Abstract
Modern science forms an inseparable whole with modern technology. A good deal, if not the greater part of present-day scientific research takes place in industrial research laboratories where science is practised in a technological setting and is exploited for technological ends. In The Netherlands, for instance, 60 to 70% of all the research in physics takes place in, or is financed by industry. For other highly industrialised countries the situation is not very much different. The foregoing means that scientists working on unified field theories, cosmological models, the foundations of quantum mechanics, evolution theory etc. can hardly be said to represent the whole of modern science. Clearly they form a minority among the community of scientists. Nevertheless, philosophers of science tend to direct their attention to the work of this minority and to base their models of science on it. As a consequence, the technological dimension of science, and the methodological problems connected with it, have stayed in the dark. However, in order to arrive at an adequate picture of modern science and of the way it develops, its technological dimension should be taken into account. For instance, the fact that solid state physics has become, in the course of this century, one of the major fields of research within the physical sciences, can only be understood on the basis of the technological relevance of the kind of knowledge produced by this type of research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agassi, J., ‘The confusion between science and technology in the standard philosophies of science’, in Rapp 1974a.
Casimir, H. B. G., Haphazard Reality, Harper and Row, New York, 1983.
Hesse, M., Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.
Hoddeson, L., ‘The discovery of the point-contact transistor’, in HSPS 12(1) 1981.
Langhaar, H. L., Dimensional Analysis and Theory of Models, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965.
Mayr, O., ‘The science-technology relationship’, in B. Barnes and D. Edge (eds.), Science in Context, MTT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982, p. 155–163.
Nersessian, N., ‘Scientific discovery and commensurability of meaning’, this volume, 1989.
Rapp, F., (ed.) Contributions to a Philosophy of Technology, Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, (1974a, 1974b).
Rapp, F., ‘Technology and natural science — A methodological investigation’, in Rapp 1974a.
Rumpf, H., ‘Gedanken zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Technikwissenschaften’, in H. Lenk and S. Moser (eds.), Techne, Technik, Technologie, Verlag Dokumentation, Pullach bei Munchen, 1973, pp. 82–107.
Sarlemijn, A., ‘Analogy analysis and transistor research’, Methodology and Science, 20 (3), 1987.
Sarlemijn, A. and Kroes, P., ‘Technological analogies and their logical nature’, in P. T. Durbin (ed.) Technology and Contemporary Life, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988.
Skolimowski, H., ‘The structure of thinking in technology’, in Rapp 1974a.
Szücs, E., Similitude and Modelling, Fundamental Studies in Engineering, Vol. 2, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1980.
Vincenti, W. G., ‘The air-propellor tests of W. F. Durand and E. P. Lesley: a case study in technological methodology’, Technology and Culture 20 (1979), 712–751.
Vincenti, W. G., ‘Control-volume analysis: a difference in thinking between engineering and physics’, Technology and Culture 23 (1982) 145–174.
Vincenti, W. G., ‘Technological knowledge without science: the innovation of flush riveting in American airplanes, ca. 1930-ca. 1950’, Technology and Culture 25 (1984), 540–576.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kroes, P. (1989). Philosophy of Science and the Technological Dimension of Science. In: Gavroglu, K., Goudaroulis, Y., Nicolacopoulos, P. (eds) Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 111. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3025-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3025-4_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7860-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3025-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive