Zusammenfassung
In prospektiven Panelstudien wie dem Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP) gibt es im Grundsatz zwei Argumente, die eine Integration von neuen Stichproben sinnvoll erscheinen lassen. Zum einen sollen diese neuen Stichproben, die ab der zweiten Welle gezogen und in die laufende Stichprobe der ersten Welle integriert werden, ausgefallene Untersuchungseinheiten ersetzen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
AAPOR (2001). Standard Definitions. Final Dispositions of Case codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Revised 2011.
De Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J., & Huisman M. (2003). Prevention and Treatment of Item Nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics 19 (2), 153–176.
Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940). On a Least Squares Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table When the Expected Marginal Totals are Known. Journal of the American Statistical Association 35, 615–630.
Deng, Y., Hillygus, D. S., Reiter, J. P., Si, Y., & Zheng, S. (2013). Handling Attrition in Longitudinal Studies: The Case for Refreshment Samples. Statistical Science 28 (2), 238–256.
Deville, J.-C., Särndal, C.-E., & Sautory, O. (1993). Generalized Raking Procedures in Survey Sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 (423), 1013–1020.
Dorsett, R. (2010). Adjusting for nonignorable sample attrition using survey substitutes identified by propensity score matching: An empirical investigation using labour market data. Journal of Official Statistics 26, 105–125.
Goebel, J., Grabka, M., Krause, P., Kroh, M., Pischner, R., Sieber, I., & Spiess, M. (2008). Mikrodaten, Gewichtung und Datenstruktur der Längsschnittstudie Sozio-oekonomisches Panel (SOEP). In J. Frick, O. Groh- Samberg, J. Schupp & K. Spiess (Hrsg.), Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 3. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (5), 646–675.
Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Frick, J. R. (2005). DTC Desktop Companion to the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Version 8.0 Dec 2005, Updated to Wave 21 (U).
Hausman, J. A., & Wise, D. A. (1979). Attrition Bias in Experimental and Panel Data: The Gary Income Maintenance Experiment. Econometrica 47, 455–473.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47 (1), 153–161.
Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., Ridder, G., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Combining Panel Data Sets With Attrition And Refreshment Samples. Econometrica 69 (6), 1645–1659.
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952). A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47 (206), 663–685.
Kalton, G., & Flores-Cervantes, I. (2003). Weighting Methods. Journal of Official Statistics 19, 81–97.
Kalton, G., & Kasprzyk, D. (1986). The Treatment of Missing Survey Data. Survey Methodology 12, 1–16.
Kish, L., & Hess, I. (1959). A „Replacement“ Procedure for Reducing the Bias of Nonresponse. The American Statistician 13, 17–19.
Kish, L (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.
Kish, L. (1992). Weighting for Unequal. Journal of Official Statistics 8 (2), 183–200.
Kim, J. K., & Kim, J. J. (2007). Nonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated response probability. Canadian Journal of Statistics 35, 501–514.
Kroh, M., Pischner, R., Spiess, M., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). On the Treatment of Non-Original Sample Members in the German Household Panel Study (SOEP): Tracing, Weighting, and Frequencies. Methoden, Daten, Analysen. Zeitschrift für Empirische Sozialforschung 2, 179–198.
Kroh, M. (2014). Documentation of sample sizes and panel attrition in the German Socio Economic Panel (SOEP) (1984 until 2012). SOEP Survey Papers 177: Series D. Berlin: DIW/SOEP.
Kroh, M., Käppner, K., & Kühne, S. (2014b). Sampling, Nonresponse and Weighting in the 2011 and 2012 Refreshment Samples J and K of the German Socio-Economic Panel. DIW Survey Papers (in press).
Kroh, M., Goebel, J., Kühne, S., & Preu, F. (2015). The 2013 SOEP-IAB Migration Sample (M): Sampling Design and Weighting Adjustment. DIW Data Documentation (in press).
Little, J. J. A., & Rubin, D. A. (2002). Statistial Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley.
Lohr, S. L. (2009). Sampling: Design and Analysis. 2nd edition. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Lynn, P., & Kaminska, O. (2010). Weighting strategy for Understanding Society (No. 2010–05). Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
Patterson, H. D. (1950). Sampling on successive occasions with partial replacement of units. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 12, 241–255.
Pischner, R. (1994). Quer- und Längsschnittgewichtung des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels. In S. Gabler, J. H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & D. Krebs (Hrsg.), Gewichtung in der Umfragepraxis (S. 166–187). Opladen: Westdt. Verlag.
Rendtel, U. (1995). Lebenslagen im Wandel: Panelausfälle und Panelrepräsentativität (Vol. 8). Campus Verlag.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 41–55.
Royston, P. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing values: Further update of ice, with an emphasis on categorical variables. The Stata Journal 9 (3), 466–477.
Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63 (3), 581–592.
Särndal, C. E., Swensson, B., & Wretman, J. (1992). Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer.
Schnell, R. (2012). Survey-Interviews. Methoden standardisierter Befragungen. Berlin: Springer.
Schnell, R., & Kreuter, F. (2005). Separating interviewer and sampling-point effects. Journal of Official Statistics 21 (3), 389–410.
Schräpler, J.-P., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Individual and Neighborhood Determinants of Survey Nonresponse. SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 288. Berlin: DIW/SOEP.
Schonlau, M., Watson, N., & Kroh, M. (2011). Household Survey Panels: How Much do Following Rules Affect Sample Size? Survey Research Methods 5, 53–61.
Schonlau, M., Kroh, M., & Watson, N. (2013). The Implementation of Cross- Sectional Weights in Household Panel Surveys. Statistics Surveys 7, 37–57.
Schröder, M., Siegers, R., & Spiess, C. K. (2013). Familien in Deutschland- FiD. Schmollers Jahrbuch 133, 595–606.
Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. (1995). Die Zuwanderer-Stichprobe des Soziooekonomischen Panels (SOEP). Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 64 (1), 16–25.
Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin 46 (2), 137–150.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2013a). Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Haushalte und Familien – Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus. Fachserie 1 Reihe 3. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2013b). Mikrozensus 2012. Qualitätsbericht. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
TNS Infratest Sozialforschung (2013). SOEP 2012– Methodenbericht zum Befragungsjahr 2012 (Welle 29) des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels. SOEP Survey Papers 144: Series B. Berlin: DIW/SOEP.
Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) – Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch 127 (1), 139–169.
Watson, N. (2012). Longitudinal and cross-sectional weighting methodology for the HILDA Survey.
Watson, N., & Wooden, M. (2011). Re-engaging with Survey Non-respondents: The BHPS, SOEP and HILDA Survey Experience. SOEPpapers 379. Berlin: DIW/SOEP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kroh, M., Siegers, R., Kühne, S. (2015). Gewichtung und Integration von Auffrischungsstichproben am Beispiel des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP). In: Schupp, J., Wolf, C. (eds) Nonresponse Bias. Schriftenreihe der ASI - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10459-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10459-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10458-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10459-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)