Skip to main content

Surface Compositionality and the Semantics of Mood

  • Chapter
Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics

Part of the book series: Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 10))

Abstract

The goal of the present paper is to extend the principles of truth-conditional semantics to non-declarative sentence moods.1 My basic hypothesis is that the different syntactic moods should be characterized semantically in terms of their characteristic kind of possible denotation. In the same way as the declarative mood is characterized semantically by the fact that declaratives denote propositions (i.e., functions from points of reference into truth values), I want to characterize the imperative and the interrogative mood by assigning suitable and natural kinds of possible denotations, which are a strictly compositional result of the characteristic syntax defining each mood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J. L.: 1962, How to do Things with Words, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of a Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass., MIT-press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.: 1975, Montague’s Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, C. L.: 1973, ‘Questions in Montague English’, Foundations of Language 10, 1973, pp. 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R.: 1974, Quantification in an Extended Montague Grammar, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R.: 1976a, ‘Presuppositions in Montague Grammar’, in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 3.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R.: 1976b, ‘Scope Ambiguity and Scope Restriction in Montague Grammar’, in Amsterdam Papers in Formal Philosophy, eds. R. Bartsch, J. Groeneddijk, and M. Stokhof, Dept. of Philosophy, The University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R.: 1976c, ‘The Logic of Questions and Answers’, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R. and D. Zaefferer: 1978, ‘Questions and Answers in a Context-dependent Montague Grammar’, in Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Natural Language, eds. F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt, Synthese Language Library, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R.: 1978, ‘Surface Compositional Semantics, chapter I’, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R.: 1979, ‘How do Pronouns Denote?’, in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 10, eds. F. Heny and H. Schnelle, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R.: 1980, ‘A Constructive Approach to Intensional Contexts, remarks on the Metaphysics of Model Theory’, in Ambiguities in Intensional Contexts, ed. F. Heny, Synthese Language Library, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, to appear: Studies in Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1976, The Semantics of Questions and the Questions of Semantics, Acta Philosophical Fennica, Vol. 28, No. 4, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K.: 1972, ‘General Semantics’, in Semantics of Natural Language, eds. Davidson and Harman, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maderna, P.: 1974, ‘Some Remarks on Montague’s Language Lo in comparison with Tichy’s language Lµ’ in Linguistische Berichte 34/74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1974, Formal Philosophy, The Papers of Richard Montague, edited and with an introduction by Richmond Thomason, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1975, ‘Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1979, ‘Montague Grammar and the Well-Formedness Constraint’, in Syntax and Semantics Vol. 10, eds. F. Heny and H. Schnelle, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenius, E.: 1967, ‘Mood and Language-Game’, Synthese 17, pp. 254–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, P.: 1971, ‘An Approach to Intensional Analysis’, Noûs 5, 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hausser, R.R. (1980). Surface Compositionality and the Semantics of Mood. In: Searle, J.R., Kiefer, F., Bierwisch, M. (eds) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1045-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8964-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics