Abstract
Among Professor Drake’s many contributions to our knowledge of Galileo and his work, the research he has done on the watermarks discernible in Galileo’s surviving manuscripts must surely rank the most significant. It was this line of attack that enabled him to date the large number of fragments long known to be associated with the second science set out in Galileo’s Two New Sciences of 1638, namely, that devoted to De motu locali, which in turn led to two important discoveries. The first was chronological, for it showed that the great bulk of these fragments date from Galileo’s early period, before he made his momentous discoveries with the telescope. The second was methodological, for it gave nearly indisputable evidence of an experimental program in which Galileo was engaged while writing the fragments, mainly at Padua and prior to 1610. Such a program, undertaken early in Galileo’s life, reveals a strong empiricist strain in his thought and counts heavily against his ever being a Platonist, as alleged by some Galileo scholars.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Stillman Drake, “Galileo’s Pre-Paduan Writings: Years, Sources, Motivations”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 17 (1986) 429–448, henceforth cited as “Pre-Paduan Writings”.
William A. Wallace, “Galileo’s Sources: Manuscripts or Printed Works?” in Print and Culture in the Renaissance, S. Vagonheim and G. Tyson, Newark, Del.: The University of Delaware Press, 1986; pp. 45–54; “The Early Jesuits and the Heritage of Domingo de Soto”, in History and Technology, 4 (1987) 301–320; and “Science and Philosophy at the Collegio Romano in the Time of Benedetti”, Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studio Giovan Battista Benedetti e il Suo Tempo, Venice: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, 1987; pp. 113–126.
Crombie, A. C., “Sources of Galileo’s Early Natural Philosophy”, in Reason, Experiment, and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution, eds. R. M. Righini Bonelli and W. R. Shea, ( New York: Science History Publications, 1975 ), p. 305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wallace, W.A. (1990). The Dating and Significance of Galileo’s Pisan Manuscripts. In: Levere, T.H., Shea, W.R. (eds) Nature, Experiment, and the Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 120. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1878-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1878-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7338-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1878-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive