Skip to main content

Decision Making in Ill-Structured Environments and with Multiple Criteria

  • Conference paper
Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid

Abstract

In Multi Criteria Decision Making one is generally concerned with decisions under certainty, i. e. decisions for which the “state” is assumed to be known with certainty. Multi Criteria Decision Making under risk or uncertainty would imply the super-imposition of the problem structures of classical MCDM and that of single criteria decision making under risk, i. e., for instance, the combinations of goal programming with stochastic programming. This would, obviously, become very involved mathematically! In this paper we are not concerned with uncertainties (probabilities) of the Kolmogroroff type but rather with uncertainties as they are considered in the theory of fuzzy sets, possibility theory and the like. It will be shown that for this type of uncertainty (vagueness) which is assumed to be more relevant for MCDM, models and methods exist, which are also adequate for MCDM and which are computationally still feasable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baas, M.S. and Kwakernaak, H. (1977), “Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets”, Automatica, 13, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J.F. and Guild, N.C.F. (1979), “Comparison of fuzzy sets on the same decision space”, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 2, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R.E. and Zadeh, L,A. (1970), “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment”, Mgt. Sc., 17, B141–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortolan, G. and Degani, R. (1985), “A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J.J. (1985), “Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chames, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1961), Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.H. (1985), “Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1984), “Criteria aggregation and ranking of alternatives in the framework of fuzzy set theory”, in H.-J. Zimmermann et al. ( 1984 ), 209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E.L. (1981), “Linear programming with multiple fuzzy goals”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Ch.-L. and Yoon,K. (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Ch.-L., Masud, A.S. (1979), Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, R. (1977), “Procedure for multi-aspect decision making using fuzzy sets”, Int. Journal Systems Science, 8, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahne, H.W. and Tucker, A.W. (1951), “Nonlinear Programming”, in J. Neyman (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Laarhoven, P.J.M. and Pedrycz, W. (1983), “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leberling, H. (1981), “On finding compromise solutions in multi-criteria problems using the fuzzy min-operator”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1986), “Partial Preference Analysis and Decision Aid; The Fuzzy Outranking Relation Concept”, SEMA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P.A. and Narasimhan, R. (1984), “Fuzzy goal programming with rested priorities”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 14, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, Th.L. (1978), “Exploring the interface between hierarchies, multiple objectives and fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, Th.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, J., Lochard, J. and Lombard, J. (1984), “A multicriteria decision making methodology under fuzziness: appreciation to the evaluation of radiological protection in nuclear power plants”, in H.-J. Zimmermann et al. ( 1984 ), 261–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, R.M. and Bonissone, P.P. (1984), “Linguistic solutions to fuzzy decision problems”, in H.-J. Zimmermann et al. ( 1984 ), 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werners, B. (1984), Interaktive Entscheidungsunterstützung durch ein flexibles mathematisches Programmierungssystem, Mühchen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R. (1978), “Fuzzy decision making including unequal objectives”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1977), “ Linguistic characterization of preference relations as a basis for choice in social systems”, Memo UCB/ERL M77/24, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.-J. (1976), “Description and optimization of fuzzy systems, Internat. J. Gen. Systems, 2, 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.-J. (1978), “Fuzzy programming and linear program-ming with several objective functions”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.-J. and Zysno, P. (1983), “Decisions and evaluations by hierarchical aggregation of information”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 10, 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.-J., Zadeh, L.A. and Gaines, B.R. (eds.) (1984), Fuzzy Sets and Decision Analysis, North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.-J. (1985), Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.-J. (1987), Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zimmermann, HJ. (1990). Decision Making in Ill-Structured Environments and with Multiple Criteria. In: Bana e Costa, C.A. (eds) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75937-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75935-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics