Abstract
The postoperative mortality after esophagectomy still remains a major factor influencing the prognosis of esophageal cancer and largely depends on the patient’s preoperative physiological status.
A composite scoring system was developed to predict the risk of esophagectomy, based on quantitative assessment of preoperatively available physiological parameters. The scoring system was reviewed retrospectively on operated patients and evaluated prospectively in two subsequent patient groups.
An initial retrospective multivariate analysis of 432 esophagectomy patients identified a compromised general status (p = 0.001) and poor cardiac (p<0.001), hepatic (p<0.05), and respiratory (p<0.05) functions as independent predictors of a fatal postoperative course. Based on the relative risks associated with individual impaired organ functions — general status 3.6, cardiac function 2.8, hepatic function 2.1, pulmonary function 1.7 — a composite risk score was established. A prospective study in 121 patients confirmed that this composite scoring system provides better identification of high-risk patients than does any of the individual parameters alone. Including this composite score into the process of patient selection and choice of procedure resulted in a decrease of postoperative mortality from 9.4% (52/553) to 1.2% (4/323) (p=0.001).
The risk of death after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer can be objectively assessed prior to surgery and quantified by a composite risk score. This score provides a useful tool in refining the criteria of patient selection for resection and choice of procedure, and markedly reduces postoperative mortality when applied prospectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Müller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H (1990) Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 77: 845–855
Law SYK, Fok M, Wong J (1994) Risk analysis in resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. World J Surg 18: 339–346
Lund O, Kimose HH, Aagaard MT, Hasenkam JM, Erlandsen M (1990) Risk stratification and long-term results after surgical treatment of carcinomas of the thoracic oesophagus and cardia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99: 200–209
Bartels H, Stein HJ, Schömig A, Siewert JR (1997) Risikoerfassung. Chirurg 68: 654–661
Bartels H, Stein HJ, Schömig A, Siewert JR (1997) Risikoerfassung. Chirurg 68: 654–661
Bumm R, Panel of experts (1996) Staging and risk analysis in esophageal carcinoma. Results of a consensus conference. Dis Esoph 9 [Suppl]: 20–29
Siewert JR, Bartels H, Bollschweiler E et al (1992) Plattenepithelcarcinom des Oesophagus. Behandlungskonzept der Chirurgischen Klinik der Technischen Universität München. Chirurg 63: 693–700
Siewert JR, Hölscher AH, Bollschweiler E, Stein HJ, Fink U (1994) Chirurgie des Barrett-Carcinoms. Chirurg 66: 102–109
Dixon WJ (1988) BMDP statistical software manual. University of California Press, Berkeley CA
Mathews HR, Powell DJ, McCarley CL (1986) Effect of surgical experience on results of resection for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 63: 621–633
Tsutsui S, Moriguchi S, Moritha M, Kuwano H, Matsuda H, Mori M, Matsuura H, Sugimachi K (1992) Multivariate analysis of postoperative complications after oesophageal resection. Ann N Thorac Surg 53: 1052–1056
Isono K, Onoda S, Ishikawa T, Sato H, Nahayama K (1982) Studies on the causes of deaths from oesophageal carcinoma. Cancer 49: 2173–2179
Nishi M, Hiramatsu J, Hioki K, Hatano T, Yamamota M (1988) Pulmonary complications after subtotal oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 75: 527–530
Gill R, Goodman N, Golfus G (1983) Aminopyrine breath test predicts surgical risk for patients with liver disease. Ann Surg 198: 701–704
Fun S, Lau WY, Yip WC et al (1987) Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 74: 408–410
Peracchia A, Bardini R, Ruol A et al (1988) Carcinoma of the oesophagus in the elderly: indications and results of surgery. Dis Esoph 1: 147–153
Karnofsky D (1984) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1: 634–635
Siewert JR, Dittler H-J (1993) Oesophageal carcinoma: impact of staging on treatment. Endoscopy 25: 28–32
Dittler H-J, Siewert JR (1993) Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal cancer. Endoscopy 25: 156–161
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bartels, H., Stein, H.J., Siewert, J.R. (2000). Risk Analysis in Esophageal Surgery. In: Lange, J., Siewert, J.R. (eds) Esophageal Carcinoma. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 155. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64044-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59600-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive