Summary
The failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a severe, long-lasting, disabling and relatively frequent (5–10%) complication of lumbosacral spine surgery. Wrong level of surgery, inadequate surgical techniques, vertebral instability, recurrent disc herniation, and lumbo-sacral fibrosis are the most frequent causes of FBSS. The results after repeated surgery on recurrent disc herniations are comparable to those after the first intervention, whereas repeated surgery for fibrosis gives only 30–35% success rate, and 15–20% of the patients report worsening of the symptoms. Computerized tomography (CT) with contrast medium and, in particular, Gd-DPTA enhanced MRI have recently allowed a differentiation between these two pathologies permitting us to adopt different therapies. In 1982–92 we applied spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a first therapy of FBSS with proven lumbo-sacral fibrosis.
Fifty-five patients underwent percutaneous trial SCS with a mono/multipolar electrode placed at the level of Th9-12. In the 36 patients who had a positive response to the trial stimulation, the electrode was connected to an implantable neurostimulator. On January ′94 a third party, not involved in the treatment of the patients, controlled 34 of the 36 patients with a mean follow-up of 55 months. We classified the patients reporting at least 50% pain relief and satisfication with result as successful, and 56% of the patients fell in that category. 10 out of 34 patients were able to resume their work. The success rate was significantly higher in females (73%) than in males, and in radicular rather than axial pain. Our data have led us to consider SCS as a first choice treatment in FBSS due to lumbo-sacral fibrosis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burton CY (1978) Lumbosacral arachnoiditis. Spine 3: 24–30
Carella A, Andreula CF (1990) Impiego del Gd-DTPA nello studio con risonanza magnetica nella patologia degenerativa del rachide lombare. Riv Neurobiol 3 [Suppl 3]: 91–98
Caspar W, Campbell B, Barbier D et al (1990) The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure. Neurosurgery 28: 78–87
Davis RA (1994) A Long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 80: 415–422
De La Porte C, Siegfried J (1993) Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery. Pain 52: 55–61
De La Porte C, Siegfried J (1983) Lumbosacral spinal fibrosis (spinal arachnoiditis): its diagnosis and treatment by spinal cord stimulation. Spine 8: 593–603
Erickson DL (1975) Percutaneous trial of stimulation for patient selection for implantable stimulating devices. J Neurosurg 43: 440–444
Finnegan WJ, Fenlin JM, Maevel JP et al (1979) Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. J Bone Joint Surg 61-A: 1077–1082
Johnston J, Matheny J (1978) Microscopic lysis of lumbar adhesive arachnoiditis. Spine 3: 36–39
Kumar K, Nath R, Wyant GM (1991) Treatment of chronic pain by chronic pain by epidural spinal cord stimulation: a 10 year experience. J Neurosurg 75: 402–407
Law JD, Lehman RAW, Kirsch WM (1978) Reoperation after lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. J Neurosurg 48: 259–263
Long DM, Erickson DE (1975) Stimulation of the posterior columns of the spinal cord for relief of intractable pain. Surg Neurol 4: 134–141
Masaryk TJ (1989) Herniated nucleus pulposus vs epidural fibrosis: disk vs scar. MRI Decisions 30: 20–26
Meglio M, Cioni B, Rossi GF (1989) Spinal cord stimulation in management of chronic pain: a 9-year experience. J Neurosurg 70: 519–524
North RB, Campbell JN et al (1991) Failed back surgery syndrome: 5 year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation. Neurosurgery 28: 685–691
North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT et al (1991) Failed back surgery syndrome: 5 years follow-up after spinal cord stimulator implantation. Neurosurgery 28, 1991: 692–699
North RB, Kidd DH, Zahruk M et al( 1993) Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: experience over two decades. Neurosurgery 32: 384–395
Rothman RH, Bernini PM (1981) Algorithm for salvage surgery of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 154: 14–17
Schubiger O, Valvanis A (1982) CT differentiation between recurrent disc herniation and postoperative scar formation: the value of contrast enhancement. Neuroradiology 22: 251– 254
Siegfried J, Lazorthes Y (1982) Long-term follow-up of dorsal column stimulation for chronic pain syndrome after multiple lumbar operation. Appl Neurophysiol 45: 201–204
Sotiropoulos S, Ghafetz NI, Lang P et al (1989) Differentiation between postoperative scar and recurrent disk herniation: prospective comparison af MR, and contrast-enhanced CT. AJNR 10: 639–643
Sweet W, Wepsic J (1974) Stimulation of the posterior columns of the spinal cord pain control. Clin Neurosurg 21: 278–310
Thomalske G, Galow W, Ploke G (1977) Critical comments on a comparison of two series (1000 patients each) of lumbar disc surgery. Adv Neurosurg 4: 22–27
Urban BJ, Nashold Jr BS (1978) Percutaneous epidural stimulation of the spinal cord for relief of pain. J Neurosurg 48: 323–328
Waddel G, Kummel EG, Lotto WN, et al (1979) Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. J Bone Joint Surg (A) 61: 201–207
Winkelmuller W (1981) Experience with the control of low back pain by the dorsal column stimulation (DCS) system and by the peridural electrode system (Pisces). In: Hosobuchi Y, Corbin T (eds) Indications for spinal cord stimulation. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 34–41
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fiume, D., Sherkat, S., Callovini, G.M., Parziale, G., Gazzeri, G. (1995). Treatment of the Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Due to Lumbo-Sacral Epidural Fibrosis. In: Meyerson, B.A., Ostertag, C. (eds) Advances in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 11. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 64. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9419-5_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9419-5_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-9421-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-9419-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive