Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 11))

Abstract

The genetic adaptation of forest trees to plantation sites can be impaired by nursery practices that favor the survival of some seedlings over others, thus producing a seedlot with a genetic makeup different from that of the original seedlot. Seed grading has considerable potential for directly altering the genetic mixture in the seedlot. Stratification period, sowing date, watering regime, lifting date, and other scheduling may have important but less direct influences on adaptation. For most seedlots, the risk of poor adaptation caused by nursery practices is probably no greater than risks caused by several current seed-collection practices. But for seedlots in which only a small percentage of seeds become seedlings that can survive outplanting, the risk may be as large as that in moving seeds between seed zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black, J. N. 1958. Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) with particular reference to leaf area and the light microclimate. Australian I. Agric. Res. 9: 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black, J. N., and G. N. Wilkinson. 1963. The role of time of mergence in determining the growth of individual plants in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Australian I. Agric. Res. 14: 628–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloomberg. W. J. 1971. Diseases of Douglas-fir seedlings caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Phytopathology 61: 467–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloomberg, W.). 1973. Fusarium root-rot of Douglas-fir seedlings. Phytopathology 63: 337–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonner, F. T. 1974. Seed testing. Pages 136–152 in Seeds of woody plants in the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C. Agric. Handb. 450.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowden-Green, R., and H. Rooke. 1980. Projected recovery of plantable trees per bed foot. Unpubl. rep. Mimeo. 1 p.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buszewicz, G., and G. D. Holmes. 1960. A summary of ten years seed testing experience with western hemlock. Tsuga heterophylla. Rep. on Forestry Res., Great Britain j. Forestry Commun.: 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell. R. K. 1982. Unpublished data. U.S.D.A. Forest Serv., Forestry Sciences Lab., Corvallis, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, R. K., and S. M. Ritland. 1982. Regulation of seed germination timing by moist chilling in western hemlock. NewPhytologist 92: 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ching, T. M. 1960. Seed production from individual cones of grand fir. J. Forestry 58: 959–961.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Copes, D. L. 1982. Varied resistance to Phytophthora infection shown by cuttings of fourteen Douglas-fir clones. Annual meeting. Western Forest Genetics Assoc., Corvallis, Oregon, Aug. 3–5. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Champs. J. 1971. Pousses d’aout du Douglas. Pages 173-217 in Rapport Annuel L. Association Foretcellulose. Nangis, France.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edgren, J. W. 1980. The reforestation system-a team effort. Pages 12–20 in Proc., North American forest tree nursery soils workshop (L. P. Abrahamson and D. H. Bickelhaupt, eds.). State Univ. New York, Coll. Environ. Sci. and Forestry, Syracuse.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edgren, J. 1982. Personal communication, Region 6, U.S.D.A. Forest Serv., Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards, D. G. W. 1978. Maturity and seed quality: a state of the art review. Pages 233–263 in Proc., A symposium on flowering and seed development in trees (F. Bonner, ed.). Mississippi State Univ., Starkville.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eriksson, G., and D. Lindgren. 1975. Nagra genetiska reflexioner kring plantsortering. (Some genetic aspects on the grading of plants.) Sveriges Skogsvardsforbunds Tidskrift 73: 615–621.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fowells, H. A. 1949. An index of ripeness for sugar pine seed. U.S.D.A. Forest Serv., Pacific SW Forest and Range Exp. Sta.,Berkeley, California. Res. Note 64. 5 p.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Griffin, A. R. 1972. The effects of seed size, germination time and sowing density on seedling development in radiata pine. Australian Forest Res. 5: 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  19. Griffin, A. R., and K. K. Ching. 1977. Geographic variation in Douglas-fir from the coastal ranges of California. I. Seed, seedling growth and hardiness characteristics. Silvae Genetica 26: 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harper, J. L. 1965. Establishment, aggression and cohabitation in weedy species. Pages 243–268 in The genetics of colonizing species (H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins, eds.). Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heide, O. M. 1974. Growth and dormancy in Norway spruce ecotypes. 11. After-effects of photoperiod and temperature on growth and development in subsequent years. Physiologia Plantarum 31: 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jenkinson, J. L. 1980. Improving plantation establishment by optimizing growth capacity and planting time of western yellow pines. U.S.D.A. Forest Serv., Pacific SW Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Berkeley, California. Res. Pap. PSW-154. 21 p.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, Z.-S. 1980. Veranderung der genetischen Struktur von Buchenpopulationen durch Viabilitatsselektion im Keimlingsstadium. Gottingen Res. Notes in For. Genetics, Lehrstuhl fur Forstgenetik und Forstpflanzenzuchtung der Universitatb Gottingen. 88 p.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kleinschmit, J., and I. Schmidt. 1974. Ergebnisse von Versuchen zur Kuhlhauslagerung von Forstpflanzen. Forstarchiv 45: 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krugman, S. L., and J. L. Jenkinson. 1974. Pinus L. Pine. Pages 598–638 in Seeds of woody plants in the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C. Agric. Handb. 450.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krugman, S. L., and E. C. Stone. 1966. The effect of cold nights on the root-regenerating potential of ponderosa pine seedlings. Forest Sci. 12: 451–459.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kummel. I. T., C. A. Rindt, and J. T. Munger. 1944. Forest planting in the Douglas-fir region. U.S.D.A. Forest Serv., Portland, Oregon. 154 p.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lavender, D. P. 1978. Seed collection, handling, and damage. Pages 53–62 in Regenerating Oregon’s forests (B. D. Cleary, R. D. Greaves, and R. K. Hermann, eds.). Oregon State Univ. Ext. Serv., Corvallis.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lavender, D. P., and P. F. Wareing. 1972. Effects of daylength and chilling on the responses of Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii ( Mirb.) Franco] seedlings to root damage and storage. New Phytologist 71: 1055–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maki, T. E. 1940. Significance and applicability of seed maturity indexes for ponderosa pine. J. Forestry 33: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morgan. P. 1982. Personal communication, D. L. Phipps Oregon State Forest Nursery, Elkton.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olson. D. L., and R. R. Silen. 1975. Influence of date of cone collection on Douglas-fir seed processing and germination: a case history. U.S.D.A. Forest Serv., Pacific NW Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Portland, Oregon. Res. Pap. PNW-190. 10 p.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rasanen, P. K. 1970. The effect of lifting date, packing, storing and watering on the field survival and growth of Scots pine seedlings. Acta Forestalia Fennica 112: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shelbourne, C. J. A. 1969. Tree breeding methods. Forest Res. Institute, New Zealand Forest Serv., Rotorua. Tech. Pap. 55. 43 p.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Silen, R., and C. Osterhaus. 1979. Reduction of genetic base by sizing of bulked Douglas-fir seed lots. Tree Planters ’ Notes 30: 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Snyder, E. B. 1972. Five-year performance of self-pollinated slash pines. Forest Sci. 18: 246.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sorensen, F. C. 1978. Date of sowing and nursery growth of provenances of Pseudotsuga menziesii given two fertilizer regimes, j. Applied Ecology 1 5: 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sorensen, F. C., and J. F. Franklin. 1977. Influence of year of cone collection on seed weight and cotyledon number in Abies procera. Silvae Genetica 26: 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sorensen, F. C.. and R. S. Miles. 1974. Self-pollination effects on Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine seeds and seedlings. Silvae Genetica 23: 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tanaka, Y. 1982. Personal communication. Western Forestry Res. Center, Weyerhaeuser Co., Centralia, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thompson, B. 1982. Personal commmunication, Western Forestry Res. Center, International Paper Co., Lebanon, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  42. U.S.D.A. Forest Service. 1974. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Part 2. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C. Agric. Handb. 450. 889 p.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Van Den Berg, D., and I. Holen. 1982. Personal communication, Medford District, Bureau of Land Management, Medford, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  44. van den Driessche, R. 1969. Forestry nursery handbook. B. C. Forest Serv., Victoria. Res. Note 48. 44 p.

    Google Scholar 

  45. White, T. L. 1981. Genecology of Douglas-fir from southwestern Oregon. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis. 103 p.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wilson, B. 1982. Personal communication, Webster Nursery, Olympia, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, R.K., Sorensen, F.C. (1984). Genetic Implications of Nursery Practices. In: Duryea, M.L., Landis, T.D., Perry, C.R. (eds) Forestry Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot Seedlings. Forestry Sciences, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6110-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6110-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6112-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6110-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics