Abstract
Rudolf Carnap’s formative years as a philosopher were his time in Jena (until 1919) where he studied mathematics, physics, and philosophy, among others, with Gottlob Frege, the neo-Kantian Bruno Bauch, and Herman Nohl, a pupil of Wilhelm Dilthey.2 Whereas both the influence of Frege and of the neo-Kantians is quite well known,3 the importance of the Dilthey school for Carnap’s intellectual development was recently highlighted by scholars, such as Gottfried Gabriel and Hans-Joachim Dahms.4 Although Carnap himself was interested mainly in the problems of logic and the philosophy of the natural sciences, the community in which he worked until he went to Vienna in 1926 was neither a community of neo-Kantian philosophers nor of logicians or philosophers of the natural sciences but a community of members of the Dilthey school that were interested in history of philosophy (Herman Nohl, Carnap’s philosophy teacher in Jena, was concerned with the publication of a huge volume on the history of nineteenth Century philosophy),5 pedagogic (this also is the case for Herman Nohl and Carnap’s lifelong friend, Wilhelm Flitner),6 aesthetics (Franz Roh, also a lifelong friend of Carnap, was one of the intellectual promoters of “neue Sachlichkeit”),7 and sociology (Hans Freyer).8 Carnap and his friends were all members of the so-called Seracircle, a group of young people that met frequently in Jena and, between 1919 and 1926, also in Carnap’s home in Buchenbach near Freiburg.9 The first version of the Aufbau was written in close connection with this group of young people that were interested in a reform of the whole society, including arts, politics, sciences, and everyday life. In Carnap’s Werkstatt in Buchenbach, the Aufbau and at least two more manifestos of a more or less philosophical nature were written: Franz Roh’s “Nach-Expressionismus” and Wilhelm Flitner’s “Laienbildung.”10 Given these historical facts, we must conclude that the Aufbau is the product of an intellectual enterprise that developed in close connection with the Dilthey school, but in which Frege and the neo-Kantians seem to have played only a small role.
I am grateful to A.W. Carus, Michael Friedman, Alan Richardson, and Tom Ricketts, for comments on the talk at the Carnap conference on which this paper is based, to Hans-Joachim Dahms, Richard Dawid, Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau, Thomas Mormann, and Matthias Neuber, for comments on different versions of this paper, and to the editor of this volume Richard Creath and the anonymous referees for very helpful suggestions.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Bibliography
Steve Awodey and Karsten Klein (eds.) (2004): Carnap Brought Home. The View from Jena. Chicago: Open Court.
David Bloor (1991 [1976]): Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rudolf Carnap (1998 [1928]): Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. (Translated, together with ‘Pseudoproblems in Philosophy’, by Rolf A. George (1967): The Logical Structure of the World. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.)
— (1968 [1934]): Logische Syntax der Sprache. Wien: Springer Verlag. (Translated by Amethe Smeaton (1937): The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner and Co.)
— (1950): ‘Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology’. In: Revue International de Philosophie, 20-40.
— (1956): ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts’. In: Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven: The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis. (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 38-76.
— (1963): ‘Carnap’s Intellectual Autobiography’, in: Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.): The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Chicago: Open Court, 3-84.
A. W. Carus (2007): Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought. Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ernst Cassirer (1994 [1910]): Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
— (1997 [1923]): Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Erster Teil. Die Sprache. Darmstadt: Primus Verlag.
Hans-Joachim Dahms (2004): ‘Neue Sachlichkeit in the Architecture and Philosophy of the 1920s’. In: Awodey & Klein (2004, 357-375).
— (2011): ‘Carnap and the Jena-Circles. Discussion of a “System of Knowledge” (1920)’. This Volume.
Christian Damböck (under review): ‘Wilhelm Diltheys empirische Philosophie und der rezente Methodenstreit in der analytischen Philosophie’.
Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison (2007): Objectivity. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Wilhelm Dilthey (1914-2006): Gesammelte Schriften. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
— (1989): Introduction to the Human Sciences. Edited, with an Introduction, by Rudolf A. Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi (Selected Works, Volume I). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
— (2010): Understanding the Human World. Edited, with an Introduction, by Rudolf A. Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi (Selected Works, Volume II). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wilhelm Flitner (1921): Laienbildung. Jena: Eugen Diederichs.
— (1986): Erinnerungen 1889-1945. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
Hans Freyer (1928): Theorie des objektiven Geistes. Eine Einleitung in die Kulturphilosophie. Leipzig: Verlag von B.G. Teubner.
Michael Friedman (1999): Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
— (2001): Dynamics of Reason. The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Gottfried Gabriel (2004): ‘Introduction: Carnap Brought Home’. In: Awodey & Klein (2004, 3-23).
Helmut Holzhey (2004): ‘Der Neukantianismus’. In: Helmut Holzhey and Wolfgang Röd (eds.): Die Philosophie des ausgehenden 19. und des 20. Jahrhunderts 2. Neukantianismus, Idealismus, Realismus, Phänomenologie. (Geschichte der Philosophie Band XII). Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.
Immanuel Kant (1998): Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Nach der ersten und zweiten Originalausgabe herausgegeben von Jens Timmermann. Hamburg: Verlag Felix Meiner.
Klaus Christian Köhnke (1986): Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantianismus. Die deutsche Universitätsphilosophie zwischen Idealismus und Positivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Friedrich Albert Lange (1866): Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart. Iserlohn: Baedeker.
Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar (1986 [1979]): Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hans-Ulrich Lessing (1984): Die Idee einer Kritik der historischen Vernunft. Freiburg: Alber.
Rudolf A. Makkreel (2010): ‘Wilhelm Dilthey and the Neo-Kantians. On the Conceptual Distinction between Geisteswissenschaften and Kulturwissenschaften’. In: Makkreel & Luft (2010, 253-271)
Rudolf A. Makkreel and Sebastian Luft (eds.) (2010): Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
John Stuart Mill (1976 [1843]): A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume VII and VIII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Thomas Mormann (2000): Rudolf Carnap. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.
Herman Nohl (1935): Einführung in die Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Gerhard Schulte-Bulmke.
Traugott Konstantin Oesterreich (1923): Die Deutsche Philosophie des XIX. Jahrhunderts und der Gegenwart. Berlin: Verlag E.S. Mittler & Sohn.
Traugott Konstantin Oesterreich (1928): Die Philosophie des Auslandes vom Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts bis auf die Gegenwart. Berlin: Verlag E.S. Mittler & Sohn.
Alan W. Richardson (1998): Carnap’s Construction of the World. The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Franz Roh (1925): Nach-Expressionismus. Magischer Realismus. Probleme der neuesten europäischen Malerei. Leipzig: Klinkhardt & Biermann.
Herbert Schnädelbach (1984): Philosophy in Germany 1831-1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Uebel (2007): Empiricism at the Crossroads. The Vienna Circle’s Protocol- Sentence Debate. Chicago: Open Court.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Damböck, C. (2012). Rudolf Carnap and Wilhelm Dilthey: “German” Empiricism in the Aufbau . In: Creath, R. (eds) Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3929-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3929-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3928-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3929-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)