Abstract
Financed almost entirely by a special public broadcasting tax, and with no advertising or sponsoring allowed, Yle is one of the ‘purest’ public service organizations in Europe and might be seen as enjoying an enviably secure position in comparison to many other European PSM organizations. In recent years, however, the tradition of media policy consensus has increasingly showed signs of unravelling. The level and justification of Yle’s funding as well as its transparency, efficiency and accountability have been subject to heated political debate, with attacks against its legitimacy spearheaded by the struggling commercial media industry. This chapter reviews the main issues and arguments in the Finnish debates. It concludes that, at least for the time being, the fragile consensus over the importance of PSM is maintained, and it is unlikely that the current government would push through radical changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ala-Fossi, M. (2012). Social obsolescence of the TV fee and the financial crisis of Finnish public service media. Journal of Media Business Studies, 9(1), 33–54.
Ala-Fossi M., & Hujanen T. (2010). The rise and fall of public service media fee proposal in Finland (Working Paper, No. 269). Cologne: Institute of Broadcasting Economics at the University of Cologne.
Brüggemann, M., Esser, F., & Humprecht, E. (2012). The strategic repertoire of publishers in the media crisis: The ‘Five C’ scheme in Germany. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 742–752.
Erho, N. (2014). Narina vailla loppua. [Complaining without an end.] Journalisti, 27 November. http://www.journalisti.fi/artikkelit/2014/14/narina-vailla-loppuaavataanko-se-/. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
Finnpanel. (2016). Results from the TV audience measurement. http://www.finnpanel.fi/en/tulokset/tv/vuosi/share/2015/. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hellman, H., & Nieminen, H. (2016). Ylen tarjonta ei ole ilmaista – eikä tutkimus ole osoittanut, että Yle hankaloittaisi muun median elämää. [Yle supply is not free – and research does not support the arguments about Yle hampering the life of other media]. Suomen Kuvalehti 19/2016. http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/ylen-tarjonta-ei-ole-ilmaista-eika-tutkimus-ole-osoittanut-etta-yle-hankaloittaisi-muun-median-elamaa/.Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
Herzog, C., & Karppinen, K. (2014). Policy streams and public service media funding reforms in Germany and Finland. European Journal of Communication, 29(4), 416–432.
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2. Ed.). New York: Longman.
Korkman, S. (2016). Onneksi meillä on Yle – mutta onko myös jatkossa? [We’re lucky to have Yle – but for how long?] Helsingin Sanomat, 20 April. http://www.hs.fi/talous/a1461119470317. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
Luukka, T. (2016). Yle-debatti kiihtyy: Viestinnän keskusliiton Kangaskorven mukaan Ylen rahoituksen supistaminen on ‘ainoa keino’, 16 May. http://www.hs.fi/kulttuuri/a1463278231117. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
Ministry of Finance. (2015). Annex to the government proposal for the parliament to amend the section 2 of the Act on public service broadcasting tax (HE 58/2015). Ministry of Finance: Helsinki. https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/JulkaisuMetatieto/Documents/EDK-2015-AK-24879.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
MINTC. (2015). Pätevät pärjäävät. Kotimaisia mediamarkkinoita arvioivan työryhmän raportti [The competent will thrive. Report by the working group assessing the Finnish media market], Reports 2/2015. Helsinki: MINTC. http://www.lvm.fi/documents/20181/514507/Raportit+ja+selvitykset+2-2015/. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
MINTC. (2016). Parlamentaarisen työryhmän muistio: Yleisradio oy:n julkisen palvelun tehtävät ja siihen liittyvät muut uudistukset [Memorandum of the parliamentary working group: The public service remit of Yleisradio and proposals for reforms]. http://www.lvm.fi/lvm-site62-mahti-portlet/download?did=207240. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
Nieminen, H. (2010). The unravelling Finnish media policy consensus. In D. Levy & R. K. Nielsen (eds.), The changing business of journalism and its implications for democracy (pp. 55–67). Oxford: Reuters Institute.
Sehl, A., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Public service news and digital media. Oxford: Reuters Institute. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/publications/2016/public-service-news-and-digital-media/. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Tapaninen, J. (Ed.) (2015). Ylen suuri tehtävä: Raportti Yleisradion roolista muuttuvassa mediakentässä [The great remit of Yle: Report on the role of Yleisradio in a changing media landscape]. http://www.greatpoint.fi/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ylen_Suuri_Tehtava.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karppinen, K., Ala-Fossi, M. (2018). Finland: Maintaining the Fragile Consensus. In: Herzog, C., Hilker, H., Novy, L., Torun, O. (eds) Transparency and Funding of Public Service Media – Die deutsche Debatte im internationalen Kontext. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17997-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17997-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17996-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17997-7
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)