Skip to main content

Multimodality and Sustainable Transport: A Critical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mobilität, Erreichbarkeit, Raum

Part of the book series: Studien zur Mobilitäts- und Verkehrsforschung ((SZMV))

Abstract

Sustainable transport research and policy making currently identify multimodality as an important way to reduce carbon emissions and other negative transport externalities. This emphasis is consistent with the ‘behaviour change agenda’ for sustainable mobility, which places responsibility for changing behaviour on ‘citizen-consumers’, while policy makers help them make ‘better’ modal choices, rather than introducing regulatory or pricing measures. In this paper, we present findings based on the British National Travel Survey, which lead us to qualify the emphasis currently placed on multimodality. We first focus on the relationship between multimodality and CO2 emissions, at the individual and trip level. While multimodal trips produce less CO2 than unimodal trips over comparable distances, they are typically longer and therefore have higher average emissions. At the individual level, there is an association between greater multimodality and lower emissions, although of weak magnitude. Second, we investigate trends in multimodality between 1995 and 2015. Contrary to expectations, we find that individual-level multimodality has decreased over time, notably among younger adults, and this during a period of declining car travel distances per capita. We conclude that there is merit in encouraging greater multimodality, but this can hardly be the only or primary goal of sustainable transport policies. More policy attention needs to be directed to the pivotal role of high levels of travel activity, and the reduction of these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Search conducted on article titles, abstracts and keywords on 2nd October 2019, search string: “multimod* AND transport* AND sustainab* AND NOT freight”.

  2. 2.

    While the concept of sustainability is notoriously ill defined, it is generally seen to include three dimensions: economic, social and environmental. In this chapter, we refer specifically to the environmental dimension of sustainability, which is generally emphasised in accounts of sustainable mobility (e.g. Banister 2008).

  3. 3.

    For reasons that are set out in detail in Heinen and Mattioli (2019b), we excluded trips including air travel stages, and the individuals who had conducted such trips, from the analysis of the multimodality-CO2 relationship.

  4. 4.

    Our analysis included short walks (i.e. of less than one mile) as well as longer walking trips, and weighted both appropriately, so in our definition multimodal trips include e.g. those consisting of a walk to the bus stop followed by a trip by bus.

References

  • Akenji, L. (2014). Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S., Gilg, A., & Shaw, G. (2011). ‘Helping people make better choices’: Exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmental sustainability. Applied Geography, 31(2), 712–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S., & Prillwitz, J. (2014). A smarter choice? Exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmentally sustainable mobility. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, A., Börjesson, M., & Eliasson, J. (2016). Explaining “peak car” with economic variables. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 236–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, R., & Hamre, A. (2015). The multimodal majority? Driving, walking, cycling, and public transportation use among American adults. Transportation, 42(6), 1081–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DECC—Department for Energy and Climate Change. (2015). Methodology paper for emission factors. Final report. London: DECC.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfT—Department for Transport. (2015). National Travel Survey, 1995–2001: Special License Access. [Computer File] UK Data Service. SN: 7804. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7804-1.

  • DfT—Department for Transport. (2017). National Travel Survey, 2002–2016: Special Licence Access. [data collection]. 6th Edition.UK Data Service. SN: 7553. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7553-6.

  • Diana, M., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2009). Desire to change one’s multimodality and its relationship to the use of different transport means. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(2), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, M., & Pirra, M. (2016). A comparative assessment of synthetic indices to measure multimodality behaviours. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 12(9), 771–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2018). 2018—Year of Multimodality. European Commission. ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/logistics-and-multimodal-transport/2018-year-multimodality_en. Zugegriffen: 8. Oct. 2019.

  • Gebhardt, L., Krajzewicz, D., & Oostendorp, R. (2017. Intermodality–key to a more efficient urban transport system? Proceedings of the 2017 eceee Summer Study, 759–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, E., & Chatterjee, K. (2015). The same mode again? An exploration of mode choice variability in Great Britain using the National Travel Survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 266–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, E., Harshfield, A., Panter, J., Mackett, R., & Ogilvie, D. (2017). Does exposure to new transport infrastructure result in modal shifts? Patterns of change in com-mute mode choices in a four-year quasi-experimental cohort study. Journal of Transport and Health, 6, 396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, E., & Mattioli, G. (2019a). Does a high level of multimodality mean less car use? An exploration of multimodality trends in England. Transportation, 46(4), 1093–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, E. & Mattioli, G. (2019b). Multimodality and CO2 emissions: A relationship moderated by distance. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment, 75, 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R., Wirtz, M., & Kalinowska, D. (2012). Travel trends among young adults in Germany: Increasing multimodality and declining car use for men. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 443–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnimhof, T., Chlond, B., & Von Der Ruhren, S. (2006). Users of transport modes and multimodal travel behavior: Steps toward understanding travelers’ options and choices. Transportation Research Record, 1985(1), 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobis, C. (2007). Multimodality: Facets and causes of sustainable mobility behavior. Transportation Research Record, 2010(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pangbourne, K., Mladenovic, M., Stead, D., Stead, D., & Milakis, D. (2020). Questioning Mobility as a Service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, A. & Holz-Rau, C. (2018). Who is responsible for more GHG-emissions in transport: Mono- or Multimodal User groups? A comparison. 5th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Santa Barbara (US).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senatsverwaltung für Umwelt, Verkehr & Klimaschutz (undated). Berlin Mobility Act. Senatsverwaltung für Umwelt, Verkehr & Klimaschutz. www.berlin.de/senuvk/verkehr/mobilitaetsgesetz/index_en.shtml. Zugegriffen: 8. Okt. 2019.

  • Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016). Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The NTS 1995–2001 and 2002–2015 special licence data sets of the British Department for Transport (DfT 2015; 2017) were kindly provided by the Economic and Social Data Service (ESDS) through the UK Data Archive at the University of Essex, Colchester. The responsibility for the analysis, interpretation and all conclusions drawn from the data lies entirely with the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio Mattioli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mattioli, G., Heinen, E. (2020). Multimodality and Sustainable Transport: A Critical Perspective. In: Appel, A., Scheiner, J., Wilde, M. (eds) Mobilität, Erreichbarkeit, Raum. Studien zur Mobilitäts- und Verkehrsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31413-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31413-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31412-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31413-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics