington 1978), pp. 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, H., Parteien kontra Bürger? Die Zukunft der Paretiendemokratie (Econ: München und Zürich 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, M., “Die ego-zentrierten Netzwerke von Meinungsbildern,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 2 (1993), 254–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. R., R. L. Dennis., and D. W. Ely, “Citizen Participation and Judgment in Policy Analysis: A Case Study of Urban Air Quality Policy,” Policy Science, 17 (1984), 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Second Edition (Harper and Brothers: New York 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, M., and M. Thompson, Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology, and Social Choice (University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Alemann, U., “Partizipation oder Akzeptanz. Bemerkungen zur Verträglichkeit von Demokratie und Technologie,” in: H. Jungermann, W. Pfaffenberger, G.F. Schä;fer, and W. Wild (eds.), Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik — Perspektiven und Interpretationen (HTV Edition “Technik und Sozialer Wandel”: Munich 1986), pp. 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Kielmannsegg, P. Graf, “Politik in der Sackgasse?”, in: Ministerium for Forschung und Technologie (ed.), Energiediskussion, Vol. 3 (BMFT: Bonn, June 1979), pp. 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeldt, D., and W. Edwards, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S. R., “Multiattribute Utility Theory for Measuring Safety,” European Journal of Operational Research, 10 (1982), 77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webler, T., Experimenting with a New Democratic Instrument in Switzerland: Siting a Landfill in the Eastern Part of Canton Aargau (Polyproject: Risk and Safety of Technical Systems, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology: Zürich 1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dienel, P.C., Renn, O. (1995). Planning Cells: A Gate to “Fractal” Mediation. In: Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3518-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0131-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics