Zusammenfassung
Politische Parteien gelten als zentral für die Ausgestaltung des Wohlfahrtsstaates. Dieser Aufsatz diskutiert die theoretische Herleitung von Parteiendifferenzen über die Interessen der Wähler einerseits, über die Überzeugungen der Parteien selbst andererseits und diskutiert, in welcher Weise der Wettbewerb um Wählerstimmen und Regierungsbeteiligung Parteiendifferenzen entgegenwirkt und inwieweit Parteieneffekte durch Globalisierung und Institutionen konditioniert werden. Anschließend wird ein Überblick über den Forschungsstand zu Parteieneffekten auf die Sozialpolitik in den entwickelten Demokratien gegeben. Dabei zeigt sich, dass Parteieneffekte im Zeitverlauf etwas abgenommen haben, allerdings bei der Analyse der wohlfahrtsstaatlichen Generosität und bei arbeitsmarktnahen Sozialleistungen besonders deutlich erkennbar sind.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literaturverzeichnis
Allan, James P. und Lyle Scruggs. 2004. Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496 – 512.
Armingeon, Klaus und Nathalie Giger. 2008. Conditional punishment: A comparative analysis of the electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment in OECD nations, 1980 – 2003. West European Politics 31(3): 558 – 580.
Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann und David Weisstanner. 2016. Choosing the path of austerity: How parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. West European Politics 39(4): 628 – 647.
Bandau, Frank. 2015. Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Strukturen und Parteieneffekte. Eine vergleichende Analyse sozialpolitischer Konfliktmuster in Großbritannien, Schweden und Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Bandau, Frank. 2017. The impact of partisanship in the era of retrenchment: Insights from quantitative welfare state research. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2969792.
Beyme, Klaus von. 2000. Parteien im Wandel. Von den Volksparteien zu den professionalisierten Wählerparteien. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Brooks, Clem und Jeff Manza. 2007. Why welfare states persist. The importance of public opinion in democracies. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara und Eric Tanenbaum. 2001. Mapping policy preferences. Estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945 – 1998. Oxford u. a.: Oxford University Press.
Castles, Francis G. 2008. What welfare states do: A disaggregated expenditure approach. Journal of Social Policy 38(1): 45 – 62.
Emmenegger, Patrick. 2007. Parteien und Opportunitätsstrukturen: Die parteipolitischen Determinanten der Staats- und Sozialausgaben, 1980 – 2000. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 53(1): 79 – 102.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta.1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan politics in the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, Geoffrey und Deborah Mitchell. 2001. Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39(2): 145 – 177.
Garritzmann, Julian L. 2016. The political economy of higher education finance. The politics of tuition fees and subsidies in OECD countries, 1945 – 2015. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giger, Nathalie. 2012. Wie reagieren Wähler auf Sparpolitik? Eine theoretische und empirische Annäherung an die elektoralen Kosten von Sparpolitik. der moderne staat 5(2): 291 – 312.
Giger, Nathalie und Moira Nelson. 2011. The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity? European Journal of Political Research 50(1): 1 – 23.
Gingrich, Jane und Silja Häusermann. 2015. The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy 25(1): 50 – 75.
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2001. Welfare-state retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands, 1982 – 1998. The role of party competition and party consensus. Comparative Political Studies 34(9): 963 – 985.
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2002. The politics of justification. Party competition and welfare-state retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1982 to 1998. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Häusermann, Silja und Hanspeter Kriesi. 2015. What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. In The politics of advanced capitalism, Hrsg. Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt und Hanspeter Kriesi, 202 – 230. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71(4): 1467 – 1487.
Hicks, Alexander M. und Duane H. Swank. 1992. Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960 – 82. American Political Science Review 86(3): 658 – 674.
Hillen, Sven. 2017. „Nur wer wählt, zählt“? Eine Analyse des Zusammenhangs von Wahlbeteiligung und arbeitsmarktbezogenen sozialen Leistungen linker Parteien in OECD-Ländern. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 58(4): 533 – 559.
Horn, Alexander. 2017. Government ideology, economic pressure and risk privatization. How economic worldviews shape social policy choices in times of crisis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Horn, Alexander und Carsten Jensen. 2017. When and why politicians do not keep their welfare promises. European Journal of Political Research 56(2): 381 – 400.
Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin und John D. Stephens. 1993. Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional Structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 711 – 749.
Huber, Evelyne und John D. Stephens. 2001. Development and crisis of the welfare State. Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Jahn, Detlef. 2006. Globalization as ‚Galton’s problem‘: The missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development. International Organization 60(2): 401 – 431.
Jensen, Carsten. 2010. Issue compensation and right-wing government social spending. European Journal of Political Research 49(2): 282 – 299.
Jensen, Carsten. 2011. Catching up by transition: Globalization as a generator of convergence in social spending. Journal of European Public Policy 18(1): 106 – 121.
Jensen, Carsten. 2012. Labour market- vs. life course-related social policies: Understanding cross-programme differences. Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 275 – 291.
Jensen, Carsten, Christoph Arndt, Seonghui Lee und Georg Wenzelburger. 2017. Policy instruments and welfare state reform. Journal of European Social Policy (i. E.).
Jensen, Carsten und Henrik B. Seeberg. 2015. The power of talk and the welfare state: Evidence from 23 Countries on an asymmetric opposition-government response Mechanism. Socio-Economic Review 13(2): 215 – 233.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. und van Kersbergen, Kees. 2010. Christian democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 183 – 209.
Katz, Richard S. und Peter Mair. 1995. Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1(1): 5 – 28.
Kersbergen, Kees van. 1995. Social capitalism. A study of Christian democracy and the welfare state. London/New York: Routledge.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2001. Partisan competition and welfare state retrenchment. When do politicians choose unpopular policies? In The new politics of the welfare state, Hrsg. Paul Pierson, 265 – 302. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert und Philipp Rehm. 2014. Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies 47(12): 1670 – 1706.
Kitschelt, Herbert und Philipp Rehm. 2015. Party alignments: Change and continuity. In The politics of advanced capitalism, Hrsg. Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt und Hanspeter Kriesi, 179 – 201. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kittel, Bernhard und Herbert Obinger. 2003. Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. Journal of European Public Policy 10(1): 20 – 45.
Klein, Markus. 2006. Partizipation in politischen Parteien. Eine empirische Analyse des Mobilisierungspotenzials politischer Parteien sowie der Struktur innerparteilicher Partizipation in Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47(1): 35 – 61.
Klitgaard, Michael Baggesen und Christian Elmelund-Præstekær. 2013. Partisan effects on welfare state retrenchment: Empirical evidence from a measurement of government intentions. Social Policy and Administration 47(1): 50 – 71.
Klitgaard, Michael Baggesen, Gijs Schumacher und Menno Soentke. 2015. The partisan politics of institutional welfare state reform. Journal of European Public Policy 22(7): 948 – 966.
Korpi, Walter und Joakim Palme. 2003. New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975 – 1995. American Political Science Review 97(3): 425 – 446.
Kwon, Hyeok Yong und Jonas Pontusson. 2010. Globalization, labour power and partisan politics revisited. Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 251 – 281.
Lindblom, Anders. 2007. Obfuscating retrenchment: Swedish welfare policy in the 1990s. Journal of Public Policy 27(2): 129 – 150.
Oesch, Daniel. 2015. Occupational structure and labor market change in Western Europe since 1990. In The politics of advanced capitalism, Hrsg. Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann,
Herbert Kitschelt und Hanspeter Kriesi, 112 – 132. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics 48(2): 143 – 179.
Pierson, Paul. 2001. Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. In The new politics of the welfare state, Hrsg. Paul Pierson, 80 – 104. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Pontusson, Jonas und David Rueda. 2010. The politics of inequality: Voter mobilization and left parties in advanced industrial states. Comparative Political Studies 43(6): 675 – 705.
Potrafke, Niklas. 2009. Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice 140(1): 105 – 124.
Potrafke, Niklas. 2017. Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. Journal of Comparative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004.
Rehm, Philipp. 2011. Social policy by popular demand. World Politics 63(2): 271 – 299.
Ross, Fiona. 2000. „Beyond left and right“: The new partisan politics of welfare. Governance 13(2): 155 – 183.
Rueda, David. 2005. Insider-outsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challenge to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review 99(1): 61 – 74.
Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30(2): 155 – 183.
Schmidt, Manfred G. 2005. Sozialpolitik in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Schmitt, Carina und Reimut Zohlnhöfer. 2017. Partisan differences and the interventionist state in advanced democracies, Socio-Economic Review online first (https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx055).
Schumacher, Gijs, Barbara Vis und Kees van Kersbergen. 2013. Political parties’ welfare image, electoral punishment and welfare state retrenchment. Comparative European Politics 11(1): 1 – 21.
Soroka, Stuart N. und Christopher Wlezien. 2010. Degrees of democracy. Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strange, Susan. 1995. The limits of politics. Government and Opposition 30(3): 291 – 311.
Swank, Duane. 2013. Party government, institutions, and social protection in the age of austerity. In Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie. Festschrift für Manfred G. Schmidt, Hrsg. Klaus Armingeon, 307 – 330. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vis, Barbara. 2016. Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 18(2): 122 – 137.
Walter, Stefanie. 2017. Globalization and the demand-side of Politics: How globalization shapes labor market risk perceptions and policy preferences. Political Science Research and Methods 5(1): 55 – 80.
Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371 – 398.
Wenzelburger, Georg. 2011. Political strategies and fiscal retrenchment: Evidence from four countries. West European Politics 34(6): 1151 – 1184.
Wenzelburger, Georg. 2014. Blame avoidance, electoral punishment and the perceptions of risk. Journal of European Social Policy 24(1): 80 – 91.
Wenzelburger, Georg und Felix Hörisch. 2016. Framing effects and comparative social policy reform: Comparing blame avoidance evidence from two experiments. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 18(2): 157 – 175.
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2007. The politics of budget consolidation in Britain and Germany: The impact of blame avoidance opportunities. West European Politics 30(5): 1120 – 1138.
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2009. How politics matter when policies change: Understanding policy change as a political problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11(1): 97 – 115.
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2012. Machen Parteiensysteme einen Unterschied? Die Struktur des Parteienwettbewerbs und die Kürzung von Sozialausgaben in Westeuropa. der moderne staat 5(2): 341 – 360.
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2017. Zum Einfluss des Parteienwettbewerbs auf politische Entscheidungen. In Parteien unter Wettbewerbsdruck, Hrsg. Sebastian Bukow und Uwe Jun, 15 – 37. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, Fabian Engler und Kathrin Dümig. 2018. The retreat of the interventionist state in advanced democracies (Review Article). British Journal of Political Science 48(2): 535 – 562.
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, Frieder Wolf und Georg Wenzelburger. 2012. Parteien und die Generosität von Altersrenten in Zeiten permanenter Austerität. Swiss Political Science Review 18(1): 28 – 53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zohlnhöfer, R. (2019). Parteien. In: Obinger, H., Schmidt, M. (eds) Handbuch Sozialpolitik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22802-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22803-3
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)