Skip to main content

Biogeography of selected Holocene coccoliths in the Atlantic Ocean

  • Chapter
Coccolithophores

Summary

In this chapter we present a revision of the biogeographical distribution of five coccolithophorid species (Coccolithus pelagicus, Calcidiscus leptoporus, Heli-cosphaera carteri, Syracosphaera pulchra and Umbilicosphaera sibogae) and the genus Gephyrocapsa in the Atlantic Ocean. The mapping is based on surface sediment samples. Each of the taxa considered here constitutes an unambiguous morphological group ideal for rapid low taxonomic resolution analysis of assemblages, which is a tempting strategy for ecological and paleoecological analysis of assemblages. However, in each case recent research has indicated that these broad taxa are in fact composed of several discrete species, or sub-species. The clearest example is C. pelagicus, with discrete morphotypes in sub-Arctic and temperate upwelling areas. For Gephyrocapsa and Umbilicosphaera the separation is less obvious but still unambiguous. Species separation is manifestly essential to understanding the biogeography of these taxa. For H. carteri and S. pulchra the mapped distributions are relatively straightforward and we do not yet know how they relate to the recently proven genotypic variation within the taxa.

At high latitudes temperature and productivity belts parallel each other and the effects are difficult to distinguish. At lower latitudes however, the effects are more clearly separable – it is for instance obvious that S. pulchra shows a warm water low productivity preference whilst H. carteri shows a warm water higher productivity distribution. In particular there are several cases where distribution patterns in the North and South Atlantic are strikingly different. These include the absence of C. pelagicus in the sub-Antarctic; the much higher abundance of C. leptoporus in temperate South Atlantic than North Atlantic; much higher abundance of U. sibogae var. sibogae in the oligotrophic South Atlantic than the North Atlantic. The Calcidiscus and Umbilicosphaera patterns are more symmetric, since the North and South Atlantic show broadly similar sets of environments in terms of temperature, salinity, productivity and macronutrients (nitrate, phosphate and silicate). Obvious possible hypotheses are that the populations in the two oceans are sufficiently separated to have evolved slightly different ecological tolerances or that an additional factor, such as a trace element is responsible for the distribution contrasts. More generally we suspect that the comparably broad coccolithophorid bio-geographic zones in all oceans and the absence of obvious vicariance in coccolith species distributions may have prevented recognition of significant contrasts between oceans, although such contrasts may provide key clues for interpreting past temporal shifts in assemblages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andruleit H, Rogalla U (2002) Coccolithophores in surface sediments of the Arabian Sea in relation to environmental gradients in surface waters. Mar Geol 31 (32): 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann K-H, Andruleit H, Samtleben C (2000). Coccolithophores in the Nordic Seas: Comparison of living communities with surface sediment assemblages. Deep-Sea Res II 47: 1743–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco D, Estrada M, Jones B (1980) Relationship between the phytoplankton distribution and composition and the hydrography in the northwest African upwelling region near Cabo Corbeiro. Deep-Sea Res Part A, Oceanographic research papers 27: 799–821

    Google Scholar 

  • Böckel B, Baumann K-H, Henrich R, Kinkel H (subm) Distribution patterns of coccoliths in South Atlantic and Southern Ocean surface-sediments in relation to environmental gradients. Palaeogeogr Palaeoecol

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollmann J (1997) Morphology and biogeography of the genus Gephyrocapsa coccoliths in Holocene sediments. Mar Micropaleontol 29: 319–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollmann J, Baumann KH, Thierstein HR (1998) Global dominance of Gephyrocapsa coccoliths in late Pleistocene: Selective dissolution, evolution, or global environmental change? Paleoceanography 13: 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand LE (1994) Physiological ecology of marine coccolithophores. In: Winter A, Siesser W (eds) Coccolithophores. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Broerse ATC, Brummer G-JA, Van Hinte JE (2000) Coccolithophore export production in response to monsoonal upwelling off Somalia (northwestern Indian Ocean). Deep-Sea Res II 47: 2179–2205

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachao M, Moita MT (2000) Coccolithus pelagicus, a. productivity proxy related to moderate fronts off Western Iberia. Mar Micropaleontol 39 (1–4): 131–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLIMAP (1976) The surface of the ice-age Earth. 191: 1131–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • CLIMAP (1981) Seasonal reconstruction of the Earth’s surface at the last glacial maximum. Geol Soc Am Map and Chart Series MC-36: 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • CLIMAP (1984) The last interglacial ocean. Quaternary Res 21: 123–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conkright ME, Locarnini RA, Garcia HE, O’Brien TD, Boyer TP, Stephens C, Antonov JI (2002): World Ocean Atlas 2001: Objective Analyses, Data Statistics, and Figures, CD-ROM Documentation. National Oceanographic Data Center, Silver Spring, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich G, Kalle K, Krauss W, Siedler G (1980) General Oceanography, John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide LK (1990) Distribution of coccoliths in surface sediments in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. Mar Micropaleontol 16: 65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham MJ, Winter A (1989) Paleoceanographic interpretations of coccoliths and oxygen isotopes from sediments from the surface of the Southwest Indian Ocean. Mar Micropaleontol 13: 325–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay CS, Giraudeau J (2001) Extant calcareous nannoplankton in the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean (austral summers 1994 and 1995). Mar Micropaleontol 40 (4): 417–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay CS, Giraudeau J (2002) Movement of oceanic fronts south of Australia during the last 10 ka: interpretation of calcareous nannoplankton in surface sediments from the Southern Ocean. Mar Micropaleontol 893: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores JA, Gersonde R, Sierro FJ (1999) Pleistocene fluctuations in the Agulhas Current Retroflection based on the calcareous plankton record. Mar Micropaleontol 37: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gard G (1987) Late Quaternary calcareous nannofossil bio stratigraphy and sedimentation patterns: Fram Strait, Arctica. Paleoceanography 2/5: 519–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisen M, Billard C, Broerse ATC, Cros L, Probert I, Young JR (2002) Life-cycle associations involving pairs of holococcolithophorid species – Intraspecific variation or cryptic speciation? Eur J Phycol 37: 531–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geitzenauer KR, Roche, MB, McIntyre A (1977) Coccolith biogeography from North Atlantic and Pacific surface sediments. In: Ramsey ATS (ed) Oceanic Micropalaeontology, Academic Press, London, pp 973–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraudeau J (1992) Distribution of recent nannofossils beneath the Benguela system: southwest African continental margin. Mar Geol 108: 219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraudeau J, Monteiro MS, Nikodemus K (1993) Distribution and malformation of living coccolithophores in the northern Benguela upwelling system off Namibia. Mar Micropaleontol 22: 93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegraeff GM (1984) Coccolithophorids (Calcareous Nanoplankton) from Australian waters. Bot Mar 27: 229–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton SD (1988) Thermocline control on coccolith diversity and abundance in recent sediments from the Celtic Sea and English Channel. Mar Geol 83: 311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan RW, Young JR (1990) Proposed changes to the classification system of living Coccolithophorids. International Nannoplankton Association Newsletter 1 (12): 15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinkel H, Baumann K-H, Cepek M (2000) Coccolithophores in the equatorial Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biol 54: 319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijne A, Kroon D, Zevenboom W (1989) Phytoplankton and foraminiferal frequencies in northern Indian Ocean and Red Sea surface waters. Neth J Sea Res 24: 531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappertsbusch M (1993) Geographic distribution of living and Holocene coccolithophores in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Micropaleontol 21: 219–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappertsbusch M, Brummer G-JA (1995) A sediment trap investigation of sinking coccolithophorids in the North Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res 142 (7): 1083–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Knappertsbusch M, Cortés MY, Thierstein HR (1997) Morphologic variability of the coccolithophorid Calcidiscus leptoporus in the plankton, surface sediments and from the Early Pleistocene. Mar Micropaleontol 30: 293–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss W (1986) The North Atlantic Current. J Geophys Res 91 (C4): 5061–5074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss W, Käse RH (1984) Mean circulation and eddy kinetic energy in the Eastern North Atlantic. J Geophys Res 89 (C3): 3407–3415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann H (1919) Die Bevölkerung des Ozeans mit Plankton nach den Ergebnissen des Zentrifugenfänge während der Ausreise der “Deutschland” 1911. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Biologie des Atlantischen Ozeans. Archiv für Biontologie, 4 (3): 1–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinverno E, Ziveri P, Corselli C (in press) Coccolithophorid distribution in the Ionian Sea and its relationship to eastern Mediterranean circulation during late fall-early winter 1997. J Geophys Res

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartney MS (1994) A Primer on Ocean Currents. Measurements and Lingo of Physical Oceanographers. Oceanus 37: 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclntyre A, Bè AWH (1967). Modern coccolithophores from the Atlantic Ocean – I. Placoliths and cyrtoliths. Deep-Sea Res 14: 561–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida S (1979) Atlas of Pacific Nannoplanktons. NOM (News of Osaka Micropaleontologists), Special Paper (3): 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada H, Honjo S (1973) The distribution of coccolithophorids in the Pacific. Deep-Sea Res 20: 355–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada H, McIntyre A (1979) Seasonal distribution of modern coccolithophores in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biol 54: 319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RG, Stramma L (1991) Upper-level circulation in the South Atlantic Ocean. Progr Oceanogr 26: 1–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujos A (1988) Spatio-temporal distribution of some Quaternary coccoliths. Oceanologica Acta 11(1): 65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaud S, Ziveri P, Broerse ATC (2002) Geographical and seasonal differences in morphology and dynamics of the coccolithophore Calcidiscus leptoporus. Mar Micropaleontol 890: 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth PH (1994) Distribution of coccoliths in oceanic sediments. In: Winter A, Siesser W.G. (eds) Coccolithophores. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 199–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáez AG, Probert I, Geisen M, Quinn P, Young JR, Medlin LK (2003) Pseudo-cryptic speciation in coccolithophores. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100 (12): 7163–7168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samtleben C, Baumann K-H, Schröder-Ritzrau A (1995) Distribution, composition and seasonal variation of coccolithophore communities in the northern North Atlantic. In: Flores JA, Sierro FJ (eds) Proceedings of the 5th INA Conference. Salamanca, pp 219–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidermann N (1977) Selective dissolution of recent coccoliths in the Atlantic Ocean. In: Ramsey ATS (ed) Oceanic Micropalaeontology. Academic Press, London, pp 973–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon LV, Nelson G (1996) The Benguela: large scale features and processes and system variability. In: Wefer G, Berger WH, Siedler G, Webb DJ (eds) The South Atlantic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 163–210

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smythe-Wright D, Chapman P, Duncombe Rae C, Shannon LV, Boswell SM (1998) Characteristics of the South Atlantic subtropical frontal zone between 15°W and 5°E. Deep-Sea Res I 45: 167–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprengel C, Baumann K-H, Henderiks J, Henrich R, Neuer S (2002) Modern coccolithophore and carbonate sedimentation along a productivity gradient in the Canary Islands region: seasonal export production and surface accumulation rates. Deep-Sea Res II 49 (17): 3577–3598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek JW (1989) Recent calcareous nannoplankton in the southernmost Atlantic. Polarforschung 59 (1/2): 45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JR (1994) The functions of coccoliths. In: Winter A, Siesser WG (eds) Coccolithophores. Cambridge University Press, pp 63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter A, Siesser WG (1994) Coccolithophores. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter A, Jordan RW, Roth P (1994) Biogeography of living coccolithophores in ocean waters. In: Winter A, Siesser WG (eds) Coccolithophores. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 161–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziveri P, Thunell RC (2000) Coccolithophore export production in Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California: response to climate forcing. Deep-Sea Res II 47: 2073–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziveri P, Thunell RC, Rio D (1995 a) Export production of coccolithophores in an up welling region: results from San Pedro Basin, Southern California Borderlands. Mar Micropaleontol 24: 335–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziveri P, Thunell R, Rio D (1995b) Seasonal Changes in coccolithophore densities in the Southern California Bight during the 1991/1992 El Nino event. Deep-Sea Res I 42 11/12: 1881–1903

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziveri P, Rutten A, de Lange G, Thomson J, Corselli C (2000) Present-day coccolith fluxes recorded in central eastern Mediterranean sediment traps and surface sediments. Palaeogeogr Palaeoecol 158 (3–4): 175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziveri P, Kleijne A, Conte M, Weber J (2001) Coccolithophorid distribution and alkenone biomarker characterisation from the tropical Equatorial Atlantic. European Geophysical Society (EGS) XXVI General Assembly, Nice, France

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ziveri, P., Baumann, KH., Böckel, B., Bollmann, J., Young, J.R. (2004). Biogeography of selected Holocene coccoliths in the Atlantic Ocean. In: Thierstein, H.R., Young, J.R. (eds) Coccolithophores. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06278-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06278-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-06016-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-06278-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics