Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovationsdynamiken und Integrationsprozesse in grenzüberschreitenden Wirtschaftsregionen: Grenzen als Triebkräfte und Barrieren verstärkter Zusammenarbeit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Grenzen

Part of the book series: RaumFragen: Stadt – Region – Landschaft ((RFSRL))

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag behandelt die Frage, welche Rolle Grenzen und Distanzen (bzw. Näheformen) für innovationsbasierte Integrationsprozesse in grenzüberschreitenden Regionen spielen. Aufbauend auf Erkenntnissen der „Proximity School“ wird zwischen verschiedenen Arten von Barrieren, welche als physische, funktionale, kognitive und institutionelle Distanzen definiert werden, unterschieden und deren Wirkungen auf Innovations- und Integrationsprozesse in grenzüberschreitenden Wirtschaftsregionen analysiert. Dabei wird eine grundlegende Differenzierung zwischen Innovationssystemen mit schwacher innovationsbasierter Integration und solchen mit stärker ausgeprägten innovationsgetriebenen Integrationsformen vorgenommen. Abschließend wird der zukünftige Forschungsbedarf zum Thema des Buchbeitrags skizziert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994). Living in the global. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Hrsg.), Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe (S. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & O’Dowd, L. (1999). Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies, 33, 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2005). The geography of innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (S. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., Lawton, Smith, H., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45, 875–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016a). Smart sepcialization as an innovation-driven strategy for economic diversification: Examples from scandinavian regions. In S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, L. Andreescu, R. Gheorgiu, & I. Wade (Hrsg.), Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (im Druck ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016b). Regional innovation systems: Past – Present – Future. In R. Shearmur, C. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux (Hrsg.), Handbook on the geographies of innovation. Cheltenham: Elgar (im Druck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6, 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balland, P., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. (2004). From ‘Spaces of Place’ to ‘Spaces of Flows’? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 530–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouba-Olga, O., Carrincazeaux, C., Coris, M., & Ferru, M. (2015). Editorial: Proximity dynamics, social networks and innovation. Regional Studies, 49(6), 901–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet-Jailly, E. (2008). Cascadia in comparative perspectives: Canada-U.S. relations and the emergence of cross-border regions. Canadian Political Science Review, 2, 104–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrincazeaux, C., Lung, Y., & Vicente, J. (2008). The scientific trajectory of the French school of proximity: Interaction- and institution-based approaches to regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 16, 617–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspctive on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. J. (Hrsg.). (2004). Regional Innovation Systems (2. Aufl.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J., & James, A. D. (2015). Understanding the emergence of new science and technology policies: Policy entrepreneurship, agenda setting and the development of the European Framework Programme. Research Policy, 44(6), 1252–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialization: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policies. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualini, E. (2003). Cross-border governance: Inventing regions in a trans-national multi-level polity. DISP, 152, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2008). Opportunities for democracy in cross-border regions? Lessons from the Öresund region. Regional Studies, 42, 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T. (2013). Bridging regional innovation: Cross-border collaboration in the Öresund region. Geografisk Tidsskrift, 113, 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassink, R., Dankbaar, B., & Corvers, F. (1995). Technology networking in border regions: Case study of the Euregion Maas-Rhine. European Planning Studies, 3, 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Van Oort, F. (2009). The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 43, 721–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, G.-J. (2006). Borders, bridges and branding: The transformation of the Öresund region into an imagined space. European Planning Studies, 14, 1015–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F. (2012). On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: Personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge Information Technology cluster. Regional Studies, 46, 1169–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2009). Cross-border regions and territorial restructuring in Central Europe: Room for more transboundary space. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirat, T., & Lund, Y. (1999). Innovation and proximity. Territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, M., & Bröcker, J. (2006). Barrieren und Potenziale der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit in der Fehmarnbeltregion. Sonderborg: Institut für Grenzregionforschung, Syddansk Universitet & Institut für Regionalforschung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, M., & Herrmann, H. (2011). Half empty or half full? Over 30 years of regional cross-border cooperation within the EU: Experiences at the Dutch-German and Danish-German border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 26(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky, K. (2000). A river is a river – Cross-border networking between Baden and Alsace. European Planning Studies, 8, 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krätke, S. (1999). Regional integration or fragmentation? The German-Polish border region in a new Europe. Regional Studies, 33, 631–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krätke, S., & Borst, R. (2007). EU Eastern enlargement and the configuration of German-Polish inter-firm linkages. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98, 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, O. (2008). Regionauts: The transformation of cross-border regions in Scandinavia. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, K.-J., & Trippl, M. (2013). Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Regional Studies, 47, 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, K., & Winther, L. (2006). The interspace between Denmark and Sweden: The industrial dynamics of the Öresund cross-border region. Danish Journal of Geography, 106, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (2010). Scope, style, and theme of research on knowledge and learning societies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1, 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M., & Uberti, E. (2007). Inter-regional knowledge flows in Europe: An econometric analysis. In K. Frenken (Hrsg.), Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography (S. 230–255). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen, T., & Rohde, S. (2016). Cross-border regional innovation systems: Conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1623–1647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen, T., Weidenfeld, A. and Williams, A. (2016) Cross-border regional innovation system integration: An analytical framework. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie (S. 1–16). doi:10.1111/tesg.12223.

  • Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2006). Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change, 37, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches in economic geography. In E. Sheppard & T. J. Barnes (Hrsg.), A Companion to Economic Geography (S. 77–94). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P., & Törnqvist, G. (1999). Building a cross-border learning region. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, C. (2004). The Öresund area: Pre- and post-bridge cross border functional integration: The bi-national regional question. GeoJournal, 61, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miörner, J., Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Moodysson, J. (2017) Creating institutional preconditions for knowledge flows in cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C. doi:10.1177/2399654417704664.

  • Moodysson, J., & Jonsson, O. (2007). Knowledge collaboration and proximity: The spatial organization of biotech innovation projects. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14, 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E., Zenker, A., Hufnagl, M., Heraud, J-A., & Schnabl, E. (2015). Policy dynamics and challenges for the Upper Rhine. Cross-border integration of regional innovation systems and smart specialisation strategies. EvoReg Research Note No. 29. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaers, C. (2014). Smart specialisation strategies: The transfrontier challenge. Vortrag bei der Veranstaltung Smart Specialisation Strategies: Implementing European Partnerships. Committee of Regions – Brussels 18 June 2014. http://cor.europa.eu/en/events/Documents/WS1_Claire%20Nauwelaers%20[Compatibility%20Mode].pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. Sept. 2016.

  • Niebuhr, A. (2008). The impact of EU enlargement on European border regions. International Journal of Public Policy, 3, 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Van der Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Regions and innovation: Collaborating across borders, OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M. (1999). Building governance institutions across European borders. Regional Studies, 33, 657–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe. Significance and drivers of cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M. (2007). Policy entrepreneurship and multi-level governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 861–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platonov, V., & Bergman, J.-P. (2011). Cross-border co-operative networks in the perspective of innovation dynamics. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organisations, 1, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Stancova, KC. (2015). Internationalising smart specialisation: Assessment and issues in the case of EU new member states. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0339-3.

  • Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1999). European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism. Regional Studies, 33, 605–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning-Part C, 29, 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M., & Mustikkamäki, N. (2015). Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship, proximity and regional innovation systems. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98, 652–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terlouw, K. (2012). Border surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned cross-border behaviour and planned territorial structures of cross-border governance. Planning Practice & Research, 27(3), 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A. (2008). Temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42, 869–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A., & Gilly, J.-P. (2000). On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Studies, 34, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trippl, M. (2008). Ökonomische Verflechtungen und Innovationsnetze im Wirtschaftsraum Centrope. Wirtschaft und Mangement, 9, 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trippl, M. (2010). Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 101, 150–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2017). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography. doi:10.1177/0309132517700982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyarra, E., Sörvik, J., & Midtkandal, I. (2014). Inter-regional collaboration in research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). (S3 Working Paper Series No. 06). Seville: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek, J., & Smulders, H. (2014). Institutional gaps in cross-border regional innovation systems. In R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, & F. Boekma (Hrsg.), The Social dynamics of innovation networks (S. 157–176). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek, J., & Smulders, H. (2015). Institutional hindrances in cross-border regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtum, H. (1998). The development of cross-border economic relations. Tilburg: Center for Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weik, E. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship and agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 466–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung, Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich

    Michaela Trippl

Authors
  1. Michaela Trippl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Trippl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

    Martin Heintel

  2. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Austria

    Robert Musil

  3. Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

    Norbert Weixlbaumer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trippl, M. (2018). Innovationsdynamiken und Integrationsprozesse in grenzüberschreitenden Wirtschaftsregionen: Grenzen als Triebkräfte und Barrieren verstärkter Zusammenarbeit. In: Heintel, M., Musil, R., Weixlbaumer, N. (eds) Grenzen. RaumFragen: Stadt – Region – Landschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18433-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18433-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18432-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-18433-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation