Skip to main content

Variance of Latency and Amplitude in SEPs Monitored During Spinal Operations with and Without Cord Manipulation

  • Conference paper
Spinal Cord Monitoring

Summary

Variability in amplitude and latency after median nerve, peroneal nerve and cauda equina stimulation has been evaluated in both healthy and diseased and manipulated and non-manipulated cords using the paired t-test. Three periods during operation were compared in individual cases. It could be demonstrated that amplitudes are more variable than latencies, that variability increases towards the end of the procedure and that variability is larger in diseased and manipulated cords than in healthy non-diseased cords. Cauda equina stimulation yielded relatively little variability in patients with manipulated spinal cords, similar to the variability after median nerve stimulation in healthy persons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown RH, Nash CL (1985)Intraoperative somatosensorisch evozierte kortikale Potentiale bei spinalen Operationen — Rückenmarkmonitoring. In: Schramm J (Hrsg) Evozierte Potentiale in der Praxis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, S 153–182

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez EG, Hajdu M, Keim H, Brand L (1984) Quantification of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 65:721–725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordwall A, Axelgaard J, Harado Y, Valencia P, McNeil D, Brown J (1979) Spinal cord monitoring using evoked potentials recorded from vertebral bone in cat. Spine 4:486–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thurner F, Schramm J, Romstöck J, Fahlbusch R (1985) Effects of Fentanyl and Enflurane on cortical and subcortical SEP during general anesthesia in man. This volume, pp 82-89

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth RM, Markand ON, De Rosa GP, Warren C (1982) Intraoperative somatosensory evoked response monitoring during spinal cord surgery. In: Courjon J, Mauguière F, Revol M (eds) Clinical applications of evoked potentials in neurology. Raven Press, New York, pp 367–373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schramm, J., Romstöck, J., Thurner, F., Fahlbusch, R. (1985). Variance of Latency and Amplitude in SEPs Monitored During Spinal Operations with and Without Cord Manipulation. In: Schramm, J., Jones, S.J. (eds) Spinal Cord Monitoring. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70687-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70687-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70689-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70687-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics