Abstract
Bacteria which are shown to have potential for biological control of destructive diseases are distributed in many genera. Among them, fluorescent pseudomonads are currently considered as the most effective bacteria for biological control of soil and foliar diseases. Fluorescent pseudomonads enhance the plant growth parameters, and hence, they are called plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). PGPR are known to control a wide range of phytopathogens like fungi, bacteria, viruses, insect pests and nematodes, and they are known to control these pathogens by biocontrol mechanism which may be by competition, or antagonism, induction of systemic resistance by these bacteria in the host plant, thereby containing the invading pathogens. For the management of pest and diseases of crop plants, applications of strain mixtures of PGPR formulations perform better than individual strains. Fluorescent pseudomonads showing various modes of action especially rhizosphere colonization, antibiotic production and induction of systemic resistance would certainly be potential biocontrol agents for the management of pest and diseases of crop plants.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Biological control of plant diseases opened an era of new technology to manage crop diseases and received the attention of researchers throughout the world, which will enhance the sustainability of agricultural production systems, and to reduce the use of chemical pesticides. The most promising group of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for biocontrol of plant diseases is fluorescent pseudomonads. Fluorescent pseudomonads associated with plants include Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. putida, P. aeruginosa and P. aureofaciens. Many of the fluorescent pseudomonads, predominantly P. fluorescens, have been isolated from suppressive soil for the management of soilborne and foliar diseases. P. fluorescens and P. putida are easy to isolate and grow in the laboratory, and they are not fastidious in their requirement of nutrition. They are normal inhabitants of the soil and especially of root surface of plants, so they grow well on the root surfaces when introduced artificially. Their generation time is as low as 5.2 h. Among the various biocontrol agents, fluorescent pseudomonads are known to survive both in rhizosphere and in phyllosphere (Wilson et al. 1992).
Rabindran (1994) highlighted that the culture filtrate of P. fluorescens isolate PfALR2 caused 100 % reduction in the germination of sclerotia and reduction in the virulence of sclerotia of R. solani. Development of resistance in cucumber against P. syringae pv. lachrymans as well as to the fungal pathogens Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum and Colletotrichum orbiculare by application of P. fluorescens 89B-27 was reported (Liu et al. 1995). Meena et al. (2000) reported that foliar application of P. fluorescens strain Pf1 induced accumulation of phenolics and PR proteins in groundnut. Significant increase in yield of several crops due to P. fluorescens had been reported (Saravanakumar et al. 2007). Uppal et al. (2008) reported that P. fluorescens Biotype F isolate DF37 significantly reduced the disease incidence, severity and vascular discoloration of Verticillium wilt in both cultivars Kennebec and Russet Burbank.
Several studies have indicated that PGPR may stimulate the production of biochemical compounds associated with host defence; massive accumulation of phytoalexins and phenolic compounds; increase in the activities of PR proteins, defence enzymes and transcripts; and enhanced lignification. The induction of SAR using various ISR inducers has been of recent interest with quite reasonable success. Induced resistance against Fusarium wilt of carnation caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi was found by prior application of Pseudomonas spp. strain WCS417r (Van Peer et al. 1991). Verhagen et al. (2009) studied the ability of P. fluorescens CHAO to induce resistance in grapevine against Botrytis cinerea and highlighted the importance of salicylic acid, pyochelin and pyoverdin in priming phytoalexin responses and induced resistance. Vleesschauwer et al. (2008) demonstrated the ability of P. fluorescens WCS374r to trigger ISR in rice (Oryza sativa) against the leaf blast pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae, and found that the induced resistance is regulated by an SA-independent but jasmonic acid/ethylene-modulated signal transduction pathway.
Fluorescent pseudomonads are shown to be effective against certain insect and nematode pests (Ramamoorthy et al. 2001). Tian et al. (2007) reported that fluorescent pseudomonads promote plant growth, increase rhizosphere colonization and suppressed nematodes. Pechy-Tarr et al. (2008) found that when P. fluorescens CHAO or Pf5 injected into the haemocoel of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, even low doses killed the larvae of Manduca sexta. Karthiba et al. (2010) reported that rice plants when treated with bioformulations containing P. fluorescens strains Pf1 and AH1 and Beauveria bassiana isolate B2 showed a greater accumulation of defence enzymes, lipoxygenase and chitinase activity against leaf folder.
2 Characteristics of an Ideal Microbial Pathogen
The ultimate aim of biological control is to achieve control over the disease by biological means. A biocontrol agent should grow and persist, or “colonize”, the surface of the plant it protects. Usually colonization or even the initial population size of the biocontrol agent suppresses/modulates the pathogen from farther distances by production of allelochemicals. The ideal characteristics of a biocontrol agent include high rhizosphere competence, high competitive saprophytic ability, enhanced plant growth, ease for mass multiplication, broad spectrum of action, reliable control, safe to environment and compatibility with other rhizobacteria and should tolerate desiccation, heat, oxidizing agents and UV radiation.
3 Plant Growth-Promoting Activity
The bacteria that provide some benefit to plants are of two general types: those that form a symbiotic relationship with them and those that are free-living in the soil but are often found near, on or even within the roots of plants. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have beneficial effects which have been variously attributed to their ability to produce various compounds including phytohormones, organic acids and siderophores, to fix atmospheric nitrogen, to solubilize soil phosphate, to produce antibiotics that suppress deleterious rhizobacteria or to show some other unidentified mechanisms (Glick 1995).
There are several reports that PGPR have promoted the growth and reproductive parameters of plants ranging from cereals, pulses, ornamentals, vegetable crops, plantation crops and even tree species. Hofte et al. (1991) highlighted that plant growth-promoting strains of P. aeruginosa 7NSK2 and P. fluorescens ANP15 significantly increased the germination of maize seeds. The growth promotion of winter wheat by treating seeds with several strains of Pseudomonas spp. under greenhouse and field condition was reported by De Freitas and Germida (1992). The grain yield of wheat was increased by 46–75 % under greenhouse condition and 11 % under field condition. Dubeikovsky et al. (1993) suggested that indoleacetic acid (IAA) production by P. fluorescens might influence the development of blackcurrant cuttings. The strongest effect was observed as changes of root system weight and morphology. The stimulating IAA-mediated effect of bacterial inoculation on the development of the roots of the cuttings was observed. Increase in growth of rice plants by seed treatment with P. fluorescens was also reported (Muthamilan 1994).
Tosi and Zazzerini (1994) recorded an increase in the length of sunflower seedlings by seed treatment with P. fluorescens strain 14. Significant plant growth promotion with increased runner length and increased leaf number per plant in cucumber by seed and soil application of PGPR was reported (Wei et al. 1996). Williams and Asher (1996) achieved improvement in seedling emergence in proportion of healthy seedling in sugar beet by Pseudomonas sp. when compared to seedlings from untreated seeds. Seed coating with pseudomonad isolates like BHU1, A19 and C185 resulted in significantly greater root length, root and shoot biomass, pod yield and nodule number of groundnut compared with the control (Pal et al. 1999). This may be attributed to various factors such as ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, sigma) deaminase activity, siderophore production and increase in root length. These bacteria might have enhanced the uptake of nutrients resulting in healthier and better root system and resulting in improved plant growth.
Seed and soil application of PGPR strains showed significant plant growth promotion with increased runner length and increased leaf number per plant in cucumber (Wei et al. 1996). Meena and Marimuthu (2012) observed the boosting effect of P. fluorescens Pf formulation on plant growth promotion like plant height, leaf area index, root length, nodules per plant and dry matter production. The growth substrates used in micropropagation are usually devoid of beneficial microorganisms. By introducing such microorganisms to the substrates, it would be possible to lower fertilizer and pesticide inputs and grow the plants in a more sustainable way.
4 Formulation Development
Major research on biocontrol is centred with the use of cell suspensions of PGPR directly to seed. Technologies become viable only when the research findings are transferred from lab to field. Bacterial cell suspension cannot be used for large-scale field use due to difficulty in storage, transport and handling. Commercial application of PGPR either to increase crop health or to manage plant diseases depends on the development of commercial formulations with suitable carriers that support the survival of bacteria for a considerable length of time. Carriers should be economical and easily available. The organic carriers used for formulation development are peat, lignite, talc, kaolinite, zeolite, alginate, press mud, sawdust, vermiculite, etc. The carriers with smaller particle size increased the surface area and thereby increased the resistance to desiccation of the bacteria by the increased coverage of the bacterial cells (Dandurand et al. 1994).
The major concern in commercial production systems is the achievement of adequate growth of the biocontrol agent. Mass production is achieved through liquid, semisolid and solid fermentation systems. A powder formulation with a longer shelf life would be beneficial. Talc is chemically referred to as magnesium silicate [Mg3Si4O10(OH2)] and available as powder form from industries suited for wide range of applications. It has very low moisture equilibrium, relative hydrophobicity and chemical inertness, reduced moisture absorption and prevents the formation of hydrate bridges that enable longer storage periods. Owing to the inert nature of talc and easy availability as raw material from soapstone industries, it is used as a carrier for formulation development in a large scale.
Addition of certain gums and polysaccharides as a sticker to the bacterial formulations did not reduce the viability of bacterial population (Suslow et al. 1979). Kloepper et al. (1980) described dry gum-talc formulations that permitted the successful introduction of pseudomonads onto potato seeds. P. fluorescens strains grown on King’s B broth for 48 h were mixed with 100 g of sterilized peat soil at the rate of 50 ml broth per 100 g of soil gave good control of root rot of black gram when it was applied to soil (Samiyappan 1988).
Hofte et al. (1991) reported that P. fluorescens was multiplied on modified King’s B medium and the cell pellet after centrifugation was resuspended in 10 ml of MgSO4 (0.1 M) and 2 ml of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (2 %). This suspension when treated to maize seeds improved the seedling emergence. Seed treatment of winter wheat by fluorescent pseudomonads multiplied in King’s B broth for 72 h mixed with 1 % carboxymethyl cellulose and talc improved the plant growth (De Freitas and Germida 1992). Fluorescent pseudomonads multiplied on 10 % trypticase soy broth was mixed with preneutralized, sterile class 3 peat, and pH was adjusted to 6.8 by using fine-grade calcium carbonate. This peat-based inoculum when applied to cotton seeds at the rate of 110 g kg−1 seed along with CMC (1 %) as sticker (55 ml kg−1) controlled the seedling diseases in cotton under field conditions (Hagedorn et al. 1993).
Talc- and peat-based formulations of P. chlororaphis and Bacillus subtilis were prepared and used for the management of rhizome rot of turmeric (Nakkeeran et al. 2005). P. putida strain 30 and 180 survived up to 6 months in talc-based formulations. The population load at the end of 6th month was 108 cfu g−1of the product (Bora et al. 2004). The feasibility of the technique and shelf life of the product have to be evaluated to make the technology as a viable component in disease management. The commercially available formulations of Pseudomonas spp. are listed in Table 2.1.
5 Delivery Systems
PGPR are delivered through several means based on the nature of survival and mode of infection of pathogens. It is delivered through seed, soil, foliage, rhizomes or setts or through combination of several methods of delivery.
5.1 Seed Treatment
Seed bacterization means treating seeds with bacterial cultures that will improve plant growth; such bacterial cultures that improve plant growth are called as bacterial fertilizers. Protection against damping off of sweet corn incited by Pythium ultimum (Pythiaceae) was observed due to biopriming (Callan et al. 1990). They also observed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain 7NSK2 and P. fluorescens strain ANP15 inoculated onto maize seeds protected seeds from cold-shock damage and increased the germination. Weststeijn (1990) reported that tulip root rot caused by P. ultimum was suppressed by dipping tulip bulbs in Pseudomonas suspension of 2 × 109 cells ml−1. Transfer of technology for commercial use could be possible if PGPR strains are available as a product. Seed bacterization with peat-based formulation of P. fluorescens strain 1 at the rate of 10 g kg−1 seed reduced rice blast and sheath blight disease (Muthamilan 1994; Rabindran 1994; Rabindran and Vidhyasekaran 1996). Meena et al. (2001) reported that seed treatment with powder formulation of P. fluorescens resulted in significant reduction in root rot incidence of groundnut under field conditions. Gamliel and Katan (1993) reported that tomato root when inoculated with P. alcaligenes reduced the wilt caused by F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum. In cotton, seedling disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani and P. ultimum was suppressed by Pseudomonas spp. under field conditions (Hagedorn et al. 1993). Treatment of tomato seeds with powder formulation of PGPR (Bacillus subtilis, B. pumilus) reduced symptom severity of tomato mosaic virus and increased the fruit yield (Murphy et al. 2000). Nagaraj et al. (2004) tested P. fluorescens strains isolated from the rice rhizosphere for their antagonistic effect towards rice sheath blight fungal pathogen, R. solani. Meena et al. (2006) found that when the groundnut seeds were treated with P. fluorescens and sown in soil, the antagonist colonized well in the groundnut rhizosphere.
5.2 Soil Application
Soil being as the repertoire of both beneficial and pathogenic microbes, delivering of PGPR strains to soil will increase the population dynamics of augmented bacterial antagonists and thereby would suppress the establishment of pathogenic microbes onto the infection court. Weststeijn (1990) found that root rot in tulip caused by P. ultimum was reduced by mixing Pseudomonas suspensions thoroughly through the soil to a concentration of 108 cells g−1 dry soil before planting the bulbs. Wilt disease of sunflower was found to be suppressed when P. cepacia strain N24 was applied to the seedbeds at the rate of 500 ml m−2 under greenhouse conditions (Hebber et al. 1991). Take-all disease of wheat was found to be suppressed by applying 120 ml of P. aureofaciens suspension to 13 kg of soil as atomized mist produced by use of chromatography sprayer and compressed air (Mazzola et al. 1992). Hagedorn et al. (1993) highlighted that furrow application of Pseudomonas spp. at the rate of 14 ml m−1 increased the seedling stand in cotton. The improved seedling stand was due to the suppression of seedling disease in cotton by the antagonistic bacteria.
5.3 Foliar Application
The efficacies of biocontrol agents for foliar diseases are greatly influenced by microclimate. The concentration of nutrients like amino acids, organic acids and sugars exuded through stomata, lenticels, hydathodes and wounds varies highly. It affects the efficacy and survival of antagonist in phylloplane. Kelly Cartwright (1995) reported that three spray applications of P. cepacia to cuttings during a two-week period were more effective than either one or two bacterial sprays in the control of Rhizoctonia stem rot of Poinsettia. Rice blast (P. oryzae) can be effectively controlled by foliar spray of talc-based powder formulation of P. fluorescens strain Pf1 (1 kg ha−1). The effectiveness of spraying persisted up to 15 days. When the bacterial product was sprayed on plants grown from treated seed, the effectiveness was higher than when spraying was carried out without any prior seed treatment (Vidhyasekaran et al. 1997). The dosage and frequency of application has to be standardized based on the crop value, which could be a reliable and practical approach. Selected strains from many genera of bacteria isolated from these suppressive soils have the potential to reduce plant diseases when applied to the plant root environment (Weller et al. 2002). The biological control of plant pests and diseases using a single organism has been reported to give inconsistent and poor performance. Bioformulations combining P. fluorescens Migula strains Pf1 and AH1 and Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuill. isolate B2 effectively reduced the incidence of leaf folder insect and sheath blight disease on rice plants and showed the possibility of controlling both pest and disease using a single bioformulation (Karthiba 2010).
5.4 Multiple Delivery Systems
Plant pathogens establish host-parasite relationship by entering through infection court such as rhizosphere, spermosphere and phyllosphere. Hence, protection of sites vulnerable for the entry and infection of pathogens would offer a better means for disease management. Meena et al. (2002) reported that combined application of P. fluorescens formulation to seed and foliage effectively controlled foliar diseases of groundnut and increased the pod yield. In rice, seed treatment followed by root dipping and foliar spray with P. fluorescens showed higher induction of ISR against sheath blight pathogen, R. solani (Radjacommare et al. 2004). Similarly, Viswanathan and Samiyappan (2001) reported PGPR-mediated ISR against red rot disease in sugarcane. Application of PGPR strains showed enhanced resistance to bacterial speck and spot of tomato (Kavitha and Umesha 2007).
The influence of plant growth promotion and induced systemic resistance (ISR) resulted in enhancing the disease resistance in tea plants against blister disease by PGPR bioformulations (Saravanakumar et al. 2007). Delivering of rhizobacteria through combined application of different delivery systems will increase the population load of rhizobacteria and thereby suppress the pathogenic propagules. PGPR formulations comprising of bacterial strain mixtures having the capability to induce chitinase in plant play an important role in hydrolyzing chitin, the structural component in gut linings of insects, and would lead to better control of insect pest (Broadway et al. 1998). In addition, certain PGPR strains also activate octadecanoid, shikimate and terpenoid pathways. This in turn alters the volatile production in the host plant leading to the attraction of natural enemies. Identification of entomopathogenic PGPR strains that have the capability to colonize phylloplane in a stable manner will be a breakthrough in the management of foliar pests (Otsu et al. 2004). Combined application of entomopathogenic strains with compatible PGPR strains which have the ability to suppress plant diseases has to be developed for broad-spectrum action.
6 Mechanisms of Biocontrol
Besides the capacity to colonize roots intensively for an extended period of time, other mechanisms are involved that make the fluorescent pseudomonads an effective biocontrol agent. PGPR that indirectly enhance plant growth via suppression of phytopathogens do so by a variety of mechanisms. These include the ability to produce siderophores that chelate iron, making it unavailable to pathogens; the ability to synthesize antifungal metabolites such as antibiotics, fungal cell wall-lysing enzymes or hydrogen cyanide, which suppress the growth of fungal pathogens; the ability to successfully compete with pathogens for nutrients or specific niches on the root; and the ability to induce systemic resistance. Multiple interactions occur between the bacteria and between bacteria and other microorganisms involving competition, antibiosis, parasitism and predation. Various interactions also occur between bacteria and plant roots that can be beneficial, neutral or harmful to the plant. Biochemical and molecular approaches are providing new insight into the genetic basis of these traits, the biosynthetic pathways involved, their regulation and importance for biological control in laboratory and field studies (Nelson 2004). The beneficial effects of these bacteria, in most cases, have been related to their ability to produce plant growth hormones and/or antimicrobial substances and to protect growing roots from deleterious root microbes present in the rhizosphere (Harish et al. 2008).
6.1 Antibiosis
Antibiosis is now often implicated as an important mechanism of biological control, resulting from the fact that it is an attractive mechanism to study and can provide a highly effective mode of action. Single strains of Pseudomonas produce several different antibiotics. Since PGPR being a potential candidate in disease management through multiple modes of action, it becomes highly imperative to know about the role of antibiotics in the management of plant pathogens. Production of antibiotics by rhizosphere bacteria is controlled by complex regulatory networks, in which plant, bacterial and environmental signals are involved. Environmental factors have a significant influence on the production of specific metabolites by fluorescent pseudomonads. Inhibition of pathogens of several crops by the release of diffusible or volatile metabolites such as pyrrolnitrin, pyoluteorin, phenazine or cyanide was confirmed by application of DNA technology and biochemical reaction techniques (Gutterson 1990).
The compound 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG) is a phenolic molecule produced by certain plant-associated fluorescent pseudomonads of worldwide origin (Thomashow et al. 1997). It has antifungal, antibacterial, antihelminthic and phytotoxic properties. DAPG is synthesized by condensation of three molecules of acetyl coenzyme A with one molecule of malonyl coenzyme A to produce the precursor monoacetylphloroglucinol, which is subsequently transacetylated to generate DAPG by a biosynthetic route utilizing chalcone synthase (CHS)-type enzyme (Shanahan et al. 1992). P. fluorescens strain CHAO suppressed black root rot of tobacco caused by Thielaviopsis basicola and take-all of wheat caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. The suppression was due to the production of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (Keel et al. 1992). Phenazine comprises a large family of heterocyclic nitrogen containing brightly coloured pigments with broad-spectrum antibiotic activity. Several strains of fluorescent pseudomonad produce antifungal metabolites, namely, phenazines (Thomashow et al. 1997). Suppression of take-all of wheat by P. fluorescens strain 2-79 was mainly due to the production of antibiotic phenazine-carboxylic acid (Thomashow and Weller 1990). Though phenazine plays a vital role in the management of soilborne pathogens, the chemotaxis and motility of the bacteria decides the antifungal action of the antibiotic producers.
Pyrrolnitrin (3-chloro-4-(2′-nitro-3′-chlorophenyl)pyrrole) is a broad-spectrum antifungal metabolite produced by many fluorescent strains of the genus Pseudomonas. The biological control agent P. fluorescens BL915 contains four gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of antifungal molecule. Pyoluteorin is an aromatic polyketide antibiotic consisting of a resorcinol ring, which is derived through polyketide biosynthesis. It is produced by several Pseudomonas spp. that suppress plant diseases incited by phytopathogenic fungi (Maurhofer et al. 1994). It mainly inhibits the oomycetous fungi, including P. ultimum against which it is strongly active. Paul and Sharma (2006) reported the production of two antibiotics—pyoluteorin and pyrrolnitrin by P. fluorescens—which inhibits the growth of Phytophthora capsici, the pathogen on black pepper. Sreenivasulu et al. (2006) reported that the volatile metabolite of P. fluorescens completely inhibited the pathogen of basal stem rot of coconut, Ganoderma lucidum.
6.2 Hydrogen Cyanide Production
Hydrogen cyanide production by certain fluorescent pseudomonads was found to influence the plant root pathogens. Suppression of black root rot of tobacco (Thielaviopsis basicola) by P. fluorescens CHAO was mainly due to the production of hydrogen cyanide (Stutz et al. 1986). Voisard et al. (1989) reported that mutants of CHAO deficient in HCN production were less suppressive than the parental strain to T. basicola in tobacco. Defago et al. (1990) highlighted that cyanide secreted by P. fluorescens strain CHAO played a role in the suppression of take-all (G. graminis var. tritici) and root rot (R. solani) of wheat. Root rot suppression by P. fluorescens strain E-11-3 was due to the production of HCN which influences the pathogen or the host or both. Wei et al. (1991) reported that four PGPR strains of P. fluorescens, namely, G8-4, P. aureofaciens 28-9 and 36-5 and P. putida 34-13, produced HCN in vitro, whereas two strains P. aureofaciens 25-33 and Serratia plymuthica 2-67 that induced resistance in the host showed no HCN production. There are suggestions that the biocontrol of pathogens through HCN production by certain fluorescent Pseudomonas may be due to the induction of plant resistance against certain pathogens.
6.3 Competition for Nutrients and Space
Competition between pathogenic and saprophytic microorganisms for organic materials released from the roots can reduce growth and/or pathogenic activity of the pathogens. Many successful antagonists that do not produce antibiotics are able to grow rapidly at the wound sites and are better to extreme nutrients and environmental conditions compared with postharvest pathogens. Unless an organism can compete favourably with other organisms and effectively scavenge and utilize favourable nutrients, it will not constitute a significant proportion of the rhizosphere population. The involvement of competition for nutrients in biological control by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. was suggested in several studies. It was found that in vitro antagonistic activity is based on competition and correlated with disease suppression. Moreover, addition of specific substrates to the plant pathogen system reduced biological control (Elad and Chet 1987). All disease-suppressive mechanisms exhibited by fluorescent pseudomonads are essentially of no real value unless these bacteria can successfully establish themselves at the root environment. Nutrient competition varies in different rhizospheres, depending on the available sources of carbon, nitrogen, sulphur, phosphate and micronutrients. It is not yet very clear whether a superior ability utilizes a particular type of nutrient or nutrients provide advantage to fluorescent pseudomonads.
6.4 Siderophore Production
Siderophores are low-molecular-weight molecules that are secreted by microorganisms to take up iron from the environment, and their modes of action in suppression of disease were thought to be solely based on competition for iron with the pathogen. These siderophores have been classified as either pyoverdins or pseudobactins. The production of these siderophores has been linked to their disease suppression ability (Loper and Buyer 1991). Production by certain fluorescent pseudomonads of extracellular, water soluble, yellow and green pigments in KB medium that fluoresce in UV light is known for a hundred years. All such pigment (or siderophore)-producing pseudomonads P. aeruginosa, P. fluorescens and P. putida belong to one intrageneric homology group. Pseudobactin, the first siderophore, was isolated, purified and characterized by X-ray crystallography from P. fluorescens strain B10. The involvement of pseudobactin production by fluorescent pseudomonads in biological control was reported by several workers (Weller 1988; Loper and Buyer 1991). Lemanceau et al. (1992) indicated that the production of pseudobactin 358 by P. putida WCS358 appeared to be responsible for the suppression of Fusarium wilt of carnation. Bhavani and Abraham (2005) found that two strains of P. fluorescens antagonists of Phytophthora palmivora causing pod rot of cocoa produced appreciable quantities of siderophores to suppress the pathogen. The production of siderophores by bacterial antagonist as one of the mechanism of antagonism against Fomes lamaoensis in tea was reported (Chakraborty et al. 2006).
6.5 Induced Systemic Resistance
Induced resistance is a state of enhanced defensive capacity developed by a plant when appropriately stimulated (Audenaert et al. 2002). Induced resistance results from perception of rhizobacteria by plant roots which give rise to an increased level of resistance which expressed upon subsequent infection by a pathogen. Localized induction of resistance at the site where eliciting bacteria are present on the roots is difficult to demonstrate, because a challenging pathogen will also be subject to bacterial antagonism at this same location. In contrast, no direct interaction between inducing bacteria and a challenging pathogen is possible when each organism is present at spatially separated sites and no contact between the two is established. Enhanced resistance due to ISR by PGPR is achieved by induction of defence compounds of phenylpropanoid pathway and PR proteins (pathogenesis-related proteins). Induced systemic resistance triggered in some rhizobacterial strains depends on salicylic acid (SA) signalling in the plants. Induced resistance by P. aeruginosa 7NSK2 was found to be iron regulated and involved three siderophores, pyoverdin, pyochelin and salicylic acid. Salicylic acid is also a precursor in the production of SA-containing siderophores, such as pseudomonine in P. fluorescens WCS374 (Audenaert et al. 2002). The transcriptome of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis revealed that root colonization by P. fluorescens WCS417r did not lead to transcriptional changes in the leaves, whereas in the roots there is a large set of genes that are differentially transcribed (Verhagen et al. 2004).
Several studies have indicated that PGPR may stimulate the production of biochemical compounds associated with host defence; massive accumulation of phytoalexins and phenolic compounds; increase in the activities of PR proteins, defence enzymes and transcripts; and enhanced lignification. Peroxidase (PO) catalyzes the last step in the biosynthesis of lignin and other oxidative phenols, and it is associated with disease resistance in plants. In groundnut, increased activity of PO was observed due to application of P. fluorescens, and PO isoforms were expressed at higher levels (Meena et al. 2000). Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) is the first enzyme involved in phenylpropanoid pathway and plays a key role in the biosynthesis of phenolics and phytoalexins. When cucumber roots were treated with P. corrugata 13 or P. aureofaciens 63-28, PAL activity was stimulated in root tissues in 2 days, and this activated accumulation lasted for 16 days after bacterization (Chen et al. 2000).
Induction of higher PPO activity was noticed in tomato and hot pepper pretreated with fluorescent pseudomonads strain against Pythium diseases (Ramamoorthy et al. 2002). Phenolics are fungitoxic in nature and increase the physical and mechanical strength of the host cell wall. M’Piga et al. (1997) reported that application of P. fluorescens strain 63-28 brought about cell wall thickening, deposition of phenolic compounds and formation of callose resulting in restricted growth of F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici. Such rapid defence reactions at the site of fungal entry delay the infection process and allow sufficient time for the host to build up other defence reactions to restrict pathogen growth. Recently reports on mechanism of biological control revealed that several microbial strains protect plants from various pests, diseases and phytonematodes in several crops by activating defence genes; encoding chitinase, glucanase, peroxidase and synthesis of phytoalexins; and inducing physiological changes (Kavino et al. 2007; Rajendran et al. 2007; Saravanakumar et al. 2007; Harish et al. 2008).
Pathogenesis-related proteins are designated as PRs and are defined as proteins coded by the host plant but induced specifically in pathological or related situations. They are not only accumulated locally in the infected leaves but also induced systemically associated with the development of systemic induced resistance against further infection by pathogens (van Loon et al. 1994). Induced resistance by PGPR is associated with the accumulation of PR proteins (Radjacommare et al. 2004). Application of PGPR strains showed enhanced resistance to bacteria speck and spot of tomato (Kavitha and Umesha 2007) and anthracnose disease in mango (Vivekananthan et al. 2004). The influence of plant growth promotion and ISR resulted in enhancing the disease resistance in tea plants against blister disease by PGPR bioformulations (Saravanakumar et al. 2007).
7 Conclusion
PGPR have gained worldwide importance and acceptance for agricultural benefits. These microorganisms are the potential tools for sustainable agriculture and the trend for the future. Scientific researches involve multidisciplinary approaches to understand adaptation of PGPR to the rhizosphere, mechanisms of root colonization, effects on plant physiology and growth, biofertilization, induced systemic resistance, biocontrol of plant pathogens, production of determinants, etc. The technology of commercial use of biocontrol agents has tremendous potentials. The inconsistency in performance of these PGPR strains is a major constraint to their widespread use as biocontrol agent in commercial agriculture. However, genetic manipulation of PGPR has the potential to construct significantly better strains with improved biocontrol efficacy. The applications of mixture of biocontrol agents may be a more ecologically sound approach because it may result in better colonization and better adaptation to the environmental changes occurring throughout the growing season.
8 Future Recommendations
Future strategies are required to clone genes involved in the production of antibiotics, siderophores and other metabolites and to transfer these cloned genes into the strains having the good colonization potential along with other beneficial characteristics. PGPR offer an environmentally sustainable approach to increase crop production and health. The application of molecular tools is enhancing our ability to understand and manage the rhizosphere and will lead to new products with effectiveness. Trends in research include the increased use of biorational screening processes to identify microorganisms with potential for biocontrol, increased testing under semicommercial and commercial production conditions and increased emphasis on combining biocontrol strains with each other and with other control methods, integrating biocontrol into an overall system. Research should be initiated on the development of improved formulations, adjuvants and protectants for microbial fungicides. Critical studies on the field survival of the antagonists based on biochemical and molecular methods have to be strengthened.
References
Audenaert K, Pattery T, Cornelis P, Hofte M (2002) Induction of systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2: role of salicylic acid, pyochelin and pyocyanin. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15:1147–1156
Bhavani R, Abraham K (2005) Efficacy of selected epiphytic microflora from pod surface against Phytophthora pod rot of cocoa. In: Proceedings of national symposium on biotechnological interventions for improvement of horticultural crops: issues and strategies, Kerala Agricultural University, Kerala, pp 398–400
Bora T, Ozaktan H, Gore E, Aslan E (2004) Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis by wettable powder formulations of the two strains of Pseudomonas putida. J Phytopathol 152:471–475
Broadway RM, Gongora C, Kain WC, Sanderson JA, Monroy JA, Bennett KC, Warner JB, Hoffman MP (1998) Novel chitinolytic enzymes with biological activity against herbivorous insects. J Chem Ecol 24:985–988
Callan NW, Mathre DE, Miller JB (1990) Biopriming seed treatment for biological control of Pythium ultimum pre-emergence damping-off in Sh2 sweet corn. Plant Dis 74:368–372
Chakraborty U, Chakraborty B, Basnet M (2006) Plant growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis by Bacillus megaterium. J Basic Microbiol 45:186–195
Chen C, Belanger RR, Benhamou N, Paulitz T (2000) Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythium aphanidermatum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 56:13–23
Dandurand LM, Morra MJ, Chaverra MH, Orser CS (1994) Survival of Pseudomonas spp. in air dried mineral powders. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1423–1430
De Freitas JR, Germida JJ (1992) Growth promotion of winter wheat by fluorescent pseudomonads under growth chamber conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1127–1135
Defago G, Berling CH, Burger U, Haas D, Kahr G, Keel C, Voisard C, Wirthner P, Wuthrich B (1990) Suppression of black root rot of tobacco and other root diseases by strains of Pseudomonas. In: Hornby D (ed) Biological control of soil borne plant pathogens. CAB International, Wallingford/Oxon, pp 93–108
Dubeikovsky AN, Mordukhova EA, Kochethov VV, Polikarpova FV, Boronin AM (1993) Growth promotion of black currant soft wood cuttings by recombinant strain Pseudomonas fluorescens BSP53a synthesizing an increased amount of indole-3-acetic acid. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1277–1281
Elad Y, Chet I (1987) Possible role of competition for nutrients in biocontrol of Pythium damping-off by bacteria. Phytopathology 77:190–195
Gamliel A, Katan J (1993) Suppression of major and minor pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads in solarized and non-solarized soils. Phytopathology 83:68–75
Glick RB (1995) The enhancement of plant growth promotion by free living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–117
Gutterson N (1990) Microbial fungicides: recent approaches to elucidating mechanisms. Crit Rev Biotechnol 10:69–91
Hagedorn C, Gould WD, Bardinelli TR (1993) Field evaluation of bacterial inoculants to control seedling disease pathogens on cotton. Plant Dis 77:278–282
Harish S, Kavino M, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D, Soorianathasundaram K, Samiyappan R (2008) Biohardening with plant growth promoting rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria induces systemic resistance against banana bunchy top virus. Appl Soil Ecol 39:187–200
Hebber P, Berge O, Heulin T, Singh SP (1991) Bacterial antagonists of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) fungal pathogens. Plant and Soil 133:131–140
Hofte M, Boelens J, Verstrete W (1991) Seed protection and promotion of seedling emergence by the plant growth beneficial Pseudomonas strains 7NSK2 and ANP15. Soil Biol Biochem 23:407–410
Karthiba L (2010) Molecular and applied biology of microbial consortia mediated resistance in rice plants against leaf folder pest and sheath blight disease. M.Sc. thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, 180 pp
Karthiba L, Saveetha K, Suresh S, Raguchander T, Saravanakumar D, Samiyappan R (2010) PGPR and entomopathogenic fungus bioformulation for the synchronous management of leaffolder pest and sheath blight disease of rice. Pest Manage Sci 66:555–564
Kavino M, Harish S, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D, Damodaran T, Soorianathasundaram K, Samiyappan R (2007) Rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria for induction of systemic resistance of banana plantlets against bunchy top virus. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1087–1098
Kavitha R, Umesha S (2007) Prevalence of bacterial spot in tomato fields of Karnataka and effect of biological seed treatment on disease incidence. Crop Prot 26:991–997
Keel C, Schneider U, Maurhofer M, Voisard C, Laville J, Burger U, Wirthner P, Haas D, Defago G (1992) Suppression of root diseases by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHAO: importance of the bacterial secondary metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 5:4–13
Kelly Cartwright D (1995) Comparison of Pseudomonas species and application techniques for biocontrol of Rhizoctonia stem rot of Poinsettia. Plant Dis 79:309–313
Kloepper JW, Schroth MN, Miller TD (1980) Effects of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathology 71:1078–1082
Lemanceau P, Bakker PAHM, Dekogel WJ, Alabouvette C, Schippers B (1992) Effect of pseudobactin 358 production by Pseudomonas putida WCS358 on suppression of Fusarium wilt of carnation by non pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum Fo47. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2978–2980
Liu L, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1995) Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: duration of protection and effect of host resistance on protection and root colonization. Phytopathology 85:1064–1068
Loper JE, Buyer JS (1991) Siderophore in microbial interaction on plant surface. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 4:5–13
M’Piga P, Belanger RR, Paulitz TC, Benhamou N (1997) Increased resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis lycopersici in tomato plants treated with the endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 63–28. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 50:301–320
Maurhofer M, Keel C, Haas D, Defago G (1994) Pyoluteorin production by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHAO is involved in the suppression of Pythium damping-off of cress but rot of cucumber. Eur J Plant Pathol 100:221–232
Mazzola M, Cook RJ, Thomashow LS, Weller DM, Pierson LS (1992) Contribution of phenazine antibiotic biosynthesis to the ecological competence of fluorescent pseudomonads in soil habitats. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2616–2624
Meena B, Marimuthu T (2012) Effect of application methods of Pseudomonas fluorescens for the late leaf spot of groundnut management. J Biopest 5:14–17
Meena B, Radhajeyalakshmi R, Marimuthu T, Vidhyasekaran P, Doraiswamy S, Velazhahan R (2000) Induction of pathogenesis-related proteins, phenolics and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in groundnut by Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Plant Dis Prot 107:514–527
Meena B, Marimuthu T, Vidhyasekaran P, Velazhahan R (2001) Biological control of root rot of groundnut with antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. J Plant Dis Prot 108:369–381
Meena B, Radhajeyalakshmi R, Marimuthu T, Vidhyasekaran P, Velazhahan R (2002) Biological control of groundnut late leaf spot and rust by seed and foliar applications of a powder formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Bio Sci Technol 12:195–204
Meena B, Marimuthu T, Velazhahan R (2006) Role of fluorescent pseudomonads in plant growth promotion and biological control of late leaf spot of groundnut. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 4:203–212
Murphy JF, Zehnder GW, Schuster DJ, Sikora EJ, Polston JE, Kloepper JW (2000) Plant growth promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection in tomato against tomato mottle virus. Plant Dis 84:779–784
Muthamilan M (1994) Management of diseases of chickpea and rice using fluorescent pseudomonads. PhD thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, 182 pp
Nagaraj KM, Bhaskaran R, Velazhahan R (2004) Involvement of secondary metabolites and extra cellular lytic enzymes produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens in inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani, the rice sheath blight pathogen. Microbiol Res 159:73–81
Nakkeeran S, Dilantha Fernando WG, Siddiqui A (2005) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Siddiqui ZA (ed) PGPR: biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 257–296
Nelson LM (2004) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): prospects for new inoculants. Plant Manage Netw 10:301–305
Otsu Y, Matsuda Y, Mori H, Ueki H, Nakajima T, Fujiwara K, Matsumoto M, Azuma N, Kakutani K, Nonomura T, Sakuratami Y, Shinogi T, Tosa Y, Mayama S, Toyode H (2004) Stable phyllosphere colonization by entomopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens KPM-018P and biological control of phytophagous ladybird beetles Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Bio Sci Technol 14:427–439
Pal KK, Dey R, Bhatt DM, Chauhan S (1999) Enhancement of groundnut growth and yield by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Int Arachis Newsl 19:51–53
Paul D, Sarma YR (2006) Antagonistic effects of metabolites of P. fluorescens strains on the different growth phases of Phytophthora capsici, root rot pathogen of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 39:113–118
Pechy-Tarr M, Bruck DJ, Maurhofer M, Fischer E, Vogne C, Henkels MD, Donahue KM, Grunder J, Loper JE, Keel C (2008) Molecular analysis of a novel gene cluster encoding an insect toxin in plant-associated strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Environ Microbiol 10:2368–2386
Rabindran R (1994) Biological control of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani and blast caused by Pyricularia oryzae using Pseudomonas fluorescens. PhD thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, 179 pp
Rabindran R, Vidhyasekaran P (1996) Development of a formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens PfALR2 for management of rice sheath blight. Crop Prot 15:715–721
Radjacommare R, Kandan A, Nandakumar R, Samiyappan R (2004) Association of the hydrolytic enzyme chitinase against Rhizoctonia solani in rhizobacteria-treated rice plants. J Phytopathol 152:365–370
Rajendran L, Samiyappan R, Raguchander T, Saravanakumar D (2007) Endophytic bacteria mediate plant resistance against cotton bollworm. J Plant Interact 2:1–10
Ramamoorthy V, Viswanathan R, Raguchander T, Prakasam V, Samiyappan R (2001) Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pest and diseases. Crop Prot 20:1–11
Ramamoorthy V, Raguchander T, Samiyappan R (2002) Enhancing resistance of tomato and hot pepper to Pythium diseases by seed treatment with fluorescent pseudomonads. Eur J Plant Pathol 108:429–441
Samiyappan R (1988) Biological control of black gram root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. PhD thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, 184 pp
Saravanakumar D, Vijayakumar C, Kumar N, Samiyappan R (2007) PGPR-induced defense responses in the tea plant against blister blight disease. Crop Prot 26:556–565
Shanahan P, O’Sullivan DJ, Simpson P, Glennon JD, O’Gara F (1992) Isolation of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol from a fluorescent pseudomonad and investigation of physiological parameters influencing its production. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:353–358
Sreenivasulu B, Krishnakumar KV, Aruna K, Lakshmi MV, Rao DVR (2006) Biointensive IDM approach against basal stem rot and stem bleeding disease of coconut. J Plant Crops 34:502–507
Stutz EW, Defago G, Keran H (1986) Naturally occurring fluorescent pseudomonads involved in suppression of black root rot of tobacco. Phytopathology 76:181–185
Suslow TV, Kloepper JW, Schroth MN, Burr TJ (1979) Beneficial bacteria enhance plant growth. Calif Agric 33:15–17
Thomashow LS, Weller DM (1990) Application of fluorescent pseudomonads to control root diseases of wheat and some mechanisms of disease suppression. Soil Biol Biochem 21:109–122
Thomashow LS, Bonsall RF, Weller DM (1997) Antibiotic production by soil and rhizosphere microbes in situ. In: Hurst CJ, Knudsen GR, McInerney MJ, Stetzenbach LD, Walter MV (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp 493–499
Tian B, Yang J, Zhang K (2007) Bacteria used in the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: populations, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:197–213
Tosi L, Zazzerini A (1994) Evaluation of some fungi and bacteria for potential control of safflower rust. J Phytopathol 142:131–140
Uppal AK, El Hadrami A, Adam R, Tenuta M, Daayf F (2008) Biological control of potato Verticillium wilt under controlled and field conditions using selected bacterial antagonists and plant extracts. Biol Control 44:90–100
Van Loon LC, Pierpoint WS, Boller T, Conejero V (1994) Recommendations for naming plant pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12:245–264
Van Peer R, Niemann GJ, Schippers B (1991) Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r. Phytopathology 81:728–734
Verhagen BWM, Glazebrook J, Zhu T, Chang HS, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2004) The transcriptome of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:895–908
Verhagen BWM, Aziz PT, Couderchet M, Hofte M, Aziz A (2009) Pseudomonas spp.-induced systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea is associated with induction and priming of defence responses in grapevine. J Exp Bot 61:249–260
Vidhyasekaran P, Rabindran R, Muthamilan M, Nayar K, Rajappan K, Subramanian N, Vasumathi K (1997) Development of powder formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for control of rice blast. Plant Pathol 46:291–297
Viswanathan R, Samiyappan R (2001) Antifungal activity of chitinase produced by some fluorescent pseudomonads against Colletotrichum falcatum Went causing red rot disease in sugarcane. Microbiol Res 155:309–314
Vivekananthan R, Ravi M, Ramanathan A, Samiyappan R (2004) Lytic enzymes induced by Pseudomonas fluorescens and other biocontrol organisms mediate defence against the anthracnose pathogen in mango. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:235–244
Vleesschauwer D, Djavaheri M, Bakker PAHM, Hofte M (2008) Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS374r-Induced systemic resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae is based on pseudobactin-mediated priming for a salicylic acid-repressible multifaceted defense response. Plant Physiol 148:1996–2012
Voisard C, Keel C, Hass D, Defago G (1989) Cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens helps suppress black root rot of tobacco under gnotobiotic conditions. EMBO J 8:351–358
Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1991) Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 81:1508–1512
Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1996) Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and increased plant growth by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Phytopathology 86:221–224
Weller DM (1988) Biological control of soil borne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 26:379–407
Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM, McSpadden Gardener BB, Thomashow LS (2002) Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:309–348
Weststeijn WA (1990) Fluorescent pseudomonads isolate E11-2 as biological agent for Pythium root rot in tulips. Neth J Plant Pathol 96:262–272
Williams GE, Asher MJC (1996) Selection of rhizobacteria for the control of Pythium ultimum and Aphanomyces cochlioides on sugarbeet seedlings. Crop Prot 15:479–486
Wilson H, Epton HAS, Sigee DC (1992) Biological control of fire blight of Hawthorn with fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. under protected conditions. J Phytopathol 136:16–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meena, B. (2014). Biological Control of Pest and Diseases Using Fluorescent Pseudomonads. In: Sahayaraj, K. (eds) Basic and Applied Aspects of Biopesticides. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1877-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1877-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1876-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1877-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)