Skip to main content

Environmental Management Accounting for Staff Appraisal: Evidence from Australia, Germany and Japan

  • Chapter
Environmental Management Accounting — Purpose and Progress

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 12))

Abstract

Interest has emerged in the idea of promoting the development of environmental management accounting systems within organisations. Various environmental management accounting frameworks and tools for analysis have been proposed and some evidence has been gathered about current practice. This paper adds to the existing body of knowledge on the potential of environmental management accounting information to be used for individual performance appraisal. It examines the results of a survey of the styles of environmental information gathered and environmental management accounting practices of companies listed on stock exchanges in Australia, Germany and Japan. The focus of the survey is on an exploratory study of the comparative link between environmental management

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AS/NZS (Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand) (2000), ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 14031: Environmental Management — Environmental Performance Evaluation. Guidelines. (Standards Australia, Strathfield, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomeo, M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J.J., Heydkamp, P., James, P., de Walle, F. and Wolters, T. (1999), Eco-Management Accounting (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomeo, M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J.J., Heydkamp, P., James, P. and Wolters, T. (2000), Environmental Management Accounting in Europe: Current Practice and Future Potential, in European Accounting Review 1, 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., Gray, R., Thomson, I. and Walters, D. (1994), Accountants’ Attitudes and Environmentally-sensitive Accounting, Accounting and Business Research 24 (94), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beder, S. (1996), The Nature of Sustainable Development, 2nd edition (Scribe Publishers, Newham, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. and James, P. (1997), Environment-related Management Accounting: Current Practice and Future Trends, Greener Management International 17, 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. and James, P. (1998a), Environment under the spotlight — current practice and future trends in environment-related performance measurement for business, Research Report #55, The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London), 1–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. and James, P. (eds.) (1998b), The Green Bottom Line in The Green Bottom Line. Environmental Accounting for Management. Current Practice and Future Trends (Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. and James, P. (1999), The Evolution of Integrated Environmental Performance Evaluation and Reporting at Baxter International, in Bennett, M. and James, P. (eds.) Sustainable Measures. Evaluation and Reporting of Environmental and Social Performance (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Carlens, J., Tyteca, D., Olsthoorn, X., Wagner, M. and Wehrmeyer, W. (2001), “Green-ness” can be measured, European Business Forum 6, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, J.J. and Wolters, T. (eds.) (1999), Developing Eco-Management Accounting: An International Perspective (Zoetemeer, NL: Economisch Institut voor het Midden en Kleinbedrijf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R.L. Hahn, T. and Schaltegger, S. (2002), Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Management Accounting — Links Between Business Actors and EMA Tools, Australian Accounting Review 12 (2), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R. and Schaltegger, S. (2001), Eco-efficiency in Corporate Budgeting, Environment Management and Health 12(2), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R.L. and Welch, S. (1997), Australian Commonwealth Entities: an Analysis of their Environmental Disclosures, Abacus 33(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1996), State of the Environment Australia 1996. An independent report presented to the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, E.D. and Hox, J.J. (1988), The Effects of Response-Stimulating Factors on Response Rates and Data Quality in Mail Surveys — A Test of Dillman’s Total Design Method, Journal of Official Statistics 4(3) 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditz, D. and Ranganathan, J. (1997), Measuring Up: Toward a Common Framework for Tracking Corporate Environmental Performance (World Resources Institute, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOMAC (1996), Synreport: Eco-management accounting as a tool of environmental management (the Ecomae project), EIM Small Business Research and Consultancy, http://www.eim.nl/uk/nl/ecomac.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmanuel, C, Otley, D. and Merchant, K. (1990), Accounting for Management Control, 2nd edition, (Chapman and Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J. and Downs, F.S. (1986), The relationship of theory and research (Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. and Guthrie, J. (1995), Recent Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports of Australian Public and Private Sector Organisations Accounting Forum 19(2/3), 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. and Collison, D. (2001), The Professional Accountancy Bodies and the Provision of Education and Training in Relation to Environmental Issues (The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh) 1–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995), Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(1), 47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. (1988), Towards a Theory of Cultural Influence on Development of Accounting Systems Internationally, Abacus 24(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R. and Fisher, E. (1999), Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle, The Federation Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G.L. and McKinnon, J.L. (1999), Cross-cultural research in management control systems design: a review of the current state, Accounting,Organizations and Society 24. 483–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, R. (1991), On Valuing Nature, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4(3), 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991), Culture and Organisations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd. ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. and Bond, M.H. (1988), Confucius & economic growth: New trends in culture’s consequences. Organizational Dynamic, 16(4), 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. (1974), Accounting and Human Behaviour Accountancy Age Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horngren, C.T., Foster, G. and Datar, S.M. (1997), Cost Accounting — A managerial emphasis, 9th edition Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hroch, N. and Schaltegger, S. (2001), How well do environmental accounts consider and report major environmental political themes? (in German: Wie gut berücksichtigen Umwelterklärungen und — berichte zentrale umweltpolitische Themen?)(Center for Sustainability Management, Lüneburg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C.B. and Auster, E.R. (1990), Proactive Environmental Management: Avoiding the Toxic Trap, Sloan Management Review, Winter, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAC (1998), Environmental Management in Organizations: The Role of Management Accounting, Financial and Management Accounting Committee, Study #6 (International Federation of Accountants, New York) March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J.L. (1992), Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. (1983), Measuring Manufacturing Performance: A New Challenge for Managerial Accounting Research The Accounting Review LVIII(4), 686–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. (1984), The Evolution of Management Accounting The Accounting Review LIX(3), 390–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1992), The Balanced Scorecard — Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1993), Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work, Harvard Business Review, September/October, 134–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokubu, K. (2002), Two Governmental Initiatives on Environmental Management Accounting and Corporate Practices in Japan, paper presented at the 5 th EMAN Europe conference, Cheltenham: UK, 11-12 February, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F.N. (1986), Foundations of Behavioural Research, CBS Publishing Japan Ltd, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangione, T.W. (1995), Mail Surveys: Improving the Quality, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (1982), The Survey Method, George Allan and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunders, K. and Burritt, R.L. (1991), Accounting and Ecological Crisis, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4(3), 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobes, C. (1998), Towards a General Model of the Reasons for International Differences in Financial Reporting, Abacus, 34(2), 162–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes, C. and Parker, R. (eds.) (2000), Comparative International Accounting, 6th Edition, Pearson Education, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001), OECD Environmental Strategy for the first decade of the 21st Century, May 16, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. (1999), Environmental Costing: An Exploratory Examination, Australian Society of Certified Practising Accountants, Melbourne, Australia, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera, M.H.B. and Mathews, M.R. (1990), The cultural relativity of accounting and international patterns of social accounting, Advances in International Accounting, 3, 215–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage — Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A. (1978), Executive Incentives vs. Corporate Growth Harvard Business Review, July-August, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts E.S. (1999), In Defence of the Survey Method: An illustration from a study of user information satisfaction, Accounting and Finance 39(1), 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, S. (2000), Managerial Accounting, in Nobes, C. and Parker R (eds.) Comparative International Accounting, 6th Edition, Pearson Education, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. and Burritt, R.L. (2000), Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concepts and Practice, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Hahn, T. and Burritt, R.L. (2001a), Environmental Management Accounting — Overview and Main Approaches, in Bennett, M. & J.J. Bouma, (eds.), Environmental Management Accounting and the Role of Information Systems (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Hahn, T. and Burritt, R.L. (2001b), EMA — Links. The Promotion of Environmental Management Accounting and the Role of Government, Management and Stakeholders, Center for Sustainability Management, Lüneburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny, S. (ed.) (1992), Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment, MIT Press, with the BCSD (Business Council for Sustainable Development), Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.B., Dugan, S. and Trompenaars, F. (1996), National culture and the values of organizational employees, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 27: 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeters, J. and Schreuder, H. (1988), The interaction between national and organization culture in accounting firms, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDSD (2001), Environmental Management Accounting Initiative of the United Nations Division for Sustainable Development at http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/estemal.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R. (1997), Hijacking Environmentalism: Corporate Responses to Sustainable Development, Earthscan Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J.J. and Seaman, A.E. (2001), Predicting change in management accounting systems: national culture and industry effects Accounting, Organizations and Society 26, 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. and Zinkl, D. (1997), Corporate Environmental Performance Indicators:, A Benchmark Survey of Business Decision Makers, Tellus Institute, Boston Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burritt, R.L., Schaltegger, S., Kokubu, K., Wagner, M. (2003). Environmental Management Accounting for Staff Appraisal: Evidence from Australia, Germany and Japan. In: Bennett, M., Rikhardsson, P.M., Schaltegger, S. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting — Purpose and Progress. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0197-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0197-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1366-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0197-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics