Zusammenfassung
Eine der größten Herausforderungen moderner Gesellschaften ist der Umgang mit dem demographischen Wandel. Die steigende Anzahl zu versorgender älterer Menschen, die zunehmende Lebenserwartung und die erhöhte Wahrscheinlichkeit für chronische Erkrankungen, aber auch Engpässe in der ökonomischen Versorgung und Lücken in der ärztlichen Versorgungskette führen zur grundsätzlichen Frage, mittels welcher technischer Lösungen Menschen länger und sicher zuhause leben wollen. Bislang vollzieht sich die Technologieentwicklung vorwiegend produktorientiert. Fragen nach der Akzeptanz der Produkte und mögliche Nutzungsbarrieren werden bislang wenig berücksichtigt. Eine zentrale Rolle für die Nutzungsbereitschaft spielt die (Un)gewissheit über mögliche Risiken, das (fehlende) Wissen über Vor- und Nachteile und eine fehlende Nutzungserfahrung mit solchen Technologien. Aber auch die Art der Technologie, der Nutzungskontext und individuelle Faktoren wie Alter, Technikgeneration und Geschlecht sind bedeutsam für die Toleranz gegenüber Risiko und Unsicherheit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Renn, O., Schweizer, P.-J., Dreyer, M., Klinke, A.: Risiko. Über den gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Oekom, München (2007)
Renn, O.: Technikakzeptanz: Lehren und Rückschlüsse der Akzeptanzforschung für die Bewältigung des technischen Wandels. Technikfolgenabschätzung. TaTuP 14/3, 29–38 (2005).
Arning, K., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: Same same but different. How service contexts of mobile technologies shape usage motives and barriers. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) HCI in Work & Learning, Life & Leisure, 6th Symposium of the WG HCI&UE of the Austrian Computer Society (2010)
Winkler, J.D., Lohr, K.N., Brook, R.H.: Persuasive Communication and Medical Technology Assessment. Intern. Med. J. 145, 314–317 (1985)
Webster, A.: Innovative Health Technologies and the Social: Redefining Health, Medicine and the Body. Curr. Sociol. 50, 443–457 (2002)
Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A., Müller, P.: Ambient Intelligence in Assisted Living: Enable Elderly People to Handle Future Interfaces. Universal Access in HCI, LNCS 4555, 103–112 (2007)
Leonhardt, S.: Personal Healthcare Devices. In: Mekherjee S., et al. (eds.) Malware: Hardware Technology Drivers of Ambient Intelligence, pp. 349–370. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)
Lymberis, A.: “Smart wearable systems for personalised health management: current R&D and future challenges“. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual 1997 International Conference, Vol. 4, IEEE, pp. 3716–3719. Los Alamitos (2003)
Warren, S., Craft, R.L.: Designing smart health care technology into the home of the future. Engineering in Medicine and Biology 2, 677. http://www.hctr.be.cua.edu/HCTworkshop/HCT-pos_SW-FutureHome.htm (1999)
Schaar, A. K., Ziefle, M.: Smart Cloths. Perceived Benefits vs. Perceived Fears. User-Centred-Design of Pervasive Health Applications (UCD-PH’11), held in conjunction with the 5th ICST/IEEE Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare 2011, 601–608 (2011a)
Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M.: What Determines the Public Perception of Implantable Medical Technology. Insights in Cognitive and Affective Factors. In: Holzinger, H., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: Information Quality in eHealth. LNCS 7058, pp. 513–532. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011b)
Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.G.: Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 24, 311–322 (2004)
Kornwachs, K.: Vertrauen in das Neue – Innovationen verantworten. Zur Philosophischen Semantik des Vertrauensbegriffs. In: Günter Spur (ed.) Wachstum durch technologische Innovationen. Acatech diskutiert, pp. 189–214, Fraunhofer IRB, Stuttgart, acatech (2006)
Renn, O., Swaton, E.: Psychological and Sociological Approachcs to Study Risk perception. Environ. Int. 10, 557–575 (1984)
Alhakami, A.S., Slovic, P.: A psychological-study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Anal. 14, 1085–1096 (1994)
Allen, F.W.: Towards a holistic appreciation of risk: The challenges for communicators and policymakers. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 12, 138–143 (1987)
Finucane, M.L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., Johnson S.M.: The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 13, 1–17 (2000)
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Reacl, S., Combs, B.: How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometrie Study of Attitudes Toward Technological Risks and Benefits. Policy Sci. 9, 127–152 (1978)
Tversky, A., Kahnemann, D.: Judgement under Uncertainty. Heuristics and Biases. Sci. 85, 1124–1131 (1974)
Keller, C., Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H.: The Role of the Affect and Availability Heuristics in Risk Communication. Risk Anal. 26, 631–639 (2006)
Renn, O., Burns, W.J., Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., Slovic, P.: The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. J. Soc. Issues 48, 137–160 (1992)
Vlek, C., Stallen, P.: Rational and personal aspects of risk. Acta Psychol. 45, 273- 300 (1980)
Arning K. & Ziefle, M.: Comparing apples and oranges? Exploring users’ acceptance of ICT and eHealth applications. Conference on Health Care Systems, Ergonomics, and Patient Safety (2008).
Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Different Perspectives on Technology Acceptance: The Role of Technology Type and Age. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) Human– Computer Interaction for eInclusion, pp. 20–41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)
Dethloff, C.: Akzeptanz und Nicht-Akzeptanz von technischen Produktinnovationen. Lengerich: Pabst (2004)
Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: Smart home technologies: insights into generation-specific acceptance motives. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K., (eds.) Human–Computer Interaction for eInclusion, pp. 312–332. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)
Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W.: Technology acceptability for medical assistance. 4th ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare 2010, 1–9 (2010)
Lahlou, S.: Identity, social status, privacy and face-keeping in digital society. Soc. Sci. Inform.47, 299–330 (2008)
Mynatt, E.D., Rogers, W.A.: Developing technology to support the functional independence of older adults. Ageing Int. 27, 24–41 (2001)
Meyer, S. and Mollenkopf, H.: Home technology, smart homes, and the Aging user: In K.W. Schaie, H.-W. Wahl, H. Mollenkopf and F. Oswald (eds.) Aging Independently: Living Arrangements and Mobility Springer, New York (2003)
Necheles, T.: Standards of Medical Care: How Does an Innovative Medical Procedure Become Accepted. Med. Health Care 10, 15–18 (1982)
Ziefle, M., Röcker, C., Holzinger, A.: Medical Technology in Smart Homes: Exploring the User’s Perspective on Privacy, Intimacy and Trust. The 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Security Aspects of Process and Services Engineering (SAPSE’11). 35th Annual IEEE Computer Software and Applications Conference, July 18–22, 2011, Munich, Germany, 410–415 (2011)
Zimmer, Z., Chappell, N.L.: Receptivity to new technology among older adults. Disabil. Rehabil. 21, 222–230 (1999)
Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: Privacy and Data Security in E-health: Requirements from Users’ Perspective. Health Inf. J., 18(3), 191–201, (2012)
Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: A Small but Significant Difference – the Role of Gender on the Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) HCI in Work & Learning, Life & Leisure, USAB 2010, LNCS 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)
Chau, P.Y.K., Hu, P.J.: Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 18, 191–229 (2002)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–334 (1989)
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decis. Sci. 27, 451–481 (1996)
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Manag. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)
Adams, D.A., Nelson, R., Todd, P.A.: Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Q. 16, 227–247 (1992)
Grimes, D.A.: Technology Follies: The Uncritical Acceptance of Medical Innovation. JAMA 269, 3030–3033 (1993)
Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Barriers of information access in small screen device applications: The relevance of user characteristics for a transgenerational design. In: Stephanidis, C., Pieper, M. (eds.) Universal Access in Ambient Intelligence Environments. LNCS, vol. 4397, pp. 117–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2007a)
Wilkowska, W., Alagöz, F., Ziefle, M.: How age and country of origin impact the readiness to adopt e-Health technologies: An intercultural comparison. Work 41, 2072–2080 (2012)
Alagöz, F., Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W., Calero Valdez, A.: Openness to accept medical technology – a cultural view. In: Holzinger, H., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) Human- Computer Interaction: Information Quality in eHealth. LNCS 7058, pp. 151–170. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011)
Schajna, B.: Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manage. Sci. 42, 85–92 (1999)
Sackmann, R., Weymann, A.: Die Technisierung des Alltags – Generationen und technische Innovationen. Frankfurt, New York: Campus (1994)
Vaughan, E.: Individual and cultural differences in adaptation to environmental risks. Am. Psychol. 48, 673–680 (1993)
Ziefle, M., Schaar, A.K.: Gender differences in acceptance and attitudes towards an invasive medical stent. eJHI 6, 1–18 (2011)
Ziefle, M., Himmel, S., Wilkowska, W.: When your living space knows what you do: Acceptance of medical home monitoring by different technologies. In: Holzinger, H., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: Information Quality in eHealth. LNCS 7058, pp. 607–624. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011)
Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D.M.: Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. J. Pers. 68, 999–1029 (2000)
Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: User diversity as a challenge for the integration of medical technology into future home environments. In: Ziefle, M., Röcker, C (eds.) Human-Centred Design of eHealth Technologies. Concepts, Methods and Applications. Pp. 95–126. IGI Global, Hershey, P.A. (2010)
Ziefle, M., Bay, S.: Transgenerational Designs in Mobile Technology. In: Lumsden, J., (ed.) Handbook of Research on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 122–141. IGI Global, Hersey, P.A. (2008)
Ellis, D. R., Allaire, J. C: Modeling computer interest in older adults: The role of age, education, computer knowledge and computer anxiety. Hum. Fact. 41, 345–364 (1999)
Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 2904–2927 (2007b)
Ziefle, M., Schaar, A.K.: Technical Expertise and its Influence on the Acceptance of Future Medical Technologies. What is influencing what to which extent? In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) HCI in Work & Learning, Life & Leisure, LNCS 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)
Durndell, A., Zsolt, H.: Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Comp. Hum. Behav. 18, 521–535 (2002)
Keogh, E., Mansoor, L.: Investigating the effects of anxiety sensitivity and coping on the perception of cold pressor pain in healthy women. Eur. J. Pain 5, 11–22 (2001)
Rodger, J.A., Pendharkar, P.C.: A field study of the impact of gender and user’s technical experience on the performance of voice-activated medical tracking application. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 60, 529–544 (2004)
Gefen, D., Straub, D.: Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model. MIS Q. 21, 389–400 (1999)
Kreie, J., Cronau, T.P.: How men and women view ethics. Commun. ACM 41, 70–76 (1998)
Adam, A.: Exploring the Gender Question in Critical Information Systems. J. Inform. Technol. 17, 59–67 (2002)
Busch, T.: Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 12, 147–158 (1995)
Malinowski, M.: Capitation, Advances in Medical Technology, and the Advent of a New Era in Medical Ethics. Am. J. Law Med. Health Care. 22, 331–360 (1996)
Miller, S.M., Brody, D.S., Summerton, J.: Styles of coping with threat: Implications for health. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 142–148 (1988)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.: Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q. 24, 115–139 (2000)
Ziefle, M., Schroeder, U., Strenk, J., Michel, T.: How young and older users master the use of hyperlinks in small screen devices. In: Proceedings of the SIG CHI 2007, pp. 307–316. ACM, New York (2007)
Hashimotoa, H., Noguchib, H., Heidenreich, P., Sayninac, O., Moreland, A., Miyazakid, S., Ikedae, S., Kanekof, Y., Ikegsamie, N.: The diffusion of medical technology, local conditions, and technology re-invention: A comparative case study on coronary stenting. Health Policy 79, 221–230 (2006)
Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M., Horstmann, A., Herding, D., Schroeder, U.: Mobile devices used for medical applications: Insights won from a usability study with diabetes patients. Int. J. Digit Soc. 2, 337–346 (2011)
Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 24, 120–124 (2008)
Calnan, M., Montaner, D., Horne, R.: How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales. Soc. Sci. Med. 60, 1937–1948 (2005)
Heidrich, F., Ziefle, M., Röcker, C., Borchers, J.: Interacting with Smart Walls: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Input Technologies for Augmented Environments. Proceedings of the ACM Augmented Human Conference (AH’11), pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2011)
Kasugai, K., Ziefle, M., Röcker, C., Russell, P.: Creating Spatio-Temporal Contiguities Between Real and Virtual Rooms in an Assistive Living Environment. Create 10 (2010)
Klack, L., Schmitz-Rode, T., Wilkowska, W., Kasugai, K., Heidrich, F., Ziefle, M.: Integrated Home Monitoring and Compliance Optimization for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (MCSDs). Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 2911–2921 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ziefle, M. (2013). Ungewissheit und Unsicherheit bei der Einführung neuer Technologien. In: Jeschke, S., Jakobs, EM., Dröge, A. (eds) Exploring Uncertainty. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00897-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00897-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00896-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00897-0
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)