Abstract
The geographical information systems (GIS) revolution, the widespread availability of digital map data and the ability to attach accurate locational references to address databases via Address Point and the Postal Address File creates the possibility of users designing their own customised zoning systems in the UK. For the first time, it is possible to take control of the zones required for reporting, mapping and analysing spatial information. This situation is, of course, not entirely novel. Ever since the first point in polygon algorithms were used in the early 1970s and digitisers permitted polygons to be encoded as strings of x, y coordinates, some users have had this ability to restructure their spatial data. Similarly, the hierarchical nature of census enumeration district codes (and postcodes) provided easy ways of performing hierarchical spatial aggregation; data for electoral or census wards could be aggregated to districts, counties or local education areas and data for unit postcodes aggregated to sectors et cetera Indeed, the BBC Doomsday system developed in the mid 1980s offered 24 different standard geographies (Openshaw et al. 1986). Whilst this was useful, the degree of aggregational freedom was still restricted by the need for the spatial building blocks to nest within the target output geography and the user had to know which aggregation was required. In practice, this meant that you were forced to restrict zone changes to one or other of the standard set of geographical areal definitions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cliff A.D., Haggett P., Ord K., Bassett K. and Davies R. 1975. Elements of Spatial Structure: A Quantitative Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DoE. 1995. 1991. Deprivation Index: A Review of Approaches and a Matrix of Results, HMSO, London.
Fletcher R. 1987. Practical Methods of Optimisation, Wiley, Chichester, Sussex.
Macmillan W.D. and Pierce T. 1996. Active computer-assisted redistricting, in McLean I. and
Butler D. (eds.) Fixing the Boundaries: Defining and Redefining Single-Member Electoral Districts, Dartmouth, Aldershot: 219–234.
Monmonier M. 1995. Drawing the Line: Tales of Maps and Cartocontroversy, Henry Holt, New York.
Openshaw S. 1977. A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 2: 459–472.
Openshaw S. 1984. The Modifiable Area Unit Problem, CATMOG 38, Geo-Abstracts, Norwich. Openshaw S. 1996. Developing GIS relevant zone based spatial analysis methods, in Longley
P. and Batty M. (eds.) Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment, GeoInformation International, Cambridge: 55–73.
Openshaw S. and Alvanides S. 1998. Applying GeoComputation to the analysis of spatial distributions, in Longley P., Goodchild M., Maguire D. and Rhind D. (eds.) Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Applications and Management, Wiley, New York.
Openshaw S. and Rao L. 1995. Algorithms for re-engineering 1991 census geography, Environment and Planning A, 27: 425–446.
Openshaw S., Wymer C. and Charlton M. 1986. A geographical and mapping system for the BBC Domesday optical disks, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 11: 296–304.
Simpson S. 1996. Resource allocation by measures of relative social need in geographical areas: the relevance of the signed X, the percentage and the raw count, Environment and Planning A, 28: 537–554.
Vilares M., Nazareth., Painho M., Baçâo F. and Coelho P. 1998. Revisâo da Lei Eleitoral para a Assembleia da República — Estudos de Delimitaçäo de CIrculos Uninominais de Candidatura, Presidência do Conselho de Ministros, Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia, Janeiro.
Wise S., Haining R. and Ma J. 1997. Regionalisation tools for the exploratory spatial analysis of health data, in Getis A. and Fischer M.M. (eds.) Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis, Springer, Berlin: 83–100.
ZDES. 1997. [htttp://www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/research/ccg/ZDES].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alvanides, S., Openshaw, S. (1999). Zone Design for Planning and Policy Analysis. In: Stillwell, J., Geertman, S., Openshaw, S. (eds) Geographical Information and Planning. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03954-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03954-0_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08517-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03954-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive