Abstract
During the last years, the debate about the characteristics of local development has undergone a substantial expansion. New interdisciplinary theoretical approaches have spurred a series of methodological and empirical instruments, which allowed for more precise and effective analyses of the contributions of local technological change to long-run economic growth. This process has been paralleled by a substantial increase in the effort of international organisations responsible for producing data, in refining and improving the coverage of the main features of innovative activity. For instance, OECD acted both as locus for theoretical and methodological debate and as data collector and organiser of new and improved sets of indicators. Also EUROSTAT acted so as to enlarge and harmonise already existing datasets (for example, the Community Innovation Survey).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow K. (1962), “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention”, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Aster (1998), Techwatch 98. L’innovazione tecnologica in Emilia Romagna. Primi risultati dell’indagine campionaria, ASTER, Bologna.
Becattini G. (1990), The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion, in: Pike F.,. (Eds.), Industrial Districts and Interfirm Co-operation in Italy, International Labor Office, Geneva.
Brusco S. (1982), “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 6, pp. 167–184.
Cainelli G., Leoncini R. (1999), “Externalities and Long-Term Local Industrial Development: Some Empirical Evidence from Italy”, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, n. 90, pp. 25–39.
Cainelli G., Leoncini R., Montini A. (2001), “Struttura produttiva e sviluppo regionale di lungo periodo in Italia”, Moneta e Credito, n. 216, pp. 461–485.
Cnel (1997), Innovazione, piccole imprese e distretti industriali, 3° Rapporto Cnel/Ceris-Cnr, Documenti Cnel, n. 7, CNEL, Roma.
Dosi G. (1988), Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26, pp. 1120–1171.
Glaeser E., Kallal H., Scheinkman J., Schleifer A. (1992), “Growth in Cities”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 100, pp. 1126–1152.
Griliches Z. (1995), “R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues”, in: Stoneman P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford.
Henderson V., Kuncoro A., Turner M. (1995), “Industrial Development in Cities”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 103, pp. 1067–1090.
Knight F. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Houghton Muffin, Boston.
Jacobs J. (1969), The Economy of Cities, Vintage, New York.
Jones C, Williams J. (1997), Measuring the Social Return to R&D, mimeo.
Marshall A. (1920), Principles of Economics, Eight Edition, MacMillan, London.
Patel P., Pavitt K. (1995), “Patterns of Technological Activity: Their Measurement and Interpretation”, in: Stoneman P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford.
Pavitt K. (1984), “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory”, Research Policy, vol. 13, pp. 343–373.
Porter M. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.
Santarelli E., Sterlacchini A. (1996), “Statistiche e banche dati sull’innovazione tecnologica a livello di impresa: la situazione italiana”, Rivista Italiana degli Economisti, vol. 1, pp. 285–316.
Schumpeter J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Schumpeter J. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper & Row, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leoncini, R., Lotti, F. (2004). Are industrial districts more conducive to innovative production? The case of Emilia Romagna. In: Cainelli, G., Zoboli, R. (eds) The Evolution of Industrial Districts. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2700-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2700-2_12
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0095-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2700-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive