Skip to main content

Learning by Single Function Agents during Spring Design

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’96

Abstract

This paper reports on some initial experiments on learning in multi-agent design systems. These experiments have several goals. The first is to study the ease with which simple learning techniques fit into the multi-agent paradigm we are using. The second is to determine the performance of these techniques. The third is to study the application of the multi-agent paradigm we use to “real” problems, as its development has mostly been concerned with a more theoretical view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berker, I. and Brown, D.C.: 1996, Conflicts and negotiations in single function agent based design systems, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, special issue on Multi-Agent Systems in Concurrent Engineering, D. C. Brown, S. Lander and C. Petrie (eds) (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Currier, P. M.: 1995, SiFAKA: Knowledge Acquisition for Single Function Agents, Major Qualifying Project, Computer Science Department, WPI, Worcester, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, R. E., Brown, D. C. and Zenger, D. C.: 1993, A concurrent engineering demonstration and training system for engineers and managers, International Journal of CADCAM and Computer Graphics, 8(3), special issue on AI and Computer Graphics, I. Costea (ed.), pp. 263–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunskus, B. V., Grecu, D. L., Brown, D. C. and Berker, I.: 1995, Using single function agents to investigate conflicts, AI EDAM, 9(4), special issue on Conflict Management in Design, I. Smith (ed.), pp. 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finin, T., Weber, J., Wiederhold, G., Genesereth, M., Fritzon, R., McKay, D., McGuire, J., Pelavin, R., Shapiro, S. and Beck, C.: 1993, DRAFT Specification of the KQML Agent-Communication Language, DARPA Knowledge Sharing Initiative External Interfaces Working Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennari, J.C., Langley, P. and Fisher, D.: 1990, Models of Incremental Concept Formation, in J. Carbonell (ed.), Machine Learning — Paradigms and Methods, MIT Press, pp. 11–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Giarratano, J. C. and Riley, G.: 1994, Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, 2nd edn, PWSx Publishing Co., Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grecu, D. L. and Brown, D. C.: 1995, Design agents that learn, AI EDAM, special issue on Machine Learning in Design, A. Duffy, M. L. Maher and D. C. Brown (eds) (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M.: 1991: Supporting conflict resolution in cooperative design systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(6), 1379–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuokka, D. R., McGuire, J. G., Pelavin, R. N., Weber, H. C., Tenenbaum, H. M., Gruber, T. and Olsen, G.: 1993, SHADE: Technology for knowledge-based collaborative engineering, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 1, 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lander, S. E. and Lesser, V. R.: 1991, Customizing distributed search among agents with heterogeneous knowledge, Proceedings 5th International Symposium on AI Applications in Manufacturing and Robotics, Cancun, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machinery’s Handbook, 1982, revised 21st ed., Industrial Press Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M. L., Brown, D. C. and Duffy, A.H.B. (eds): 1994, AI EDAM, 8(2), special issue on Machine Learning in Design.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. S.: 1983, A theory and methodology of inductive learning, Artificial Intelligence, 20, 110–156.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. S., Mozetic, I., Hong, J. and Lavrac, N.: 1986, The multi-purpose incremental learning system AQ15 and its testing application to three medical domains, Proceedings of AAAI-86, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, pp. 1041–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. M.: 1982, Generalization as search, Artificial Intelligence, 18, 203–266.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • NagendraPrasad, M. V., Lesser, V. and Lander, S. E.: 1995, Learning experiments in a heterogeneous multi-agent system, in S. Sen (ed.), Working Notes of the IJCAI-95 Workshop on Adaptation and Learning in Multiagent Systems, Montréal, pp.59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. (ed.): 1995, Working Notes of the IJCAI-95 Workshop on Adaptation and Learning in Multiagent Systems, Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, K. P.: 1990, Cooperative negotiation in concurrent engineering design, Cooperative Engineering Design, Springer-Verlag, pp. 269–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb-Bendiab, A. and Oh, V.: 1993, Speech-act based communication protocol to support multi-agent cooperative design systems, Proceedings 1993 AI in Engineering Conference, CMI Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, S. K., Brown, D. C., Bausch, J. J., Zenger, D. C., Ludwig, R. and Sisson, R. D.: 1993, Using multiple expert systems with distinct roles in a concurrent engineering system for powder ceramic components, in G. Rzevski, J. Pastor and R. A. Adey (eds), Applications of AI in Engineering VIII, Vol. 1, Design, Methods and Techniques, Elsevier Press, pp. 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, S. K. and Brown, D. C.: 1994, Designing with negotiation using single function agents, in G. Rzevski, R. A. Adey and D. W. Russell (eds), Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering IX, CMI Publ., pp. 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werkman, K. J. and Barone, M.: 1991, Evaluating alternative connection designs through multiagent negotiation, in D. Sriram, R. Logcher and S. Fukuda (eds), Computer Aided Cooperative Product Development, Springer Verlag, pp. 298–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M. and Jennings, N. R.: 1995, Intelligent agents: Theory and practice, Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grecu, D.L., Brown, D.C. (1996). Learning by Single Function Agents during Spring Design. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’96. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0279-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0279-4_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6610-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0279-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics