Abstract
Compound eyes are the most abundant eye design in the animal kingdom, and probably its most adaptable. In this chapter I describe the ways in which compound eyes have evolved in response to the intensity and direction of natural illumination. Species active in bright light generally have no need for compound eyes of high sensitivity. Instead, their eyes frequently possess acute zones, regions where spatial resolution is greatly enhanced, and where the spatial layout of ommatidia is often matched to the spatial layout of the habitat. Such matched filtering is not confined to habitat structure. Acute zones may also behave as matched filters for an animal’s motion flow-field or for localizing other animals. In dim light, sensitivity becomes the overriding priority, and at night, or in the depths of sea, compound eyes of immense sensitivity have evolved. Those from increasing depths in the sea also tend to have an increasingly dorsal bias that reflects the dominance of dorsal (down-welling) illumination. These and other aspects of compound eye design are illustrated using a broad range of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates as examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aho A-C, Donner K, Hydén C, Larsen LO, Reuter T (1988). Low retinal noise in animals with low body temperature allows high visual sensitivity. Nature 334: 348–350
Barlow HB (1956) Retinal noise and absolute threshold. J Opt Soc Am 46: 634–639
Brännström PA, Nilsson D-E (2000) Gradations of eye design in the superposition eyes of male mayflies. J Comp Physiol A, in press
Dahmen H (1991) Eye specialisation in waterstriders: an adaptation to life in a flat world. J Comp Physiol A 169: 623–632
Denton EJ (1990) Light and vision at depths greater than 200 metres. In: Herring PJ, Campbell AK, Whitfield M, Maddock L (eds) Light and Life in the Sea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 127–148
Exner S (1891) Die Physiologie der facettirten Augen von Krebsen und Insecten. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig Vienna. English translation: Hardie RC ( 1988 ) The Physiology of the Compound Eyes of Insects and Crustaceans. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Franceschini N, Hardie R, Ribi W, Kirschfeld K (1981) Sexual dimorphism in a photoreceptor. Nature 291: 241–244
Gibson JJ (1950) The Perception of the Visual World. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Gilbert C, Strausfeld NJ (1991) The functional organization of male-specific visual neurons in flies. J Comp Physiol A 169: 395–411
Gronenberg W, Strausfeld NJ (1991) Descending pathways connecting the male-specific visual system of flies to the neck and flight motor. J Comp Physiol A 169: 413–426
Hardie R (1979) Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina. I: Comparative properties of R1–6 and R7 and 8. J Comp Physiol A 129: 19–33
Horridge GA (1978) The separation of visual axes in apposition compound eyes. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 285: 1–59
Horridge GA, Duelli, P (1979) Anatomy of the regional differences in the eye of the mantis Ciulfina. J Exp Biol 80: 165–190
Hughes A (1977) The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: comparative optics and retinal organisation. In: Crescitelli F (ed) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VII/5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 613–756
Jerlov NG (1976) Marine Optics. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam
Kirschfeld K (1967) Die Projektion der optischen Umwelt auf das Raster der Rhabdomere im Komplexauge von Musca. Exp Brain Res 3: 248–270
Kirschfeld K (1974) The absolute sensitivity of lens and compound eyes. Z Naturforsch 29C: 592–596
Krapp HG, Hengstenberg R (1996) Estimation of self-motion by optic flow processing in single visual neurons. Nature 384: 463–466
Labhart T, Nilsson D-E (1995) The dorsal eye of the dragonfly Sympetrum: specializations for prey detection against the blue sky. J Comp Physiol A 176: 437–453
Land MF (1976) Superposition images are formed by reflection in the eyes of some oceanic decapod cn.istacea. Nature 263: 764–765
Land MF (1981) Optics and vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol VII/6B. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 471–592
Land MF (1984) The resolving power of diurnal superposition eyes measured with an ophthalmoscope. J Comp Physiol 154: 515–533
Land MF (1989a) Variations in the structure and design of compound eyes. In: Stavenga DG, Hardie RC (eds) Facets of Vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 90–111
Land MF (1989b) The eyes of hyperiid amphipods: relations of optical structure to depth. J Comp Physiol A 164: 751–762
Land MF (1999) Compound eye structure: Matching eye to environment. In: Archer SN, Djamgoz MBA, Loew ER, Partridge JC, Vallerga S (eds). Adaptive Mechanisms in the Ecology of Vision. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp 51–71
Land MF, Burton FA, Meyer-Rochow VB (1979) The optical geometry of euphausiid eyes. J Comp Physiol 130: 49–62
Land MF, Eckert H (1985) Maps of the acute zones of flies. J Comp Physiol A 156: 525–538
Land MF, Gibson G, Horwood J (1997) Mosquito eye design: conical rhabdoms are matched to wide aperture lenses. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 1183–1187
Land MF, Gibson G, Horwood J, Zeil J (1999) Fundamental differences in the optical structure of the eyes of nocturnal and diurnal mosquitoes. J Comp Physiol A 185: 91–103
Layne J, Land MF, Zeit J (1997) Fiddler crabs use the visual horizon to distinguish predators from conspecifics: a review of the evidence. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 77: 43–54
Lillywhite PG, Laughlin SB (1979) Transducer noise in a photoreceptor. Nature 277: 569–572
McIntyre PD, Caveney S (1998) Superposition optics and the time of flight in onitine dung beetles. J Comp Physiol A 183: 45–60
Melzer RR, Zimmermann T, Smola U (1997) Modification of branched photoreceptor axons, and the evolution of neural superposition. Cell Mol Life Sci 53: 242–247
Nilsson D-E (1988) A new type of imaging optics in compound eyes. Nature 332: 76–78
Nilsson D-E (1989) Optics and evolution of the compound eye. In: Stavenga DG, Hardie RC (eds) Facets of Vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3073
Nilsson D-E, Nilsson HL (1981) A crustacean compound eye adapted for low light intensities ( Isopoda ). J Comp Physiol 143: 503–510
Nilsson D-E, Ro A-I (1994) Did neural pooling for night vision lead to the evolution of neural superposition eyes? J Comp Physiol A 175: 289–302
Nilsson D-E, Gislén L, Brännström PA (2000) Principles and constraints in the design of superposition eyes. J Comp Physiol A, in press
Olberg R (1981) Object-and self-movement detectors in the ventral cord of the dragonfly. J Comp Physiol A 141: 327–334
Olberg R (1986) Identified target-selective visual interneurons descending from the dragonfly brain. J Comp Physiol A 159: 827–840
Schwind R (1978) Visual system of Notonecta glauca: a neuron sensitive to movement in the binocular visual field. J Comp Physiol 123: 315–328
Schwind R (1980) Geometrical optics of the Notonecta eye: adaptations to optical environment and way of life. J Comp Physiol 140: 59–68
Sherk TE (1978) Development of the compound eyes of dragonflies (Odonata). III. Adult compound eyes. J Exp Zoo! 203: 61–80
Snyder AW (1977) Acuity of compound eyes: physical limitations and design. J Comp Physiol 116: 161–182
Snyder AW (1979) Physics of vision in compound eyes. In: Autrum (ed) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol VII/6A. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York. pp 225–313
Srinivasan MV, Bernard GD (1975) The effect of motion on visual acuity of the compound eye: a theoretical analysis. Vision Res 15: 515–525
Strausfeld NJ (1991) Structural organization of male-specific visual neurons in calliphorid optic lobe. J Comp Physiol A 169: 379–393
Tyler JE, Smith RC (1970) Measurement of Spectral Irradiance Underwater. Gordon and Breach, New York
Vogt K (1975) Zur Optik des Flußkrebsauges. Z Naturforsch 30: 691
Walls GL (1942) The Vertebrate Eye and its Adaptive Radiation. The Cranbrook Press, Bloomfield Hills
Warrant EJ (1999) Seeing better at night: life style, eye design and the optimum strategy of spatial and temporal summation. Vision Res 39: 1611–1630
Warrant EJ, McIntyre PD (1990a) Limitations to resolution in superposition eyes. J Comp Physiol A 167: 785–803
Warrant EJ, McIntyre PD (1990b) Maturation of optics and resolution in adult dung beetle superposition eyes. J Comp Physiol A 167: 805–815
Warrant EJ, McIntyre PD (1991) Strategies for retinal design in arthropod eyes of low F-number. J Comp Physiol A 168: 499–512
Warrant EJ, McIntyre PD (1992) The trade-off between resolution and sensitivity in compound eyes. In: Pinter RB, Nabet B (eds) Nonlinear Vision, CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton. pp 391–421
Warrant EJ, McIntyre PD (1993) Arthropod eye design and the physical limits to spatial resolving power. Prog Neurobiol 40: 413–461
Warrant EJ, Porombka T, Kirchner WH (1996) Neural image enhancement allows honeybees to see at night. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1521–1526
Warrant EJ, Nilsson D-E (1998) Absorption of white light in photoreceptors. Vision Res 38: 195–207
Warrant EJ, Bartsch K, Günther C (1999) Physiological optics in the hummingbird hawkmoth: a compound eye without ommatidia. J Exp Biol 202: 497–511
Wehner R (1987) “Matched filters” - neural models of the external world. J Comp Physiol A 161: 511–531
Zeil J (1983) Sexual dimorphism in the visual system of flies: the compound eyes and neural superposition in Bibionidae (Diptera). J Comp Physiol 150: 379–393
Zeil J, Nalbach G, Nalbach H-O (1986) Eyes, eye stalks and the visual world of semi-terrestrial crabs. J Comp Physiol 159: 801–811
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Warrant, E.J. (2001). The Design of Compound Eyes and the Illumination of Natural Habitats. In: Barth, F.G., Schmid, A. (eds) Ecology of Sensing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22644-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22644-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08619-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-22644-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive