Abstract
In computer-aided pedicle-screw implantation, exactly as in conventional procedures, correct positioning of the screw is only possible based on a precise knowledge of the anatomical structure in question. The choice of screw length and caliber depends to a great extent on detailed knowledge about this structure [6]. Generally, the greater the screw length and caliber, the better the anchoring [4]. In addition, particular attention must be paid to ventral boundaries and the constant danger of perforation in the area of the spinal cord. The proximity of the spinal column means the greatest care is required in introducing the screw in order to avoid damage to surrounding neural and vascular structures. Placement of a pedicle screw is therefore difficult since there is no direct view into the spine. In particular, problems can arise with medial or caudal placement of the screw, possibly resulting in serious neurological dysfunction. In the literature, faulty placements (perforations) using conventional procedures are reported to range from between 8.5% [2], 15.9% [9], 39.9% [3], and 42% [5].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birnbaum K, Schkommodau E, Decker N, Prescher A, Klapper U, Radermacher K (2001) Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery with individual templates an comparison to conventional operation method.Spine 26: 365–370.
Haaker RG, Eickhoff U, Schopphoff E et al. (1997) Verification of the position of pedicle screws in lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 6:125–128.
Jerosch J, Malms J, Castro WHM et al. (1992) Lagekontrolle von Pedikelschrauben nach instrumentierter dorsaler Fusion der Lendenwirbelsäule. Z Orthop 130:479–483.
Krag MH (1988) Depth of insertion of transpedicular vertebral screws into human vertebrae: effect upon screw-vertebra interface strength. J Spinal Disorders 1:287–294.
Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L et al. (1998) Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop 354:39–48.
Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC et al. (1990) Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 72:541–549.
Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M et al. (1998) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image-based individual templates. Clin Orthop 354:28–38.
Radermacher K (1999) Computerunterstützte Operationsplanung und -ausführung mittels individueller Bearbeitungsschablonen in der Orthopädie. Berichte aus der Biomedizinischen Technik, Bd 7. Shaker, Aachen.
Schlenzka D, Laine T, Lund T (2000) Computer-assisted spine surgery. Eur Spine J 9[Suppl 1]:S57–64.
D Arning A, Bloch M, Heinecke A, Kalchschmidt K (1994) Triple pelvic osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 3:54–67.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schkommodau, E., Decker, N., Klapper, U., Birnbaum, K., Staudte, HW., Radermacher, K. (2004). Pedicle Screw Implantation Using the DISOS Template System. In: Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59290-4_70
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59290-4_70
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63922-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59290-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive