Skip to main content

Disturbance and Basic Properties of Ecosystem Energetics

  • Conference paper
Disturbance and Ecosystems

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 44))

Abstract

Ecologists have traditionally been inclined to envisage the natural environment as relatively benign and disturbance-free, nurturing a diversity of steady-state systems. Thus, it has been customary to view the human-dominated world as a harsh and strange place for the native biota because of the predominance of disturbance associated with human activities. In the last decade, however, the realization that disturbance was and is a natural and frequent component of unpeopled landscapes has taken firm root in our thinking. As a result, a different paradigm for natural systems is emerging: one that recognizes natural disturbance and concomitant recovery mechanisms as integrated aspects of normal ecosystem behavior (Loucks 1970; Levin and Paine 1974; Connell and Slatyer 1977; Grime 1977; Trudgill 1977; Cattelino et al. 1979; White 1979; Holling 1981; Shugart and West 1980; Vogl 1980).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber JD, Botkin DB, Melillo JM (1979) Predicting the effects of different harvesting regimes on productivity and yield in northern hardwoods. Can J For Res 9:10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajtay JL, Ketner P, Duvigneaud P (1979) Terrestrial primary production and phytomass. In: Bolin B, Degens S, Kempe S, Ketner P (eds) The global carbon cycle. Sci Comm Probl Environ. Wiley, Chichester, p 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann FH, Likens GE (1979) Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brink RA, Densmore JW, Hill GA (1977) Soil deterioration and the growing world demand for food. Science 197:625–630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cates RG, Orians GH (1975) Successional status and the palatability of plants to generalized herbivores. Ecology 56:410–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattelino PJ, Noble IR, Slatyer RO, Kesseil SR (1979) Predicting the multiple pathways of plant succession. Environ Manage 3:41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Chapin MC (1980) Revegetation of an arctic disturbed site by native tundra species. J Appl Ecol 17:449–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman DC, Andrews R, Ellis JE, Singh JS (1976) Energy flow and partitioning in selected man-managed and natural ecosystems. Agro-Ecosystems 3:45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimingham CH, Chapman SB, Webb NR (1979) European heathlands. In: Specht RL (ed) Heathlands and related shrublands of the world, A. Descriptive studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorham E, Vitousek PM, Reiners WA (1979) The regulation of chemical budgets over the course of terrestrial ecosystem succession. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:53–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings JR, Turner RM (1965) The changing mile. Univ Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1981) Forest insects, forest fires, and resilience. In: Mooney H, Bonnicksen TM, Christensen NL, Lotan JE, Reiners WA (eds) Fire regimes and ecosystem properties. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep WO-26. US Dep Agric For, Washington DC, pp 445–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA, Paine RT (1974) Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2744–2747.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks OL (1970) Evolution of diversity, efficiency, and community stability. Am Zool 10:17–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE (1978) Stress and ecosystems. In: Thorp JH, Gobbons JW (eds) Energy and environmental stress in aquatic systems. DOE Symp Ser. CONF-771114. Natl Tech Inf Serv, Springfield VA, p 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef R (1963) On certain unifying principles in ecology. Am Nat 97:357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson WJ, Addy ND (1975) Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production. Science 190:515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh RP (1980) The relationship between succession and the recovery process. In: Cairns J (ed) The recovery process in damaged ecosystems. Ann Arbor Sci Inc, Ann Arbor Mich, p 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1979) Grazing as an optimization process: grass-ungulate relationships in the Serengeti. Am Nat 113:691–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble IR, Slatyer RO (1980) The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43:5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye PH, Greenland DJ (1960) The soil under shifting cultivation. Tech Commun No 51. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden. Commonw Agric Bur, Farnham Royal, Bucks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP, Finn JT, Franz EH (1979) Perturbation theory and the subsidy-stress gradient. Bio Science 29:349–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS (1981) Carbon balance in relation to fire regimes. In: Mooney H, Bonnicksen JM, Christensen NL, Lotan JE, Reiners WA (eds) Fire regimes and ecosystem properties. USDA For Serv, Gen Tech Rep WO-26 US Dep Agric For, Washington DC, pp 327–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet RK (1981) Changes in biomass and production during secondary forest succession. In: West DC, Shugart HH, Botkin DB (eds) Forest succession: concepts and application. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 324–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman RM (1980) Influence of ecosystem structure and perturbation history on recovery processes. In: Cairns J (ed) The recovery process in damaged ecosystems. Ann Arbor Sci Inc, Mich, p 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiners WA (1980) Nitrogen cycling in relation to ecosystem succession. In: Clark FE, Rosswall T (eds) Terrestrial nitrogen cycles. Processes, ecosystem strategies, and management impacts. Ecol Bull: (Stockholm) 33:507–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart HH Jr, West DC (1980) Forest succession models. Bio Science 30:308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (ed) (1968) Insect abundance. Symp R Entomol Soc No 4. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaby RJ (1966) Cultivation practices in relation to soil organic matter levels. In: Use of isotopes in soil organic matter studies. FAO/IAEA Tech Meet, Brunswick-Volkenrode, 1963. Spec Suppl Appl Radiat Isotopes. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York, p 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill ST (1977) Soil and vegetation systems. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl B (1980) The ecological factors that produce perturbation-dependent ecosystems. In: Cairns J (ed) The recovery process in damaged ecosystems. Ann Arbor Sci Inc, Ann Arbor Mich, p 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • White PS (1979) Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation. Bot Rev 45:229–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and ecosystems, 2nd edn. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodwell GM, Whittaker RH (1968) Primary production in terrestrial ecosystems. Am Zool 8:19–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reiners, W.A. (1983). Disturbance and Basic Properties of Ecosystem Energetics. In: Mooney, H.A., Godron, M. (eds) Disturbance and Ecosystems. Ecological Studies, vol 44. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69137-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69137-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69139-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69137-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics